Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:46:07.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring Kirsch and Moncrieff’s “response rate illusion”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic
Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic*
Affiliation:
School of Psychiatry, University of NSW, Kensington, NSW, Australia Black Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia
*
Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic Black Dog Institute Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia. Tel: +61 2 9382 3716; Fax: +61 2 9382 3712; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Statistically Speaking
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 38 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Blackwell Munksgaard

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kirsch, I, Moncrieff, J. Clinical trials and the response rate illusion. Contemp Clin Trials 2007;28:348–351. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadzi-Pavlovic, D. Effect sizes I: differences between means. Acta Neuropsychiatr 2007;19:318–320. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadzi-Pavlovic, D. Effect sizes II: differences between proportions. Acta Neuropsychiatr 2007;19:384–385. CrossRefGoogle Scholar