Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:56:44.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Simple Stochastic Kinetic Transport Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Michel Dekking*
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology
Derong Kong*
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology
*
Postal address: 3TU Applied Mathematics Institute, Delft University of Technology, Faculty EWI, PO Box 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands.
Postal address: 3TU Applied Mathematics Institute, Delft University of Technology, Faculty EWI, PO Box 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We introduce a discrete-time microscopic single-particle model for kinetic transport. The kinetics are modeled by a two-state Markov chain, and the transport is modeled by deterministic advection plus a random space step. The position of the particle after n time steps is given by a random sum of space steps, where the size of the sum is given by a Markov binomial distribution (MBD). We prove that by letting the length of the time steps and the intensity of the switching between states tend to 0 linearly, we obtain a random variable S(t), which is closely connected to a well-known (deterministic) partial differential equation (PDE), reactive transport model from the civil engineering literature. Our model explains (via bimodality of the MBD) the double peaking behavior of the concentration of the free part of solutes in the PDE model. Moreover, we show for instantaneous injection of the solute that the partial densities of the free and adsorbed parts of the solute at time t do exist, and satisfy the PDEs.

Type
General Applied Probability
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

References

Benson, D. A. and Meerschaert, M. M. (2009). A simple and efficient random walk solution of multi-rate mobile/immobile mass transport equations. Adv. Water Resources 32, 532539.Google Scholar
Billingsley, P. (1995). Probability and Measure, 3rd edn. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Dehling, H. G., Hoffmann, A. C. and Stuut, H. W. (2000). Stochastic models for transport in a fluidized bed. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 60, 337358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekking, M. and Kong, D. (2011). Multimodality of the Markov binomial distribution. J. Appl. Prob. 48, 938953.Google Scholar
Durrett, R. (2010). Probability: Theory and Examples, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gut, A. and Ahlberg, P. (1981). On the theory of chromatography based upon renewal theory and a central limit theorem for randomly iterated indexed partial sums of random variables. Chemica Scripta 18, 248255.Google Scholar
Kinzelbach, W. (1988). The random walk method in pollutant transport simulation. In Groundwater Flow and Quality Modelling (NATO ASI Ser. C Math. Phys. Sci. 224), pp. 227245.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, F. T. and Narasimham, M. N. L. (1973). Mathematical theory of a kinetic model for dispersion of previously distributed chemicals in a sorbing porous medium. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 24, 496510.Google Scholar
Michalak, A. M. and Kitanidis, P. K. (2000). Macroscopic behavior and random-walk particle tracking of kinetically sorbing solutes. Water Resources Res. 36, 21332146.Google Scholar
Omey, E., Santos, J. and Van Gulck, S. (2008). A Markov-binomial distribution. Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 2, 3850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uffink, G. et al. (2012). Understanding the non-Gaussian nature of linear reactive solute transport in 1D and 2D: from particle dynamics to the partial differential equations. Transport Porous Media 91, 547571.Google Scholar
Viveros, R., Balasubramanian, K. and Balakrishnan, N. (1994). Binomial and negative binomial analogues under correlated Bernoulli trials. Amer. Statist. 48, 243247.Google Scholar