Element contents
Wittgenstein on Religious Belief
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 January 2023
Summary
Wittgenstein published next to nothing on the philosophy of religion and yet his conception of religious belief has been both enormously influential and hotly contested. In the contemporary literature, Wittgenstein has variously been labelled a fideist, a non-cognitivist and a relativist of sorts. This Element shows that all of these readings are misguided and seriously at odds, not just with what Wittgenstein says about religious belief, but with his entire later philosophy. This Element also argues that Wittgenstein presents us with an important 'third way' of understanding religious belief – one that does not fall into the trap of either assimilating religious beliefs to ordinary empirical or scientific beliefs or seeking to reduce them to the expression of certain attitudes.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009276061Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 02 February 2023
References
Amesbury, R. (2022). Fideism. The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Summer 2022 Edition), Zalta, E. N. (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/fideism.Google Scholar
Andrejc, G. and Weiss, D., eds. (2019). Interpreting Interreligious Relations with Wittgenstein: Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Asad, T. (2020). Thinking about Religion through Wittgenstein. Critical Times 3 (3), 403–42.Google Scholar
Barth, K. (2003). Church Dogmatics vol. 1. Bromiley, G. W. and Torrance, T. F. (eds.). London and New York: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Burley, M. (2008). Phillips and Eternal Life: A Response to Haldane. Philosophical Investigations 31 (3), 237–51.Google Scholar
Burley, M. (2012). Wittgenstein, Religion and the Rejection of Metaphysics. Conference contribution. https://bit.ly/3ElAccb.Google Scholar
Burley, M. (2018). Wittgenstein and the Study of Religion: Beyond Fideism and Atheism. In Burley, M. (ed.), Wittgenstein, Religion and Ethics: New Perspectives from Philosophy and Theology. London: Bloomsbury, 49–76.Google Scholar
Clack, B. (1996). Wittgenstein and Expressive Theories of Religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40 (1), 47–61.Google Scholar
Clack, B. (1999). An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Religion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Coliva, A. (2010). Moore and Wittgenstein: Scepticism, Certainty, and Common Sense. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Coliva, A. (2015). Extended Rationality: A Hinge Epistemology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cottingham, J. (2009). Wittgenstein, Religion and Analytic Philosophy. In Glock, H.-J. and Hyman, J. (eds.), Wittgenstein and Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 203–27.Google Scholar
Diamond, C. (2005). Wittgenstein on Religious Belief: The Gulfs Between Us. In Phillips, D. Z. and von der Ruhr, M. (eds.), Religion and Wittgenstein’s Legacy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 99–138.Google Scholar
Drury, M. O’C. (1981). Some Notes on Conversations with Wittgenstein. In Rhees, R. (ed.), Recollections of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, G. (2014). Wittgenstein and Natural Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. (2007). Philosophy, Death and Immortality. Philosophical Investigations 30 (3), 245–65.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. (2008). Phillips and Eternal Life: A Response to Mikel Burley. Philosophical Investigations 31 (3), 252–60.Google Scholar
Holmer, P. (2012). Selected Essays. Barrett, L. and Gouwens, D. (eds.). Cambridge: The Lutterworth Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, J. (2001). The Gospel according to Wittgenstein. In Addis, M. and Arrington, R. L. (eds.), Wittgenstein and Philosophy of Religion. London: Routledge, 1–11.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1980). Sickness unto Death. Hong, H. and Hong, E. (eds. and trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1985). Philosophical Fragments. Hong, H. and Hong, E. (eds. and trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1991). Practice in Christianity. Hong, H. and Hong, E. (eds. and trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1992). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments. Hong, H. and Hong, E. (eds. and trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1998). The Book on Adler. Hong, H. and Hong, E. (eds. and trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kusch, M. (2011). Disagreement and Picture in Wittgenstein’s Lectures on Religious Belief. In Heinrich, R., Nemeth, E., Pichler, W. and Wagner, David. (eds.), Image and Imaging in Philosophy, Science and the Arts. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos, 35–57.Google Scholar
Kusch, M. (2012). Wittgenstein and the Epistemology of Peer Disagreement. https://bit.ly/3V5s5WV.Google Scholar
Law, S. (2017). Wittgensteinian Accounts of Religious Belief: Non-Cognitivist, Juicer, and Atheist-Minus. European Journal of Philosophy 25 (4), 1186–207.Google Scholar
LePoidevin, R. (2021). Religious Conversion and Loss of Faith: Cases of Personal Paradigm Shift? Sophia 60 (3), 551–66.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, F. (2001). Religion within the Limits of Language Alone: Wittgenstein on Philosophy and Religion. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. (1993). Wittgenstein: A Religious Point of View? New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, A. (2003). Realism and Christian Faith: God, Grammar, and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, P. K. (2013). God and Evidence: A Cooperative Approach. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (2), 47–61.Google Scholar
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2004). Understanding Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mulhall, S. (2001). Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Religion. In Phillips, D. Z. and Tessin, T. (eds.), Philosophy of Religion in the 21st Century. New York: Palgrave, 95–118.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. (2000). Religious Belief as Properly Basic. In Davies, B. (ed.), Philosophy of Religion: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 42–94.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. (2014). Entitlement and the Groundlessness of our Believing. In Dodd, D. and Zardini, E. (eds.), Scepticism and Perceptual Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 190–212.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. (2021). Sceptical Fideism and Quasi-Fideism. Manuscrito, 44 (4), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. (2022). Exploring Quasi-Fideism. In Moyal-Sharrock, D. and Sandis, C. (eds.), Extending Hinge Epistemology. London: Anthem.Google Scholar
Rhees, R. (2001). On Religion: Notes on Four Conversations with Wittgenstein. Faith and Philosophy 18 (4), 409–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridley, A. (2004). The Philosophy of Music: Theme and Variation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2007). A Confusion of the Spheres: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein on Philosophy and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2013). Kierkegaard and the Tractatus. In Sullivan, P. and Potter, M. (eds.), Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: History and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 59–75.Google Scholar
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2014). Wittgenstein and the ‘Factorization Model’ of Religious Belief. European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 6 (1), 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2016a). ‘Hinge Propositions’ and the ‘Logical’ Exclusion of Doubt. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 6 (2–3), 165–81.Google Scholar
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2018a). ‘Meaning-Dawning’ in Wittgenstein’s Notebooks: A Kierkegaardian Reading and Critique. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (3), 540–56.Google Scholar
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2018b). On the Very Idea of a Theodicy. In Burley, M. (ed.), Wittgenstein, Religion and Ethics: New Perspectives from Philosophy and Theology. London: Bloomsbury, 93–112.Google Scholar
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2021). ‘Logical’ and ‘Epistemic’ Uses of ‘to Know’ or ‘Hinges’ as Logical Enabling Conditions. In Kyriacou, C. and Wallbridge, K. (eds.), Sceptical Invariantism Reconsidered. London: Routledge, 235–52.Google Scholar
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (in press). An Equation Entirely Unlike Any of the Familiar Curves: Wittgenstein on the Grammar of God and the Meaning of Religious Language. In Sievers, M. and Suleiman, F. (eds.), The Grammar of God: Jewish, Christian and Islamic Perspectives. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Sievers, M. and Suleiman, F. (eds.) (in press). The Grammar of God: Jewish, Christian and Islamic Perspectives. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. and Weiss, D. (eds.) (2020). Scripture and Religious Violence. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, R. (2001). Philosophical Theism. In Phillips, D. Z. and Tessin, T. (eds.), Philosophy of Religion in the 21st Century. New York: Palgrave, 3–20.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. (2016). The Coherence of Theism, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, R. (2014). The Edge of Words: God and the Habits of Language. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Winch, P. (1995). The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Ogden, C. K. (trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2004). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. trans. B. F. McGuinness and D. F. Pears. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1966). Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief. Barrett, C. (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright (eds.), G. H., Anscombe, G. E. M. and Paul, D. (trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1977). Culture and Value. von Wright, G. H. (ed.), Winch, P. (trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1998). Culture and Value, revised edition. von Wright, G. H. (ed.), Winch, P. (trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1984). Notebooks 1914–16, 2nd ed. von Wright, G. H. and Anscombe, G. E. M. (eds.), Anscombe, G. E. M. (trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations, 4th ed. Hacker, P. M. S. and Schulte, J. (ed.), Anscombe, G. E. M., Hacker, P. M. S. and Schulte, J. (trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2016). Lectures. Cambridge 1930–33. Stern, D. G., Rogers, B. and Citron, G. (eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2018). Remarks on Frazer’s Bough, Golden. da Col, G. and. Palmié, S. (eds.), Palmié, S. (trans.). Chicago: Hau Books.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2004a). On Epistemic Entitlement: Warrant for Nothing (and Foundations for Free)? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 78 (1), 167–212.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2004b). Wittgensteinian Certainties. In McManus, Denis (ed.), Wittgenstein and Scepticism. London: Routledge, 22–55.Google Scholar
- 9
- Cited by