Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:47:29.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anxiety and styles of coping with occupational stress resulting from work with ‘dangerous’ prisoners in prison service officers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2015

Konstantinos Tsirigotis ,
Wojciech Gruszczyński  and
Sebastian Pęczkowski
Konstantinos Tsirigotis*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Piotrków Trybunalski Branch, Piotrków Trybunalski, Poland
Wojciech Gruszczyński
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Psychology, Social University of Sciences, Lodz, Poland
Sebastian Pęczkowski
Affiliation:
Remand Centre, Piotrków Trybunalski, Poland
*
Dr. Konstantinos Tsirigotis, Department of Psychology, Jan Kochanowski University, Piotrków Trybunalski Branch, Słowackiego 114/118 street, 97-300 Piotrków Trybunalski, Poland. Tel: (+48 44) 732 74 00 ext. 149; E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Prisoners categorised as ‘dangerous’ are a category of prisoners that require and/or force into using special measures of caution, protection and security. The aim of the study was to examine the intensity of anxiety (as a state and as a trait) experienced by officers working with ‘dangerous’ prisoners and styles of coping with stress they adopt.

Methods

A total of 40 officers working with ‘dangerous’ prisoners (the study group, SG) and 60 officers of the security department not working with ‘dangerous’ prisoners (the reference group, RG) were studied. The intensity of anxiety was assessed applying the Polish version of ‘State-Trait Anxiety Inventory’ (STAI); styles of coping with stress were explored employing the Polish version of ‘Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations’ (CISS) and the author’s own questionnaire. Data were analysed using the mean, standard deviation, difference testing (the Mann–Whitney U test), correlation–regression procedure (Kendall’s tau, τ correlation coefficient and forward stepwise multiple regression).

Results

Officers in the SG faced verbal and physical aggression; nevertheless, scores of officers in both the groups were within the interval of mean scores for all the studied STAI and CISS variables. Officers in the SG achieved significantly higher scores on the state-anxiety scale and the Emotion-Oriented Style (EOS), and lower scores on the Task-Oriented Style (TOS) and Social Diversion (SD). The correlation-regression procedure indicated that there were relationships between anxiety and styles of coping with stress but they differed slightly between the groups.

Conclusions

Officers in the SG feel state anxiety stronger and display a stronger preference for the EOS than officers in the RG. Officers in the RG more strongly prefer the TOS and SD. State anxiety is a variable negatively explaining the TOS in the SG, whereas anxiety as a trait is a variable explaining the EOS in both the groups. The coping styles of warders dealing with dangerous prisoners are different and may need specific psychological counselling and training programmes.

Keywords

anxietydangerous prisonersprison servicesecurity department officersstyles of coping with occupational stress
Type
Original Articles
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 27 , Supplement 5 , October 2015 , pp. 297 - 306
Check for updates
Copyright
© Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

1. Misis, M, Kim, B, Cheeseman, K, Hogan, NL, Lambert, EG. The impact of correctional officer perceptions of inmates on job stress. SAGE Open 2013:1–13; doi: 10.1177/2158244013489695.Google Scholar
2. Guo-Yuan, S, Shu, H, Wei, S, Yang, W, Li, L, Xiao-Shi, Y, Lie, W. Prevalence and associated factors of depressive symptoms among Chinese male correctional officers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2014;87:387–395.Google Scholar
3. Ghaddar, AH, Mateo, I, Sanchez, P. Occupational stress and mental health among correctional officers: a cross-sectional study. J Occup Health 2008;50:92–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Brough, P, Williams, J. Managing occupational stress in a high-risk industry: measuring the job demands of correctional officers. Crim Justice Behav 2007;34(4):555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Black, S. Correctional employee stress and strain. Corrections Today 2001;63:82–87.Google Scholar
6. Machel, H. Psychospołeczne uwarunkowania pracy resocjalizacyjnej personelu więziennego [Psychosocial conditions of resocialisation work of prison staff]. Gdańsk, Poland: UG, 2001 (in Polish).Google Scholar
7. Machel, H, Żerko, J. Zagrożenie personelu resocjalizacyjnego agresją w zakładach izolacyjnych [The threat of aggression against the resocialisation staff in isolation units]. Kraków, Poland: WSP, 1998 (in Polish).Google Scholar
8. Kaczmarek, A. Wybrane aspekty szkolenia zawodowego kadry penitencjarnej [Chosen aspects of professional training of penitentiary staff]. Kalisz, Poland: COSSW, 1998 (in Polish).Google Scholar
9. Jędrzejak, K. Konflikty w izolacji więziennej [Conflicts in prison isolation]. Kalisz, Poland: COSSW, 1996; (in Polish).Google Scholar
10. Lenczewska, H, Machel, H. Personel więzienny a zagadnienie patologii instytucji [Prison staff and the issue of institution pathology]. Bydgoszcz, Poland: WSP, 1995 (in Polish).Google Scholar
11. CIOSEK, M. Izolacja więzienna. Wybrane aspekty izolacji więziennej w percepcji więźniów i personelu [Prison isolation. Selected aspects of prison isolation in the perception of prisoners and staff]. Gdańsk, Poland: UG, 1993 (in Polish).Google Scholar
12. Przybyliński, S. Więźniowie „niebezpieczni”-ukryty świat penitencjarny [‘Dangerous’ Prisoners-the hidden penitentiary world]. Kraków, Poland: Impuls, 2012 (in Polish).Google Scholar
13. Johnson, S, Cooper, C, Cartwright, S, Donald, I, Taylor, P, Millet, C. The experience of work related stress across occupations. J Manag Psychol 2005;20:1–2.Google Scholar
14. Triplett, R, Mullings, JL, Scarborough, KE. Correctional officers: implications from organizational literature. J Crim Justice 1996;24(4):291–308.Google Scholar
15. Korczyński, M. Wybrane elementy sytuacji społecznej policjantów a sposoby radzenia sobie w sytuacjach trudnych [Selected elements of the social situation of police officers and ways of coping with difficult situations]. Lublin, Poland: UMCS, 2003 (in Polish).Google Scholar
16. Dowden, C, Tellier, C. Predicting work-related stress in correctional officers: a meta-analysis. J Crim Justice 2004;32:31–47.Google Scholar
17. Finney, C, Stergiopoulos, E, Hensel, J, Bonato, S, Dewa, CS. Organizational stressors associated with job stress and burnout in correctional officers: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2013;13:82; doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Bourbonnais, R. Work characteristics and health of correctional officers. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2005;53:127–142.Google Scholar
19. Przybyliński, S. Podkultura więzienna-wielowymiarowość rzeczywistości penitencjarnej [The prison subculture-the multidimensionality of penitentiary reality]. Kraków, Poland: Impuls, 2005 (in Polish).Google Scholar
20. Cooper, CL, Marshall, J. Occupational sources of stress: a review of the literature relating to coronary heart disease and mental ill health. J Occup Psychol 1976;49:11–28.Google Scholar
21. Cullen, FT, Link, BG, Wolfe, NT, Frank, J. The social dimensions of correctional officer stress. Justice Q 1985;2:505–533.Google Scholar
22. Selye, H. The stress of life. New York, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hill, 1956.Google Scholar
23. Heszen-Niejodek, I. Człowiek w sytuacji stresu. Problemy teoretyczne i metodologiczne [Man in the situation of stress. Theoretical and methodological problems]. Katowice, Poland: UŚ, 1996 (in Polish).Google Scholar
24. Lazarus, RS, Folkman, S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1984.Google Scholar
25. Ogińska-Bulik, N. Stres zawodowy w zawodach usług społecznych [Occupational stress in social service professions]. Warszawa, Poland: Difin, 2006 (in Polish).Google Scholar
26. Spielberger, CD. State-trait anxiety inventory: a comprehensive bibliography. Palo Alto, CA, USA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1989.Google Scholar
27. Sosnowski, T, Wrześniewski, K, Jaworowska, A, Fecenec, D. Inwentarz Stanu i Cechy Lęku STAI [State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI]. Warszawa, Poland: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego, 2011 (in Polish).Google Scholar
28. Endler, NS, Parker, JDA. Assessment of multidimensional coping: task, emotion and avoidance strategies. Psychol Assess 1994;6:50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Strelau, J, Jaworowska, A, Wrześniewski, K, Szczepaniak, P. CISS-Kwestionariusz Radzenia Sobie w Sytuacjach Stresowych [CISS-Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations]. Warszawa, Poland: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego, 2005 (in Polish).Google Scholar
30. Ogińska-Bulik, N, Juczyński, Z. Osobowość, stres a zdrowie [Personality, stress and health]. Warszawa, Poland: Difin, 2008 (in Polish).Google Scholar
31. Garbarino, S, Cuomo, G, Chiorri, C, Nicola Magnavita, N. Association of work-related stress with mental health problems in a special police force unit. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002791, doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002791.Google Scholar
32. Webster, JH. Police officer perceptions of occupational stress: the state of the art. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 2013;36:636–652.Google Scholar
33. StatSoft Polska. Statistica PL. Kraków, Poland: StatSoft, 2011.Google Scholar
34. Finn, P. Correctional officer stress: a cause for concern and additional help. Fed Probation 1998;62:65–75.Google Scholar
35. Adwell, S, Miller, L. Occupational burnout. Corrections Today 1985;47:70–72.Google Scholar
36. Cheek, F, Miller, M. The experience of stress for correction officers: a double-bind theory of correctional stress. J Crim Justice 1983;11:105–120.Google Scholar
37. Regan, S. Occupational stress and coping among Irish prison officers: an exploratory examination. Ireland (Galway-Sligo): Greenhouse Press, 2009.Google Scholar
38. Cieslak, R, Korczynska, J, Strelau, J, Kaczmarek, M. Burnout predictors among prison officers: the moderating effect of temperamental endurance. Pers Individ Dif 2008;45:666–672.Google Scholar
39. Biggam, FH, Power, KG, Macdonald, RR. Coping with the occupational stressors of police work: a study of Scottish Officers. Stress Med 1997;13:109–115.Google Scholar
40. Gacek, M. Aktywność fizyczna w stylu życia mężczyzn zatrudnionych w policji-z uwzględnieniem jej roli w redukcji stresu psychologicznego [Physical activity in the lifestyle of men employed in the police-with regard to its role in reducing psychological stress]. Problemy Higieny i Epidemiologii 2007;88:370–375 (in Polish).Google Scholar
41. Patterson, GT. Examining the effects of coping and social support on work and life stress among police officers. J Crim Justice 2003;31:215–226.Google Scholar
42. Borys, B, Majkowicz, M, Majkowicz, H. Radzenie sobie ze stresem w różnych grupach służb ratowniczych [Coping with stress in various groups of rescue services]. Psychiatria Polska 2003;2:337–348. (in Polish, with abstract in English).Google Scholar

Legislation

Regulation of the Minister of Justice of 31 October 2003 Concerning Methods of Protecting Prison Service Organizational Units.Google Scholar
Instruction No. 15/10 of the Director-General of the Prison Service of 13 August 2010.Google Scholar
Order No. 43/2010 of the Director-General of the Prison Service of 13 August 2010 on Determining Methods and Forms of Operation in the Area of Protecting Prison Service Organizational Units.Google Scholar