Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:12:01.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Ancient Philosophy

Stoic Eros

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2024

Simon Shogry
Simon Shogry
Affiliation:
Brasenose College, University of Oxford

Summary

The Stoics distinguish two forms of eros. In vicious agents eros is indeed a passion and thus born out of a defective rational judgment about what is needed for happiness. But there is also a positive form of erotic love, practiced by the Sage on the basis of knowledge, which aims to reproduce his virtuous condition in others. In this Element, the author shows how the Stoics' wider theoretical commitments in ethics, epistemology, aesthetics, and psychology support their duplex account of eros. They also consider the influence of Plato's Symposium on the Stoic account, arguing for hitherto unrecognized links with Socratic moral psychology. The Element concludes with an assessment of how the Stoic erotic ideal fares in relation to our intuitions about the non-egoistic and particularized nature of love.
Get access

Keywords

Plato SymposiumStoic loveStoic emotionStoic moral psychologyerotic expertise
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Ancient Philosophy
Online ISBN: 9781009039277
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 15 February 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnim, J. von (1903). Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. Leipzig: Teubner. [SVF]Google Scholar
Bastianini, G. and Sedley, D. (1995). Commentarium in Platonis “Theaetetum.” Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, 3, 227–562. [Anonymous Commentary on the Theaetetus]Google Scholar
Bett, R. (2010). Beauty and Its Relation to Goodness in Stoicism. In Nightingale, A. and Sedley, D., eds., Ancient Models of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–52.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1998). Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. and Shogry, S. (2020). Stoic Logic and Multiple Generality. Philosophers’ Imprint, 20(31), 1–36.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (1998). Eros in Government: Zeno and the Virtuous City. Classical Quarterly, 48(1), 168–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2007). Physiognomy and Ancient Psychological Theory. In Swain, S., ed., Seeing the Face, Seeing the Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–124.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (1998). The Old Stoic Theory of Emotions. In Sihvola, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T., eds., The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 21–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, T. (2005). The Stoic Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisson, L. (2006). Agathon, Pausanias and Diotima in Plato’s Symposium. In Lesher, J., Nails, D., and Sheffield, F., eds., Plato’s Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies, pp. 229–51.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2002). Non-Rational Perception in the Stoics and Augustine. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 22, 253–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Čelkytė, A. (2020). The Stoic Theory of Beauty. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Chadwick, H. (1980). Origen, Contra Celsum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (1976). Plutarch: Moralia, Volume XIII, Part II. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Collette-Dučić, B. (2014). Making Friends: The Stoic Conception of Love and Its Platonic Background. In Stern-Gillet, S. and Gurtler, G. M., eds., Ancient and Medieval Concepts of Friendship. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 87–116.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (1999). The Unity of Virtue. In Cooper, Reason and Emotion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 76–117.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (2005). The Emotional Life of the Wise. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 43(S1), 176–218.Google Scholar
Dancy, J. (2017). Moral Particularism. In E. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/moral-particularism/.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. (1984). Galen: De Placitis Hippocratis et Platonis. Berlin: De Gruyter. [PHP]Google Scholar
Delattre, D. (2007). Philodème de Gadara, Sur la Musique Livre IV. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (2013). Diogenes Laertius, Lives of the Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DL]Google Scholar
Dover, K. (1978). Greek Homosexuality. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1990). The History of Sexuality, Vol. 2: The Use of Pleasure, trans. R. Hurley. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1994). The Stoic Conception of Reason. In Boudouris, K., ed., Hellenistic Philosophy. Athens: International Society for Greek Philosophy and Culture, pp. 50–63.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1999). Stoic Epistemology. In Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M., eds., The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 295–322.Google Scholar
Furley, W. (2021). Menander, Misoumenos or “The Hated Man.” London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Gaca, K. (2000). Early Stoic Eros. Apeiron, 33(3), 207–38.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2006). The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2013). Stoic Erôs: Is There Such a Thing? In Sanders, E., Thumiger, C., and Carey, C., eds., Erôs in Ancient Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 143–58.Google Scholar
Glibert-Thirry, A. (1977). Pseudo-Andronicus de Rhodes, Περὶ παθῶν. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2002). Cicero on the Emotions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2007). Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halperin, D. (1990). Why Is Diotima a Woman? In Halperin, One Hundred Years of Homosexuality. New York: Routledge, pp. 113–51.Google Scholar
Hense, O. (1905). C. Musonii Rufi Reliquiae. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2022). Intuitions in Stoic Philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 31(4), 614–29.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1985). Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1997). Why Do Fools Fall in Love? In Sorabji, R., ed., Aristotle and After. London: Institute of Classical Studies, pp. 55–69.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2007). Seneca, Selected Philosophical Letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. and Gerson, L. (1997). Hellenistic Philosophy: Introductory Readings, Second Edition. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. (1995). Plato’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (2016). The Stoic Argument from oikeiōsis. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 50, 143–200.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (2021). Desire and Impulse in Epictetus and the Older Stoics. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 103(2), 221–51.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. and Ramelli, I. (2009). Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments and Excerpts. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Laurand, V. (2007). L’érôs pédagogique chez Platon et les stoïciens. In Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C., eds., Platonic Stoicism, Stoic Platonism. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 63–86.Google Scholar
Long, A. and Sedley, D. (1987). The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marcovich, M. (2002). Clementis Alexandrini Paedagogus. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1994). The Therapy of Desire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1998). Eros and the Wise: The Stoic Response to a Cultural Dilemma. In Sihvola, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T., eds., The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 271–304.Google Scholar
Obdrzalek, S. (2010). Moral Transformation and the Love of Beauty in Plato’s Symposium. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 48(4), 415–44.Google Scholar
Obdrzalek, S. (2022). Why Erōs? In Ebrey, D. and Kraut, R., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Plato, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202–32.Google Scholar
Price, A. (1997). Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle. Reprinted with Afterword. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Price, A. (2002). Plato, Zeno, and the Object of Love. In Nussbaum, M. and Sihvola, J., eds., The Sleep of Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 170–99.Google Scholar
Reid, J. (2019). Plato on Love and Sex. In Martin, A., ed., The Routledge Handbook of Love in Philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 105–15.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2019). Pithana and Probabilia. In Bénatouïl, T. and Ierodiakonou, K., eds., Dialectic after Plato and Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 218–53.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2005). The Roman Stoics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. (1998). Plato, Symposium: Edited with an Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Oxford: Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. (2006). The Symposium as a Socratic Dialogue. In Lesher, J., Nails, D., and Sheffield, F., eds., Plato’s Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies, pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1984). Ariston of Chios and the Unity of Virtue. Ancient Philosophy, 4(1), 83–96.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1991). The Stoic Idea of the City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2002). The Origins of Stoic God. In Frede, D. and Laks, A., eds., Traditions of Theology. Leiden: Brill, pp. 41–83.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. (2006). Plato’s Symposium: The Ethics of Desire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. (2012). The Symposium and Platonic Ethics: Plato, Vlastos, and a Misguided Debate. Phronesis, 57(2), 117–41.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. (2017). Platonic Piety: Putting Humpty Dumpty Together Again. In, A. Petersen and van Kooten, G., eds., Religio-philosophical Discourses in the Mediterranean World. Leiden: Brill, pp. 37–62.Google Scholar
Shogry, S. (2021). Psychological Disease and Action-Guiding Impressions in Early Stoicism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 29(5), 784–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shogry, S. (2022). The Starting-Points for Knowledge. Phronesis, 67(1), 62–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shogry, S. (in press). Seneca on Moral Improvement through Dialectical Study: A Chrysippean Reading of Letter 87. Ancient Philosophy.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, A. (2020). Sex as a Pedagogical Failure. Yale Law Journal, 129(4), 1100–46.Google Scholar
Stephens, W. (1996). Epictetus on How the Stoic Sage Loves. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 14, 193–210.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1982). The End of the Euthyphro. Phronesis, 27(2), 109–18.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. (2003). Chrysippus’ On Affections. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visnjic, J. (2021). The Invention of Duty. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1973). The Individual as Object of Love in Plato. In Vlastos, Platonic Studies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–34.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. (2008). Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. (1884). Ioannis Stobaei Anthologii. Berlin: Weidmann. [Stob.]Google Scholar
Walsh, P. (1998). Cicero: The Nature of the Gods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, R. (2009). Diotima’s Eudaemonism. Phronesis, 54(4–5), 297–325.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Stoic Eros
  • Simon Shogry, Brasenose College, University of Oxford
  • Online ISBN: 9781009039277
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Stoic Eros
  • Simon Shogry, Brasenose College, University of Oxford
  • Online ISBN: 9781009039277
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Stoic Eros
  • Simon Shogry, Brasenose College, University of Oxford
  • Online ISBN: 9781009039277
Available formats
×