Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T22:24:57.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impacts of Variable Rate Nitrogen (VRN) on Nitrate-N Losses from Tile Drained Maize in Minnesota, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2017

G. Wilson ,
A. Laacouri ,
J. Galzki  and
D. Mulla
G. Wilson
Affiliation:
Dept. Soil, Water & Climate, University of Minnesota, MN, USA
A. Laacouri
Affiliation:
Dept. Soil, Water & Climate, University of Minnesota, MN, USA
J. Galzki
Affiliation:
Dept. Soil, Water & Climate, University of Minnesota, MN, USA
D. Mulla*
Affiliation:
Dept. Soil, Water & Climate, University of Minnesota, MN, USA
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Little is known about the effectiveness of sensor-based variable rate nitrogen (VRN) fertilizer application at reducing nitrate-N losses. A variable rate in-season nitrogen (VRN) treatment was compared to a conventional pre-plant uniform rate nitrogen treatment in eight Minnesota, USA sub-fields. Water samples collected weekly during 2016 were analyzed for nitrate-N. The Drainmod model was able to accurately represent measured tile discharge and nitrate-N concentration data. Modeled nitrate-N losses in tile discharge were 16% lower in VRN than uniform treatments. These results show that in-season VRN fertilizer N management can significantly reduce nitrate-N loads from tile drained maize fields.

Keywords

VRNnitrate-Nwater qualitytile drainagemodeling
Type
Precision Nitrogen
Information
Advances in Animal Biosciences , Volume 8 , Special Issue 2: Papers presented at the 11th European Conference on Precision Agriculture (ECPA 2017), John McIntyre Centre, Edinburgh, UK, July 16–20 2017 , July 2017 , pp. 317 - 321
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cassman, KG, Dobermann, A and Walters, DT 2002. Agroecosystems, nitrogen-use efficiency, and nitrogen management. Ambio 31, 132–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erickson, B and Widmar, DA 2015. 2015 Precision agricultural services dealership survey results. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.Google Scholar
Lazarus, W, Mulla, DJ and Wall, D 2014. A spreadsheet planning tool for assisting a state agency with cost-effective watershed scale surface water nitrogen planning. J. Soil Water Conservation 69, 45A–50A.Google Scholar
Luo, W, Sands, GR, Youssef, M, Strock, JS, Song, I and Canelon, D 2010. Modeling the impact of alternative drainage practices in the northern Corn-belt with DRAINMOD-NII. Agricultural Water Management 97 (3), 389–398.Google Scholar
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) 2013. Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters. Conditions, trends, sources and reductions. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-s6-26a.pdf. Retrieved <Dec. 5, 2016>..>Google Scholar
Moriasi, DN, Arnold, JG, Van Liew, MW, Bingner, RL, Harmel, RD and Veith, TL 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE 50 (3), 885–900.Google Scholar
Mulla, DJ 2013. Twenty five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: Key advances and remaining knowledge gaps. Biosystems Engineering 114 (4), 358–371.Google Scholar
Papiernik, SK, Lindstrom, MJ, Schumacher, JA, Farenhorst, A, Stephans, KD, Schumacher, TE and Lobb, DA 2005. Variation in soil properties and crop yield across an eroded prairie landscape. Journal of Soil Water Conservation 60, 388–395.Google Scholar
Raun, WR, Solie, JB, Johnson, GV, Stone, ML, Mullen, RW, Freeman, KW, Thomason, WE and Lukina, EV 2002. Improving nitrogen use efficiency in cereal grain production with optical sensing and variable rate application. Agronomy Journal 94, 351–815.Google Scholar
Sands, GR, Song, I, Busman, LM and Hansen, BJ 2008. The effects of subsurface drainage depth and intensity on nitrate loads in the northern cornbelt. Transactions of the ASABE 51 (3), 937–946.Google Scholar
Scharf, PC, Kitchen, NR, Sudduth, KA, Davis, JG, Hubbard, VC and Lory, JA 2005. Field-scale variability in optimal nitrogen fertilizer rate for corn. Agronomy Journal 97, 452–461.Google Scholar
Schepers, JS, Varvel, GE and Watts, DG 1995. Nitrogen and water management strategies to reduce nitrate leaching under irrigated maize. Journal of Contaminated Hydrology 20, 227–239.Google Scholar
Skaggs, RW, Fausey, NR and Evans, RO 2012. Drainage water management. Journal of soil and water conservation 67 (6), 167A–172A.Google Scholar
Tremblay, N and Belec, C 2006. Adapting nitrogen fertilization to unpredictable seasonal conditions with the least impact on-the environment. Horttechnology 16, 408–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, RE and Rabalais, NN 1991. Changes in Mississippi river water-quality this century. Bioscience 41, 140–147.Google Scholar
Varvel, GE, Wilhelm, WW, Shanahan, JF and Schepers, JS 2007. An algorithm for corn nitrogen recommendations using a chlorophyll meter based sufficiency index. Agronomy Journal 99, 701–706.Google Scholar