Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:01:13.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dimensional models and neurobiology of personality disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

W. van den Brink
W. van den Brink*
Affiliation:
Academisch Medisch Centrum, Universiteit van Amsterdam, divisie Psychiatric Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research
*
AMC divisie Psychiatrie, Tafelbergweg 25, 1105 BC Amsterdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Since the introduction of a separate axis in DSM-III (1980), the validity of the categorical nature of the classification of personality disorders has been seriously questioned. Subsequently, a number of multidimensional alternatives have been proposed based on statistical procedures or theoretical considerations. At the same time, the study of the neurobiological underpinnings of personality and personality disorders has created a better understanding of etiological and pathogenetic processes responsible for these chronic disorders. The findings of these studies corroborate some of the major findings of statistical studies regarding the nature of the frequent comorbidity of axis II disorders. In the discussion, a mixed, two-tier diagnostic model is proposed to serve both scientific and clinical aims without the disadvantages of an exclusive choice for either categorical or dimensional approaches to the classification of personality pathology.

Keywords

Personality disorderclassificationtaxonomyneurobiologyPersoonlijkheidsstoornisclassificatietaxonomieneurobiologie
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 1 - 4
Copyright
Copyright © Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literatuur

1.Livesley, WJ, Schroeder, ML, Jackson, DN, Jang, KL. Categorical distinctions in the study of personality disorder. J abn Psychol 1994; 103: 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Siever, J. The new view of self: how genes and neurotransmitters shape your mind, your personality, and your mental health. New York: MacMillan, 1997.Google Scholar
3.Silk, KR, ed. Biology of personality disorders. Washington: APA Press, 1998.Google Scholar
4.Frances, A. Categorical and dimensional systems of personality diagnosis: A comparison. Compr Psychiat 1982: 23: 515–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Brink, W van den. Meting van DSM-III persoonlijkheidspathologie: betrouwbaarheid en validiteit van de SIDP-R en as II van de DSM-III. Groningen: RUG, 1989.Google Scholar
6.Westen, D. Divergences between clinical and research methods for assessing personality disorders: Implications for research and evaluation of Axis II. Am J Psychiat 1997; 154: 895–903.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Jong, CAJ de, Brink, W van den, Harteveld, FM, Wielen, EGM van der. Personality disorders in alcohol and drug addicts: Prevalence and validity of DSM-III personality disorders. Compr Psychiat 1993: 34; 87–94.Google Scholar
8.Pukrop, R, Herpertz, S, Sab, H, Steinmeyer, EM. Personality and personality disorders: A facet theoretical analysis of the similarity relationships. J Personal Disord 1998; 12: 226–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Siever, LJ, Davis, K. A psychobiologic perspective on the personality disorders. Am J Psychiat 1991; 148: 1674–78.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Livesley, WJ, Schroeder, ML. Dimensions of personality disorder: the DSM-III cluster. A diagnoses. J nerv ment Dis 1990; 178: 627–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.DeJong, CAJ, Brink, W van den, Jansen, JAM, Schippers, G. Interpersonal Aspects of DSM-III Axis II. Theoretical Hypotheses and Empirical Findings. J Personality Disord 1989;3:135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Widiger, TA, Trull, TJ. Personality and psychopathology: an application of the five-factor model. J Personality 1992; 60: 363–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Cloninger, CR, Svrakic, DM, Pryzbeck, TR. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch gen Psychiat 1993; 50: 975–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Coccaro, EF. Neurotransmitter functioning in personality disorders. In: Silk, KR, ed. Biology of personality disorders. Washington: APA Press, 1998: 1–26.Google Scholar
15.Siever, LJ, New, AS, Kirrane, R, Novotny, S, Koenigsberg, H, Grossman, R. New biological research strategies for personality disorders. In: Silk, KR, ed. Biology of personality disorders. Washington, APA Press, 1998: 27–62.Google Scholar
16.Maier, W, Franke, P, Hawellek, B. Family-genetic research strategies for personality disorders. J Personality Disord 1998: 262–76.Google Scholar
17.Cloninger, CR. The genetics and psychobiology of the seven-factor model of personality. In: Silk, KR, ed. Biology of personality disorders. Washington, APA Press, 1998: 63–92.Google Scholar
18.Paris, J. Social factors in personality disorders. New York: Cambridge Univ Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Links, PS, Heslegrave, R, Villella, J. Psychopharmacological management of personality disorders: An outcome focused model. In: Silk, KR, ed. Biology of personality disorders. Washington: APA Press, 1998: 93–128.Google Scholar
20.Praag, HM van. Two-tier diagnosing in psychiatry. Psychiat Res 1990: 34: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Verheul, R. Classificatie en differentiële diagnostiek (bij de borderline persoonlijkheidsstoornis). In: Tilburg, W van, Brink, W van den, Arnts, A, eds. Behandelingsstrategieen bij de borderline persoonlijkheidsstoornis. Houten/Diegem: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, 1998.Google Scholar