Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:35:17.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Contentious Politics

The Phantom at The Opera

Social Movements and Institutional Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2021

Sidney Tarrow
Sidney Tarrow
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York

Summary

Movements and parties have given rise to two largely separates specialties in the social sciences. This Element is an effort to link the two literatures, using evidence from American political development. It identifies five relational mechanisms governing movement/party relations: two of them short term, two intermediate term, and one long-term. It closes with a reflection on the role of movement/party relations in democratization and for democratic resilience.
Get access

Keywords

American political developmentelectionshybrid movementsmovement-partiespolitical partiesrelatonal mechanismssocial movements
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Contentious Politics
Online ISBN: 9781009043731
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 27 January 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, J. H. (1995). Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Almeida, P. (2008). Waves of Protest: Popular Struggle in El Salvador, 1925–2005. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Almeida, P. (2010). Social Movement Partyism: Collective Action and Oppositional Political Parties. Minneapolis and St. Paul: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Almond, G. A. and Verba, S. (1964). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Amenta, E. (2005). “Political Contexts, Challenger Strategies, and Mobilization: Explaining the Impact of the Townsend Plan.” In D. Meyer, V. Jenness, and H. Ingram, eds. Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy and Democracy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, ch. 1.Google Scholar
Amenta, E. (2006). When Movements Matter: The Townsend Plan and the Rise of Social Security. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aminzade, R., Goldstone, J., McAdam, D., Sewell, W., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C.. (2021). Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, K. (2002). “Movement-Countermovement Dynamics and the Emergence of New Institutions: The Case of ‘White Flight’ Schools in Mississippi.” Social Forces 80: 911–936.Google Scholar
Anria, S. (2019). When Movements Become Parties: The Bolivian MAS in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aytaç, S. E. and Stokes, S. C. (2019). Why Bother? Rethinking Participation in Elections and Protests. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bawn, K., Cohen, M., Karol, D., Masket, S., Noel, H., and Zaller, J.. (2012). “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10: 571–597.Google Scholar
Ben-Ghiat, R. (2020). Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Bensel, R. F. (1990). Yankee Leviathan. The Origins of Central Authority in America, 1859–1877. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blings, S. (2020). “Niche Parties and Social Movements: Mechanisms of Programmatic Alignment and Party Success.” Government and Opposition 55: 220–240.Google Scholar
Blum, R. M. (2020). How the Tea Party Captured the GOP: Insurgent Factions in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boix, C., Ed. (2009). Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bremer, B., S. Hutter and H. Kriesi. (2020a). “Dynamics of Protest and Electoral Politics in the Great Recession.” European Journal of Political Research 59: 1–25.Google Scholar
Bremer, B., Hutter, S., and Kriesi, H. (2020b). “Electoral Punishment and Protest Politics in Times of Crisis.” In Kriesi, H., Lorenzini, J., Wüest, B., and Hausermann, S., eds. Contention in Times of Crisis: Recession and Political Protest in Thirty European Countries. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, ch. 10.Google Scholar
Burnham, W. D. (1970). Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., and Stokes, D.. (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cantrell, G. (2020). The People’s Revolt: Texas Populists and the Roots of American Liberalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, A. (2020). “Black Lives Matter, CHS, and the Current Moment.” Trajectories 31: 23–38.Google Scholar
Cohen, M., Karol, D., Noel, H., and Zaller, J.. (2008). The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, D. and Collier, R. (1991). Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, D. and Munck, G., eds. (2017). Symposium on Critical Junctures and Historical Legacies. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Collier, D. and Munck, G. (in press). Critical Junctures and Historical Legacies: Insights and Tools for Comparative Social Science. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
de Felice, R. (2005). Mussolini giornalista. Milan: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D., Fernandez, J., , Kourki, H., and Mosca, L. (2017). Movement Parties Against Austerity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D. and Diani, M. (2006). Social Movements: An Introduction, 2nd edition. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Donoso, Sofia and von Bülow, Marisa, eds. 2017. Social Movements in Chile: Organization, Trajectories, and Political Consequences. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B. (1935). Black Reconstruction in America: An Essay Toward a History of the Part Which Black Folk Played in the Attempt to Reconstruct Democracy in America, 1860–1880. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Dudziak, M. L. (2000). Cold War Civil Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eisinger, P. (1973). “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities.” American Political Science Review 67:11–28.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. R. (2018). “Climate of Resistance: How the Climate Movement Connected to the Resstance.” In David S. Meyer and Sidney Tarrow, eds., The Resistance. Oxford University Press, ch. 5.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. R. (2019). American Resistance: From the Women’s March to the Blue Wave. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. R. (2020). “The Diversity of the Recent Black Lives Matter Protests is a Good Sign for Racial Equity.” How We Rise. Brookings Institution, 8 July.Google Scholar
Foner, E. (2014). Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Francis, M. M. (2014). Civil Rights and the Making of the Modern American State. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frymer, P. (1999). Uneasy Alliances: Race and Party Competition in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gamson, W. A. (1990). The Strategy of Social Protest. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Gervais, B. and Morris, I. (2018). Reactionary Republicanism: How the Tea Party Paved the Way for Trump’s Victory. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gillion, D. Q. (2020). The Loud Minority: Why Protests Matter in American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Giugni, M. and Yamasaki, S. (2009). “The Policy Impact of Social Movements: A Replication through Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Mobilization 14: 467–484.Google Scholar
Giugni, M., McAdam, D., and Tilly, C. (1999a). From Contention to Democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Giugni, M., Mc, D. Adam, and C. Tilly (1999b). How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Goldstone, J. A., ed. (2003). State, Parties, and Social Movements. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grossmann, M. and Hopkins, D. (2016). Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hans Noel. 2012. “Which Long Coalition? The Creation of the Anti–slavery Coalition.” Party Politics 19: 962–984.Google Scholar
Heaney, M. T. and Rojas, F. (2015). Party in the Street: The Antiwar Movement and the Democratic Party After 9/11. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, W. (2011). The Transformation of the Workers’ Party of Brazil, 1989–2009. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutter, S. (2014). “Protest Event Analysis and its Offspring.” In D. della Porta, ed., Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, ch. 14.Google Scholar
Jacobs, N. F., King, D. and Milkis, S. M. (2019). “Building a Conservative State: Partisan Polarization and the Redeployment of Administrative Power.” Perspectives on Politics 17: 453–469.Google Scholar
Jacobs, N. F. and Milkis, S. M. (2022). What Happened to the Vital Center. Oxford: Oxford Univerity Press.Google Scholar
Katz, R. S. and Mair, P. (1993). “The Evolution of Party Organizations in Europe: The Three Faces of Party Organization.” American Review of Politics 14: 593–618.Google Scholar
Katznelson, I. (2013). Fear Itself: The New Deal and the Origins of Our Time. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Keck, M. (1992). The Worker’s Party and Democratization in Brazil. New Havan and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. (1955). “A Theory of Critical Elections.” Journal of Politics 17: 3–18.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. (1984). Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville, TX: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (1986). “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 16: 57–85.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (2006). “Movement Parties.” In R. A. Katz and B. Krotty, eds., Handbook of Party Politics.London: Sage Publications, ch. 24.Google Scholar
Klandermans, B. (2018). “How Citizens Try to Influence Politics: On Movements and Parties.” Unpublished paper presented to the Closing Conference of the PolPart project, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kolb, F. (2007). Protest and Opportunities: The Political Outcomes of Social Movements. Frankfurt and New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. (1995). The Political Opportunity Structure of the New Social Movements: Its Impact on Their Mobilization. The Politics of Social Protest. J. C. Jenkins and B. Klandermans. Minneapolis and St. Paul: University of Minnesota Press, ch. 7Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., S. Hutter, and A. Bojar (2019). “Contentious Episode Analysis.” Mobilization 29: 1–26.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., R. Koopmans, J. W. Duyvendak, and M. Giugni. (1995). The Politics of New Social Movements in Western Europe. Minneapolis and St. Paul: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., J. Lorenzini, B. Wüest, and S. Hausermann. (2020). Contention in Times of Crisis. Comparing Political Protest in 30 European Countries, 2000–2015. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, R. C., Mettler, S., and. Roberts, K. M., eds. (2021). Democratic Resilience: Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization? New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (1967). Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-national Perspectives. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Luders, J. E. (2003). “Countermovements, the State, and the Intensity of Racial Contention in the American South.” In J. A. Goldstone, ed., States, Parties and Social Movements. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ch. 1.Google Scholar
Luna, J. P. and Altman, D. (2011). “Uprooted but Stable: Chilean Parties and the Concept of Party System Institutionalization.” Latin American Politics and Society 53: 1–28.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2000). “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 24: 507–548.Google Scholar
Zald, Mayer N. and McCarthy, John, eds. (1987). Social Movements in an Organizational Society: Collected Essays. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, D. (1986). Placing Parties in American Politics: Organization, Electoral Settings, and Government Activity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, D. (1999a). “The Biographical Impact of Activism.” In M. Giuni, D. McAdam and C. Tilly, eds., How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis and St. Paul: University of Minnesota, ch. 6.Google Scholar
McAdam, D. (1999b). Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, D. (2020). “We’ve Never Seen Protests Like These Before.” Jacobin. January, 6. www.jacobinmag.com/2020/06/george-floyd-protests-black-lives-matter-riots-demonstrationsGoogle Scholar
McAdam, D. and Kloos, K. (2014). Deeply Divided: Racial Politics and Social Movements in Post-War America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, D. and Tarrow, S. (2010). “Ballots and Barricades: The Reciprocal Relations Between Elections and Social Movements.” Perspectives on Politics 8: 529–542.Google Scholar
McAdam, D., S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. (2001). Dynamics of Contention. New York and Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. and Zald, M. N. (1977). “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82: 1212–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, N. and Schickler, E. (2018). “On The Theory of Parties.” Annual Review of Political Science 21: 175–193.Google Scholar
Melucci, A. (1980). “The New Social Movements: A Theoretical Approach.” Social Science Information 19: 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercieca, J. (2020). Demagogue for President: The Rhetorical Genius of Donald Trump. College Station TX: Texas A & M University Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, S. and Lieberman, R. (2020). Four Threats: The Recurring Crises of American Democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. S. and Staggenborg, S. (1996). “Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity.” American Journal of Sociology 101: 1628–1660.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. S. and Tarrow, S. (1998). The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. S. and Tarrow, S., eds. (2018). The Resistance: The Dawn of the Anti-Trump Opposition Movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milkis, S. M. (1993). The President and the Parties: The Transformation of the American Party System Since the New Deal. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milkis, S. M. and Tichenor, D. J. (2019). Rivalry and Reform: Presidents, Social Movements, and the Transformation of American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Milkis, s. M. and D.J. Tichenor 2021). “When Revolutions Go Backward: Democratic Precarity in American Political Development,” unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Milkis, S. M. and York, J. W. (2017). “Barack Obama, Organizing for Action, and Executive-Centered Partisanship.” Studies in American Political Development 31: 1–23.Google Scholar
Minkoff, D. C. (1995). Organizing for Equality: The Evolution of Women‘s and Racial-ethnic Organizations in America, 1955–1985. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. and Kaltwasser, C. R., Eds. (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Munck, G. (in preparation). “When Causes are Distant and Effects Persist: Rethinking the Critical Juncture Framework.” In D.Collier and G.Munck, eds., Critical Junctures and Historical Legacies: Insights and Tools for Comparative Social Science. Lanham, MD: Romwan and Littlefield, ch.2.Google Scholar
Noel, H. (2014). Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1985). “New Social Movements: Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics.” Social Research 52: 817–868.Google Scholar
Parker, C. S. and Barreto, M. A. (2013). Change They Can’t Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, T. E. (2020). Is the Republican Party Destroying Itself? Seattle, WA: KDP Publishing.Google Scholar
Perlstein, R. (2009). Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus. New York: Nation Books.Google Scholar
Perlstein, R. (2020). Reaganland: America’s Right Turn, 1976–1980. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2017). “American Hybrid: Donald Trump and the Strange Merger of Populism and Plutocracy.” British Journal of Sociology 68: S10–S119.Google Scholar
Piven, F. F. and Cloward, R. (1972). Regulating the Poor. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Piven, F. F. and Cloward, R. (1977). Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. (2015). Changing Course in Latin America: Party Systems in the Neoliberal Era. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, S. (2018). The Polarizers: Postwar Architects of our Partisan Era. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rucht, D. and Ohlemacher, T. (1992). “Protest Event Data: Collection, Uses and Perspectives.” In M. Diani and R. Eyerman, eds., Studying Collective Action. London, Sage Publications, pp. 76–106.Google Scholar
Schickler, E. (2016). Racial Realignment: The Transformation of American Liberalism, 1932–1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schlozman, D. (2015). When Movements Anchor Parties: Electoral Alignments in American History. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schlozman, D. and Rosenfeld, S. (2018). The Long New Right and the World it Made. Presented to the annual conference of the American Political Science Association. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Schlozman, D. and Rosenfeld, S. (2019). “The Hollow Parties.” In F. Lee and N. McCarty, eds., Can America Govern Itself? New York and Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, ch. 6.Google Scholar
Shafer, B. E. (1983). The Struggle for the Democratic Party and the Shaping of Post-Reform Politics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. and Hertel-Fernandez, A. (2016a). “The Koch Effect.” Inequality Mini-Conference of the Souther Political Science Association. San Juan, Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. and Hertel-Fernandez, A. (2016b). “The Koch Network and Republican Party Extremism.” Perspectives on Politics 14: 681–699.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. and Tervo, C., Eds. (2020). Upending American Politics: Polarizing Parties, Ideological Elites, and Citizen Activists from the Tea Party to the Anti-Trump Resistance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. and Williamson, V. (2011). The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snow, D.,. A. Soule, and H. Kriesi, Eds. (2004). Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Snow, D., S. A. Soule, and H. Kriesi, Eds. (2018). Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. (2020). It Was All a Lie: How the Republican Party Became Donald Trump. New York: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (1990). “The Phantom at the Opera: Political Parties and Social Movements in Italy in the 1960s and 1970s.” In R. Dalton and M. Kuechler, eds., Challenging the Political Order. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 251–273.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (2018). “Rhythms of Resistance: The Anti-Trumpian Moment in a Cycle of Contention.”S In D. S. Meyer and S. Tarrow, eds., The Resistance: The Dawn of the Anti-Trump Opposition Movement. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 187–206.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (2021). Movements and Parties in American Political Develpment. New York and Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teele, D. L. (2018a). Forging the Franchise: The Political Origins of the Women’s Vote. Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Teele, D. L. (2018b). “How the West Was Won: Competition, Mobilization, and Women’s Enfranchisement in the United States.” Journal of Politics 80: 442–461.Google Scholar
Tichenor, D. and Harris, R. (2003). “Organized Interests and American Political Development.” Political Science Quarterly 117: 587–612.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1983). “Speaking Your Mind without Elections, Surveys, or Social Movements.” Public Opinion Quarterly 47: 461–478.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1995). Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (2006). Regimes and Repertoires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. and Tarrow, S. (2015). Contentious Politics, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Touraine, A. (1971). The May Movement: Revolt and Reform. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Truman, D. (1951). The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Vallely, R. M. (2004). The Two Reconstructions: The Struggle for Black Enfranchisement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vallely, R., S. Mettler, and R. Lieberman, eds. (2016). Oxford Handbook of American Political Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, E. (2014). Grassroots for Hire: Public Affairs Consultants in American Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Phantom at The Opera
  • Sidney Tarrow, Cornell University, New York
  • Online ISBN: 9781009043731
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Phantom at The Opera
  • Sidney Tarrow, Cornell University, New York
  • Online ISBN: 9781009043731
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Phantom at The Opera
  • Sidney Tarrow, Cornell University, New York
  • Online ISBN: 9781009043731
Available formats
×