Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:57:57.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Public Economics

Political Competition and the Study of Public Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2022

Stanley L. Winer  and
J. Stephen Ferris
Stanley L. Winer
Affiliation:
Carleton University, Ottawa and CESifo
J. Stephen Ferris
Affiliation:
Carleton University, Ottawa

Summary

Why is an understanding of political competition essential for the study of public economics and public policy generally? How can political competition be described and understood, and how does it differ from its strictly economic counterpart? What are the implications of the fact that policy proposals in a democracy must always pass a political test? What are the strengths and weaknesses of electoral competition as a mechanism for the allocation of economic resources? Why are tax structures in democratic polities so complicated, and what implications follow from this for normative views about good policy choice? How can the intensity of political competition be measured, why and how does it vary in mature democracies, and what are the consequences? This Element considers how answers to these questions can be approached, while also illustrating some of the interesting theoretical and empirical work that has been done on them.
Get access

Keywords

public economicspolitical competitionelectoral competitivenesspolitical feasibilitypolitical economy
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Public Economics
Online ISBN: 9781009006149
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 06 October 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdel-Khader, K., and De Mooij, R. (2021). Tax Policy. In Cerra, V., Eichengreen, B., El-Ganainy, A., and Schindler, M. (eds.), How to Achieve Inclusive Growth. Oxford Scholarship Online, 424–56. www.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780192846938.001.0001/oso-9780192846938-chapter-12Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. (2003). Why Not a Political Coase Theorem? Social Conflict, Commitment and Politics. Journal of Comparative Economics 31(4), 620–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Golosov, M., and Tsyvinski, A. (2008). Political Economy of Mechanisms. Econometrica 76(3), 619–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., and Robinson, J. A. (2013). Economics versus Politics: Pitfalls of Policy Advice. Journal of Economic Perspectives 27(2), 173–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, C. H., and Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J., Merrill, S., and Grofman, B. (2005). A Unified Theory of Party Competition: A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Special and Behavioral Factors. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aidt, T., and Jensen, P. S. (2009). Tax Structure, Size of Government, and the Extension of the Voting Franchise in Western Europe. International Tax and Public Finance 16(3), 362–94.Google Scholar
Aidt, T., and Magris, F. (2006). Capital Taxation and Electoral Accountability. European Journal of Political Economy 22(2), 277–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aidt, T., Dutta, J., and Loukoianova, E. (2006). Democracy Comes to Europe: Franchise Extension and Fiscal Outcomes 1830–1938. European Economic Review 50(2), 249–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aidt, T., Asatryan, Z., Badalyan, L., and Heinemann, F. (2020). Vote Buying or (Political) Business (Cycles) as Usual? Review of Economics and Statistics 102(3), 409–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, J. H. (1995). Why Parties: The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., Favero, C., and Giavazzi, F. (2019). Austerity: When It Works and When It Doesn’t. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alfano, M. R., and Baraldi, L. (2011). Political Competition and Economic Growth: Evidence from Italy. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1751066.Google Scholar
Allcott, H., and Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(2), 1–28.Google Scholar
Alpanda, S., and Honig, A. (2009). The Impact of Central Bank Independence on Political Monetary Cycles in Advanced and Developing Nations. Journal of Money Credit and Banking 41(7), 1365–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, S., de Figueiredo, J. M., and Snyder, J. M., Jr. (2003). Why Is There So Little Money in US Politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(1), 105–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, J., Geys, B., Heyndels, B., and Wille, F. (2014). Competition in the Political Arena and Local Government Performance. Applied Economics 46(19), 2264–76.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B., and Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). Lectures on Public Economics. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Atkinson, M.M., Mou, H., and Bruce, P. (2016). Fiscal Rules in the Canadian Provinces: Abject Failure or Qualified Success? Canadian Public Administration 59(4), 495–515.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, D. (1987). Parties, Districts and the Spatial Theory of Elections. Social Choice and Welfare 4(1), 9–23.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, D. (2008). Political Competition. In Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan, 4982–88.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, D., and Feddersen, T. J. (2009). Information Aggregation and Communication in Committees. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364, 763–69.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, D., and Wright, J. R. (1996). Theory and Evidence for Counteractive Lobbying. American Journal of Political Science 40(2), 543–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avina, M. M., and Blais, A. (2021). Are Tax Cuts Supporters Self-interested and/or Partisan? The Case of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. American Politics Research 50(3), 416–27.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. (2022). Regulatory Failure and Renewal: The Evolution of the Natural Monopoly Contract. A Study Prepared for the Economic Council of Canada 1989. McGill Queens’ University Press.Google Scholar
Baqir, R. (2002). Districting and Government Overspending. Journal of Political Economy 110(6), 1318–54.Google Scholar
Bardhan, P., and Yang, T. (2004). Political Competition in Economic Perspective. Working Paper E04-341. Department of Economics, University of California–Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bartolini, S. (1999). Collusion, Competition and Democracy: Part I. Journal of Theoretical Politics 11(4), 435–70.Google Scholar
Bartolini, S., and Mair, P. (2007). Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilization of European Electorates, 1885–1985. ECPR Classics.Google Scholar
Basu, K. (2000). Prelude to Political Economy: A Study of the Social and Political Foundations of Economics. Oxford Scholarship Online. http://doi.org/10.1093/0198296711.001.0001.Google Scholar
Bates, R. H., and Lien, D. D. (1985). A Note on Taxation, Development, and Representative Government. Politics & Society 14(1), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (1982). Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure. American Economic Review 72(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1958). Competition and Democracy. Journal of Law and Economics 1, 105–9.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1983). A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 98(3), 371–400.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1985). Public Policies, Pressure Groups, and Dead Weight Costs. Journal of Public Economics 28(3), 329–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G., and Mulligan, C. B. (2003). Deadweight Costs and the Size of Government. Journal of Law and Economics 46(2), 293–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G., and Mulligan, C. B. (2017). Is Voting Rational or Instrumental? In Hall, J. (ed.), Explorations in Public Sector Economics: Essays by Prominent Economists. Springer, 1–12.Google Scholar
Bénassy-Quéré, A., Coeuré, B, Jacquet, P., and Pisani-Ferry, J. (2010). Economic Policy: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beramendi, P., and Rueda, D. (2007). Social Democracy Constrained: Indirect Taxation in Industrialized Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 37, 619–41.Google Scholar
Berliant, M., and Gouveia, M. (2021). On the Political Economy of Income Taxation. Unpublished. MPRA paper 106138 at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/106138/Google Scholar
Besley, T. (2006). Principled Agents: The Political Economy of Good Government. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Besley, T., and Burgess, R. (2002). The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economic 117(4), 1415–51.Google Scholar
Besley, T., and Case, A. (1995). Does Political Accountability Affect Economic Policy Choices? Quarterly Journal of Economics 100(3), 769–98.Google Scholar
Besley, T., and Coate, S. (2003). On the Public Choice Critique of Welfare Economics. Public Choice 114, 253–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T., and Persson, T. (2011). Pillars of Prosperity: The Political Economics of Development Clusters. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Besley, T., Persson, T., and Sturm, D. M. (2010). Political Competition, Policy and Growth: Theory and Evidence from the US. Review of Economic Studies 77, 1329–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierbrauer, F., Boyer, P., and Peichl, A. (2020). Politically Feasible Reforms of Non-linear Tax Systems. American Economic Review 111(1), 153–91.Google Scholar
Bishop, B. (2008). The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Black, D. (1958). The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Blais, A. (2000). To Vote or Not to Vote? The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Blais, A., and Bodet, M. A. (2006). Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence Between Citizens and Policy Makers? Comparative Political Studies 39(10), 1243–61.Google Scholar
Blais, A., and Lago, I. (2009). A General Measure of District Competitiveness. Electoral Studies 28, 94–100.Google Scholar
Blesse, S., Buhlman, F., and Doerrenberg, P. (2021). Attitudes towards Tax Simplification: Evidence from a Representative Survey and Experiments. ZEW Mannheim.Google Scholar
Blinder, A. S. (1997). Is Government Too Political? Foreign Affairs 76(6), 115–26.Google Scholar
Boadway, R. (2002). The Role of Public Choice Considerations in Normative Public Economics. In Winer, S. L. and Shibata, H. (eds.), Political Economy and Public Finance. Edward Elgar Publishing, 47–68 (chapter), 85–97 (comments and rejoinder).Google Scholar
Boadway, R. (2012). From Optimal Tax Theory to Tax Policy: Retrospective and Prospective Views. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boadway, R. (2017). Second-Best Theory: Ageing Well at Sixty. Pacific Economic Review 22(2), 249–70.Google Scholar
Boadway, R., Chamberlain, E., and Emmerson, C. (2010). Taxation of Wealth and Wealth Transfers. In Adam, S., Besley, T., Blundell, R., et al. (eds.),. Dimensions of Tax Design. Oxford University Press, chapter 8.Google Scholar
Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. R., and Weimer, D. L. (2020). Efficiency without Apology: Consideration of the Marginal Excess Tax Burden and Distributional Impacts in Benefit–Cost Analysis. Journal of Benefit Cost Analysis 11(3), 457–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodet, M. A. (2014). Strongholds and Battlegrounds: Measuring Party Support Stability in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science 46(3), 575–96.Google Scholar
Bombardini, M., and Trebbi, F. (2020). Empirical Models of Lobbying. Annual Reviews of Economics 12, 391–413.Google Scholar
Bowen, H. R. (1943). The Interpretation of Voting in the Allocation of Economic Resources. Quarterly Journal of Economics 58, 27–48.Google Scholar
Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., and Shapiro, J. E. (2020). Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization. NBER Working Paper No. 26669. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3522318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracco, E., Porcelli, F., and Redoano, M. (2013). Political Competition, Tax Salience and Accountability: Theory and Some Evidence from Italy. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4167. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2244783.Google Scholar
Bradbury, J. C., and Crain, W. M. (2001). Legislative Organization and Government Spending: Cross-country Evidence. Journal of Public Economics 82(3), 309–25.Google Scholar
Brender, A., and Drazen, A. (2008). How Do Budget Deficits and Economic Growth Affect Re-election Prospects? Evidence from a Large Panel of Countries. American Economic Review 98, 2203–20.Google Scholar
Brennan, G., and Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, G., and Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breton, A. (1996). Competitive Governments: An Economic Theory of Politics and Public Finance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breton, A., and Scott, A. (1978). The Economic Constitution of Federal States. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Broms, R., Dahlstrom, C., and Fazekas, M. (2019). Political Competition and Public Procurement Outcomes. Comparative Political Studies, 52(9), 1259–92.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. (1976). Taxation in Fiscal Exchange. Journal of Public Economics 6, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J., and Congleton, R. D. (1998). Politics by Principle, Not Interest: Towards Nondiscriminatory Democracy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J., and Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Buchler, J. (2011). Hiring and Firing Public Officials: Rethinking the Purpose of Elections. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Budina, M. N., Kinda, M. T., Schnaechter, M. A., and Weber, A. (2012). Fiscal Rules at a Glance: Country Details from a New Dataset. International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M. and Morrow, J. D. (2003). The Logic of Political Survival. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Callander, S. (2005). Electoral Competition in Heterogeneous Districts. Journal of Political Economy 113(5), 1116–45Google Scholar
Calvert, R. L. (1986). Models of Imperfect Information in Politics. Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Caplan, B. (2001). When Is Two Better Than One? How Federalism Mitigates and Intensifies Imperfect Political Competition. Journal of Public Economics 80, 99–119.Google Scholar
Caplan, B. (2007). The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Capoccia, G., and Ziblatt, D. (2010). The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond. Comparative Political Studies 43(8–9), 931–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y. (2000). Electoral Systems, Legislative Process, and Income Taxation. Journal of Public Economic Theory 2(1), 71–100.Google Scholar
Chhibber, P., and Nooruddin, I. (2004). Do Party Systems Count? The Number of Parties and Government Performance in the Indian States. Comparative Political Studies, 37(2), 152–87.Google Scholar
Coase, R. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1–44.Google Scholar
Coate, S. (2000). An Efficiency Approach to the Evaluation of Policy Changes. Economic Journal 110(463), 437–55.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Marquis de (1785). Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix. Paris.Google Scholar
Congdon, W. J., Kling, J. R., and Mullainathan, S. (2011). Policy and Choice: Public Finance Through the Lens of Behavioral Economics. The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Congleton, R. (2011). Perfecting Parliament: Liberalism and the Rise of Western Democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Congleton, R., Grofman, B., and Voigt, S. (eds.) (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cordes, T., Kinda, T., Muthoora, P., and Weber, A. (2017). Expenditure Rules: Effective Tools for Sound Fiscal Policy? In Gaspar, V., Gupta, S., and Mulas Granados, C. (eds.), Fiscal Politics. International Monetary Fund, 299–325.Google Scholar
Coughlin, P. J. (1992). Probabilistic Voting Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coughlin, P. J. (2015). Probabilistic Voting in Model of Electoral Competition. In Heckelman, J. C. and Miller, R. (eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Voting. Edward Elgar, 218–234.Google Scholar
Coughlin, P. J., and Nitzan, S. (1981). Electoral Outcomes with Probabilistic Voting and Nash Social Welfare Maxima. Journal of Public Economics 15(1), 113–21.Google Scholar
Coughlin, P. J., Mueller, D. C., and Murrell, P. (1990). Electoral Politics, Interest Groups, and the Size of Government. Economic Inquiry 28(4), 682–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coviello, D., and Gagliarducci, S. (2017). Tenure in Office and Public Procurement. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 9(1), 59–105.Google Scholar
Cox, G. W., and Weingast, B. R. (2018). Executive Constraint, Political Stability and Economic Growth. Comparative Political Studies 51(3), 279–303.Google Scholar
Cox, G. W., Fiva, J. H., and Smith, D. M. (2019). Measuring the Competitiveness of Elections. Political Analysis 28(2), 168–85.Google Scholar
Creedy, J., and Moslehi, S. (2011). Modelling the Composition of Government Expenditure. Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronert, A., and Nyman, P.. (2021). A General Approach to Measuring Electoral Competitiveness for Parties and Governments. Political Analysis 29(3), 337–55.Google Scholar
Cullis, J., and Jones, P. (2009). Public Finance and Public Choice: Analytical Perspectives, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dash, B. B., Ferris, J. S., and Winer, S. L. (2019). The Measurement of Electoral Competition with Application to Indian States. Electoral Studies 62, 1–21.Google Scholar
de Figueiredo, J. M., and Richter, B. K. (2014). Advancing the Empirical Research on Lobbying. Annual Reviews of Political Science 17, 163–85.Google Scholar
de Figueiredo, R. J. P. (2003). Endogenous Budget Institutions and Political Insulation: Why States Adopt the Line Item Veto. Journal of Public Economics 87, 677–701.Google Scholar
de Haan, J., Jong-A-Pin, R., and Mierau, J. O. (2013). Do Budgetary Institutions Mitigate the Common Pool Problem? New Empirical Evidence for the EU. Public Choice 156, 423–41.Google Scholar
del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., et al. (2016). The Spreading of Misinformation Online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(3), 554–9.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H. (1968). Why Regulate Utilities? Journal of Law and Economics, 11(1), 55–65.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H. (1982). Economic, Legal, and Political Dimensions of Competition. De Vries Lectures in Economics 4. North Holland.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H. (2008). The Contrast between Firms and Political Parties. In Demsetz, H., From Economic Man to Economic System: Essays on Human Behavior and the Institutions of Capitalism. Cambridge University Press, 130–40.Google Scholar
Diamond, P., and Mirrlees, J. (1971a). Optimal Taxation and Public I: Production Efficiency, American Economic Review 61(1), 8–27.Google Scholar
Diamond, P., and Mirrlees, J. (1971b). Optimal Taxation and Public Production II: Tax Rules, American Economic Review 61(3), 261–78.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. K. (1996). The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction Cost Politics Perspective. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. K., and Londregan, J. (1996). The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics. Journal of Politics 58(4), 1132–55.Google Scholar
Dixit, A., Grossman, H., and Helpman, E. (1997). Common Agency and Coordination: General Theory and Application to Government Policy Making. Journal of Political Economy 105, 752–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Drazen, A. (2000). Political Economy in Macroeconomics. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drazen, A., and Eslava, M. (2010). Electoral Manipulation via Voter-Friendly Spending: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Development Economics 92(1), 39–52.Google Scholar
Dror, Y. (1969). The Prediction of Political Feasibility. Futures 1(4), 282–8.Google Scholar
Duverger, M. (1954). Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Methuen and Co.Google Scholar
Elkins, D (1974). The Measurement of Party Competition. American Political Science Review. 68(2), 682–700.Google Scholar
Enelow, J. M., and Hinich, M. J. (1989). A General Probabilistic Spatial Theory of Elections. Public Choice 61(2), 101–13.Google Scholar
Erikson, R. S. (2015). Income Inequality and Policy Responsiveness. Annual Reviews of Political Science 18, 11–29.Google Scholar
Eterovic, D. S., and Eterovic, N. A. (2012). Political Competition versus Electoral Participation: Effects on Government Size. Economics of Governance 13, 333–63.Google Scholar
Feddersen, T., and Pesendorfer, W. (1997). Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections with Private Information. Econometrica 65(5), 1029–58Google Scholar
Ferejohn, J. (1986). Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control. Public Choice 50, 5–25.Google Scholar
Fernandez, R., and Rodrik, D. (1991). Resistance to Reform: Status Quo Bias and the Presence of Individual Specific Uncertainty. American Economic Review 81, 1146–55.Google Scholar
Ferris, J. S., Park, S. B., and Winer, S. L. (2008). Studying the Role of Political Competition in the Evolution of Government Size Over Long Horizons. Public Choice 137, 369–401.Google Scholar
Ferris, J. S., Winer, S. L., and Grofman, B. (2016). The Duverger–Demsetz Perspective on Electoral Competitiveness and Fragmentation: With Application to the Canadian Parliamentary System, 1867–2011. In Gallego, M. and Schofield, N. (eds.), The Political Economy of Social Choices. Springer Publishing, 93–122.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. (1980). Dynamic Inconsistency, Cooperation and the Benevolent Dissembling Government. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 2, 93–107.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B., and Bester, D. W. (2021). The Benefit–Cost Fallacy: Why Cost–Benefit Analysis is Broken and How to Fix it. Journal of Benefit Cost Analysis 12(3), 395–419.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S., and Stutzer, A. (2006). Mispredicting Utility and the Political Process. In McCaffery, E. J. and Slemrod, J. (eds.), Behavioral Public Finance. Russell Sage Foundation, 113–40.Google Scholar
Fuest, C., Huber, B., and Mintz, J. (2005). Capital Mobility and Tax Competition. Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics 1(1), 1–62.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, T. (2015). Voting Technology, Political Responsiveness, and Infant Health: Evidence From Brazil. Econometrica 83(3), 423–64.Google Scholar
Galasso, V., and Nannicini, T. (2011). Competing on Good Politicians. American Political Science Review 105(1), 79–99.Google Scholar
Gallagher, M., and Mitchel, P.. (2009). The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gamm, G., and Kousser, T. (2021). Life, Literacy, and the Pursuit of Prosperity: Party Competition and Policy Outcomes in 50 States. American Political Science Review 115(4), 1442–63.Google Scholar
Gehl, K. M. and Porter, M. E. (2020). The Politics Industry: How Political Innovation Can Break Partisan Deadlock and Save Our Democracy. Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Gehlbach, S. (2006). Electoral Institutions and the National Provision of Local Public Goods. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2(1), 5–25.Google Scholar
Gerring, J., Hicken, A., Weitzel, D., and Cojocaru, L. (2018). Electoral Contestation: A Comprehensive Polity-Level Analysis. V-Dem Institute Working Paper 73, University of Gothenberg.Google Scholar
Gerring, J., Palmer, M., Teorell, J., and Zarecki, D. (2015). Demography and Democracy: A Global, District-Level Analysis of Electoral Contestation. American Political Science Review 109(3), 574–91.Google Scholar
Gilligan, T. W., and Matsusaka, J. G. (1995). Deviations from Constituent Interests: The Role of Legislative Structure and Political Parties in the States. Economic Inquiry 33, 383–401.Google Scholar
Glazer, A., and Rothenberg, L. S. (2001). Why Government Succeeds and Why It Fails. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Golden, M., and Min, B. (2013). Distributive Politics around the World. Annual Reviews of Political Science 16, 73–99.Google Scholar
Golder, M., and Stramski, J. (2010). Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 54(1), 90–106Google Scholar
Gordon, S. (1999). Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Graetz, M. J., and Shapiro, I. (2005). Death By a Thousand Cuts: The Fight over Taxing Inherited Wealth. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grofman, B. (2004). Downs and Two-Party Convergence. Annual Reviews of Political Science 7, 25–46.Google Scholar
Grofman, B., and Selb, P. (2009). A Fully General Index of Political Competition. Electoral Studies 28(2), 291–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. M., and Helpman, E. (2001). Special Interest Politics. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M., and Helpman, E. (2019). Electoral Competition with Fake News. NBER Working Paper #26409.Google Scholar
Hallerberg, M., Strauch, R. R., and von Hagen, J. (2009). Fiscal Governance in Europe. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamlin, A. (2018). What Political Philosophy Should Learn from Economics about Taxation. In O’Neil, M. and Orr, S. (eds.), Taxation: Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, A. E., Lin, J. Y., and Xu, L. C. (2014). Explaining Africa’s (Dis)Advantage. World Development 63(4), 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, K. (ed). (2006). Racing to the Bottom: Provincial Interdependence in the Canadian Federation. UBC Press.Google Scholar
Hartle, D. (1993). The Federal Deficit. Government and Competitiveness Project 93–30. School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University.Google Scholar
Haufler, A. (2001). Taxation in a Global Economy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1980 [1948]). The Meaning of Competition. In Hayek, F. A. (ed.), Individualism and Economic Order. University of Chicago Press, 92–106.Google Scholar
Hettich, W. (1979). Henry Simons on Taxation and the Economic System. National Tax Journal 32(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Hettich, W. (2002). Better Than What? Policy Analysis, Collective Choice and the Standard of Reference. In Winer, S. L. and Shibata, H. (eds.), Political Economy and Public Finance. Edward Elgar Publishing, 69–84 (chapter), 85–97 (comments and rejoinder).Google Scholar
Hettich, W., and Winer, S. L. (1988). Economic and Political Foundations of Tax Structure. American Economic Review 78(4), 701–12.Google Scholar
Hettich, W., and Winer, S. L. (1999). Democratic Choice and Taxation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hettich, W., and Winer, S. L. (2006). Explaining Tax Reform. In Alm, J. and Ryder, M. (eds.), The Challenges of Tax Reform in a Global Economy. Springer, 347–61.Google Scholar
Hillman, A. (2019). Public Finance and Public Policy: A Political Economy Perspective on the Responsibilities and Limitations of Government, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hillman, A. (1982). Declining Industries and Political-Support Protectionist Motives. American Economic Review 72(5), 1180–7.Google Scholar
Hillman, A., and Ursprung, H. (2016). Where Are the Rent Seekers? Constitutional Political Economy 27(2), 124–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinich, M. J., and Munger, M. C. (1994). Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hobolt, S. B., and Klemmensen, R. (2008). Government Responsiveness and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Political Studies 41, 309–37.Google Scholar
Hou, Y., and Smith, D. L. (2010). Do State Balanced Budget Requirements Matter? Testing Two Explanatory Frameworks. Public Choice 145, 57–79.Google Scholar
Hoover, K. D., and Shefrin, S. M. (1992). Causation, Spending and Taxes: Sand in the Sandbox or Tax collector for the Welfare State. American Economic Review 82(1), 225–48.Google Scholar
Howitt, P. (1990). Intergenerational Redistribution. In Asimakopulos, A., Cairns, R. D., and Green, C. (eds.) Economic Theory, Welfare and the State: Essays in Honor of John C. Weldon. McGill-Queen’s University Press, 218–37.Google Scholar
Hsu, K. W., and Yang, C. C. (2008). Political Economy and the Social Marginal Cost of Public Funds: The Case of the Meltzer-Richard Economy. Economic Inquiry 46(3), 401–10.Google Scholar
Hyde, S. D., and Marinov, N. (2012). Which Elections Can Be Lost? Political Analysis 20(2), 191–210.Google Scholar
Inman, R., and Rubinfeld, D. L. (2020). Democratic Federalism: The Economics, Politics and Law of Federal Governance. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Institute for Fiscal Studies (1977). The Structure and Reform of Direct Taxation. George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Issacharoff, S., and Pildes, R. H. (1998). Politics as Markets: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process. Stanford Law Review 50(3), 643–717.Google Scholar
Iversen, T., and Soskice, D. (2006). Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others. American Political Science Review 100(2), 165–81.Google Scholar
Jacobson, G. (2004). The Politics of Congressional Elections, 6th ed. Longman.Google Scholar
Jacobson, G. (2006). On Competition in Congressional Elections, US. In, M. P. McDonald and Samples, J. (eds.), The Marketplace of Democracy: Electoral Competition in American Politics. Brookings Institution, 27–52.Google Scholar
James, S. R., Sawyer, A. J., and Budak, T. (2016). The Complexity of Tax Simplification: Experiences from Around the World. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jones, B. D., and Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kanbur, S. M. R., and Myles, G. (1992). Policy Choice and Political Constraints. European Journal of Political Economy 8(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Kangas, O. (2021). The Feasibility of Universal Basic Income. In Kangas, O., Jauhiainen, S., Simanainen, M., and Yikanno, M. (eds.), Experimenting with Unconditional Basic Income. Edward Elgar, 187–96.Google Scholar
Kayser, M. A., and Lindstadt, R. (2015). A Cross-National Measure of Electoral Competitiveness. Political Analysis 23(2), 242–53.Google Scholar
Kayser, M. A., and Peress, M. (2012). Benchmarking across Borders: Electoral Accountability and the Necessity of Comparison. American Political Science Review 106(3), 661–84.Google Scholar
Keefer, P., and Knack, S. (2007). Boondoggles, Rent-Seeking, and Political Checks and Balances: Public Investment Under Unaccountable Governments. Review of Economics and Statistics 89(3), 566–72.Google Scholar
Keen, M., and Konrad, K. A. (2013). The Theory of International Tax Competition and Coordination. In Auerbach, A. J., Chetty, R., Feldstein, M., and Saez, E. (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics. Elsevier: 257–328.Google Scholar
Keen, M., and Lockwood, B. (2006). Is the VAT a Money Machine? National Tax Journal 59(4), 905–28.Google Scholar
Kenny, L., and Winer, S. L. (2006). Tax Systems in the World: An Empirical Investigation into the Importance of Tax Bases, Collection Costs, and Political Regime. International Tax and Public Finance 13(2/3), 181–215.Google Scholar
Klein, B., and Leffler, K. B. (1981). The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance. Journal of Political Economy 89(4), 615–41.Google Scholar
Krueger, A. (1974). The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society. American Economic Review 64(3), 291–303Google Scholar
Kydland, F., and Prescott, E. G. (1977). Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans. Journal of Political Economy 85(3), 473–92.Google Scholar
Laakso, M., and Taagepera, R. (1979). Effective Number of Parties: a Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12(1), 3–27.Google Scholar
Ledyard, J. O. (1984). The Pure Theory of Large Two Candidate Elections. Public Choice 44, 7–41.Google Scholar
Ledyard, J. O. (2006). Voting and Efficient Public Good Mechanisms. In Weingast, B. R. and Wittman, D. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Cambridge University Press, 479–501.Google Scholar
Ledyard, J. O. (2014). Non-coercion, Efficiency, and Incentive Compatibility in Public Goods. In Martinez-Vasquez, J. and Winer, S. L. (eds.), Coercion and Social Welfare in Public Finance. Cambridge University Press, 143–60.Google Scholar
Lee, D., Kim, D., and Borcherding, T. E. (2013). Tax Structure and the Size of Government: Does the Value-Added Tax Increase the Size of Government? National Tax Journal 66(3), 541–70.Google Scholar
Levy, G. (2004). A Model of Political Parties. Journal of Economic Theory 115, 250–77.Google Scholar
Lin, T., Enelow, J., and Dorussen, H. (1999). Equilibrium in Multicandidate Probabilistic Spatial Voting. Public Choice 98, 59–82.Google Scholar
Lindahl, E. (1919). Just Taxation – a Positive Solution. In Musgrave, R. A. and Peacock, A. T. (eds.), Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. Macmillan and Co. Ltd., 168–76.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, A., and Weibull, J. W. (1987). Balanced-Budget Redistribution as the Outcome of Political Competition. Public Choice 52(3), 273–97.Google Scholar
Lindert, P. H. (2004). Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth since the Eighteenth Century. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindert, P. H. (2019). Welfare States: Achievements and Threats. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lizzeri, A., and Persico, N. (2005). A Drawback of Electoral Competition. Journal of the European Economic Association 3(6), 1318–48.Google Scholar
Mandeler, M. (2012). The Fragility of Information Aggregation in Large Elections. Games and Economic Behavior 74, 257–68.Google Scholar
Marceau, M., and Smart, M. (2003). Corporate Lobbying and Commitment Failure in Capital Taxation. American Economic Review 93(1), 241–51.Google Scholar
Marín, D. A., Goda, T., and Pozos, G. T. (2021). Political Competition, Electoral Participation and Local Fiscal Performance. Development Studies Research 8(1), 24–35.Google Scholar
Martinez-Vazquez, J., and Winer, S. L. (2014). Coercion, Welfare and Public Finance. In Martinez-Vazquez, J. and Winer, S. L. (eds.), Coercion and Social Welfare in Public Finance: Economic and Political Dimensions. Cambridge University Press, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, J. G. (2020). Let the People Rule: How Direct Democracy Can Meet the Populist Challenge. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals. Polity 6(3), 295–317.Google Scholar
McCaffery, E. J., and Slemrod, J. (eds.) (2006). Behavioral Public Finance. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
McCarty, N., Poole, K., and Rosenthal, H. (2016). Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches, 2nd ed. MIT Press.Google Scholar
McKee, M., and West, E. G. (1981). The Theory of Second Best: A Solution in Search of a Problem. Economic Inquiry 19(3), 436–48.Google Scholar
McKelvey, R. D. (1976). Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control. Journal of Economic Theory 12, 472–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, K. (2001). A Tragedy of the House of Commons: Political Institutions and Fiscal Policy Outcomes from a Canadian Perspective. C. D. Howe Benefactors Lecture, Toronto.Google Scholar
McLure, C. E. Jr., and Zodrow, G. (2007). Consumption-Based Direct Taxes: A Guided Tour of the Amusement Park. Finanzarchiv 63, 285–307.Google Scholar
Medina, L. F. (2007). A Unified Theory of Collective Action and Social Change. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Meltsner, A. J. (1972). Political Feasibility and Policy Analysis. Public Administration Review 32(6), 859–67.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A., and Richard, S. (1981). A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy 89, 914–27.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A., and Richard, S. (1983). Tests of a Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Public Choice 41(3), 403–18Google Scholar
Migué, J.-L. (1977). Controls versus Subsidies in the Economic Theory of Regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 20(1), 213–21.Google Scholar
Milesi-Ferretti, G. M., Perotti, R., and Rostagno, M. (2002). Electoral Systems and Public Spending. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(2), 609–57.Google Scholar
Miller, G., and Schofield, N. (2003). Activists and Partisan Realignment in the United States. American Political Science Review 97, 245–60.Google Scholar
Mirrlees, J., S. Adam, T. Besley, R. Blundell, S. Bond, R. Chote, M. Gammie, P. Johnson, G. Myles and J.M. Poterba (2011). Tax by Design (The Mirrlees Review). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, D. C. (2000). Constitutional Constraints on Governments in a Global Economy. Constitutional Political Economy 9, 171–86.Google Scholar
Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public Choice III. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. A. (1959) The Theory of Public Finance. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Musgrave, P. (1988). Fiscal Coordination and Competition in an International Setting. In Eden, L. (ed.), Retrospectives on Public Finance. Duke University Press, 276–305.Google Scholar
Nyhan, B. (2020). Facts and Myths About Misperceptions, Journal of Economic Perspectives. 34(3), 220–36.Google Scholar
Oh, J. (2017). Will Tax Reform Be Stable? University of Pennsylvania Law Review 165, 1159–220Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Padovano, F., and Ricciuti, R. (2008). The Political Competition-Economic Performance Puzzle: Evidence from the OECD Countries and the Italian Regions. CESifo Working Paper 2411.Google Scholar
Padovano, F., and Ricciuti, R. (2009). Political Competition and Economic Performance: Evidence from the Italian Regions. Public Choice 138(1–2), 263–77.Google Scholar
Palfrey, T. (1984). Spatial Equilibrium with Entry. Review of Economic Studies 51, 139–56.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1971 [1909]). Manual of Political Economy. A. S. Schwier (trans.). Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a More General Theory of Economic Regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 19(2), 211–40.Google Scholar
Persson, T., and Tabellini, G. (2000). Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Persson, T., and Tabellini, G. (2008). Electoral Systems and Economic Policy. In Weingast, B. R and Wittman, D. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford University Press, 723–38.Google Scholar
Persson, T., Roland, G., and Tabellini, G. (2007). Electoral Rules and Government Spending in Parliamentary Democracies. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2(2), 155–88.Google Scholar
Poole, K., and Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A Political-economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, S. L. (1994). The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (2013 [1945]). The Open Society and Its Enemies. One vol. ed. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Potrafke, N. (2021). Fiscal Performance of Minority Governments: New Empirical Evidence for OECD Countries. Party Politics 27(3), 501–14.Google Scholar
Profeta, P. (2002). Retirement and Social Security in a Probabilistic Voting Model. International Tax and Public Finance 9, 331–48.Google Scholar
Profeta, P., Scabrosetti, S., and Winer, S. L. (2016). Wealth Transfer Taxation: An Empirical Investigation. International Tax and Public Finance 21(4), 720–67.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the Market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A., and Sprague, J. (1971). Concepts in Search of an Explicit Formulation: A Study in Measurement. Midwest Journal of Political Science 15(2), 183–218.Google Scholar
Quattrone, G. A., and Tversky, A. (1988). Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice. American Political Science Review 82(3), 719–36.Google Scholar
Razin, A., Sadka, E., and Suwankiri, B. (2011). Migration and the Welfare State: Political Economy Policy Formation. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Revelli, F., and Bracco, E.. (2020). Empirical Fiscal Federalism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Riker, W. H. (1986). The Art of Political Manipulation. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, W. H. (1990). Heresthetic and Rhetoric in the Spatial Model. In Enelow, J. M. and Hinich, M. J. (eds.), Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge University Press, 46–65.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. W. S. (1977). Voting over Income Tax Schedules. Journal of Public Economics 8, 329–40.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. (1998). Why the Poor Do Not Expropriate the Rich: An Old Argument in New Garb. Journal of Public Economics 70, 399–424.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. (2001). Political Competition: Theory and Applications. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, D. L., and Rogers, J. H. (2000). Political Competition and State Government Size: Do Tighter Elections Produce Looser Budgets? Public Choice 105(1–2), 1–21.Google Scholar
Romer, T. (1975). Individual Welfare, Majority Voting, and the Properties of a Linear Income Tax. Journal of Public Economics 4(2), 163–85.Google Scholar
Romer, T., and Rosenthal, H. (1979). The Elusive Median Voter. Journal of Public Economics 12, 143–70.Google Scholar
Rosset, J., and Stecker, C. (2019). How Well Are Citizens Represented by Their Governments? European Political Science Review 11(2), 145–60.Google Scholar
Rubin, P. H. (2002). Darwinian Politics: The Evolutionary Origin of Freedom. Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, P. H. (2014). Buchanan, Economics and Politics. Southern Economic Journal 80(4), 912–17.Google Scholar
Rubin, R.H. (2019). The Capitalism Paradox: How Cooperation Enables Free Market Competition. Post Hill Press.Google Scholar
Rueda, D., and Stegmueller, D. (2019). Who Wants What? Redistributive Preferences in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salanié, B. (2011). The Economics of Taxation, 2nd ed. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, P. (1987). Decentralization as an Incentive Scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 3(2), 24–43.Google Scholar
Salmon, P. (2019). Yardstick Competition among Governments: Accountability and Policymaking When Citizens Look Across Borders. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, T. (2004). Global Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, T., and Arce, D. G. (2003). Pure Public Goods versus Commons: Benefit–Cost Duality. Land Economics 79(3), 355–68.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scartascini, C. G., and Crain, W. M. (2021). The Size and Composition of Government Spending in Multi-Party Systems. In Hall, J. and Khoo, B. (eds.), Essays on Government Growth: Political Institutions, Evolving Markets, and Technology. Springer, 97–127.Google Scholar
Scheve, K., and Stasavage, D. (2017). Wealth Inequality and Democracy. Annual Reviews of Political Science 20, 451–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, N. (2007). Political Equilibria with Electoral Uncertainty. Social Choice and Welfare 28, 461–90.Google Scholar
Schofield, N., Claassen, C., Ozdemir, U., and Zakharo, A. (2011). Estimating the Effects of Activists in Two-Party and Multi-Party Systems: Comparing the United States and Israel. Social Choice and Welfare 36, 483–518.Google Scholar
Schuknecht, L. (2000). Fiscal Policy Cycles and Public Expenditure in Developing Countries. Public Choice 102, 115–30.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1950). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 3rd ed. Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Scott, A. (1987). Tax Harmonization in the Comparison of Federal and Other States. European Journal of Political Economy 3(1–2), 219–49.Google Scholar
Seligman, E. R. A. (1921). Essays in Taxation, 9th ed. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1972). Control Areas and Accounting Prices: An Approach to Economic Evaluation. Economic Journal 82, 486–501.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shafrir, E. (ed.) (2013). The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sheffrin, S. (2013). Tax Fairness and Folk Justice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K. A. (1979). Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in a Multidimensional Voting Model. American Journal of Political Science 23, 23–57.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K. A., and Weingast, B. R. (1981). Structure-Induced Equilibrium and Legislative Choice. Public Choice 37(3), 503–19.Google Scholar
Shi, M., and Svensson, J. (2006). Political Budget Cycles: Do They Differ Across Countries and Why? Journal of Public Finance 90(8–9), 1367–89.Google Scholar
Shugart, W. F. II (1997). Taxing Choice: The Predatory Politics of Fiscal Discrimination. Independent Institute.Google Scholar
Simons, H. (1936). Rules versus Authorities in Monetary Policy. Journal of Political Economy 44(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Simons, H. (1938). Personal Income Taxation: The Definition of Income as a Problem of Fiscal Policy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sinn, H.-W. (2003). The New Systems Competition. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Shafrir, E. (ed.) (2013). The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Skaperdas, S., and Vaidya, S.. (2021). Investing in Influence: How Minority Interests Can Prevail in a Democracy. CESifo Working Paper Series 9367, CESifo, Munich.Google Scholar
Skilling, D., and Zeckhauser, R. J. (2002). Political Competition and Debt Trajectories in Japan and the OECD. Japan and the World Economy 14, 121–35.Google Scholar
Slemrod, J. (2018). Is This Tax Reform, or Just Confusion? Journal of Economic Perspectives 32(4), 73–96.Google Scholar
Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., and Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. M., and Kramer, G. H. (1988). Fairness, Self-Interest and the Politics of the Progressive Income Tax. Journal of Public Economics 36(2), 197–230.Google Scholar
Somin, I. (2020). Free To Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soroka, S. N., and Wlezien, C. (2010). Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion and Policy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Splinter, J. (2019). Electoral Competition: New Measures and Applications. PhD thesis. Carleton University.Google Scholar
Stantcheva, S. (2021). Understanding Tax Policy: How Do People Reason? Quarterly Journal of Economics 136(4) 2309–69.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S. (1993). Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S. (2003). The Evolution of Policy Ideas: Tax Policy in the 20th Century. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5(2), 206–36.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. (1971). The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. (1972). Economic Competition and Political Competition. Public Choice 13, 91–106.Google Scholar
Stimson, J. A., and Wager, E. M. (2020). Converging on Truth. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. C., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., and Brusco, V. (2013). Brokers, Voters and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strom, K. (1989). Inter-party Competition in Advanced Democracies. Journal of Theoretical Politics 1(3), 277–300.Google Scholar
Strom, K. (1990). A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties. American Journal of Political Science 34(2), 565–98.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2013). If Misfearing is the Problem, Is Cost–Benefit Analysis the Solution? In Shafrir, E. (ed.), The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy. Princeton University Press, 231–63.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2018). The Cost–Benefit Revolution. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2020). Behavioral Science and Public Policy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Surrey, S. (1973). Pathways to Tax Reform. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tanzi, V. (2018). Termites of the State: Why Complexity Leads to Inequality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Theocharis, Y., and Lowe, W. (2016). Does Facebook Increase Political Participation? Evidence from a Field Experiment. Information, Communication & Society 19(10), 1465–86.Google Scholar
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64, 416–24.Google Scholar
Treisman, D. (2007). The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barberá, P., et al. (2018). Social Media, Political Polarization and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature. The Hewlett Foundation. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3144139.Google Scholar
Tucker, P. (2018). Unelected Power: The Quest for Legitimacy in Central Banking and the Regulatory State. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barberá, P., et al. (2018). Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature. Hewlett Foundation.Google Scholar
Tullock, G. (1959). Problems of Majority Voting. Journal of Political Economy 67(6), 571–79.Google Scholar
Tullock, G. (1967). The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft. Western Economic Journal 5(2), 224–32.Google Scholar
Ursprung, H. (1991). Economic Policies and Political Competition. In Hillman, A. L. (ed.), Markets and Politicians: Politicized Economic Choice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1–26.Google Scholar
Usher, D. (1994). The Significance of the Probabilistic Voting Theorem. Canadian Journal of Economics 27(2), 433–45.Google Scholar
Vanberg, V. (2000). Globalization, Democracy and Citizens’ Sovereignty: Can Competition Among Governments Enhance Democracy? Constitutional Political Economy 11(1), 87–112.Google Scholar
Vickrey, W. (1977). Economic Rationality and Social Choice. Social Research 44(4), 691–707.Google Scholar
von Hagen, J. (2006). Political Economy of Fiscal Institutions. In Weingast, B. R. and Wittman, D. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Cambridge University Press, 464–78.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, M. (2004). Behavioral Economics and Political Economy. Nordic Journal of Political Economy 30, 37–48Google Scholar
Warskett, G., Winer, S. L., and Hettich, W.. (1998). The Complexity of Tax Structure in Competitive Political Systems. International Tax and Public Finance 5, 127–55Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1946 [1919]). Politics as a Vocation. In Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. (eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford University Press, 77–156.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. R., and Marshall, W. (1988). The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets. Journal of Political Economy 96(1), 132–63.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. R. (1979). A Rational Perspective on Congressional Norms. American Journal of Political Science 23(2), 245–62.Google Scholar
Wellisch, D. (2000). Theory of Public Finance in a Federal State. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. (1896). A New Principle of Just Taxation. In Musgrave, R. A. and Peacock, A. T. (eds.), Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, 72–118.Google Scholar
Wildasin, D. (2021). Open Economy Public Finance. National Tax Journal 74(2), 467–90.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. D. (1999). Theories of Tax Competition. National Tax Journal 52(2), 269–304.Google Scholar
Winer, S. L. (2019). The Political Economy of Taxation: Power, Structure, Redistribution. In Congleton, R., Grofman, B., and Voigt, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice. Oxford University Press, 456–98.Google Scholar
Winer, S. L., and Hettich, W. (1998). What Is Missed if We Leave Out Collective Choice in the Analysis of Taxation. National Tax Journal 51(2), 373–89.Google Scholar
Winer, S. L., and Shibata, H. (eds.), (2002). Political Economy and Public Finance: The Role of Political Economy in the Theory and Practice of Public Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Winer, S. L., Kenny, L., and Grofman, B. (2014). Explaining Variation in the Competitiveness of US Senate Elections, 1922–2004. Public Choice 161(3/4), 471–97.Google Scholar
Winer, S. L., Ferris, J. S., Dash, B. B., and Chakraborty, P. (2021). The Privateness of Public Expenditure: A Model and Empirics for the Indian States. International Tax and Public Finance 28, 1430–71.Google Scholar
Wiseman, J. (1989). Cost, Choice and Political Economy. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Wittman, D. (1983). Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories. American Political Science Review 77(1), 142–57.Google Scholar
Wittman, D. (1987). Elections with N Voters, M Candidates and K Issues. In Holler, M. (ed.). The Logic of Multiparty Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Wittman, D. (1995). The Myth of Democratic Failure: Why Political Institutions Are Efficient. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wohlgemuth, M. (1995). Economic and Political Competition in Neoclassical and Evolutionary Perspective. Constitutional Political Economy 6, 71–96.Google Scholar
Wohlgemuth, M. (2002). Democracy and Opinion Falsification: Towards a New Austrian Political Economy. Constitutional Political Economy 13, 223–46.Google Scholar
Yitzhaki, S. (1979). A Note on Optimal Taxation and Administration Costs. American Economic Review 69, 475–80.Google Scholar
Young, R. A. (1991). Tectonic Policies and Political Competition. In Breton, A., Galeotti, G., Salmon, P., and Wintrobe, R. (eds.), The Competitive State. International Studies in Economics and Econometrics, vol 21. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0645-7_8.Google Scholar
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Political Competition and the Study of Public Economics
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Political Competition and the Study of Public Economics
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Political Competition and the Study of Public Economics
Available formats
×