Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:48:25.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A limit theorem with application to Båth's law in seismology

Part of: Special processes Limit theorems Geophysics Geophysics (general)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

David Vere-Jones
David Vere-Jones*
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Wellington and Statistical Research Associates Ltd
*
∗ Postal address: School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand. Email address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper a limit theorem is proved that establishes conditions under which the distribution of the difference between the size of the initial event in a random sequence, modeled as a finite point process, and the largest subsequent event approaches a limiting form independent of the size of the initial event. The underlying assumptions are that the sizes of the individual events follow an exponential distribution, that the expected total number of events increases exponentially with the size of the initial event, and that the structure of the sequence approximates that of a Poisson process. Particular cases to which the results apply include sequences of independent and identically distributed exponential variables, and the epidemic-type aftershock (ETAS) branching process model in the subcritical case. In all these cases the form of the limit distribution is shown to be that of a double exponential (type-I extreme value distribution). In sampling from a family of aftershock sequences, with possibly different underlying parameters, the limit distribution is a mixture of such double exponential distributions. The conditions for the simple limit to exist relate to the approximation of the distribution of the number of events by a Poisson distribution. One such condition requires the coefficient of variation (ratio of standard deviation to mean) of the number of events to converge to 0 as the mean increases. The results provide a statistical background to Båth's law in seismology, which asserts that in an aftershock sequence the magnitude of the main shock is commonly around 1.2 units higher than the magnitude of the largest aftershock.

Keywords

Extreme value distributionETAS modelBåth's lawPoisson limitsexponential variates

MSC classification

Primary: 60F05: Central limit and other weak theorems 60K40: Other physical applications of random processes
Secondary: 86A15: Seismology
Type
General Applied Probability
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 882 - 896
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2008 

References

Console, R., Lombardi, A. M. and Murru, M. (2003). Båth's law and the self-similarity of earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2128.Google Scholar
Daley, D. J. and Vere-Jones, D. (2003). An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Vol. I, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Daley, D. J. and Vere-Jones, D. (2007). An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Vol. II, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Feller, W. (1966). Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 2. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Felzer, K. R., Abercrombie, R. E. and Ekström, G. (2004). A common origin for aftershocks, foreshocks and multiplets. Bull. Amer. Seismological Soc. 94, 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felzer, K. R. et al. (2002). Triggering of the 1999 MW 7.1 Hector Mine earthquake by aftershocks of the 1992 MW 7.3 Landers earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1029.Google Scholar
Galambos, J. (1987). The Asymptotic Theory of Extreme Order Statistics, 2nd edn. Krieger, Florida.Google Scholar
Helmstetter, A. and Sornette, D. (2003). Båth's law derived from the Gutenberg–Richter law and from aftershock properties. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2069.Google Scholar
Johnson, N., Kotz, S. and Balakrishnan, N. (1995). Continuous Univariate Distributions, Vol. 2, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Lombardi, A. M. (2002). Probabilistic interpretation of Båth's law. Ann. Geophys. 45, 455–472.Google Scholar
Ogata, Y. (1988). Statistical models for earthquake occurrence and residual analysis for point processes. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 83, 9–27.Google Scholar
Saichev, A. and Sornette, D. (2005). Distribution of the largest aftershock in branching models of triggered seismicity: theory of Båth's law. Phys. Rev. E 71, 056127.Google Scholar
Shcherbakov, R. and Turcotte, D. L. (2004). A modified form of Båth's law. Bull. Seismological Soc. Amer. 94, 1968–1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utsu, T. (1961). A statistical study on the properties of aftershocks. Geophys. Mag. 30, 521–605.Google Scholar
Utsu, T., Ogata, Y. and Matu'ura, R. S. (1995). The centenary of the Omori formula for a decay law of aftershock activity. J. Phys. Earth 43, 1–33.Google Scholar
Vere-Jones, D. (1969). A note on the statistical interpretation of Båth's law. Bull. Seismological Soc. Amer. 59, 1535–1541.Google Scholar
Vere-Jones, D., Murakami, J. and Christophersen, A. (2006). A further note on Båth's law. In Proc. 4th International Workshop Statist. Seismology (Zushi, Japan, January 2006), pp. 244–247.Google Scholar
Vere-Jones, D., Murakami, J. and Christophersen, A. (2008). A further note on Bath's law. (In preparation.)Google Scholar
Zhuang, J. and Ogata, Y. (2006). Properties of the probability distribution associated with the largest event in an earthquake cluster and their implications to foreshocks. Phys. Rev. E 73, 046134.Google Scholar