Element contents
The Nature and Challenges of Indigenous Psychologies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 August 2018
Summary
The indigenous psychologies (IPs) stress the importance of research being grounded in the conditions and culture of the researcher's own society due to the dominance of Western culture in mainstream psychology. The nature and challenges of the IPs are discussed from the perspectives of science studies and anthropology of knowledge (the study of human understanding in its social context). The Element describes general social conditions for the development of science and the IPs globally, and their development and form in some specific countries. Next, some more specific issues relating to the IPs are discussed. These issues include the nature of the IPs, scientific standards, type of culture concept favored, views on the philosophy of science, understanding of mainstream psychology, generalization of findings, and the IPs' isolation and independence. Finally, conclusions are drawn, for example with respect to the future of the IPs.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108562171Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 23 August 2018
References
Abdi, Y. O. (1975). The problem and prospects of psychology in Africa. International Journal of Psychology, 10, 227–234. doi:10.1080/00207597508247334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adair, J. G. (1992). Empirical studies of indigenization and development of the discipline in developing countries. In Iwawaki, S., Kashima, Y., & Leung, K. (Eds.), Innovations in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 62–74). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Adair, J. G. (1995). The research environment in developing countries: Contributions to the national development of the discipline. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 643–662. doi:10.1080/00207599508246592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adair, J. G. (1996). The indigenous psychology bandwagon: Cautions and considerations. In Pandey, J., Sinha, D., & Bhawuk, D. P. S. (Eds.), Asian contributions to cross-cultural psychology (pp. 50–58). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Adair, J. G. (1998). Factors facilitating and impeding psychology’s contribution to national development. InterAmerican Journal of Psychology, 32, 13–32.Google Scholar
Adair, J. G. (1999). Indigenization of psychology: The concept and its practical implementation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 403–418. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00062.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adair, J. G. (2006). Creating indigenous psychologies: Insights from empirical social studies of the science of psychology. In Kim, U., Yang, K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 467–485). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adair, J. G., & Diaz-Loving, R. (1999). Indigenous psychologies: The meaning of the concept and its assessment: Introduction. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 397–402. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00061.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adair, J. G., Kashima, Y., Maluf, M. R., & Pandey, J. (2009). Beyond indigenization: International dissemination of research by majority-world psychologists. In Gari, A. & Mylonas, K. (Eds.), Quod Erat Demonstrandum (Q. E. D.): From Heroditus’ ethnographic journeys to cross-cultural research (pp. 59–68). Athens: Pedio Books.Google Scholar
Allwood, C. M. (2011a). On the foundation of the indigenous psychologies. Social Epistemology, 25, 3–14. doi:10.1080/02691728.2010.534564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, C. M. (2011b). On the use of the culture concept in the indigenous psychologies: Reply to Hwang and Liu. Social Epistemology, 25, 155–166. doi:10.1080/02691728.2011.552128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, C. M. (2012). The distinction between qualitative and quantitative research methods is problematic. Quality & Quantity, 46, 1417–1429. doi:10.1007/s11135-011–9455-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, C. M. (2013a). Anthropology of knowledge. In Keith, K. D. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 69–72). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118339893.wbeccp025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, C. M. (2013b). The role of culture and understanding in research. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2(5) 1–11. http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-JLGoogle Scholar
Allwood, C. M., & Berry, J. W. (2006). Origins and development of indigenous psychologies: An international analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 243–268. doi:10.1080/00207590544000013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 5%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602–614. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asante, K. O. & Oppong, S. (2012). Psychology in Ghana. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 22, 473–476. doi:10.1080/14330237.2012.10820557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atran, S., Medin, D. L., & Ross, N. O. (2005). The cultural mind: Environmental decision making and cultural modeling within and across populations. Psychological Review, 112, 744–776. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.744CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barth, F. (2002). An anthropology of knowledge. Current Anthropology, 43, 1–18. doi:10.1086/324131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basalla, G. (1967). The spread of Western science. Science, 14, 611–22. doi:10.1126/science.156.3775.611.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1997). Cruising the world: A nomad in academe. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), Working at the interface of culture: Eighteen lives in social science (pp. 138–153). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., & Kim, U. (1993). The way ahead: From indigenous psychologies to a universal psychology. In Kim, U. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 277–280). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., & Triandis, H. C. (2006). Culture. In Pawlik, K. & d’Ydewalle, G. (Eds.), Psychological concepts: An international historical perspective (pp. 47–62). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bond, M. H. (2010). Introduction: Reaching this stage in studying the psychology of the Chinese people. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 1–4). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapple, C. K. (Ed.). (2002). Jainism and ecology: Nonviolence in the web of life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Divinity School.Google Scholar
Choi, S.-C., Kim, U., & Choi, S.-H. (1993). Indigenous analysis of collective representations: A Korean perspective. In Kim, U. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 193–210). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Church, A. T., & Katigbak, M. S. (2002). Indigenization of psychology in the Philippines. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 129–148. doi:10.1080/00207590143000315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalal, A. K. (1990). India: Psychology in Asia and Pacific. In Shouksmith, G. & Shouksmith, E. A. (Eds.), Special report on teaching in eleven countries. Bangkok: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (2006). Universalism and indigenization in the history of modern psychology. In Brock, A. C. (Ed.), Internationalizing the history of psychology (pp. 208–225). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
de Souza, D. E. (2014). Culture, context and society – The underexplored potential of critical realism as a philosophical framework for theory and practice. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 141–151. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Guerrero, R. (1993). Mexican ethnopsychology. In Kim, U. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 44–55). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Diaz-Loving, R. (2005). Emergence and contributions of a Latin American indigenous social psychology. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 213–227. doi:10.1080/00207590444000168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Loving, R. (2015). Roglio Diaz-Guerrero: Pioneer of Latin American psychology. In Rich, G. J. & Gielen, U. P. (Eds.), Pathfinders in international psychology (pp. 175–186). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Dudgeon, P. (2017). Editorial Australian indigenous psychology. Australian Psychologist, 52, 251–254. doi:10.1111/ap.12298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudgeon, P., Bray, A., D’Costa, B., & Walker, R. (2017). Decolonizing psychology: Validating social and emotional wellbeing. Australian Psychologist, 52, 316–325. doi:10.1111/ap.12294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durojaiye, M. O. (1993). Indigenous psychology in Africa: The search for meaning. In Kim, U. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 211–220). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Earp, B. D., & Trafimow, D. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers of Psychology, 6, 621. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00621CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enriquez, V. G. (1977). Filipino psychology in the third world. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 10, 3–18.Google Scholar
Enriquez, V. G. (1993). Developing a Filipino Psychology. In Kim, U. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Indigenous Psychologies Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 152–169). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Enriquez, V. G. (1997). Filipino psychology: Concepts and methods. In Kao, H. S. R. & Sinha, D. (Eds.), Asian perspectives on psychology (Vol. 19, Cross-cultural research and methodology series; pp. 40–53). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Furlow, C. A. (1996). The Islamization of knowledge: Philosophy, legitimation and politics. Social Epistemology (Special issue: Islamic Social Epistemology), 10, 259–271. doi:10.1080/02691729608578818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrenya, W. K. Jr, Kung, M.-C., & Chen, L.-Y. (2006). Understanding the Taiwan indigenous psychology movement. A sociology of science approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 597–622. doi:10.1177/0022022106290480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrenya, W. K. Jr., & Sun, C.-R. (2015). Kuo-Shu Yang: Scholar, leader, activist. In Rich, G. J. & Gielen, U. P. (Eds.), Pathfinders in international psychology (pp. 201–212). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G. (1960/1985). Truth and method. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company.Google Scholar
García-Martínez, A. T., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). World scientific production in psychology. Universitas Psychologica, 11, 699–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastardo-Conaco, M. C. (2005). The development of a Filipino indigenous psychology. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 38, 1–17.Google Scholar
Ghamari-Tabrizi, B. (1996). Is Islamic science possible? Social Epistemology (Special issue: Islamic Social Epistemology), 10, 317–330. doi:10.1080/02691729608578822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, J. L., & Carr, S. C. (2016). IPP–Quo vadis? International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 5, 207–210. doi:10.1037/ipp0000062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goonatilake, S. (1998). Toward a global science: Mining civilizational knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Hadjistavropoulos, T. (2009). Presidential Address: Canadian psychology in a global context. Canadian Psychology, 50, 1–7. doi:10.1037/a0013398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., & Martin, B. R. (2008). Creative knowledge environments. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 196–210. doi:10.1080/10400410802060018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., Martin, B., & Mumford, M. M. (2013a). Introduction: Why is leadership important for creativity in science, technology and innovation? In Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., Martin, B., & Mumford, M. M. (Eds.), Creativity and leadership in science technology and innovation (pp. 1–26). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., Martin, B., & Mumford, M. M. (2013b). Conclusion. In Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., Martin, B., & Mumford, M. M. (Eds.), Creativity and leadership in science technology and innovation (pp. 316–331). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The WEIRDest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, D. Y. F. (1998). Indigenous psychologies: Asian perspectives. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 88–103. doi:10.1177/0022022198291005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, T. E. (1996). Can scientific knowledge be Islamized? Social Epistemology (Special issue: Islamic Social Epistemology), 10, 305–316. doi:10.1080/02691729608578821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, K.-K. (2005). From anti-colonialism to postcolonialism: The emergence of Chinese indigenous psychology in Taiwan. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 228–238. doi:10.1080/00207590444000177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, K.-K. (2006). Constructive realism and Confucian relationalism: An epistemological strategy for the development of indigenous psychology. In Kim, U., Yang, K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 73–107). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, K.-K. (2011a). Reification of culture in indigenous psychologies: Merit or mistake? Social Epistemology, 25, 125–131. doi:10.1080/02691728.2011.552125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, K.-K. (2011b). The implication of Popper’s anti-inductive theory for the development of indigenous psychologies. Psychological Studies, 55, 390–394. doi:10.1007/s12646-010-0050-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, K.-K. (2013a). Indigenous psychology. In Keith, K. D. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 2 (pp. 716–718). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118339893.wbeccp025Google Scholar
Hwang, K.-K. (2013b). The construction of culture-inclusive theories by multiple philosophical paradigms. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2(7), 46–58. http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-PLGoogle Scholar
Hwang, K.-K. (2015). Cultural system vs pan-cultural dimensions: Philosophical reflection on approaches for indigenous psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45, 2–25. doi:10.1111/jtsb.12051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inayatullah, S. (1996). Islamic responses to emerging scientific, technological and epistemological transformations. Social Epistemology (Special issue: Islamic Social Epistemology), 10, 331–349. doi:10.1080/02691729608578823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahoda, G. (2016). On the rise and decline of “indigenous psychology.” Culture & Psychology, 22, 169–181. doi:10.1177/1354067X16634052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jing, Q., & Fu, X. (2001). Modern Chinese psychology: Its indigenous roots and international influences. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 408–418. doi:10.1080/00207590143000234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kao, H. S. R., & Sinha, D. (Eds.). (1997). Asian perspectives on psychology (Vol. 19, Cross-cultural research and methodology series). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kashima, Y. (2005). Is culture a problem for social psychology? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 19–38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2005.00154.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, U. (1995). Psychology, science, and culture: Cross-cultural analysis of national psychologies. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 663–679. doi:10.1080/00207599508246593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, U., & Berry, J. W. (1993a). Introduction. In Kim, U. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 1–29). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Kim, U., & Berry, J. W. (Eds.). (1993b). Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Kim, U., Park, Y.-S., & Park, D. (1999). The Korean indigenous psychology approach: Theoretical considerations and empirical applications. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 451–464. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00065.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, U., Park, Y.-S., & Park, D. (2000). The challenge of cross-cultural psychology: The role of the indigenous psychologies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 63–75. doi:10.1177/0022022100031001006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, U., & Park, Y.-S. (2005). Integrated analysis of indigenous psychologies: Comments and extensions of ideas presented by Shams, Jackson, Hwang and Kashima. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 75–95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2005.00162.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, U., & Park, Y.-S. (2006). The scientific foundation of indigenous and cultural psychology: The transactional approach. In Kim, U., Yang, K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 27–48). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, U., Yang, K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (Eds). (2006a). Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, U., Yang, K.-S. & Hwang, K.-K. (2006b). Contributions to indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. In Kim, U., K.-S.Yang, & Hwang, K.-K. (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 3–25). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K., & Zhang, J. (1995). Systemic considerations: Factors facilitating and impeding the development of psychology in developing countries. International Journal of Psychology (Special issue: National development of psychology: Factors facilitating and impeding progress in developing countries), 30, 693–706. doi:10.1080/00207599508246595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J. H. (2011). On the limited foundations of western skepticism towards indigenous psychological thinking: Pragmatics, politics, and philosophy of indigenous psychology. Social Epistemology, 25, 133–140. doi:10.1080/02691728.2011.552126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, J. E. (Ed.). (2005). Defining Hinduism: A reader. London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Long, W. (2014). Critical reflections on the Islamicisation of psychology. Revelation and Science, 4(1), 14–19.Google Scholar
Lonner, W. J. (2013). Foreword. In Keith, K. D. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 1 (pp. xl–xlx). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118339893.wbeccp025Google Scholar
Mate-Kole, C. C. (2013). Psychology in Ghana revisited. Journal of Black Psychology, 39, 316–320. doi:10.1177/0095798413480664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, J. A. (2004a). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Research, 33, 3–11. doi:10.3102/0013189X033002003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, J. A. (2004b). Using qualitative methods for causal explanation. Field Methods, 16, 243–264. doi:10.1177/1525822X04266831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, S. (2002). Psychology in Nigeria: a view from the outside. Ife PsychologIA An International Journal, 10, 1–8. doi:10.4314/ifep.v10i1.23481Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2006). National character and personality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 156–161. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00427.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, G. (1998). Obituary: Professor Durganand Sinha (1922–1998). Cross-Cultural Psychology Bulletin, September, 6–10.Google Scholar
Misra, G., Jain, U., & Singh, T. (2002). Culture and social cognition: The Indian experience. In Misra, G. & Mohanty, A. K. (Eds.), Perspectives on indigenous psychology (pp. 224–248). New Dehli: Concept Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Misra, G., & Mohanty, A. K. (Eds.). (2002), Perspectives on indigenous psychology. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Misra, G., & Paranjpe, A. C. (2012). Psychology in modern India. In Rieber, R. W. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the history of psychological theories (Part 16; pp. 881–892). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M., & Taylor, D. M. (1985). Psychology in the developing world: An evaluation through the concepts of “dual perception” and “parallel growth.” American Psychologist, 40, 1144–1146. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.40.10.1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, M. W., Chiu, C., & Liu, Z. (2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 631–659. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814–015001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullainathan, S. & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity The true cost of not having enough. London, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nikora, L. W. (2007). Māori and psychology: Indigenous psychology in New Zealand. In Weatherall, A., Wilson, M., Harper, D., & McDowall, J. (Eds.), Psychology in Aotearoa/New Zealand (pp. 80–85). Auckland: Pearson Education New Zealand.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently … and why. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nsamenang, A. B. (2013). Cameroon black psychologists. Journal of Black Psychology, 39, 307–310. doi:10.1177/0095798413480662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojalehto, B. L. & Medin, D. L. (2015). Perspectives on culture and concepts. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 249–275. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349 (6251), aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716Google Scholar
Oppong, S. (2016). The journey towards Africanising psychology in Ghana. Psychological Thought, 9, 1–14. doi:10.5964/psyct.v9i1.128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padalia, D. (2017). Why indigenous psychology? A review article. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4, 78–82. doi:10.25215/0403.151Google Scholar
Pandey, J. (1998). Obituary: Professor Durganand Sinha (1922–1998). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 691–694. doi:10.1177/0022022198296001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pe-Pua, R. (2015). Indigenous psychology. In Wright, J. D. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioural sciences (2nd edn.; pp. 788–794). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pe-Pua, R., & Protacio-Marcelino, E. (2000). Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino psychology): A legacy to Virgilio Enriquez. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 49–71. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H. (1999). Do differences in behaviour imply a need for different psychologies? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 419–432. doi:10.1080/026999499377394Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H. (2016). Integration of basic controversies in cross-cultural psychology. Psychology & Developing Societies, 28, 161–182. doi:10.1177/0971333616657169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raina, D. (1997). Evolving perspectives on science and history: A chronicle of modern India’s scientific enchantment and disenchantment. Social Epistemology, 11, 3–24. doi:10.1080/02691729708578826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randerson, A. K. (2015). Human sensitivity towards nature: Eastern and Western perspectives. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 12(3), 172–182. doi:10.1108/WJSTSD-05-2015-0023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saberwal, S. (1982). Uncertain transplants: Anthropology and sociology in India. Ethnos, 47, 36–49. doi:10.1080/00141844.1982.9981230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San Juan, E Jr. (2006). Toward a decolonizing indigenous psychology in the Philippines: Introducing Sikolohiyang Pilipino. Journal for Cultural Research, 10, 47–67. doi:10.1080/14797580500422018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanzez Sosa, J. J., & Valderrama-Iturbe, P. (2001). Psychology in Latin America: Historical reflections and perspectives. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 384–394. doi:10.1080/00207590143000216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Shams, M. (2002). Issues in the study of Indigenous psychologies: Historical perspectives, cultural interdependence and institutional regulations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 79–91. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shams, M. (2005). Developmental issues in indigenous psychologies: sustainability and local knowledge. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 39–50. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2005.00155.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, D. (2015). Durganand Sinha: The pioneering work of an Indian psychologist. In Rich, G. J. & Gielen, U. P. (Eds.), Pathfinders in international psychology (pp. 187–199). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Shiraev, E., & Levy, D. (2013). National character. In Keith, K. D. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 2 (pp. 917–919). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118339893.wbeccp025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shweder, R. (1990). Cultural psychology –What is it? In Stigler, J., Shweder, R., & Herdt, G. (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 1–43). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. (2000). The psychology of practice and the practice of three psychologies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 207–222. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, D. (1993). Indigenization of psychology in India and its relevance. In Kim, U. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 30–43). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Sinha, D. (1997). Indigenizing psychology. In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., & Pandey, J. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 1. Theory and method (pp. 129–169). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Sinha, D. (2002). Culture and psychology: Perspective of cross-cultural psychology. Psychology and Developing Societies, 14, 11–25. doi:10.1177/097133360201400102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, D., & Sinha, M. (1997). Orientations to psychology: Asian and Western. In Kao, H. S. R. & Sinha, D. (Eds.), Asian perspectives on psychology (Vol. 19: Cross-cultural research and methodology series; pp. 25–39). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sinha, D., & Tripathi, R. C. (1994). Individualism in a collectivist culture: A case of coexistence of opposites. In Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kâğitçibaşi, C., Choi, S.-C. & Yoon, G. (Eds), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 123–136). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Sinha, J. B. P. (1995). Factors facilitating and impeding growth of psychology in South Asia with special reference to India. International Journal of Psychology (Special issue: National development of psychology: Factors facilitating and impeding progress in developing countries), 30, 741–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sismondo, S. (2004). An introduction to science and technology studies. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B. (2010). On the distinctiveness of Chinese psychology; or: Are we all Chinese? In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 699–710). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stringer, H. (2018). The healing power of heritage. Monitor on Psychology, 49(2), 44–51.Google Scholar
Sundararajan, L., Kim, U., & Park, Y.-S. (2017). Indigenous psychologies. In Stein, J. (Ed.), Reference module in neuroscience and biobehavioral psychology (pp. 1–7). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sundararajan, L., Misra, G., & Marsella, A. J. (2013). Indigenous approaches to assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of mental disorders. In Paniagua, F. A. & Yamada, A.-M. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural mental health (pp. 69–88). Oxford: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulayman, A. (1989). Islamization of knowledge: General principles and a workplan (2nd edn.). Herndon: International Institute of Islamic Thought.Google Scholar
Terracciano, A., Abdel-Khalek, A. M., Ádám, N., Adamovová, L., Ahn, C.-K., Ahn, H.-N.,… McCrae, R. R. (2005). National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures. Science, 310(5745), 96–100. doi:10.1126/science.1117199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorngate, W. (2008, March). Psychology in Iran. Observer (Association for Psychological Science), 21(3) www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/psychology-in-iranGoogle Scholar
Tohidi, N. (2016). Women’s rights and feminist movements in Iran. SUR International Journal on Human Rights, 13, 75–89.Google Scholar
Torres, H., & Consoli, A. (June, 2015). Moving towards a new relationship with Latin American psychology. Psychology International, 26(2), 5–8.Google Scholar
Tuck, E. (2013). Commentary: Decolonizing methodologies 15 years later. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 9, 365–72. doi:10.1177/117718011300900407Google Scholar
Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Themel, M., & Verma, J. (1999). The modernization of tradition: Thinking about madness in Patna, India. Culture & Psychology, 5, 413–445. doi:10.1177/1354067X9954003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, E. U., & Morris, M. W. (2010). Culture and judgment and decision making: The constructivist turn. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 410–419. doi:10.1177/1745691610375556CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, K.-S. (1997). Indigenising Westernized Chinese psychology. In Bond, M.H. (Ed.), Working at the interface of culture: Eighteen lives in social science (pp. 62–76). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yang, K.-S. (2012). Indigenous psychology, Westernized psychology, and indigenized psychology: A non-Western psychologist’s view. Chang Gung Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(1), 1–32.Google Scholar
Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39
- Cited by