Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:32:15.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential of freely available remote sensing visible images to support growers in delineating within field zones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2017

T. Crestey ,
L. Pichon  and
B. Tisseyre
T. Crestey*
Affiliation:
UMR ITAP, Montpellier SupAgro/Irstea, Bât. 21, 2 Pl. Pierre Viala, Montpellier 34060, France
L. Pichon
Affiliation:
UMR ITAP, Montpellier SupAgro/Irstea, Bât. 21, 2 Pl. Pierre Viala, Montpellier 34060, France
B. Tisseyre
Affiliation:
UMR ITAP, Montpellier SupAgro/Irstea, Bât. 21, 2 Pl. Pierre Viala, Montpellier 34060, France
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Remote sensing images offer a unique monitoring capacity for agriculture fields. Despite significant drawbacks, free historical remote sensing images are likely to provide valuable information to delineate temporally stable zones, especially for a perennial crop like vines. In order to test the potential of these free images for delineating within field soil zones, an experiment was performed on three vine fields located in southern France. On each vine field, the grower was asked to delineate within field zones that present differences in soil characteristics. The first expert zoning (ZP zoning) was only based on the grower’s knowledge. Two weeks after, 12 visible free remote sensing were provided to the grower to refine the first zoning (ZAI zoning). In order to assess the relevancy of both zonings, a soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) survey was performed on each field. The Rv zoning index was then computed on ECa data to assess the potential improvement between ZP and ZAI zonings. Results show that for two fields, remote sensing images improved the zoning while for one field both ZP and ZAI expert zonings were similar. This result highlights a potential interest in historical remote sensing images to improve the knowledge that growers have of their fields. It should be noted, however, that this improvement is still limited in the case of viticulture where the small size of the fields with a large number of manual operations is likely to lead to a good knowledge of within field variability.

Keywords

remote sensingvisible imageszones delineationsoil variability
Type
Satellite Applications
Information
Advances in Animal Biosciences , Volume 8 , Special Issue 2: Papers presented at the 11th European Conference on Precision Agriculture (ECPA 2017), John McIntyre Centre, Edinburgh, UK, July 16–20 2017 , July 2017 , pp. 372 - 376
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Battude, M, Al Bitar, A, Morin, D, Cros, J, Huc, M, Sicre, CM and Demarez, V 2016. Estimating maize biomass and yield over large areas using high spatial and temporal resolution Sentinel-2 like remote sensing data. Remote Sensing of Environment 184, 668–681.Google Scholar
Bobryk, CW, Myers, DB, Kitchen, NR, Shanahan, JF, Sudduth, KA, Drummond, ST and Gomez Raboteaux, NN 2016. Validating a Digital Soil Map with Corn Yield Data for Precision Agriculture Decision Support. Agronomy Journal 108 (3), 957–965.Google Scholar
Corwin, DL and Plant, RE 2005. Applications of apparent soil electrical conductivity in precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 46 (1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Fleming, KL, Heermann, DF and Westfall, DG 2004. Evaluating soil color with farmer input and apparent soil electrical conductivity for management zone delineation. Agronomy Journal 96 (6), 1581–1587.Google Scholar
Lamb, DW, Mitchell, A and Hyde, G 2005. Vineyard trellising with steel posts distorts data from EM soil surveys. Australian journal of Grape and Wine Research 11 (1), 24–32.Google Scholar
Mulla, DJ 2013. Twenty five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: Key advances and remaining knowledge gaps. Biosystems Engineering 114 (4), 358–371.Google Scholar
Heijting, S, de Bruin, S and Bregt, AK 2011. The arable farmer as the assessor of within-field soil variation. Precision Agriculture 12 (4), 488–507.Google Scholar
Houborg, R and McCabe, MF 2016. High-Resolution NDVI from Planet’s Constellation of Earth Observing Nano-Satellites: A New Data Source for Precision Agriculture. Remote Sensing 8 (9), 768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar