Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Lalam, Nadia
Jacob, Christine
and
Jagers, Peter
2005.
Estimation of the PCR efficiency based on a size-dependent modelling of the amplification process.
Comptes Rendus. Mathématique,
Vol. 341,
Issue. 10,
p.
631.
Lalam, Nadia
2006.
Estimation of the reaction efficiency in polymerase chain reaction.
Journal of Theoretical Biology,
Vol. 242,
Issue. 4,
p.
947.
Gasbarra, Dario
and
Sillanpää, Mikko J
2006.
Constructing the Parental Linkage Phase and the Genetic Map Over Distances <1 cM Using Pooled Haploid DNA.
Genetics,
Vol. 172,
Issue. 2,
p.
1325.
Vikalo, H.
Hassibi, B.
and
Hassibi, A.
2006.
On joint maximum-likelihood estimation of PCR efficiency and initial amount of target.
p.
47.
LALAM, NADIA
and
JACOB, CHRISTINE
2007.
Bayesian Estimation for Quantification by Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction Under a Branching Process Model of the DNA Molecules Amplification Process.
Mathematical Population Studies,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 2,
p.
111.
Vikalo, H.
Hassibi, B.
and
Hassibi, A.
2007.
ML Estimation of DNA Initial Copy Number in Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Processes.
p.
I-417.
Jacob, Christine
2008.
Mathematical Modeling of Biological Systems, Volume II.
p.
339.
Lalam, Nadia
and
Jacob, Christine
2008.
Mathematical Modeling of Biological Systems, Volume II.
p.
303.
Lalam, Nadia
2009.
A quantitative approach for polymerase chain reactions based on a hidden Markov model.
Journal of Mathematical Biology,
Vol. 59,
Issue. 4,
p.
517.
Jacob, Christine
2010.
Conditional least squares estimation in nonstationary nonlinear stochastic regression models.
The Annals of Statistics,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
Sochivko, D. G.
Fedorov, A. A.
Varlamov, D. A.
Kurochkin, V. E.
and
Petrov, R. V.
2010.
Simulation of the PCR amplification as two-type-particle branching process.
Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics,
Vol. 434,
Issue. 1,
p.
239.
Vikalo, Haris
Hassibi, Babak
and
Hassibi, Arjang
2010.
Limits of Performance of Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Systems.
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 2,
p.
688.
Gani, J.
and
Swift, R. J.
2011.
A PCR Birth Process Subject to an Enzyme Death Process.
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 3,
p.
383.
Bar, Tzachi
Kubista, Mikael
and
Tichopad, Ales
2012.
Validation of kinetics similarity in qPCR.
Nucleic Acids Research,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 4,
p.
1395.
Tellinghuisen, Joel
and
Spiess, Andrej-Nikolai
2014.
Comparing real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis methods for precision, linearity, and accuracy of estimating amplification efficiency.
Analytical Biochemistry,
Vol. 449,
Issue. ,
p.
76.
Best, Katharine
Oakes, Theres
Heather, James M.
Shawe-Taylor, John
and
Chain, Benny
2015.
Computational analysis of stochastic heterogeneity in PCR amplification efficiency revealed by single molecule barcoding.
Scientific Reports,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 1,
Kebschull, Justus M.
and
Zador, Anthony M.
2015.
Sources of PCR-induced distortions in high-throughput sequencing data sets.
Nucleic Acids Research,
p.
gkv717.
Sochivko, D. G.
Fedorov, A. A.
Varlamov, D. A.
Kurochkin, V. E.
and
Petrov, R. V.
2016.
Mathematics analysis of polymerase chain reaction kinetic curves.
Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics,
Vol. 466,
Issue. 1,
p.
13.
Bilgrau, Anders E.
Falgreen, Steffen
Petersen, Anders
Kjeldsen, Malene K.
Bødker, Julie S.
Johnsen, Hans E.
Dybkær, Karen
and
Bøgsted, Martin
2016.
Unaccounted uncertainty from qPCR efficiency estimates entails uncontrolled false positive rates.
BMC Bioinformatics,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 1,
Argyropoulos, Christos
Etheridge, Alton
Sakhanenko, Nikita
and
Galas, David
2017.
Modeling bias and variation in the stochastic processes of small RNA sequencing.
Nucleic Acids Research,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 11,
p.
e104.