Element contents
Tip-toeing through the Tulips with Congress
How Congressional Attention Constrains Covert Action
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 January 2025
Summary
Over the years, the US has intervened covertly in many countries to remove dictators, subvert elected leaders, and support coups. Explanations for this focus on characteristics of target countries or strategic incentives to pursue regime change. This Element provides an account of domestic political factors constraining US presidents' authorization of covert foreign-imposed regime change operations (FIRCs), arguing that congressional attention to covert action alters the Executive's calculus by increasing the political costs associated with this secretive policy instrument. It shows that congressional attention is the result of institutional battles over abuses of executive authority and has a significant constraining effect independent of codified rules and partisan disputes. These propositions are tested using content analysis of the Congressional Record, statistical analysis of Cold War covert FIRCs, and causal-process evidence relating to covert interventions in Chile, Angola, Central America, Afghanistan, etc.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009598019Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 30 January 2025
References
Abadie, Alberto, Athey, Susan, Imbens, Guido W, and Wooldridge, Jeffrey (2017). When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A (1956). Public opinion and national security policy. Public Opinion Quarterly 20(2), 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronsson-Storrier, Marie (2020). Publicity in international lawmaking: Covert operations and the use of force. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakrishnan, Nandita N (2020). Where Have All the Coups Gone? Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Barkawi, Tarak (2015). Scientific decay. International Studies Quarterly 59(4), 827–829.Google Scholar
Barrett, David (2005). The CIA and Congress: The untold story from Truman to Kennedy. University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew A and Groeling, Tim (2009). Shot by the messenger: Partisan cues and public opinion regarding national security and war. Political Behavior 31(2), 157–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Daniel, Easterly, William, Nunn, Nathan, and Satyanath, Shanker (2013). Commercial imperialism? Political influence and trade during the Cold War. American Economic Review 103(2), 863–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biddle, Stephen, Friedman, Jeffrey A, and Long, Stephen (2012). Civil war intervention and the problem of Iraq. International Studies Quarterly 56(1), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Sarah, Goldgeier, James, and Saunders, Elizabeth N (2024, July). The Imperial Presidency Unleashed. Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
Boucher, Vincent and Gagnon, Frédérick (2024). Partisanship and congressional intelligence oversight: The case of the Russia inquiries, 2017–2020. Intelligence and National Security 39(1), 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brands, William J (1969). Intelligence and foreign policy: Dilemmas of a democracy. Foreign Affairs 47(2), 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Mesquita, Bueno, Bruce, and Downs, George W (2006). Intervention and democracy. International Organization 60(3), 627–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnegie, Allison and Carson, Austin (2020). Secrets in global governance: Disclosure dilemmas and the challenge of international cooperation, Volume 154. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, David B and Signorino, Curtis S (2010). Back to the future: Modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis 18(3), 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafetz, Josh (2017). Congress’s constitution: Legislative authority and the separation of powers. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Charlton, Linda (1975, June). Nedzi’s Critic to Head C.I.A. Inquiry. The New York Times.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S (2009). Measuring ideological polarization on the United States supreme court. Political Research Quarterly 62(1), 146–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colaresi, Michael P (2014). Democracy declassified: The secrecy dilemma in national security. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee on Foreign Affairs House of Representatives (1987). Possible violation or circumvention of the Clark Amendment. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Africa, One Hundredth Congress, first session, Wednesday, July 1.Google Scholar
Cormac, Rory and Aldrich, Richard J (2018). Grey is the new black: Covert action and implausible deniability. International Affairs 94(3), 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormac, Rory, Walton, Calder, and Van Puyvelde, Damien (2022). What constitutes successful covert action? Evaluating unacknowledged interventionism in foreign affairs. Review of International Studies 48(1), 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, Jane Kellett (2006, January). “Just cause” or just politics?: U.S. Panama invasion and standardizing qualitative tests for diversionary war. Armed Forces & Society 32(2), 178–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Mark (1987). Glenn asks Reagan to halt Pakistan aid pending review of nuclear programs. Science 235(4794), 1321–1321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cumming, Alfred (2011, April). Sensitive Covert Action Notifications: Oversight Options for Congress. Archive Location: United States Publisher: Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Dallek, Robert (1998). Flawed giant: Lyndon Johnson and his times, 1961–1973. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Graeme AM and Johns, Robert (2013). Audience costs among the British public: The impact of escalation, crisis type, and prime ministerial rhetoric. International Studies Quarterly 57(4), 725–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLaet, C James and Scott, James M (2006). Treaty-making and partisan politics: Arms control and the US senate, 1960–2001. Foreign Policy Analysis 2(2), 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinges, John (1990). Our man in Panama: How General Noriega Used the United States and made millions in drugs and arms. Random House Incorporated.Google Scholar
Downes, Alexander B and O’Rourke, Lindsey A (2016). You can’t always get what you want: Why foreign-imposed regime change seldom improves interstate relations. International Security 41(2), 43–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N, Peterson, Erik, and Slothuus, Rune (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review 107(1), 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durbin, Brent (2017). The CIA and the politics of US intelligence reform. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eason, Thomas, Daddow, Oliver, and Cormac, Rory (2020). From secrecy to accountability: The politics of exposure in the Belgrano affair. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22(3), 542–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, George C (2006). On deaf ears: The limits of the bully pulpit. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Engelberg, Stephen (1989, October). Reagan Agreed to Prevent Noriega Death. The New York Times.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D (1994). Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review 88(3), 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felten, Peter Gerhard (1995). The 1965–1966 United States Intervention in the Dominican Republic. Ph. D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin O (2002). Another look at “parties, voters, and the use of force abroad.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(4), 572–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Linda L (2015). Watchdogs on the hill: The decline of congressional oversight of US foreign relations. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Foyle, Douglas C (1997). Public opinion and foreign policy: Elite beliefs as a mediating variable. International Studies Quarterly 41(1), 141–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Edward and Thomas, M. & Weisband, (1979). Foreign Policy by Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedberg, Aaron L (2000). In the shadow of the garrison state: America’s anti-statism and its Cold War grand strategy. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrichs, Gordon M and Tama, Jordan (2022). Polarization and US foreign policy: Key debates and new findings. International Politics 59(5), 767–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froio, Caterina, Bevan, Shaun, and Jennings, Will (2017). Party mandates and the politics of attention: Party platforms, public priorities and the policy agenda in Britain. Party Politics 23(6), 692–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara, Wright, Joseph, and Frantz, Erica (2014). Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new data set. Perspectives on Politics 12(2), 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, Kelly, Bryan, and Taddy, Matt (2019). Text as data. Journal of Economic Literature 57(3), 535–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John (2006). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleijeses, Piero (2013). Visions of freedom: Havana, Washington, Pretoria, and the struggle for Southern Africa, 1976–1991. UNC Press Books.Google Scholar
Goldman, Minton F (1992). President Bush and Afghanistan: A turning point in American policy. Comparative Strategy 11(2), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, Joanne (1998). Politics at the water’s edge: Parties, voters, and the use of force abroad. International Organization 52(2), 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Peter (2020). The politics of American foreign policy: How ideology divides liberals and conservatives over foreign affairs. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Guisinger, Alexandra and Saunders, Elizabeth N (2017). Mapping the boundaries of elite cues: How elites shape mass opinion across international issues. International Studies Quarterly 61(2), 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Melinda (2023). Origins of oversight: Covert action amendments to the national security act of 1947. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 36(4), 1297–1318.Google Scholar
Haines, Gerald K (2004). Looking for a rogue elephant: The Pike Committee investigations and the CIA. In Chauhan, S. (Ed.), Inside CIA: Lessons in Intelligence, pp. 272–283. APH Publishing.Google Scholar
Hampson, Fen Osler (1984). The divided decision-maker: American domestic politics and the Cuban crises. International Security 9(3), 130–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Robert M and Jack Smith, Russell (1993). Richard Helms as Director of Central Intelligence 1966–1973. History Staff, Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency.Google Scholar
Hayes, Jarrod (2012). Securitization, social identity, and democratic security: Nixon, India, and the ties that bind. International Organization 66(1), 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, David and Goshko, John M. (1989, October). Administration Sought Funds Last Spring for Covert Action. Washington Post.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R (1992). Public opinion and foreign policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann consensus. International studies quarterly 36(4), 439–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Ole R (2004). Public opinion and American foreign policy. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Lise Morjé and Stark, Alexandra (2018). How civil wars end: The international system, norms, and the role of external actors. International Security 42(3), 127–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, William G and Pevehouse, Jon C (2007). While dangers gather: Congressional checks on presidential war powers. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Tyler (2018). Assessing minority party influence on partisan issue attention in the US house of representatives, 1989–2012. Party Politics 24(2), 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, Gyung-Ho and Quirk, Paul J (2019). Division at the water’s edge: The polarization of foreign policy. American Politics Research 47(1), 58–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Loch K (1989). Covert action and accountability: Decision-making for America’s secret foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly 33(1), 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Loch K (2005). Accountability and America’s secret foreign policy: Keeping a legislative eye on the Central Intelligence Agency. Foreign Policy Analysis 1(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Loch K (2017). Spy watching: Intelligence accountability in the United States. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D and Baumgartner, Frank R (2004). Representation and agenda setting. Policy Studies Journal 32(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Michael F and Poznansky, Michael (2018). Media technology, covert action, and the politics of exposure. Journal of Peace Research 55(3), 320–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D (2009). Power, the state, and sovereignty: Essays on international relations. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, Sarah (2010). Elite consensus as a determinant of alliance cohesion: Why public opinion hardly matters for NATO-led operations in Afghanistan. Foreign Policy Analysis 6(3), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, Sarah and Das, Debak (2017). Warring from the virtual to the real: Assessing the public’s threshold for war over cyber security. Research & Politics 4(2), 2053168017715930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, Douglas and Schickler, Eric (2018). The resilience of separation of powers? Congress and the Russia investigation. Presidential Studies Quarterly 48(3), 436–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L (2010). After the Rubicon: Congress, presidents, and the politics of waging war. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L (2018). Congress, public opinion, and an informal constraint on the commander-in-chief. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 20(1), 52–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A and Trubowitz, Peter L (2007). Dead center: The demise of liberal internationalism in the United States. International Security 32(2), 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, Alan J (1999). The stinger missile and US intervention in Afghanistan. Political Science Quarterly 114(2), 219–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, Alan J (2008). The moral hazard of humanitarian intervention: Lessons from the Balkans. International Studies Quarterly 52(1), 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Corey and Pearson-Merkowitz, Shanna (2015). Partisan sorting in the United States, 1972–2012: New evidence from a dynamic analysis. Political Geography 48, 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, William M (1984). The Central Intelligence Agency: History and documents. University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E (2009). Beyond ideology: Politics, principles, and partisanship in the US Senate. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances E (2016). Insecure majorities: Congress and the perpetual campaign. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, Genevieve (2015). When should state secrets stay secret?: Accountability, democratic governance, and intelligence. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, Genevieve and Leith Jones, Frank (2021). Reaching the inflection point: The Hughes-Ryan Amendment and intelligence oversight. In National security intelligence and ethics, pp. 201–215. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Dov H (2016). When the great power gets a vote: The effects of great power electoral interventions on election results. International Studies Quarterly 60(2), 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey B, Poole, Keith, Rosenthal, Howard, et al. (2019). Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. See https://voteview.com/.Google Scholar
Lindsay, James M (1994). Congress and the politics of US foreign policy. JHU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Lilliana (2015). “I disrespectfully agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science 59(1), 128–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R (2000). Electoral realignments. Annual Review of Political Science 3(1), 449–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D and Schwartz, Thomas (1984). Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science 28(1), 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFaul, Michael (1989). Rethinking the “Reagan doctrine” in Angola. International Security 14(3), 99–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen V and Tingley, Dustin (2015). Sailing the water’s edge: The domestic politics of American foreign policy. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Christopher (2015). Turning against the CIA: Whistleblowers during the “time of troubles.” History 100(340), 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, Daniel Patrick (1998). Secrecy: The American experience. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Murdie, Amanda and Peksen, Dursun (2014). The impact of human rights INGO shaming on humanitarian interventions. The Journal of Politics 76(1), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noel, Hans (2012). The coalition merchants: The ideological roots of the civil rights realignment. The Journal of Politics 74(1), 156–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Rourke, Lindsey A (2018). Covert regime change: America’s secret Cold War. Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I and Shapiro, Robert Y (2010). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Peck, Justin C and Jenkins, Jeffery A (2020). The “flip-side” of delegation: Examining congressional reassertion efforts. In Carson, J. L. and Lynch, M. S. (Eds.), New directions in Congressional politics, pp. 251–273. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peksen, Dursun (2011). Foreign military intervention and women’s rights. Journal of Peace Research 48(4), 455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Roger D (2011). Western intervention in the Balkans: The strategic use of emotion in conflict. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Jeffrey and Kisangani, Emizet F (2009). The international military intervention dataset: An updated resource for conflict scholars. Journal of Peace Research 46(4), 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poznansky, Michael (2015). Stasis or decay? Reconciling covert war and the democratic peace. International Studies Quarterly 59(4), 815–826.Google Scholar
Poznansky, Michael (2020). In the shadow of international law: Secrecy and regime change in the postwar world. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poznansky, Michael, Downes, Alexander B, and O’Rourke, Lindsey A (2017). Friends, foes, and foreign-imposed regime change. International Security 42(2), 191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prados, John (2003). Lost crusader: The secret wars of CIA Director William Colby. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, Kevin M, Monroe, Burt L, Colaresi, Michael, H Crespin, Michael, and Radev, Dragomir R (2010). How to analyze political attention with minimal assumptions and costs. American Journal of Political Science 54(1), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rielly, John E. (1975). American Public Opinion and U.S. foreign policy, 1975. Chicago Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Tinto, Rio, Daniel, (2017). Tracing the security dilemma in civil wars: How fear and insecurity can lead to intra-state violence. Ph. D. thesis, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas (1991). Public opinion, domestic structure, and foreign policy in liberal democracies. World politics 43(4), 479–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Margaret E, Stewart, Brandon M, and Tingley, Dustin (2019). Stm: An R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software 91(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, David W (1991). Parties and leaders in the postreform House. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross-Nazzal, Jennifer (2010). Détente on Earth and in space: The Apollo-Soyuz test project. Organization of American Historians Magazine of History 24(3), 29–34.Google Scholar
Saunders, Elizabeth N (2009). Transformative choices: Leaders and the origins of intervention strategy. International Security 34(2), 119–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, Elizabeth N (2012). The electoral disconnection in US foreign policy. In APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper.Google Scholar
Saunders, Elizabeth N (2015). War and the inner circle: Democratic elites and the politics of using force. Security Studies 24(3), 466–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, Elizabeth N (2024). The insiders’ game: How elites make war and peace, Volume 207. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schickler, Eric (2016). Racial realignment: The transformation of American liberalism, 1932–1965. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A (2001). Democracy and coercive diplomacy, Volume 76. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seawright, Jason (2016). Multi-method social science: Combining qualitative and quantitative tools. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara (2014, December). Congressional realignment, 1925–1978. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Gregory L (2019). Secret but constrained: The impact of elite opposition on covert operations. International Organization 73(3), 685–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack, Shapiro, Robert Y, and Bloch-Elkon, Yaeli (2009). Free hand abroad, divide and rule at home. World Politics 61(1), 155–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tama, Jordan (2020). Forcing the president’s hand: How the US congress shapes foreign policy through sanctions legislation. Foreign Policy Analysis 16(3), 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tama, Jordan (2024). Bipartisanship and US foreign policy: Cooperation in a polarized age. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Theoharis, Athan G, Immerman, Richard H, Olmsted, Kathryn, and Prados, John (2005). The Central Intelligence Agency: Security under scrutiny. Bloomsbury Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touchton, Michael R, Klofstad, Casey A, West, Jonathan P, and Uscinski, Joseph E (2020, January). Whistleblowing or leaking? Public opinion toward Assange, Manning, and Snowden. Research & Politics 7(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Congress Senate Committee on Foreign Relations (1960, May 27). Events Incident to the Summit Conference: Hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, Eighty-Sixth Congress, Second Session. U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Weeks, Jessica L (2008). Autocratic audience costs: Regime type and signaling resolve. International Organization 62(1), 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, Herbert F (2002). The party in the electorate as a basis for more responsible parties. Responsible Partisanship, 161–179.Google Scholar
Wells, Matthew S and Ryan, Timothy J (2018). Following the party in time of war? The implications of elite consensus. International Interactions 44(5), 919–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westad, Odd Arne (2005). The global Cold War: Third World interventions and the making of our times. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas J (2000). Saving strangers: Humanitarian intervention in international society. OUP Oxford.Google Scholar
Wittkopf, Eugene R (1990). Faces of internationalism: Public opinion and American foreign policy. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C (2020). Realism and great power subversion. International Relations 34(4), 459–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zegart, Amy and Quinn, Julie (2010). Congressional intelligence oversight: The electoral disconnection. Intelligence and National Security 25(6), 744–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zegart, Amy B (2000). Flawed by design: The evolution of the CIA, JCS, and NSC. Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zegart, Amy B (2011). The domestic politics of irrational intelligence oversight. Political Science Quarterly 126(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zegart, Amy B (2013). Eyes on spies: Congress and the United States intelligence community. Hoover Press.Google Scholar