Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:49:55.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multifocal visual-evoked potentials in patients with schizophrenia during treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

Mariko Yamada ,
Eiichi Yukawa ,
Futoshi Taketani ,
Toyoaki Matsuura  and
Yoshiaki Hara
Mariko Yamada
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Hannan Hospital, Osaka, Japan Department of Ophthalmology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
Eiichi Yukawa*
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
Futoshi Taketani
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
Toyoaki Matsuura
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
Yoshiaki Hara
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
*
Eiichi Yukawa, Department of Ophthalmology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara-shi, Nara 634-8521, Japan. Tel: +81 744 223051; Fax: +81 744 238032; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Aim: Investigation of responses of multifocal visual-evoked potentials (mfVEPs) in schizophrenic patients under treatment in whom no abnormality was detected on the conventional perimetry.

Methods: Recordings of mfVEPs were performed in 31 schizophrenic patients and 30 normal subjects using a VERIS Junior Science recording apparatus (Mayo, Aichi, Japan). Responses from eight sites in each subject were divided into four quadrants (superior and inferior temporal quadrants, and superior and inferior nasal quadrants). In each quadrant, two response waves were grouped and averaged, and the latency and amplitude of main waveforms that appeared near 100 ms were evaluated.

Results: The peak latency was about 7–9 ms prolonged and the amplitude was reduced by about 2–5 nV/deg2 in the schizophrenic patient group compared to those in the normal subject group, and significant differences were noted in both parameters in all quadrants.

Conclusion: In schizophrenic patients under treatment with psychotropic agents, prolongation of the latency and amplitude reduction were noted in mfVEPs even though no abnormality was detected on the conventional perimetry.

Keywords

mental disordermultifocal visual-evoked potentialsperimetryschizophreniavisual field
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 31 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Halliday, AM, McDonald, WI, Mushin, J.Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis. Lancet 1972;1:982–985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Halliday, AM, Halliday, E, Kriss, A, McDonald, WI, Mushin, J.The pattern-evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways. Brain 1976;99:357–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Atkin, A, Bodis-Wollner, I, Podos, SM, Wolkstein, M, Mylin, L, Nitzberg, S.Flicker threshold and pattern VEP latency in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983;24:1524–1528.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Towle, VL, Moskowitz, A, Sokol, S, Schwartz, B.The visual evoked potential in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: effects of check size, field size, and stimulation rate. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983;24:175–183.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Jibiki, I, Takizawa, Y, Yamaguchi, N.Visual dysfunction in treated schizophrenia suggested by visual evoked potentials from pattern-reversal stimulation. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1991;241:61–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Fotiou, F, Fountoulakis, KN, Iacovides, A, Kaprinis, G.Pattern-reversed visual evoked potentials in subtypes of major depression. Psychiatry Res 2003;118:259–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Moore, NC.Visual evoked responses in Alzheimer's disease: a review. Clin Electroencephalogr 1997;28:137–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Sutter, EE. Multi-input VER and ERG analysis for objective perimetry. In: Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 7th Annual Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Chicago, 1985: 414–419.Google Scholar
9.Sutter, EE, Tran, D.The field topography of ERG components in man-I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res 1992;32:433–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Baseler, HA, Sutter, EE, Klein, SA, Carney, T.The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;90:65–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Hood, DC, Odel, JG, Zhang, X.Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: A multifocal VEP study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:4032–4038.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Watanabe, K, Shinoda, K, Kimura, I, Mashima, Y, Oguchi, Y, Ohde, H.Discordance between subjective perimetric visual fields and objective multifocal visual evoked potential-determined visual fields in patients with hemianopsia. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:295–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Yukawa, E, Kim, YJ, Ueda, T, Hara, Y.Case report of multiple sclerosis in which visual function was evaluated using multifocal visual evoked potentials. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2007;51:153–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Yukawa, E, Kim, YJ, Kawasaki, K, Taketani, F, Hara, Y.A child with epilepsy in whom multifocal VEPs facilitated the objective measurement of the visual field. Epilepsia 2005;46:577–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Yukawa, E, Matsuura, T, Kim, YJ, Nitta, N, Taketani, F, Hara, Y.Objective visual field evaluation using multifocal visual evoked potentials in patients with intracranial disease complicated by mental disorders. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2008;110:592–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Straumanis, JJ, Shagass, C, Roemer, RA.Influence of antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs on evoked potential correlates of psychosis. Biol Psychiatry 1982;17:1101–1122.Google ScholarPubMed
17.Klistorner, A, Graham, SL.Objective perimetry in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2000;107:2283–2299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Betsuin, Y, Mashima, Y, Ohde, H, Inoue, R, Oguchi, Y.Clinical application of the multifocal VEPs. Curr Eye Res 2001;22:54–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Seiple, W, Holopigian, K, Clemens, C, Greenstein, VC, Hood, DC.The multifocal visual evoked potential: An objective measure of visual fields? Vision Res 2005;45:1155–1163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Yukawa, E, Matsuura, T, Kim, YJ, Taketani, F, Hara, Y.Usefulness of multifocal VEP in a child requiring perimetry. Pediatr Neurol 2008;38:360–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar