Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:29:01.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age-related cognitive decline and the borderland between normal aging and dementia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

J. Jolles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is now generally agreed that healthy individuals are characterized by cognitive decline during the later decades of adult life. The acquisition of new information becomes less efficient, which, coupled with a diminished retention of this information for later use, results in substantially poorer memory performance. The ability to plan new activities, solve problems and make complex decisions, as well as cognitive flexibility is noticeably diminished. In addition, attentional processes appear to be invariably poorer in old subjects than in young subjects (for review). While it is quite clearly established that elderly subjects (i.e. after 65 years of age) show a deterioration of cognitive functioning, there is also evidence that this deterioration may start in middle age (40 years). There is large individual variance in age groups; for instance, some old individuals perform on many neurocognitive tests as well as young individuals do. Rowe and Kahn proposed in their influential article to discern between successful aging and usual aging. Successful aging would be due to the effect of chronological age, whereas additional factors would be responsible for usual aging. An important point is the nature of the borderland between usual cognitive aging and pathological conditions such as dementia. Various health-related factors are thought to be important in this respect. They may be a determinant for the transition between successful aging to normal aging and into the borderland with dementia. The Brain & Behavior Research Institute in Maastricht investigates the determinants of successful and pathological aging in a number of related and multidisciplinary projects. This paper describes some major findings of this research programme and gives a theory on the interaction of vulnerability factors and protective factors in their effect on cognitive aging.

Keywords

Agecognitiondementia
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 94 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature

1.Jolles, J, Verhey, FRJ, Riedel, WJ, et al.Cognitive Impairment in elderly people: predisposing factors and implications for experimental drug studies. Drugs Aging 1995;7:459–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Birren, JE, Warner Schaie, KW, eds. Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, 3rd ed. New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990.Google Scholar
3.Rowe, J W, Kahn, RL. Human aging: usual and successful. Science 1987;237:143–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Jolies, J, Houx, PJ, Boxtel, MPJ van, et al.The Maastricht Aging Study: Determinants of cognitive aging. Maastricht: Neuropsych Pubi, 1995.Google Scholar
5.Houx, PJ, Vreeling, FW, Jolles, J. Rigorous health screening reduces age effect on memory scanning task. Brain Cognition 1991; 15: 246–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Houx, PJ, Jolles, J. Age-related decline of psychomotor speed: Effects of age, brain health, sex and education. Percept Mot Skills 1993;76:195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Jolles, J, Houx, PJ, Vreeling, FW, et al.Cognitive aging, biological life events and primitive reflexes. Neurosci Res Comm 1993; 13: S47–50.Google Scholar
8.Klein, M. Cognitive aging, attention and mild traumatic brain injury. Maastricht: Neuropsych Pubi, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Dijkstra, JB. An operation under general anaesthesia and cognitive aging. Maastricht: Neuropsych Pubi, 1997.Google Scholar
10.Verhey, FRJ, Jolles, J, Ponds, RWHM, et al.Diagnosing dementia: a comparison between a mono-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary approach. J Neuropsychiat clin Neurosci 1993;5:78–85.Google Scholar
11.Satz, P. Brain reserve capacity on symptom onset after brain injury: A formulation and review of evidence for threshold theory. Neuropsychol 1993;7:273–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar