Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:26:36.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generalized Gamma measures and shot-noise Cox processes

Part of: Stochastic processes Probabilistic methods, simulation and stochastic differential equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Anders Brix
Anders Brix*
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University
*
∗ Postal address: Guy Carpenter Instrat, Aldgate House, 6th Floor, 33 Aldgate High Street, London EC3N 1AQ. Email address: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A parametric family of completely random measures, which includes gamma random measures, positive stable random measures as well as inverse Gaussian measures, is defined. In order to develop models for clustered point patterns with dependencies between points, the family is used in a shot-noise construction as intensity measures for Cox processes. The resulting Cox processes are of Poisson cluster process type and include Poisson processes and ordinary Neyman-Scott processes.

We show characteristics of the completely random measures, illustrated by simulations, and derive moment and mixing properties for the shot-noise random measures. Finally statistical inference for shot-noise Cox processes is considered and some results on nearest-neighbour Markov properties are given.

Keywords

Spatial point processrandom measurestable measuregamma measuregamma processshot-noise processCox processPoisson cluster processNeyman-Scott process60G57

MSC classification

Primary: 60G57: Random measures
Secondary: 60G60: Random fields 65C05: Monte Carlo methods
Type
Stochastic Geometry and Statistical Applications
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , December 1999 , pp. 929 - 953
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalen, O (1992). Modelling heterogeneity in survival analysis by the compound Poisson distribution. Ann. App. Prob. 2, 951–972.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. and Möller, J. (1989). Nearest-neighbour Markov point processes and random sets. Int. Stat. Rev. 57, 89–121.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., Van Lieshout, M. and Möller, J. (1996). Markov properties of cluster processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 28, 346–355.Google Scholar
Bar-Lev, S. and Enis, P. (1986). Reproducibility and natural exponential families with power variance functions. Ann. Statist. 14, 1507–1522.Google Scholar
Bondesson, L. (1982). On simulation from infinitely divisible distributions. Adv. App. Prob. 14, 855–869.Google Scholar
Brix, A. (1997). The P-G-family. Software libraries for C and S-plus. DINA Notat 61, Danish Informatic Network in Agriculture, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural College, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Brix, A. and Chadœuf, F. (1998). Spatio-temporal modeling of weeds by shot-noise G Cox processes. Report 98-7, Department of Mathematics and Physics, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Carter, D. and Prenter, P. (1972). Exponential spaces and counting processes. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 21, 1–19.Google Scholar
Chambers, J., Malllows, C. and Stuck, B. (1976). A method for simulating stable random variables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 71, 340–344.Google Scholar
Daimen, P., Laud, P., and Smith, A. (1995). Approximate random variate generation from infinitely divisible distributions with applications to bayesian inference. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 57, 547–563.Google Scholar
Daley, D. and Vere-Jones, D. (1988). An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Diggle, P. (1983). Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Goulard, M., Chadœuf, J. and Bertuzzi, P. (1994). Random boolean functions: Non-parametric estimation of the intensity, application to soil surface roughness. Statistics 25, 123–136.Google Scholar
Hougaard, P. (1986). Survival models for heterogeneous populations derived from stable distributions. Biometrika 73, 387–396.Google Scholar
Hougaard, P., Lee, M.-L. and Whitmore, G. (1997). Analysis of overdispersed count data by mixtures of Poisson variables and Poisson processes. Biometrics 53, 1225–1238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jörgensen, B (1987). Exponential dispersion models. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 49, 127–162.Google Scholar
Kallenberg, O (1983). Random Measures. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Larsen, M. (1996). Point process models for weather radar image prediction. , Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Le Cam, L. (1961). A stochastic description of precipitation. In Proceedings 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, ed. Neyman, J.. Vol. 3, pp. 165–186.Google Scholar
Lee, M.-L. T. and Whitmore, G. (1993). Stochastic processes directed by randomized time. J. Appl. Prob. 30, 302–314.Google Scholar
Lévy, P., (1954). Théorie de l'Addition des Variables Aléatoires. Gauthier-Villars, Paris.Google Scholar
Möller, J., Syversveen, A. and Waagepetersen, R. (1998). Log Gaussian Cox processes. Scand. J. Statist. 25, 451–482.Google Scholar
Moran, P. (1959). The Theory of Storage. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Rice, J. (1977). On generalized shot noise. Adv. Appl. Prob. 9, 553–565.Google Scholar
Ripley, B. (1987). Stochastic Simulation. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Ripley, B., and Kelly, F. (1977). Markov point processes. J. London Math. Soc. 15, 188–192.Google Scholar
Samorodnitsky, G and Taqqu, M. (1994). Stable Non-Gaussian Random Processes. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Stoyan, D. and Stoyan, H. (1994). Fractals, Random Shapes and Point Fields. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Stoyan, D., Kendall, W., and Mecke, J. (1995). Stochastic Geometry and its Applications. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Tweedie, M. (1984). An index which distinguishes between some important exponential families. In Statistics: Applications and New Directions, eds. Ghosh, J. and Roy, J.. Proceedings of the Indian Statistical Institute Golden Jubilee International Conference, pp. 579–604 Google Scholar
Vere-Jones, D. and Davies., R. (1966). A statistical survey of earthquakes in the main seismic region of New Zealand. Part II, time series analysis. N.Z.J. Geol. Geophys. 9, 251–284.Google Scholar
Wolpert, R. and Ickstadt, K. (1998). Poisson/Gamma random field models for spatial statistics. Biometrika 85, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar