No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Options for the better use of less nitrogen on livestock farms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 September 2014
Abstract
The previous articles have shown that preoccupations concerning discharge of nitrate emissions are not recent, even if they have not yet resulted in expected reductions. The Water Framework Directive, which aims at a ‘good’ ecological state of all aquatic environments in 2015, enlarges the objectives of the Nitrates Directive. We are currently witnessing the broadening of objectives for reducing emissions of all forms of nitrogen from livestock farming systems to other compartments, in particular the atmosphere. The reduction of ammonia emissions, which was a little concerned by the French context until now, is a priority for animal systems in several northern European countries. It is a subject of intense efforts of international regulations.
- Type
- Full Paper
- Information
- Advances in Animal Biosciences , Volume 5 , Issue s1: Nitrogen flows in livestock farming systems: Reduce losses, restore balance , October 2014 , pp. 59 - 67
- Copyright
- © The Animal Consortium 2014
References
Aarts, HFM, Biewing, EE and van Keulen, H 1992. Dairy farming systems based on efficient nutrient management. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 40, 285–299.Google Scholar
Académie d'Agriculture de France 2010. Elevages intensifs et environnement – les effluents: menace ou richesse? Les colloques de l’Académie d'Agriculture de France 1, 137p.Google Scholar
Aznar, O, Jeanneaux, P and Deprés, C 2009. Les services environnementaux fournis par l'agriculture, entre logique sectorielle et logique territoriale: un cadre d’analyse économique 3. Journées de recherches en sciences sociales INRA-SFER-CIRAD, Montpellier, France, 9–11 November 2009, 20 pp.Google Scholar
Bockstaller, C, Vertès, F, Fiorelli, JL, Rochette, P and Aarts, F. Tools for evaluating nitrogen impacts in livestock farming systems. Advances in Animal Biosciences 5, 48–53.Google Scholar
Boisset, G 2008. Les systèmes de paiements pour services environnementaux (PSE) et l’eau: des opportunités pour aider les agriculteurs? ENGREF, Paris, AgroParisTech, 21pp.Google Scholar
Cellier, P, Rochette, P, Durand, P, Faverdin, P, Kuikman, PJ and Peyraud, JL. 2014. Contribution of livestick farming systems to the nitrogen cascade and consequences for farming regions. Advances in Animal Biosciences 5, 8–19.Google Scholar
Chevassus-au-Louis, B 2006. Un nouveau regard sur la diversité du vivant. Responsabilité et Environnement 44, 7–15.Google Scholar
Delaby, L, Dourmad, JY, Béline, F, Lescoat, P, Faverdin, P, Fiorelli, JL, Vertès, F, Veysset, P, Morvan, T, Parnaudeau, V, Durand, P, Rochette, P and Peyraud, JL. 2014. Origin, quantities and fate of nitrogen flows associated with animal production. Advances in Animal Biosciences 5, 28–47.Google Scholar
Doussan, I 2005. Considérés comme des ‘sous-produits’, les effluents d’élevage répandus en violation des règles protectrices de l'environnement échappent à la qualification de déchet. Droit de l’Environnement 134, 286–287.Google Scholar
Doussan, I 2008. Le rôle du droit dans l'évaluation des dommages affectant les services écologiques et le principe de compensation. Colloque Responsabilité environnementale, prévention, imputation, réparation, Le Mans, France, 27–28 November 2008.Google Scholar
Knudsen, MT, Kristensen, IBS, Berntsen, J, Petersen, BM and Kristensen, ES 2006. Estimated N leaching losses for organic and conventional farming in Denmark. Journal of Agricultural Science 144, 135–149.Google Scholar
Langlais, A, Nicourt, C, Bourblanc, M and Gaigné, C 2014. Livestock farming and nitrogen within the economic and social context. Advances in Animal Biosciences 5(S1), 20–27.Google Scholar
Le Goffe, P and Donnars, C. 2014. Economic and regulatory instruments to control nitrogen pressure. Advances in Animal Biosciences 5, 54–57.Google Scholar