Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:57:01.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Probability in quantum mechanics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

J. V. Corbett*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University

Extract

Quantum mechanics is usually described in the terminology of probability theory even though the properties of the probability spaces associated with it are fundamentally different from the standard ones of probability theory. For example, Kolmogorov's axioms are not general enough to encompass the non-commutative situations that arise in quantum theory. There have been many attempts to generalise these axioms to meet the needs of quantum mechanics. The focus of these attempts has been the observation, first made by Birkhoff and von Neumann (1936), that the propositions associated with a quantum-mechanical system do not form a Boolean σ-algebra. There is almost universal agreement that the probability space associated with a quantum-mechanical system is given by the set of subspaces of a separable Hilbert space, but there is disagreement over the algebraic structure that this set represents. In the most popular model for the probability space of quantum mechanics the propositions are assumed to form an orthocomplemented lattice (Mackey (1963), Jauch (1968)). The fundamental concept here is that of a partial order, that is a binary relation that is reflexive and transitive but not symmetric. The partial order is interpreted as embodying the logical concept of implication in the set of propositions associated with the physical system. Although this model provides an acceptable mathematical expression of the probabilistic structure of quantum mechanics in that the subspaces of a separable Hilbert space give a representation of an ortho-complemented lattice, it has several deficiencies which will be discussed later.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1978 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birkhoff, G. and von Neumann, J. (1936) The logic of quantum mechanics. Ann. Math. 37, 823843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bub, J. (1969) What is a hidden variable theory of quantum phenomena. Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 2, 101123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bub, J. and Demopoulos, W. (1974) The interpretation of quantum mechanics. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13, ed. Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. W., 92122.Google Scholar
Gleason, A. M. (1957) Measures on closed subspaces of Hilbert space. J. Math. Mech. 6, 885893.Google Scholar
Kochen, S. and Specker, E. P. (1967) The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Mech. 17, 5987.Google Scholar
Jauch, J. (1968) Foundations of Quantum Mechanics Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. Google Scholar
Mackey, G. W. (1963) The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Benjamin, New York.Google Scholar
Moyal, J. E. (1949) Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 45, 99124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. (1969) Is logic empirical? In Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5, ed. Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. W., 216241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar