Element contents
Space as Language
The Properties of Typographic Space
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 August 2023
Summary
This Element examines the function and significance of typographic space. It considers in turn the space within letters, the space between letters, the space between lines, and the margin space surrounding the text-block, to develop the hypothesis that viewed collectively these constitute a 'metalanguage' complementary to the text. Drawing upon critical perspectives from printing, typeface design, typography, avant-garde artistic practice and design history, the Element examines the connotative values and philosophies embodied in the form and disposition of space. These include the values attributed to symmetry and asymmetry, the role of 'active' space in the development of modernist typography, the debated relationship between type and writing, the divergent ideologies of the printing industry and the letter arts, and the impact of successive technologies upon both the organisation and the perception of typographic space.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009265447Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 24 August 2023
Bibliography
Bachelard, G. (1994). The Poetics of Space. Translated by Jolas, M. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Banks, C. (2003). Edward Johnston and Letter Spacing. In Berry, J., Randle, J. (eds.), Type and Typography. New York: Mark Batty, pp. 347–353.Google Scholar
Bierut, M. (2003). Graphic Design and the New Certainties. Retrieved 25 October 2022, from https://designobserver.com/feature/graphic-design-and-the-new-certainties/1617.Google Scholar
Blokland, F. (2016). On the Origin of Patterning in Movable Latin Type. Retrieved 25 October 2022, from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/43556.Google Scholar
Boag, A. (1996). Typographic Measurement: A Chronology. In Typography Papers, 1, Reading: Department of Typography and Graphic Communication, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Boulton, M. (2005). Semantic Typography: Bridging the XHTML Gap. Retrieved 24 October 2022, from https://markboulton.co.uk/journal/semantic-typography-bridging-the-xhtml-gap/.Google Scholar
Bringhurst, R. (1997). The Elements of Typographic Style. Vancouver: Hartley and Marks.Google Scholar
Burnhill, P. (2003). Type Spaces: In-house Norms in the Typography of Aldus Manutius. London: Hyphen.Google Scholar
Carter, R., Day, B., Meggs, P. (2006). Typographic Design: Form and Communication. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cinamon, G. (2000). Rudolf Koch: Letterer, Type Designer, Teacher. Delaware: Oak Knoll.Google Scholar
Cobbing, B. (1989). Square Poem. Retrieved 24 December 2022, from https://gammm.org/2022/06/18/square-poem-bob-cobbing–1989/.Google Scholar
Dowding, G. (1954). Finer Points in the Spacing and Arrangement of Type. London: Wace.Google Scholar
Drucker, J. (2006). Quantum Leap: Beyond Literal Materiality. In Bierut, M., Drenttel, W., Heller, S. (eds.), Looking Closer 5. New York: Allworth, pp. 26–32.Google Scholar
Drucker, J. (1984). Letterpress Language: Typography as a Medium for the Visual Representation of Language. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
de Campos, A., Pignatari, D., de Campos, H. (1958). Pilot Plan for Concrete Poetry. Retrieved 25 October 2022, from https://ubu-mirror.ch/papers/noigandres01.html.Google Scholar
Highsmith, C. (2020). Inside Paragraphs: Typographic Fundamentals. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Kindersley, D. (2001). LOGOS: Letterspacing with a Computer. In Jury, D. (ed.), Typographic Writing. Stroud: ISTD, pp. 174–178.Google Scholar
Krauss, R. (1999). A Voyage on the North Sea: Art in the Age of the Post-modern Condition. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Larson, K. (2022). The Science of Word Recognition. Retrieved 25 October 2022, from https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/develop/word-recognition.Google Scholar
Li Er Lao, Tzu. (1997). Tao Te Ching. Translated by Waley, A. and Wilkinson, R. Ware: Wordsworth.Google Scholar
Lissitzky, L. (1999). Topography of Typography. In Beirut, M., Helfand, J., Heller, J. Poynor, R. (eds.), Looking Closer 3. New York: Allworth.Google Scholar
Lupton, E. (2004). Writing Lessons: Modern Design Theory. Retrieved 25 October 2022, from www.typotheque.com/articles/writing_lessons_modern_design_theory.Google Scholar
Lupton, E. (2004). Deconstruction and Graphic Design: History Meets Theory. Retrieved 26 October 2022, from www.typotheque.com/articles/deconstruction_and_graphic_design_history_meets_theory.Google Scholar
Lupton, E. (2000). Visual Syntax. In Swanson, G. (ed.), Graphic Design and Reading. New York: Allworth.Google Scholar
Lupton, E. and Miller, J. A. (1994). A Natural History of Typography. In Bierut, M., Drenttel, W., Heller, S. and Holland, D. K. (eds.), Looking Closer: Critical Writings on Graphic Design. New York: Allworth.Google Scholar
Maia, J. (2018). Toward a Typographical Linguistics: The Semantics-Pragmatics of Typographic Emphasis in Discourse. Retrieved 25 October 2022, from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4922/.Google Scholar
Maier, S. (2015). Design Dissection. Retrieved 25 October 2022, from http://thesis2015.micadesign.org/sally/.Google Scholar
Moholy-Nagy, L. (1999). The New Typography. In Beirut, M., Helfand, J., Heller, J., Poynor, R. (eds.), Looking Closer 3. New York: Allworth, pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
Nash, P. (2016). Scaleboard: The Material of Interlinear Spacing before ‘Leading’. Journal of the Printing Historical Society. 25, pp. 71–83.Google Scholar
Nash, R., Williams, R. (1999) Revival of Calligraphy (19th and 20th Centuries). Retrieved 25 October 2022, from www.britannica.com/art/calligraphy/Revival-of-calligraphy-19th-and-20th-centuries.Google Scholar
Noordzij, G. (2005). The Stroke: Theory of Writing. Translated by Enneson, P. London: Hyphen.Google Scholar
Nordquist, R. (2020). Retrieved 25 October 2022, from www.thoughtco.com/syntax-grammar.Google Scholar
Papazian, H. (2000). Improving the Tool. In Swanson, G. (ed.), Graphic Design and Reading. New York: Allworth.Google Scholar
Ritscher, P. (2014). Hand Setting. Retrieved October 25, 2022, from www.briarpress.org/37356.Google Scholar
Ronell, A. and Eckersley, R. (1991). The Telephone Book : Technology, Schizophrenia, Electric speech. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Saenger, P. (2000). Space between Words: The Origins of Silent Reading. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwitters, K. (1932). Ursonate. Retrieved 24 December 2022, from https://web.archive.org/web/20060216143920/http://ubu.clc.wvu.edu/historical/schwitters/ursonate.html.Google Scholar
Shaw, P. (2006). W. A. Dwiggins: Jack of all Trades, Master of More Than One. Linotype Matrix. 4.2, pp. 37–47.Google Scholar
Simpson, N. (ed.). (2012) Notes from the Cosmic Typewriter. London: Occasional papers.Google Scholar
Symons, A. J. A. (1973). An Unacknowledged Movement in Fine Printing. In Meynell, F., Simon, H. (eds.), Fleuron Anthology. London: Ernest Benn, pp. 301–325.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. (2015). Rudolf von Larisch: Investigating and Analysing the Ideas and Theories of a Lettering Reformer, unpublished Master’s thesis, Monash University.Google Scholar
Tschichold, J. (1998). The New Typography. Translated by McLean, R. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Warde, B. (1999). The Crystal Goblet or Printing Should be Invisible. In Bierut, M., Helfand, J., Heller, J., Poynor, R. (eds.), Looking Closer 3. New York: Allworth, pp. 56–59.Google Scholar
Winterson, J. (2003) The Hole of Life. Retrieved 25 October 2022, from www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/dame-barbara-hepworth-1274/hole-life.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by