Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T15:05:02.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparison and Unification of Ellipsoidal Statistical and Shakhov BGK Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2015

Songze Chen ,
Kun Xu  and
Qingdong Cai
Songze Chen
Affiliation:
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Kun Xu*
Affiliation:
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong LTCS and CAPT, Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Qingdong Cai*
Affiliation:
LTCS and CAPT, Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] (S. Z. Chen), [email protected] (K. Xu), [email protected] (Q. D. Cai)
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] (S. Z. Chen), [email protected] (K. Xu), [email protected] (Q. D. Cai)
Get access

Abstract

The Ellipsoidal Statistical model (ES-model) and the Shakhov model (Smodel) were constructed to correct the Prandtl number of the original BGK model through the modification of stress and heat flux. With the introduction of a new parameter to combine the ES-model and S-model, a generalized kinetic model can be developed. This new model can give the correct Navier-Stokes equations in the continuum flow regime. Through the adjustment of the new parameter, it provides abundant dynamic effect beyond the ES-model and S-model. Changing the free parameter, the physical performance of the new model has been tested numerically. The unified gas kinetic scheme (UGKS) is employed for the study of the new model. In transition flow regime, many physical problems, i.e., the shock structure and micro-flows, have been studied using the generalized model. With a careful choice of the free parameter, good results can be achieved for most test cases. Due to the property of the Boltzmann collision integral, the new parameter in the generalized kinetic model cannot be fully determined. It depends on the specific problem. Generally speaking, the Smodel predicts more accurate numerical solutions in most test cases presented in this paper than the ES-model, while ES-model performs better in the cases where the flow is mostly driven by temperature gradient, such as a channel flow with large boundary temperature variation at high Knudsen number.

Keywords

65M1078A48Kinetic modelsunified gas kinetic schemerarefied flow
Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 245 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Bhatnagar, P. L., Gross, E. P. and Krook, M., A model for collision processes in gases, Phys. Rev., 94 (1954), pp. 511–525.Google Scholar
[2]Holway, L. H., New statistical models for kinetic theory: Methods of construction, Phys. Fluids, 9(9) (1966), pp. 1658–1673.Google Scholar
[3]Andries, P. and Perthame, B., The ES-BGK model equation with correct Prandtl number, Aip Conf. Proc., 585 (2001), pp. 30–36.Google Scholar
[4]Shakhov, E. M., Generalization of the Krook kinetic relaxation equation, Fluid Dynamics, 3 (1968), pp. 95–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Liu, G., A method for constructing a model form for the Boltzmann equation, Phys. Fluids A, 2 (1990), 277.Google Scholar
[6]Andries, P., Bourgat, J., Le Tallec, P. and Perthame, B., Numerical comparison between the Boltzmann and ES-BGK model for rarefied gases, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 191 (2002), pp. 3369–3390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Garzó, V., De Haro, M. and LóPez, M., Kinetic model for heat and momentum transport, Phys. Fluids, 6 (1994), 3787.Google Scholar
[8]Graur, I. A. and Polikarpov, A. P., Comparison of different kinetic models for the heat transfer problem, Heat Mass Transfer, 46 (2009), pp. 237–244.Google Scholar
[9]Zheng, Y. and Struchtrup, H., Ellipsoidal statistical Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook model with velocity-dependent collision frequency, Phys. Fluids, 17 (2005), 127103.Google Scholar
[10]Kudryavtsev, A. N., Shershnev, A. A. and Ivanov, M. S., Comparison of different kinetic and continuum models applied to the shock-wave structure problem, Aip Conf. Proc., 1084 (2008), pp. 507–512.Google Scholar
[11]Mieussens, L., Numerical comparison of Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook models with proper prandtl number, Phys. Fluids, 16 (2004), 2797.Google Scholar
[12]Xu, K. and Huang, Juan-Chen, A unified gas-kinetic scheme for continuum and rarefied flows, J. Comput. Phys., 229 (2010), pp. 7747–7764.Google Scholar
[13]Xu, Kun and Huang, Juan-Chen, An improved unified gas-kinetic scheme and the study of shock structures, Ima J. Appl. Math., 76 (2011), pp. 698–711.Google Scholar
[14]Huang, J. C., Xu, K. and Yu, P. B., A unified gas-kinetic scheme for continuum and rarefied flows ii: Multi-dimensional cases, Commun. Comput. Phys., 12 (2012), pp. 662–690.Google Scholar
[15]Huang, J. C., Xu, K. and Yu, P. B., A unified gas-kinetic scheme for continuum and rarefied flows iii: Microflow simulations, Commun. Comput. Phys., 14 (2011), pp. 1147–1173.Google Scholar
[16]Chen, S. Z., Xu, K., Lee, C. B. and Cai, Q. D., A unified gas kinetic scheme with moving mesh and velocity space adaptation, J. Comput. Phys., 231 (2012), pp. 6643–6664.Google Scholar
[17]Grad, H., On the kinetic theory of rarefied gases, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 2 (1949), pp. 331–407.Google Scholar
[18]Struchtrup, H. and Torrilhon, M., Regularization of grad’s 13 moment equations: Derivation and linear analysis, Phys. Fluids, 15 (2003), 2668.Google Scholar
[19]Xu, K., A gas-kinetic BGK scheme for the Navier-Stokes equations and its connection with artificial dissipation and godunov method, J. Comput. Phys., 171 (2001), pp. 289–335.Google Scholar
[20]Meng, J., Zhang, Y., and Reese, J. M., Assessment of the ellipsoidal-statistical Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook model for force-driven poiseuille flows, J. Comput. Phys., 251 (2013), pp. 383–395.Google Scholar
[21]Bird, G. A., Molecular Gas Dynamics and the Direct Simulation of Gas Flows, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar
[22]Meng, J., Zhang, Y., Hadjiconstantinou, N. G., Radtke, G. A. and Shan, X., Lattice ellipsoidal statistical BGK model for thermal non-equilibrium flows, J. Fluid Mech., 718 (2013), pp. 347–370.Google Scholar
[23]Homolle, T. M. M. and Hadjiconstantinou, N. G., Low-variance deviational simulation Monte Carlo, Phys. Fluids, 19 (2007), 041701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Radtke, G. A., Hadjiconstantinou, N. G. and Wagner, W., Low-noise Monte Carlo simulation of the variable hard sphere gas, Phys. Fluids, 23 (2011), 030606.Google Scholar
[25]Harris, S., An Introduction to the Theory of the Boltzmann Equation, Dover Publications, Inc, 2004.Google Scholar
[26]Zhuk, V. I., Rykov, V. A. and Shakhov, E. M., Kinetic models and the shock structure problem, Fluid Dynamics, 8 (1973), pp. 620–625.Google Scholar