Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:18:23.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Provenience Is Lost: Achievements and Challenges in Preserving the Historical St. John's, Belize, Skeletal Collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2019

Hannah Plumer-Moodie ,
Carlos Quiroz ,
Katherine A. Miller Wolf  and
Yasser Musa
Hannah Plumer-Moodie*
Affiliation:
Social Sciences Division, Niagara County Community College, 3111 Saunders Settlement Road, Sanborn, NY 14132, USA
Carlos Quiroz
Affiliation:
History Department, Saint John's College, Princess Margaret Drive, Belize City, Belize, Central America
Katherine A. Miller Wolf
Affiliation:
Anthropology Department, Indiana University East, Chester Blvd, Richmond, IN 47374, USA
Yasser Musa
Affiliation:
History Department, Saint John's College, Princess Margaret Drive, Belize City, Belize, Central America
*
([email protected], corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In small developing countries like Belize, lack of funding for archaeological research and post excavation curation remains one of our greatest challenges to preserving our tangible cultural heritage. The state of curation of human remains and artefact collections at St. John's College in Belize City is a perfect example of what can go wrong in the absence of a properly funded and managed curation program both at the national and the institutional level. This article highlights the rediscovery of a historically significant group of over 70 human remains in the biological collection of Friar Deickman, which had been forgotten in an attic after his death in 2003. We outline the process of, and accomplishments in improving the curation conditions of these individuals while uncovering their importance to Belizean history in the eighteenth through twentieth centuries. Preliminary analysis reveals life histories of slavery and indentured servitude of individuals of African, Maya, European, and possible mixed African and European descent. We emphasize the importance of ethical responsibility in properly curating excavated human remains, and the challenges researchers face when poor curation results in lost provenience. We offer suggestions for scientific analysis in recovering information lost as a result of poor excavation or curation methods.

En pequeños países en desarrollo como Belice, el financiamiento de la investigación arqueológica y la conservación posterior a la excavación sigue siendo uno de los mayores desafíos para preservar el patrimonio cultural. El estado de conservación de restos humanos y colecciones de artefactos en St. John's College, en la Ciudad de Belice, es un ejemplo perfecto de lo que puede suceder cuando no se establece un programa de curaduría administrado y financiado adecuadamente a nivel nacional e institucional. Este documento destaca el redescubrimiento de un grupo históricamente significativo de restos humanos que representan más de 70 individuos en la colección biológica de Fray Deickman, que fue olvidada en un ático después de su muerte en 2003. Describimos el proceso y los logros de mejorar las condiciones de conservación de estos individuos, al mismo tiempo descubriendo su contexto e importancia para la historia de Belice en los siglos de dieciocho a veinte. El análisis preliminar revela historias de vida de esclavitud y servidumbre de individuos de ascendencia africana, maya, europea y posiblemente mixta africana y europea. Enfatizamos la importancia de la responsabilidad ética para conservar adecuadamente los restos humanos una vez excavados y los desafíos que enfrentan los investigadores una vez que la mala conservación resulta en la pérdida de información de proveniencia. También proporcionamos sugerencias para el análisis científico y la recuperación de información perdida como resultado de métodos de excavación o curación inadecuados.

Keywords

Belizeosteologybioarchaeologycurationmuseum studiesMoho CayeBelizean historypost-colonialisland archaeology
Type
Articles
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 7 , Special Issue 1: The Practice and Ethics of Skeletal Conservation , February 2019 , pp. 40 - 46
Copyright
Copyright 2019 © Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Boxt, Mathew 1984 The Archaeology of Hick's Caye, Belize. Belizean Studies 12:10–19.Google Scholar
Brues, Alice M. 1977 People and Races. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Buikstra, Jane E., and Ubelaker, Douglas H. 1994 Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains: Proceedings of a Seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History Organized by Johnathon Haas. Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No 44, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Bulmer-Thomas, Victor, and Bulmer-Thomas, Barbara 2012 The Economic History of Belize: From the 17th Century to Post-Independence. Cubola Books, Cayo, Belize.Google Scholar
Burdon, John Adler 1934 Archives of British Honduras, Volume II. Sifton Praed & Co., Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Byers, Steven N. 2011 Introduction to Forensic Anthropology. 4th Ed. Pearson, New York.Google Scholar
Cassman, Vicki, Odegaard, Nancy, and Powell, Joseph 2008 Human Remains: Guide for Museums and Academic Institutions. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Dillon, A. Barrow 1923 Geography of British Honduras. Waterlow & Sons, London.Google Scholar
Druffel, Ellen 1980 Radiocarbon in Annual Coral Rings of Belize and Florida. Radiocarbon 22(2):363–371.Google Scholar
Healy, Paul, and McKillop, Heather 1980 Moho Caye: A Preliminary Report on the 1979 Season. Belizean Studies 8(6):10–16.Google Scholar
Healy, Paul F., McKillop, Heather I., and Walsh, Bernie 1984 Analysis of Obsidian from Moho Cay, Belize: New Evidence on Classic Maya Trade Routes, Science 225:414–417.Google Scholar
Killingray, David 1994 The Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919 in the British Caribbean. Social History of Medicine 7(1):59–87.Google Scholar
Krogman, Wilton M. 1986 The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. 2nd Ed. Thomas, Charles C., Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
MacFarland, Kathryn, and Vokes, Arthur W.. 2017 Dusting Off the Data: Curating and Rehabilitating Archaeological Legacy and Orphaned Collections. Advances in Archaeological Practice 4:161–175.Google Scholar
McKillop, Heather 1984 Prehistoric Maya Reliance on Marine Resources: Analysis of a Midden from Moho Cay, Belize. Journal of Field Archaeology, 11(1):25–35.Google Scholar
McKillop, Heather 1985 Prehistoric Exploitation of the Manatee in the Maya and Circum-Caribbean Areas. World Archaeology 16(3):337–353.Google Scholar
McKillop, Heather 2004 The Classic Maya Trading Port of Moho Cay, The Ancient Maya of the Belize Valley, edited by Garber, James F.. University of Florida Press, Gainsville.Google Scholar
Rhine, Stanley 1990 Non-metric Skull Racing. In Skeletal Attribution of Race: Methods for Forensic Anthropology, edited by Gill, George W. and Rhine, J. Stanley, pp. 9–20. Anthropological Papers 4, Maxwell Museum of Anthropology, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Sauer, Norman J. 1992 Forensic Anthropology and the Concept of Race: If Races Don't Exist, Why Are Forensic Anthropologists so Good at Identifying Them? Social Science and Medicine 34(2):107–111.Google Scholar
Shoman, Assad 2004 A History of Belize in Thirteen Chapters. The Angelus Press, Belize City.Google Scholar
Department, US Treasury 1910 Annual Report of the Surgeon-General of the Public Health and Marine Hospital Service of the United Sates for the Fiscal Year 1909. Washington Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ulm, Sean 2006 Australian Marine Reservoir Effects: A Guide to ΔR Values. Australian Archaeology 63:57–60.Google Scholar
Voss, Barbara 2012 Curation as Research: A Case Study in Orphaned and Underreported Archaeological Collections. Archaeological Dialogues 19(2):145–169.Google Scholar