Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:30:57.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confidence bounds for the adjustment coefficient

Part of: Applications Nonparametric inference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Susan M. Pitts ,
Rudolf Grübel  and
Paul Embrechts
Susan M. Pitts*
Affiliation:
University College London
Rudolf Grübel*
Affiliation:
Universität Hannover
Paul Embrechts*
Affiliation:
ETH, Zürich
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Statistical Science, University College London, Gower Street, London WCIE 6BT, UK.
∗∗ Postal address: Institut für Mathematische Stochastik, Universität Hannover, Postfach 6009, 30060 Hannover, Germany.
∗∗∗ Postal address: Department of Mathematics, ETH-Zentrum, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let ?(u) be the probability of eventual ruin in the classical Sparre Andersen model of risk theory if the initial risk reserve is u. For a large class of such models ?(u) behaves asymptotically like a multiple of exp (–Ru) where R is the adjustment coefficient; R depends on the premium income rate, the claim size distribution and the distribution of the time between claim arrivals. Estimation of R has been considered by many authors. In the present paper we deal with confidence bounds for R. A variety of methods is used, including jackknife estimation of asymptotic variances and the bootstrap. We show that, under certain assumptions, these procedures result in interval estimates that have asymptotically the correct coverage probabilities. We also give the results of a simulation study that compares the different techniques in some particular cases.

Keywords

RISK THEORYRUIN PROBABILITYADJUSTMENT COEFFICIENTRANDOM WALKNON-PARAMETRIC ESTIMATIONBOOTSTRAPJACKKNIFEBIAS CORRECTION

MSC classification

Primary: 62P05: Applications to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics
Secondary: 62G20: Asymptotic properties
Type
General Applied Probablity
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 802 - 827
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bickel, P. J. and Freedman, D. A. (1981) Some asymptotic theory for the bootstrap. Ann. Statist. 9, 1196–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chow, Y. S. and Teicher, H. (1988) Probability Theory: Independence, Interchangeability, Martingales . 2nd edn. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D. R. and Hinkley, D. V. (1974) Theoretical Statistics. Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csörgõ, S. (1982) The empirical moment generating function. In Nonparametric Statistical Inference (Coll. Math. Soc. J. Bolyai 32) ed. Gnedenko, B. V., Puri, M. L. and Vincze, I.. North-Holland, Amsterdam. pp. 139–159.Google Scholar
Csörgõ, M. and Steinebach, J. (1991) On the estimation of the adjustment coefficient in risk theory via intermediate order statistics. Insurance Math. Econ. 10, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csörgõ, S. and Teugels, J. L. (1990) Empirical Laplace transform and approximation of compound distributions. J. Appl. Prob. 27, 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deheuvels, P. and Steinebach, J. (1990) On some alternative estimates of the adjustment coefficient in risk theory. Scand. Act. J. 135–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B. (1982) The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans. (CBMS Monograph 38). SIAM, Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B. and Lepage, R. (1992) Introduction to bootstrap. In Exploring the Limits of Bootstrap. ed. LePage, R. and Billard, L.. Wiley, New York. pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
Embrechts, P. and Mikosch, T. (1991) A bootstrap procedure for estimating the adjustment coefficient. Insurance Math. Econ. 10, 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embrechts, P. and Veraverbeke, N. (1982) Estimates for the probability of ruin with special emphasis on the possibility of large claims. Insurance Math. Econ. 1, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frees, E. W. (1986) Nonparametric estimation of the probability of ruin. ASTIN Bulletin 16S, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaver, D. P. and Jacobs, P. A. (1988) Nonparametric estimation of the probability of a long delay in the M/G/1 queue. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 50, 392–402.Google Scholar
Gill, R. D. (1989) Non- and semi-parametric maximum likelihood estimators and the von Mises method (Part 1). Scand. J Statist. 16, 97–128.Google Scholar
Goovaerts, M., Kaas, R., Van Heerwaarden, A. E. and Bauwelinckx, T. (1990) Effective Actuarial Methods. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Grandell, J. (1979) Empirical bounds for ruin probabilities. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 8, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandell, J. (1991) Aspects of Risk Theory. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. (1992) The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansions. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herkenrath, U. (1986) On the estimation of the adjustment coefficient in risk theory by means of stochastic approximation procedures. Insurance Math. Econ. 5, 305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hipp, C. (1989a) Efficient estimators for ruin probabilities. In Proc. Fourth Prague Symp. on Asymptotic Statistics. ed. Mandl, P. and Hušková, M.. Charles University, Prague. pp. 259–268.Google Scholar
Hipp, C. (1989b) Estimators and bootstrap confidence intervals for ruin probabilities. ASTIN Bulletin 19, 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hipp, C. (1996) The delta-method for actuarial statistics. Scand. Act. J. 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hipp, C. and Michel, R. (1990) Risikotheorie: Stochastische Modelle und Statistische Methoden. Versicherungswirtschaft, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Lang, S. (1993) Real and Functional Analysis. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mammitzsch, V. (1986) A note on the adjustment coefficient in ruin theory. Insurance Math. Econ. 5, 147–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parr, W. C. (1985) Jackknifing differentiable statistical functionals. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 47, 56–66.Google Scholar
Pitts, S. M. (1994) Nonparametric estimation of the stationary waiting time distribution function for the GI/G/1 queue. Ann. Statist. 22, 1428–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, D. (1984) Convergence of Stochastic Processes. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyke, R. and Shorack, G. R. (1968) Weak convergence of a two-sample empirical process and a new approach to Chernoff–Savage theorems. Ann. Math. Statist. 39, 755–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shao, J. (1993) Differentiability of statistical functionals and consistency of the jackknife. Ann. Statist. 21, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorack, G. R. and Wellner, J. A. (1986) Empirical Processes with Applications to Statistics. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Widder, D. (1946) The Laplace Transform. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar