Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:34:38.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dalfsen

A Dutch Case Study of Involving the Community by Development-Led Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2018

Henk M. van der Velde  and
Niels Bouma
Henk M. van der Velde*
Affiliation:
ADC ArcheoProjecten, Nijverheidsweg-Noord 114, 3812 PN Amersfoort, Netherlands
Niels Bouma
Affiliation:
ADC ArcheoProjecten, Nijverheidsweg-Noord 114, 3812 PN Amersfoort, Netherlands
*
([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses the way development-led archaeology in the Netherlands disseminates archaeological knowledge to and with the public using the way archaeological projects were designed in Dalfsen (Netherlands) as a case study. In the early days of contract archaeology, which in the Netherlands was designed after the Valetta Convention, archaeologists were primarily concerned with the financial and planning aspects of projects, and there was little room for public archaeology. We suggest that this caused archaeologists to forget to involve the public in their projects. In time, it became almost impossible to rectify this mistake because archaeological contractors became extremely bureaucratic. In the case of Dalfsen, a spectacular project was needed to change this situation. The project, and especially its media value, inspired the municipality to invest in community archaeology and make choices that an archaeologist would not primarily be concerned with. Thus, we discuss the effects of these choices and archaeologists’ actions in this process. We conclude that it is important for archaeologists to act as facilitators because it improves the success rate of community archaeology projects.

Este artículo aborda la manera en que la arqueología comercial en los Países Bajos comparte los resultados con el público, usando como estudio de caso el diseño de proyectos arqueológicos en Dalfsen, un poblado en el este de los Países Bajos. En los primeros años de la arqueología comercial, que en los Países Bajos fue diseñada con base en el convenio de La Valetta, los arqueólogos se enfocaron en la planificación y gestión financiera de los proyectos en el contexto de las obras públicas de gran tamaño, dejando poco espacio para la arqueología pública. La resolución de este problema se complicó porque actuando de esa manera las empresas arqueológicas se volvieron extremadamente burocráticas. El caso de Dalfsen, donde se encontraron los restos de un cementerio de la época megalítica, ha causado un cambio relevante. El grande impacto mediático de los hallazgos ocasionó que el ayuntamiento del mismo pueblo decidiera invertir en un proyecto de arqueología pública. De esa manera se abrió un campo de trabajo antes no conocido, donde los arqueólogos se transformaron de científicos y profesionales del patrimonio en gestores e intérpretes para el público. El artículo describe esta transformación y concluye que el éxito de la arqueología pública depende de las decisiones de los arqueólogos y su voluntad de cambiar la dirección de la profesión.

Type
Articles
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 6 , Special Issue 3: Interpreting and Presenting Archaeology , August 2018 , pp. 187 - 198
Copyright
Copyright 2018 © Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Bazelmans, Jos 2016 Archeologie en gemeentelijke gebiedsontwikkeling: De casus Oosterdalfsen. Vitruvius 36:20–27.Google Scholar
Blom, Edwin, van der Velde, Henk M., and Wyns, Sofie 2006 Dalfsen-Gerner Marke, een archeologische opgraving. ADC Rapport 766. Amersfoort, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Bente, Diederick, and Raap, Edwin 2004 Bestek opgraving De Gerner Marke, gemeente Dalfsen. ArcheoLogic Rapportage 159. Woerden, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Bouma, Niels, and van der Velde, Henk M. 2017 Een geschiedenis van meer dan 5000 jaar: Resten van begraven en wonen in Oosterdalfsen, gemeente Dalfsen. ADC Rapport 4500. Amersfoort, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Ducoffe, Robert H. 1995 How Consumers Assess the Value of Advertising. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 17:1–18.Google Scholar
Goudswaard, Boudewijn 2006 Malta in de maak: Archeologisch management tijdens het Betuwerouteproject. Rapportage Archeologische Monumentenzorg 101, Amersfoort, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Goudswaard, Boudewijn, Bos, Jolanda, van Roode, Sigrid, and Pape, Harry 2012 Forward with Reverse Archaeology: On a New Method for Utilizing the Past in Spatial Planning. Heritage & Society 5:101–115.Google Scholar
Holtorf, Cornelius 2007 Archaeology Is a Brand! The Meaning of Archaeology in Contemporary Popular Culture. Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hulst, Ron A. 2003 Gemeente Dalfsen, De Gerner Marke: Aanvullend archeologisch onderzoek. BAAC Rapport 03.020. Deventer, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Lewis, Carenza 2015 Archaeological Excavation and Deep Mapping in Historic Rural Communities. Humanities 4:393–417.Google Scholar
Little, Barbara J., and Shackel, Paul A. (editors) 2007 Archaeology as a Tool of Civic Engagement: Working toward the Public Good. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Past2Present-ArcheoLogic 2007 Start-notitie archeologiebeleid gemeente Dalfsen. Past2Present-ArcheoLogic Rapportage 422. Woerden, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Marshall, Yvonne 2002 What Is Community Archaeology? World Archaeology 34:211–219.Google Scholar
Pape, Harry, and van Eijk, Charissa 2012 Adviesdocument ten behoeve van selectiebesluit archeologie Oosterdalfsen, gemeente Oosterdalfsen. TML Rapport 520. Missing Link, Woerden, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Smith, Monica L. 2014 Citizen Science in Archaeology. American Antiquity 79:749–762.Google Scholar
Spitzers, Thomas A., and Koop, P. J. M. 2002 Dalfsen, De Gerner Marke: Archeologische prospectie. BAAC Rapport 01112. Deventer, Netherlands.Google Scholar
van den Dries, Monique H. 2014 Community Archaeology in the Netherlands. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage 1:69–88.Google Scholar
van den Dries, Monique H. 2015 From Malta to Faro, How Far Have We Come? Some Facts and Figures on Public Engagement in the Archaeological Heritage Sector in Europe. In Setting the Agenda: Giving Meaning to the European Archaeological Heritage, edited by Schut, Peter A. C., Scharff, Djurra, and de Wit, Leonard C., pp. 45–47. EAC Occasional Paper No. 10. Archaeolingua, Budapest.Google Scholar
van den Dries, Monique H., and van der Linde, Sjoerd J. 2012 Twenty Years after Malta: Archaeological Heritage as a Source of Collective Memory and Scientific Study anno 2012. Annalecta Praehistoria Leidensia 43/44:1–19.Google Scholar
van der Velde, Henk M. 2011 Wonen in een grensgebied: Een langetermijngeschiedenis van het Oost-Nederlandse cultuurlandschap (500 v.Chr.–1300 na Chr.). PhD dissertation, Department of Archaeology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
van der Velde, Henk M., Bouma, Niels, and Raemaeker, Daan C. M. 2018 A Monumental Burial Ground from the Funnel Beaker Period at Oosterdalfsen (the Netherlands). In Megaliths, Societies, Landscapes: Early Monumentality and Social Differentiation in Neolithic Europe, edited by Hinz, Martin and Müller, Johannes, in press. Habelt, Bonn.Google Scholar
van Roode, Sigrid M., and Bos, Jolanda E. M. F. 2006 Thuis op De Gerner Marke: Archeologie in een nieuwbouwwijk. The Missing Link, Woerden, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Witte, Neelson, van Eijk, Charissa, and Hornickx, Saskia 2015 Bestek archeologisch onderzoek opgraving Oosterdalfsen, gemeente Dalfsen. Missing Link Rapport 320. Woerden, Netherlands.Google Scholar