Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:44:36.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mapping properties of an asynchronous crop: the example of time interval between flowering and maturity of banana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2017

J. Lamour ,
O. Naud ,
M. Lechaudel  and
B. Tisseyre
J. Lamour*
Affiliation:
UMR ITAP, Irstea - Montpellier SupAgro, France Compagnie Fruitière, Marseille, France
O. Naud
Affiliation:
UMR ITAP, Irstea - Montpellier SupAgro, France
M. Lechaudel
Affiliation:
CIRAD,UMR Qualisud, F-97130 Capesterre Belle-eau Guadeloupe, France
B. Tisseyre
Affiliation:
UMR ITAP, Irstea - Montpellier SupAgro, France
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Precision agriculture for banana crops has been little investigated so far. The main difficulty to implement precision agriculture methods lies in the asynchronicity of this crop: after a few cycles, each plant has its own development stage in the field. Indeed, maps of agronomical interest are difficult to produce from plant responses without implementing new methods. The present study explores the feasibility to derive a spatially relevant indicator from the date of flowering and the date of maturity (time to harvest). The time between these dates (TFM) may give insight in spatial distribution of vigor. The study was carried out using production data from 2015 acquired in a farm from Cameroon. Data from individual plants that flowered at different weeks were gathered so as to increase the density of TFM sampling. The temporal variability of TFM, which is induced by weather and operational constraints, was compensated by centering TFM data on their medians (TFMc). The mapping of TFMc was obtained using a classical kriging method. Spatial structures highlighted by TFMc either at the farm level or at the plot level, suggest that such maps could be used to support agronomic decisions.

Keywords

bananamappingasynchronousmaturity
Type
Precision Horticulture and Viticulture
Information
Advances in Animal Biosciences , Volume 8 , Special Issue 2: Papers presented at the 11th European Conference on Precision Agriculture (ECPA 2017), John McIntyre Centre, Edinburgh, UK, July 16–20 2017 , July 2017 , pp. 481 - 486
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnaud, M and Xavier, E 2000. Estimation et interpolation spatiale (Spatial estimation and interpolation). Hermes.Google Scholar
Bachmaier, M and Backes, M 2008. Variogram or semivariogram? Understanding the variances in a variogram. Precision Agriculture 9, 173–175.Google Scholar
Bivand, R, Pebesma, E and Gómez-Rubio, V 2013. Applied spatial data: analysis with R., 2nd edn, Springer, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Bugaud, C and Lassoudière, A 2005. Variabilité de la durée de vie verte des bananes en conditions réelles de production (Variability in the green shelf life of bananas in real conditions of production). Fruits 60, 227–236.Google Scholar
Cottin, R, Melin, P and Ganry, J 1987. Modélisation de la production bananière. Influence de quelques paramètres en Martinique. Fruits 42, 691–701.Google Scholar
FAO 2013. FAOSTAT, Production Quantities, Bananas.Google Scholar
Ganry, J and Chillet, M 2008. Methodology to forecast the harvest date of banana bunches. Fruits 63, 371–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganry, J and Meyer, JP 1975. Recherche d’une loi d’action de la temperature sur la croissance des fruits du bananier. Fruits 30, 375–392.Google Scholar
Jullien, A, Chillet, M and Malezieux, E 2008. Pre-harvest growth and development, measured as accumulated degree days, determine the post-harvest green life of banana fruit. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 83, 506–512.Google Scholar
Lassoudière, A 2012. Le bananier: Un siècle d’innovations techniques. Editions Quae.Google Scholar
McBratney, A, Whelan, B, Ancev, T and Bouma, J 2005. Future directions of precision agriculture. Precision Agriculture 6, 7–23.Google Scholar
Pebesma, EJ 2004. Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Computers & Geosciences 30, 683–691.Google Scholar
Pebesma, EJ and Bivand, RS 2005. Classes and methods for spatial data in R. R News 5, 9–13.Google Scholar
Plant, RE 2001. Site-specific management: the application of information technology to crop production. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 30, 9–29.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Stoorvogel, JJ, Kooistra, L and Bouma, J 2015. Managing soil variability at different spatial scales as a basis for precision agriculture. Advances in Soil Science pp. 37–72.Google Scholar
Taylor, JA and Bates, TR 2013. A discussion on the significance associated with Pearson’s correlation in precision agriculture studies. Precision Agriculture 14, 558–564.Google Scholar
Tisseyre, B, Geraudie, V and Saurin, N 2015. How to define the size of a sampling unit to map high resolution spatial data?, in: Precision agriculture’15. Wageningen Academic Publishers, pp. 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tixier, P, Malezieux, E and Dorel, M 2004. SIMBA-POP: a cohort population model for long-term simulation of banana crop harvest. Ecological Modelling 180, 407–417.Google Scholar
Vargas-Calvo, A 2012. Grosor Del Fruto De La Última Y Segunda Mano Como Criterio De Cosecha En Banano (Diameter of the fruit of the last and second hand as criterion of harvest in banana). Agronomía Mesoamericana 23, 41–46.Google Scholar