Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:08:12.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of an empirical spatio-temporal model of the grapevine phenology at the within-field scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2017

N. Verdugo-Vásquez ,
C. Acevedo-Opazo ,
H. Valdés-Gómez ,
I. García de Cortázar-Atauri  and
B. Tisseyre
N. Verdugo-Vásquez*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Talca, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, CITRA, 2 Norte, 685 Talca, Chile Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Departamento de Fruticultura y Enología, Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile INRA, AGROCLIM Unit, Domaine St Paul, Site Agroparc 84914 Avignon cedex 9, France Montpellier SupAgro/Irstea, UMR ITAP, Bât. 21, 2 Pl. Pierre Viala, Montpellier 34060, France
C. Acevedo-Opazo
Affiliation:
Universidad de Talca, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, CITRA, 2 Norte, 685 Talca, Chile
H. Valdés-Gómez
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Departamento de Fruticultura y Enología, Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile
I. García de Cortázar-Atauri
Affiliation:
INRA, AGROCLIM Unit, Domaine St Paul, Site Agroparc 84914 Avignon cedex 9, France
B. Tisseyre
Affiliation:
Montpellier SupAgro/Irstea, UMR ITAP, Bât. 21, 2 Pl. Pierre Viala, Montpellier 34060, France
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this work is to calibrate and validate an empirical approach to predict the date of occurrence of the grapevine phenology (budburst, flowering and veraison) temporally and spatially at the within-field scale. It is based on the collaboration between a classical model of phenology based on climate data and a spatial model calibrated with ancillary data of phenology observations. This approach was tested and validated on a field of cv Cabernet Sauvignon. Results showed that the spatial component improved the fit of the climatic model, allowing the generation of maps of the grapevine phenology with errors lower than 5 days of prediction. Spatio-temporal model errors were mainly associated with the temporal component of the model.

Keywords

within field variabilityVitis viniferahomogeneous management zonesmodelling
Type
Precision Horticulture and Viticulture
Information
Advances in Animal Biosciences , Volume 8 , Special Issue 2: Papers presented at the 11th European Conference on Precision Agriculture (ECPA 2017), John McIntyre Centre, Edinburgh, UK, July 16–20 2017 , July 2017 , pp. 534 - 539
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acevedo-Opazo, C, Tisseyre, B, Ojeda, H and Guillaume, S 2010. Spatial extrapolation of the vine (Vitis vinifera L.) water status: a first step towards a spatial prediction model. Irrigation Science 28 (2), 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acevedo-Opazo, C, Valdés-Gómez, H, Taylor, JA, Avalo, A, Verdugo-Vásquez, N, Araya, M and Tisseyre, B 2013. Assessment of an empirical spatial prediction model of vine water status for irrigation management in a grapevine field. Agricultural Water Management 124, 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chuine, I, García de Cortazar-Atauri, I, Kramer, K and Hänninen, H 2013. Plant Development Models. In MD Schwartz (Ed.), Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, pp. 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, BG 1995. Adoption of a system for identifying grapevine growth stages. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 1 (2), 104–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García de Cortázar-Atauri, I, Brisson, N and Gaudillere, JP 2009. Performance of several models for predicting budburst date of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). International Journal of Biometeorology 53 (4), 317–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mariani, L, Alilla, R, Cola, G, Monte, GD, Epifani, C, Puppi, G and Osvaldo, F 2013. IPHEN--a real-time network for phenological monitoring and modelling in Italy. International Journal of Biometeorology 57 (6), 881–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullins, MG, Bouquet, A and Williams, LE 1992. Biology of the Grapevine. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Parker, A, García de Cortázar-Atauri, I, Chuine, I, Barbeau, G, Bois, B, Boursiquot, J-M and van Leeuwen, C 2013. Classification of varieties for their timing of flowering and veraison using a modelling approach: A case study for the grapevine species Vitis vinifera L. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 180, 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdugo-Vásquez, N, Acevedo-Opazo, C, Valdés-Gómez, H, Araya-Alman, M, Ingram, B, García de Cortázar-Atauri, I and Tisseyre, B 2015a. Spatial variability of phenology in two irrigated grapevine cultivar growing under semi-arid conditions. Precision Agriculture 17, 217–245.Google Scholar
Verdugo-Vásquez, N, Acevedo-Opazo, C, Valdés-Gómez, H, Araya-Alman, M, Ingram, B, García de Cortázar-Atauri, I and Tisseyre, B 2015b. Variabilité spatiale de la phénologie de la vigne à l’ échelle intra-parcellaire: vers un modèle d’ extrapolation spatial. In Colloque francophone PHENOLOGIE 2015, Clermont-Ferrand, 17–19 November 2015, pp. 127–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar