Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:58:11.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lessons to be learnt from Freud; how to deal with the relations between somatic and mental processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

G.E.M. Panhuysen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In biological psychiatry, the biopsychosocial model is broadly supported. This does not mean a rejection of materialism, but of reductionism. Psychological (and social) psychiatry is deemed to be a necessary supplement to biological psychiatry.

This is one of the lessons made avalaible by Freud. In addition, there are other lessons to be taken from his work. From his view on the mind-body relationship a useful strategy for theory construction can be abstracted:

  1. specify the relevant (neuro)physiologiocal mechanims,

  2. specify the relevant mental mechanisms,

  3. look for that output of the neurophysiological mechanisms that can also serve as the input of the mental mechanisms, and conversely. Especially the third directive will be of use for adherents of the biopsychosocial model.

We may also learn from Freud's mistakes. He rightly used his interactionistic but non-dualistic arguments for the vindication of a relatively autonomous psychological psychiatry. However, he wrongly delayed biological-psychiatric tasks to an indefinite future.

Keywords

biopsychosocial modelmaterialismreductionismdualisminteractionismmind-body problempsychoanalysissexualityanorexia nervosabiopsychosociale modelmaterialismereductionismedualismeinteractionismelichaam-geestprobleempsychoanalyseseksualiteitanorexia nervosa
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 29 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literatuur

1.Hoofdakker, RH van den. Biologische concepten en strategieen. In: Albersnagel, FA, Emmelkamp, PMG, Hoofdakker, RH van den, red. Depressie. Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus, 1989: 67–86.Google Scholar
2.Sulloway, FJ. Freud, biologist of the mind. New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
3.Verbaten, MN. Freud's psychoanalyse in het licht van de moderne neurowetenschappen. Leiden: Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden, 1989.Google Scholar
4.Grünbaum, A. The foundations of psychoanalysis. Berkeley: Univ Cal Press, 1984.Google Scholar
5.Panhuysen, GEM, Terwee, SJS, red. Psychoanalyse en wetenschap. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, 1991.Google Scholar
6.Freud, S. Zur Kenntnis der cerebralen Diplegien des Kindesalters (im Anschluss an die Little'sche Krankheit). Wenen: Perles, 1893.Google Scholar
7.Panhuysen, GEM. Het ei van Freud; over de bijdrage van medische heuristieken aan geboorte en groei van de psychoanalyse. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1990.Google Scholar
8.Jackson, JH. On the anatomical and physiological localization of movements in the brain. In: Taylor, J, red. Selected Writings of John Hughlings Jackson. Vol. 1. Londen: Hodder & Stoughton, 1931 (1875): 52.Google Scholar
9. O.e., 41.Google Scholar
10. O.e., 41.Google Scholar
11.Conrat, F. Hermann von Helmholtz' psychologische Anschauungen. Halle: Niemeyer, 1904.Google Scholar
12.Freud, S. Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse. Studienausgabe, Band I. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer, 1969 (1916-1917): 68.Google Scholar
13. O.e., 80.Google Scholar
14.Freud, S. Das Unbewusste. Studienausgabe, Band III. Frankfurt am Main: S Fischer, 1975 (1915): 125–6.Google Scholar
15.Masson, JM, red. The complete letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess 1887-1904. Cambridge MAS: Belknap, 1985 (1895): 98–105.Google Scholar
16.Sulloway, FJ. Freud, biologist of the mind. New York: Basic Books, 1979: 104.Google Scholar
17.Freud, S. Triebe und Triebschicksale. Studienausgabe, Band III. Frankfurt am Main: S Fischer, 1975 (1915): 85.Google Scholar
18.Freud, S. Neue Vorlesungen zur Einfuhrung in die Psychoanalyse. Studienausgabe, Band I. Frankfurt am Main: S Fischer, 1969 (1933): 529.Google Scholar
19. O.e., 511.Google Scholar
20.Albersnagel, FA, Emmelkamp, PMG, Hoofdakker, RH van den, red. Depressie. Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus, 1989.Google Scholar
21.Panhuysen, GEM, Tuiten, JJA. Overpsychosomatiek en de dwang-buis van het reduetionisme. Metamedica 1988; 67: 150–62.Google Scholar
22.Tuiten, JJA, Panhuysen, GEM. Een interactionistisch altematief voor de psychosomatiek. Metamedica 1988; 67: 222–37.Google Scholar
23.Tuiten, JJA. Anorexia nervosa: een belast verleden, het verleden ontlast. Ned Tijdsch Psychol, 1988; 43, 43–54.Google Scholar
24.Tuiten, JJA, Panhuysen, GEM. Anorexia nervosa en de wisselwer-king tussen lichaam en geest. In: Draaisma, D, Vries, R de, red. Lichaam en geest in Psychologie en geneeskunde. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1989: 99–119.Google Scholar