Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:44:31.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stochastic Spatial Model of Producer-Consumer Systems on the Lattice

Part of: Special processes Game theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

N. Lanchier
N. Lanchier*
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
*
∗ Postal address: School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA. Email address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The objective of this paper is to give a rigorous analysis of a stochastic spatial model of producer-consumer systems that has been recently introduced by Kang and the author to understand the role of space in ecological communities in which individuals compete for resources. Each point of the square lattice is occupied by an individual which is characterized by one of two possible types, and updates its type in continuous time at rate 1. Each individual being thought of as a producer and consumer of resources, the new type at each update is chosen at random from a certain interaction neighborhood according to probabilities proportional to the ability of the neighbors to consume the resource produced by the individual to be updated. In addition to giving a complete qualitative picture of the phase diagram of the spatial model, our results indicate that the nonspatial deterministic mean-field approximation of the stochastic process fails to describe the behavior of the system in the presence of local interactions. In particular, we prove that, in the parameter region where the nonspatial model displays bistability, there is a dominant type that wins regardless of its initial density in the spatial model, and that the inclusion of space also translates into a significant reduction of the parameter region where both types coexist.

Keywords

Interacting particle systemvoter modelRichardson modelthreshold contact process

MSC classification

Primary: 60K35: Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory
Secondary: 91A22: Evolutionary games
Type
General Applied Probability
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 1157 - 1181
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

References

Athreya, S. R. and Swart, J. M. (2005). Branching-coalescing particle systems. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 131, 376–414.Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, C. and Gray, L. (1994). Critical attractive spin systems. Ann. Prob. 22, 1160–1194.Google Scholar
Bramson, M. and Durrett, R. (1988). A simple proof of the stability criterion of Gray and Griffeath. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 80, 293–298.Google Scholar
Bramson, M. and Griffeath, D. (1981). On the Williams-Bjerknes tumour growth model. I. Ann. Prob. 9, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. T. and Durrett, R. (1991). Nonlinear voter models. In Random Walks, Brownian Motion, and Interacting Particle Systems (Progress Prob. 28), Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, pp. 189–201.Google Scholar
Durrett, R. (1992). Multicolor particle systems with large threshold and range. J. Theoret. Prob. 5, 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrett, R. (1995). Ten lectures on particle systems. In Lectures on Probability Theory (Saint-Flour, 1993; Lecture Notes Math. 1608), Springer, Berlin, pp. 97–201.Google Scholar
Durrett, R. and Levin, S. (1994). The importance of being discrete (and spatial). Theoret. Pop. Biol. 46, 363–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handjani, S. J. (1999). The complete convergence theorem for coexistent threshold voter models. Ann. Prob. 27, 226–245.Google Scholar
Kang, Y. and Lanchier, N. (2012). The role of space in the exploitation of resources. Bull. Math. Biol. 74, 1–44.Google Scholar
Krone, S. M. and Neuhauser, C. (1997). Ancestral processes with selection. Theoret. Pop. Biol. 51, 210–237.Google Scholar
Lanchier, N. and Neuhauser, C. (2009). Spatially explicit non-Mendelian diploid model. Ann. Appl. Prob. 19, 1880–1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liggett, T. M. (1985). Interacting Particle Systems (Fundamental Principles Math. Sci. 276). Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Liggett, T. M. (1994). Coexistence in threshold voter models. Ann. Prob. 22, 764–802.Google Scholar
Neuhauser, C. and Pacala, S. W. (1999). An explicitly spatial version of the Lotka-Volterra model with interspecific competition. Ann. Appl. Prob. 9, 1226–1259.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. (1973). Random growth in a tessellation. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 74, 515–528.Google Scholar