Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:22:53.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Ocean Iron Fertilization on the Phytoplankton Biological Carbon Pump

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2015

Adam Pan*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3 Program of Engineering Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A1
Babak Pourziaei*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3
Huaxiong Huang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3
*
Corresponding author. URL: http://www.math.yorku.ca/~hhuang/ Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

It has been proposed that photosynthetic plankton can be used as a biological carbon pump tp absorb and sequester carbon dioxide in the ocean. In this paper, plankton population dynamics are simulated in a single stratified water column to predict carbon dioxide sequestering due to surface iron fertilization in deep ocean. Using a predator-prey model and realistic parameter values, iron fertilization was found to only cause temporary blooms up to 5 months in duration, and relatively small increases in adsorption of atmospheric CO2.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Gregg, W. W., Tracking the SeaWiFS record with a coupled physical/biogeochemical/radiative model of the global oceans, Deep. Sea. Res. II., 49 (2001), pp. 81105.Google Scholar
[2] Gregg, W. W., Ginoux, P., Schopf, P. S., and Casey, N. W., Phytoplankton and iron: validation of a global three-dimensional ocean biogeochemical model, Deep. Sea. Res. II., 50 (2003), pp. 31433169.Google Scholar
[3] Huisman, J., Arrayas, M., and Ebert, U., How do sinking phytoplankton species manage to persist?, Am. Nat., 159 (2002), pp. 245254.Google Scholar
[4] Huisman, J., and Sommejer, B., Population dynamics of sinking phytoplankton in light-limited environments: simulation techniques and critical parameters, J. Sea. Res., 48 (2002), pp. 8396.Google Scholar
[5] Huisman, J., and Sommeijer, B. P., Simulation Techniques for the Population Dynamics of Sinking Phytoplankton in Light Limited Environments, 2002.Google Scholar
[6] Kawamiya, M., Kishi, M., Yamanaka, Y., and Suginohara, N., An ecological-physical coupled model applied to station papa, J. Oceanography., 51 (1995), pp. 635664.Google Scholar
[7] Kishi, M., Motono, H., Kashiwai, M., and Tsuda, A., An ecological-physical coupled model with ontogenetic vertical migration of zooplankton in the northwestern pacific, J. Oceanography., 57 (2001), pp. 499507.Google Scholar
[8] Lippsett, L., Madin, K., and Nevala, A., WHOI: Oceanus: Fertilizing the Ocean with Iron, http://www.whoi.edu/oceanus/viewArticle.do?id=34167&sectionid=1000.Google Scholar
[9] Okunishi, T., Kishi, M. J., Ono, Y., and Yamashita, T., A lower trophic ecosystem model including iron effects in the Okhotsk sea, Cont. Shelf. Res., 27 (2007), pp. 20802098.Google Scholar
[10] Roach, J., Can Iron-Enriched Oceans Thwart Global Warming?, http://news.national-geographic.com/news/2004/06/0609040609carbonsink.html. Google Scholar
[11] Steele, J. H., and Henderson, E. W., The role of predation in Plankton models, J. Plankton. Res., 14 (1992), pp. 157172.Google Scholar