Element contents
Series: Elements in Ethics
Moral Responsibility Reconsidered
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2022
Summary
This Element examines the concept of moral responsibility as it is used in contemporary philosophical debates and explores the justifiability of the moral practices associated with it, including moral praise/blame, retributive punishment, and the reactive attitudes of resentment and indignation. After identifying and discussing several different varieties of responsibility-including causal responsibility, take-charge responsibility, role responsibility, liability responsibility, and the kinds of responsibility associated with attributability, answerability, and accountability-it distinguishes between basic and non-basic desert conceptions of moral responsibility and considers a number of skeptical arguments against each. It then outlines an alternative forward-looking account of moral responsibility grounded in non-desert-invoking desiderata such as protection, reconciliation, and moral formation. It concludes by addressing concerns about the practical implications of skepticism about desert-based moral responsibility and explains how optimistic skeptics can preserve most of what we care about when it comes to our interpersonal relationships, morality, and meaning in life.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in EthicsOnline ISBN: 9781009219730Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 01 December 2022
References
Alicke, Mark D. (2000). “Culpable Control and the Psychology of Blame,” Psychology Bulletin 126: 556–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alicke, Mark D., Rose, David, and Bloom, Dori. (2012). “Causation, Norm Violation and Culpable Control,” Journal of Philosophy 106: 587–612.Google Scholar
Baker, Lynne R. (2006). “Moral Responsibility without Libertarianism,” Noûs 40: 307–30.Google Scholar
Balaguer, Mark. (2010). Free Will as an Open Scientific Problem, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Christopher. (2002). “The Varieties of Retributive Experience,” Philosophical Quarterly 52(207): 145–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. (1823/1948). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bohm, David. (1952). “A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables, I and II,” Physics Review 85(2): 166–93.Google Scholar
Bok, Hilary. (1998). Freedom and Responsibility, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boonin, David. (2008). The Problem of Punishment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, Jean. (1970). Never in Anger: Portrait of an Eskimo Family, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brink, David. (2021). Fair Opportunity, Responsibility and Excuse, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buckwalter, Wesley, and Turri, John. (2015). “Inability and Obligation in Moral Judgment,” PloS One 10(8): 1–20.Google Scholar
Campbell, Charles Arthur. (1957). On Selfhood and Godhood, London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Capes, Justin. (forthcoming). “Manipulation and Direct Arguments,” in A Companion to Free Will, Campbell, Joseph, ed., New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carlsmith, Kevin M., and Darley, John M.. (2008). “Psychological Aspects of Retributive Justice,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 40: 193–236.Google Scholar
Carlsson, Andrea B. (2017). “Blameworthiness as Deserved Guilt,” The Journal of Ethics 21: 89–115.Google Scholar
Caruso, Gregg D. (2012). Free Will and Consciousness: A Determinist Account of the Illusion of Free Will, Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Caruso, Gregg D. (2016). “Free Will Skepticism and Criminal Behavior: A Public Health-Quarantine Model,” Southwest Philosophy Review 32(1): 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruso, Gregg D. (2017). “Free Will Skepticism and the Question of Creativity: Creativity, Desert, and Self-Creation,” Ergo 3(23): 591–607.Google Scholar
Caruso, Gregg D. (2018a). “Origination, Moral Responsibility, and Life-Hopes: Ted Honderich on Determinism and Freedom,” in Ted Honderich on Consciousness, Determinism, and Humanity, Caruso, Gregg D., ed., pp. 195–216, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Caruso, Gregg D. (2018b). “Skepticism About Moral Responsibility,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring ed., Edward N. Zalta, ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism-moral-responsibility/.Google Scholar
Caruso, Gregg D. (2019a). “A Defense of the Luck Pincer: Why Luck (Still) Undermines Moral Responsibility,” Journal of Information Ethics 28(1): 51–72.Google Scholar
Caruso, Gregg D. (2019b). “Free Will Skepticism and Its Implications: An Argument for Optimism,” in Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society, Shaw, Elizabeth, Pereboom, Derk, and Caruso, Gregg D., eds., pp. 43–72, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caruso, Gregg D. (2020). “Justice without Retribution: An Epistemic Argument against Retributive Criminal Punishment,” Neuroethics 13(1): 13–28.Google Scholar
Caruso, Gregg D. (2021a). “On the Compatibility of Rational Deliberation and Determinism: Why Deterministic Manipulation is Not a Counterexample,” Philosophical Quarterly 71(3): 524–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruso, Gregg D. (2021b). Rejecting Retributivism: Free Will, Punishment, and Criminal Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caruso, Gregg D. (2021c). “Rejecting Retributivism: Reply to Leo Zaibert,” The Philosopher 109(4): 118–26.Google Scholar
Caruso, Gregg D. (2021d). “Retributivism, Free Will Skepticism, and the Public Health-Quarantine Model: Replies to Kennedy, Walen, Corrado, Sifferd, Pereboom, and Shaw,” Journal of Legal Philosophy 46(2): 161–216.Google Scholar
Caruso, Gregg D. (forthcoming). “Preemptive Incapacitation, Victim’s Rights, Desert, and Respect for Persons: Replies to McCormick and Donelson,” Journal of Practical Ethics.Google Scholar
Caruso, Gregg D., and Morris, Stephen G.. (2017). “Compatibilism and Retributivist Desert Moral Responsibility: On What is of Central Philosophical and Practical Importance,” Erkenntnis 82(4): 837–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruso, Gregg D., and Pereboom, Derk. (2020). “A Non-Punitive Alternative to Punishment,” in Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Science of Punishment, Focquaert, Farah, Waller, Bruce, and Shaw, Elizabeth, eds., pp. 355–65, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick. (1964). “Human Freedom and the Self,” The Lindley Lecture, Department of Philosophy, University of Kansas; reprinted in Free Will, Watson, Gary, ed., pp. 24–35, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Chituc, Vladimir, Henne, Paul, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, and Felipe, De Brigard. (2016). “Blame, Not Ability, Impacts Moral ‘Ought’ Judgments for Impossible Actions: Toward an Empirical Refutation of ‘Ought’ Implies ‘Can’,” Cognition 150: 20–25.Google Scholar
Clark, Cory J., Luguri, James B., Ditto, Peter H. et al. (2014). “Free to Punish: A Motivated Account of Free Will Belief,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 106(4): 501–13.Google Scholar
Clark, Cory J., Shniderman, Adam, Luguri, James B., Baumeister, Roy F., and Ditto, Peter H.. (2018). “Are Morally Good Actions Ever Free?” Consciousness and Cognition 63: 161–82.Google Scholar
Clark, Cory J., Winegard, Bo M., and Baumeister, Roy F.. (2019). “Forget the Folk: Moral Responsibility Preservation Motives and Other Conditions for Compatibilism,” Frontiers in Psychology 10: Article 215, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00215, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Clarke, Randolph. (1993). “Toward a Credible Agent-Causal Account of Free Will,” Noûs 27: 191–203.Google Scholar
Clarke, Randolph. (1996). “Agent Causation and Event Causation in the Production of Free Action,” Philosophical Topics 24: 19–48.Google Scholar
Clarke, Randolph. (2003). Libertarian Theories of Free Will, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Randolph. (2005). “On an Argument for the Impossibility of Moral Responsibility,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29: 13–24.Google Scholar
Clarke, Randolph. (2013). “Some Theses on Desert,” Philosophical Explorations 16: 153–44.Google Scholar
Clarke, Randolph. (2019). “Free Will, Agent Causation, and ‘Disappearing Agents’,” Noûs 53(1): 76–96.Google Scholar
Cohen, Yishai. (2018). “An Analysis of Recent Empirical Data on ‘Ought’ Implies ‘Can’,” Philosophia 46(1): 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrado, Michael L. (2013). “Why Do We Resist Hard Incompatibilism? Some Thoughts on Freedom and Determinism,” in The Future of Punishment, Nadelhoffer, Thomas, ed., pp. 79–106, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corrado, Michael L. (2016). “Chapter Four: Quarantine and the Problem of the Third Man.” UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2849473. Available at SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2849473.Google Scholar
Corrado, Michael L. (2017). “Doing without Desert,” in Free Will and the Law: New Perspectives, McCay, Allan and Sevel, Michael, eds., pp. 144–63, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Corrado, Michael L. (2018). “Criminal Quarantine and the Burden of Proof,” Philosophia 47: 1095–110. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11406-018-0026-2.Google Scholar
Corrado, Michael L. (2019). “Fichte and the Psychopath: Criminal Justice Turned Upside Down,” in Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society: Challenging Retributive Justice, Shaw, Elizabeth, Pereboom, Derk, and Caruso, Gregg D., eds., pp. 161–76, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corrado, Michael L. (2021). “The Limits of the State’s Power to Control Crime,” Journal of Legal Philosophy 46(2): 126–31.Google Scholar
Cushman, FA. (2018). “Crime and Punishement: Differential Reliance on Causal and Intentional Information for Different Classes of Moral Judgment.” Cognition 108: pp. 353–80.Google Scholar
d’Holbach, , Paul-Henri, Thiry. (1770). Système de la Nature, ou Des Loix du Monde Physique et du Monde Moral, Amsterdam: Marc-Michel Rey.Google Scholar
Jozefien, De Leersnyder, Boiger, Michael, and Mesquita, Batja. (2013). “Cultural Regulation of Emotion: Individual, Relational, and Structural Sources,” Frontiers in Psychology 4: pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C., and Caruso, Gregg D.. (2021). Just Deserts, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Raff., Donelson (forthcoming). “Comments on Gregg Caruso’s Rejecting Retributivism,” Journal of Practical Ethics.Google Scholar
Doris, John. (2015). “Doing without (Arguing about) Desert,” Philosophical Studies 172: 2625–34.Google Scholar
Duggan, Austin. (2018). “Moral Responsibility as Guiltworthiness,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21: 291–309.Google Scholar
Ekstrom, Laura W. (2019). “Toward a Plausible Event-Causal Indeterminist Account of Free Will,” Synthèse 196: 127–44.Google Scholar
Eshleman, Andrew. (2014). “Moral Responsibility,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta, ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/moral-responsibility/.Google Scholar
Everett, Jim A. C., Clark, Cory J., Meindl, Peter. (2021). “Political Differences in Free Will Belief are Associated with Differences in Moralization,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 120(2): 461–83.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel . (1970). “Justice and Personal Desert,” in Doing and Deserving, pp. 55–94, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Gilad, Wong, Kin Fai Elick, and Baumeister, Roy F.. (2016). “Bad is Freer than Good: Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Attributions of Free Will,” Consciousness and Cognition 42: 26–40.Google Scholar
Feltz, Adam. (2013). “Pereboom and Premises: Asking the Right Questions in the Experimental Philosophy of Free Will,” Consciousness and Cognition 22(1): 53–63.Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. (2004). “Responsibility and Manipulation,” The Journal of Ethics 8: 145–77.Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. (2007). “Compatibilism” and “Response to Kane, Pereboom, and Vargas,” in Four Views on Free Will, Fischer, John Martin, Kane, Robert, Pereboom, Derk, and Vargas, Manuel, eds., pp. 44–84, 184–90, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. (2014). “Review of Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life,” Science, Religion, and Culture 1(3): 202–8.Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin, and Ravizza, Mark. (1998). Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Owen. (2019). The Geography of Morals: Varieties of Moral Possibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Owen. (2021). How to Do Things with Emotions: The Morality of Anger and Shame Across Cultures, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Focquaert, Farah. (2019a). “Free Will Skepticism and Punishment: A Preliminary Ethical Analysis,” in Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society: Challenging Retributive Justice, Shaw, Elizabeth, Pereboom, Derk, and Caruso, Gregg D., eds., pp. 207–36, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Focquaert, Farah. (2019b). “Neurobiology and Crime: A Neuro-Ethical Perspective,” Journal of Criminal Justice 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.01.001.Google Scholar
Focquaert, Farah, Glenn, Andrea L., and Raine, Adrian. (2018). “Free Will Skepticism, Freedom, and Criminal Behavior,” in Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience, Caruso, Gregg D. and Flanagan, Owen, eds., pp. 235–50, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, John. (1991). The Immaterial Self: A Defense of the Cartesian Dualist Conception of Mind, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. (1971). “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person,” Journal of Philosophy 68: 5–20.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. (2016). “What’s the Point of Blame? A Paradigm Based Explanation,” Nous 50(1): 165–83.Google Scholar
Ginet, Carl. (1997). “Freedom, Responsibility, and Agency,” The Journal of Ethics 1: 85–98.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Julie H., Lerner, Jennifer S., and Tetlock, Philip E.. (1999). “Rage and Reason: The Psychology of the Intuitive Prosecutor,” European Journal of Social Psychology 29: 781–95.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua, and Cohen, Jonathan D.. (2004). “For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B-Biological Sciences 359: 1775–85.Google Scholar
Griffith, Meghan. (2010). “Why Agent-Caused Actions are Not Lucky,” American Philosophical Quarterly 47: 43–56.Google Scholar
Harinck, Fieke, and Van Kleef, Gerben A.. (2012). “Be Hard on the Interests and Soft on the Values: Conflict Issue Moderates the Effects of Anger in Negotiations,” British Journal of Social Psychology 51: 741–52.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and Responsibility, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henne, Paul, Chituc, Vladimir, De Brigard, Felipe, and Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. (2016). “An Empirical Refutation of ‘Ought’ Implies ‘Can’,” Analysis 76(3): 283–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hieronymi, Pamela. (2001). “Articulating an Uncompromising Forgiveness,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 529–55.Google Scholar
Hume, David. (1739/1978). A Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. (1748/2000). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jeppsson, Sofia. (2016). “Accountability, Answerability, and Freedom,” Social Theory and Practice 42(4): 681–705.Google Scholar
Kane, Robert. (1996). The Significance of Free Will, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (1781/1787/1987). Critique of Pure Reason, Paul Guyer and Allen Wood, trs., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (1785/1981). Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, James Ellington, tr., Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (1797/2017). The Metaphysics of Morals, Mary Gregor, tr., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Chloe. (2021). “Taking Responsibility for Criminal Responsibility: Comments on Rejecting Retributivism: Free Will, Punishment, and Criminal Justice,” Journal of Legal Punishment 46(2): 132–37.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. (1843/1971). Either/Or, vol. 2, Walter Lowrie, tr., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kurthy, Miklos, and Lawford-Smith, Holly. (2015). “A Brief Note of Ambiguity of ‘Ought’: Reply to Moti Mizrahi’s ‘Ought, Can, and Presuppositions: An Empirical Study’,” Methode 4(6): 244–49.Google Scholar
Kurthy, Miklos, Lawford-Smith, Holly, and Sousa., Paulo (2017). “Does Ought Imply Can?” PloS One 12(4): 1–24.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brain. (2007). “Nietzsche’s Theory of the Will,” Philosophers’ Imprint 7: 1–15.Google Scholar
Lemos, John. (2013). Freedom, Responsibility, and Determinism: A Philosophical Dialogue, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Lemos, John. (2016). “Moral Concerns About Responsibility Denial and the Quarantine of Violent Criminals,” Law and Philosophy 35: 461–83.Google Scholar
Lemos, John. (2018). A Pragmatic Approach to Libertarian Free Will, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lenman, James. (2006). “Compatibilism and Contractualism: The Possibility of Moral Responsibility,” Ethics 117: 7–31.Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S., Goldberg, Julie H., and Tetlock, Philip E.. (1998). “Sober Second Thought: The Effects of Accountability, Anger, and Authoritarianism on Attributions of Responsibility,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24(6): 563–74.Google Scholar
Levy, Neil. (2009). “Luck and History-Sensitive Compatibilism,” Philosophical Quarterly 59(235): 237–51.Google Scholar
Levy, Neil. (2011). Hard Luck: How Luck Undermines Free Will and Moral Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Neil. (2012). “Skepticism and Sanction: The Benefits of Rejecting Moral Responsibility,” Law and Philosophy 31: 477–93.Google Scholar
Levy, Neil. (2015). “Less Blame, Less Crime? The Practical Implications of Moral Responsibility Skepticism,” Journal of Practical Ethics 3(2): 1–17.Google Scholar
Lewis, Peter J. (2016). Quantum Ontology: A Guide to the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Litvak, Paul M., Lerner, Jennifer S., Tiedens, Larissa Z., and Shonk, Katherine. (2010). “Fuel in the Fire: How Anger Impacts Judgments and Decision Making,” in International Handbook of Anger, Potegal, Michael, Stemmler, Gerhard, and Spielberger, Charles, eds., pp. 287–301, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Lucretius. (50 BCE/1998). On the Nature of the Universe, Ronald Melville, tr., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Henry J. (1965). “A Non-Utilitarian Approach to Punishment,” Inquiry 8: 249–63.Google Scholar
McCormick, Kelly. (forthcoming). “Comments on Gregg Caruso’s Rejecting Retributivism: Free Will, Punishment, and Criminal Justice,” Journal of Practical Ethics.Google Scholar
McGeer, Victoria. (2015). “Building a Better Theory of Responsibility,” Philosophical Studies 172(10): 2635–49.Google Scholar
McKenna, Michael. (2008). “A Hard-Line Reply to Pereboom’s Four-Case Manipulation Argument,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77: 142–59.Google Scholar
McKenna, Michael. (2012). Conversation and Responsibility, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKenna, Michael. (2014). “Revisiting the Manipulation Argument: A Hard-Liner Takes It on the Chin,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87(2): 467–87.Google Scholar
McKenna, Michael. (2019). “Basically Deserved Blame and its Value,” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 15: 255–82.Google Scholar
McKenna, Michael, and Pereboom, Derk. (2016). Free Will: A Contemporary Introduction, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred. (2008). “Manipulation, Compatibilism, and Moral Responsibility,” The Journal of Ethics 12: 263–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milam, Per-Erik. (2016). “Reactive Attitudes and Personal Relationships,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42: 102–22.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, Moti. (2015a). “Ought, Can, and Presupposition: An Experimental Study,” Methode 4(6): 232–43.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, Moti. (2015b). “Ought, Can, and Presupposition: A Reply to Kurthy and Lawford-Smith,” Methode 4(6): 250–56.Google Scholar
Morris, Stephen. (2009). “The Impact of Neuroscience on the Free Will Debate,” Florida Philosophical Review 9(2): 56–78.Google Scholar
Stephen., Morris (2018). “The Implications of Rejecting Free Will: An Empirical Analysis.” Philosophical Psychology 31(2): 299–321.Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. (2004). “Reasons, Results, and Criminal Responsibility,” University of Illinois Law Review 2004: 363–444.Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. (2016). “The Inevitable Mind in the Age of Neuroscience,” in Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience, Patterson, Dennis and Pardo, Michael S., eds., pp. 29–50, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. (2018). “The Neuroscientific Non-Challenge to Meaning, Morals, and Purpose,” in Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience, Caruso, Gregg D. and Flanagan, Owen, eds., pp. 333–58, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrie G. (1988). “Hatred: A Qualified Defense,” in Forgiveness and Mercy, Murphy, Jeffrie G. and Hampton, Jean, eds., pp. 88–110, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Dylan, and Lombrozo, Tania. (2017). “Effects of Manipulation on Attributions of Causation, Free Will, and Moral Responsibility,” Cognitive Science 41: 447–81.Google Scholar
Nadelhoffer, Thomas. (2006). “Bad Acts, Blameworthy Agents, and Intentional Action: Some Problems for Jury Impartiality,” Philosophical Explorations 9: 203–20.Google Scholar
Nadelhoffer, Thomas. (2011). “The Threat of Shrinking Agency and Free Will Disillusionism,” in Conscious Will and Responsibility, Nadel, Lynne and Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, eds., pp. 173–88, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nahmias, Eddy. (2014). “Is Free Will an Illusion? Confronting Challenges from the Modern Mind Sciences,” in Moral Psychology, vol. 4, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, ed., pp. 1–25, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dana K. (2004/2013). “Moral Luck,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Zalta, Edward N., ed., https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-luck/.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dana K. (2011). Making Sense of Freedom and Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dana K. (2014). “Free Will Skepticism and Obligation Skepticism: Comments on Derk Pereboom’s Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life,” Science, Religion and Culture 1(3): 209–17.Google Scholar
Nichols, Shaun. (2007). “After Compatibilism: A Naturalistic Defense of the Reactive Attitudes,” Philosophical Perspectives 21: 405–28.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. (1888/1954). Twilight of the Idols, Walter Kaufmann, tr., New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. (2010). “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions,” Political Behavior 32: 303–30.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. (2015). “Does Correcting Myths about the Flu Vaccine Work? An Experimental Evaluation of the Effects of Corrective Information,” Vaccine 33: 459–64.Google Scholar
Timothy., O’Connor (2008). “Agent-Causal Power,” in Dispositions and Causes, Handfield, Toby, ed., pp. 189–214, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Papineau, David. (2002). Thinking About Consciousness, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. (2001). Living without Free Will, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. (2008). “A Hard-Line Reply to the Multiple-Case Manipulation Argument,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77: 160–70.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. (2013). “Free Will Skepticism and Criminal Responsibility,” in The Future of Punishment, Nadelhoffer, Thomas, ed., pp. 49–78, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. (2014a). Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. (2014b). “Responses to John Fischer and Dana Nelkin,” Science, Religion, and Culture 1(3): 218–25.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. (2016). “A Defense of Free Will Skepticism: Replies to Commentaries by Victor Tadros, Saul Smilansky, Michael McKenna, and Alfred R. Mele on Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life,” Criminal Law and Philosophy 11(3): 1–20.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. (2017a). “Response to Daniel Dennett on Free Will Skepticism,” Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 8: 259–65.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. (2017b). “Responsibility, Agency, and the Disappearing Agent Objection,” in Arbitre, Le Libre-, approches contemporaines, Jean-Baptiste Guillon, ed., pp. 1–18, Paris: Collège de France.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. (2017c). “Responsibility, Regret, and Protest,” in Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, vol. 4, David Shoemaker, ed., pp. 121–40, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. (2018). “Love and Freedom,” in The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Love, Christopher Grau and Aaron Smuts, eds., pp. 123–76, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. (2020). “Incapacitation, Reintegration, and Limited General Deterrence,” Neuroethics 13: 87–97.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. (2021a). “Undivided Forward-Looking Moral Responsibility,” The Monist 104(4): 484–97.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. (2021b). Wrongdoing and the Moral Emotions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. (2022). Free Will, Cambridge Elements in Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk, and Caruso, Gregg D.. (2018). “Hard-Incompatibilist Existentialism: Neuroscience, Punishment, and Meaning in Life,” in Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience, Caruso, Gregg D. and Flanagan, Owen, eds., pp. 193–222, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Powers, Madison, and Faden, Ruth. (2006). Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health Policy, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Priestley, Joseph. (1778/1965). “A Free Discussion of the Doctrines of Materialism and Philosophical Necessity,” in A Correspondence between Dr. Price and Dr. Priestley, London: Joseph Johnson, 1778, Part III; reprinted in Priestley, Joseph, Priestley’s Writings on Philosophy, Science, and Politics, John Passmore, ed., New York: Collier.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas. (1788/1983). Essays on the Active Powers of Man, in The Works of Thomas Reid, D.D., Hamilton, Sir William, ed., Hildesheim: G. Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Richards, Janet Radcliffe. (2000). Human Nature after Darwin: A Philosophical Introduction, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosen, Gideon. (2004). “Skepticism about Moral Responsibility,” Philosophical Perspectives 18: 295–313.Google Scholar
Rudy-Hiller, Fernando. (2018). “The Epistemic Condition for Moral Responsibility,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman eds., https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility-epistemic/.Google Scholar
Śāntideva. (700/1995). The Bodhicaryāvaātra, Kate Crosby and Andrew Skilton, trs., New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sapolsky, Robert M. (2017). Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other, Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas M. (2013). “Giving Desert Its Due,” Philosophical Explorations 16: 101–16.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. (1818/1961). The World as Will and Idea (later translated as The World as Will and Representation), Richard Burdon Haldane and John Kemp, trs., Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Shabo, Seth. (2012). “Where Love and Resentment Meet: Strawson’s Interpersonal Defense of Compatibilism,” Philosophical Review 121: 95–124.Google Scholar
Shariff, Azim F., Greene, Joshua D., Karremans, Johan C. et al. (2014). “Free Will and Punishment: A Mechanistic View of Human Nature Reduces Retribution,” Psychological Science 25(8): 1563–70.Google Scholar
Shaw, Elizabeth. (2011). “Free Will, Punishment and Neurotechnologies,” in Technologies on the Stand: Legal and Ethical Questions in Neuroscience and Robotics, Bibi, van den Berg and Klaming, Laura, eds., pp. 177–94, Nijmegen: Wolf Legal.Google Scholar
Shaw, Elizabeth. (2019). “Justice without Moral Responsibility?” Journal of Information Ethics 28(1): 95–114.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, David. (2011). “Attributability, Answerability, and Accountability: Toward a Wider Theory of Moral Responsibility,” Ethics 121: 602–32.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, David. (2015). Responsibility from the Margins, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, David. (2018). “You Oughta Know: Defending Angry Blame,” in The Moral Psychology of Anger, Cherry, Mysha and Flanagan, Owen, eds., pp. 67–88, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Sifferd, Katrina. (2006). “In Defense of the Use of Commonsense Psychology in the Criminal Law,” Law and Philosophy 25(6): 571–612.Google Scholar
Sifferd, Katrina. (2014). “What Does It Mean to Be a Mechanism? Stephen Morse, Non-Reductivism, and Mental Causation,” Criminal Law and Philosophy 11: 143–59.Google Scholar
Sifferd, Katrina. (2021). “Why Not ‘Weak’ Retributivism?” Journal of Legal Philosophy 46(2): 138–43.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. (1984). “‘Ought’ Conversationally Implies ‘Can’,” Philosophical Review 93(2): 249–61.Google Scholar
Slattery, , ‘Trick. (2014). Breaking the Free Will Illusion for the Betterment of Humankind, Working Matter Publishing.Google Scholar
Slote, Michael. (1990). “Ethics without Free Will,” Social Theory and Practice 16: 369–83.Google Scholar
Smilansky, Saul. (1990). “Utilitarianism and the ‘Punishment’ of the Innocent: The General Problem,” Analysis 50: 256–61.Google Scholar
Smilansky, Saul. (1997). “Can a Determinist Help Herself?” in Freedom and Responsibility: General and Jewish Perspectives, Manekin, Charles H. and Kellner, Menachem M., eds., pp. 85–98, College Park: University of Maryland Press.Google Scholar
Smilansky, Saul. (1999). “Free Will: The Positive Role of Illusion,” The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Bowling Green: Philosophy Document Center 2: 143–52.Google Scholar
Smilansky, Saul. (2002). “Free Will, Fundamental Dualism, and the Centrality of Illusion,” in The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, Kane, Robert, ed., pp. 249–505, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smilansky, Saul. (2005). “Free Will and Respect for Persons,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29: 248–61.Google Scholar
Smilansky, Saul. (2011). “Hard Determinism and Punishment: A Practical Reductio,” Law and Philosophy 30: 353–67.Google Scholar
Smilansky, Saul. (2012). “Review of Bruce N. Waller’s Against Moral Responsibility,” Notre Dame Philosophical Review. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/against-moral-responsibility/.Google Scholar
Smilansky, Saul. (2017). “Pereboom on Punishment: Funishment, Innocence, Motivation, and Other Difficulties,” Criminal Law and Philosophy 11: 591–603.Google Scholar
Smilansky, Saul. (2022). “Illusionism,” in The Oxford Handbook on Moral Responsibility, Nelkin, Dana Kay and Pereboom, Derk, eds., pp. 203–21, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Angela. (2012). “Attributability, Answerability, and Accountability: In Defense of a Unified Account,” Ethics 122(3): 575–89.Google Scholar
Smith, Angela. (2013). “Moral Blame and Moral Protest,” in Blame: Its Nature and Norms, Justin Coates, D. and Tognazzini, Neal A., eds., pp. 27–48, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sommers, Tamler. (2007). “The Objective Attitude,” Philosophical Quarterly 57: 321–41.Google Scholar
Sommers, Tamler. (2012). Relative Justice: Cultural Diversity, Free Will, and Moral Responsibility, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus. (1677/1985). Ethics, in The Collected Works of Spinoza, vol. 1, Curley, Edwin, ed. and tr., pp. 408–620, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen. (1994). “The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility,” Philosophical Studies 75: 5–24.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F. (1962). “Freedom and Resentment,” Proceedings of the British Academy 48: 187–211.Google Scholar
Tadros, Victor. (2017). “Doing without Desert,” Criminal Law and Philosophy 11: 605–16.Google Scholar
Talbert, Matthew. (2012). “Moral Competence, Moral Blame, and Protest,” Journal of Ethics 16: 89–101.Google Scholar
Telech, Daniel. (2021). “Praise as Moral Address,” in Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, vol. 7, David Shoemaker, ed., pp. 154–81, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tognazzini, Neal A. (2014). “The Structure of a Manipulation Argument,” Ethics 124(2): 358–69.Google Scholar
Trevors, Gregory J., Muis, Krista R., Pekrun, Reinhard, Sinatra, Gale M., and Winne, Philip H. (2016). “Identity and Epistemic Emotions During Knowledge Revision: A Potential Account for the Backfire Effect,” Discourse Processes 53(5–6): 339–70.Google Scholar
Vaidman, Lev. (2014). “Quantum Theory and Determinism,” Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations 1: 5–38.Google Scholar
Vargas, Manuel. (2007). “Revisionism” and “Response to Fischer, Kane, and Pereboom,” in Four Views on Free Will, Fischer, John Martin, Kane, Robert, Pereboom, Derk, and Vargas, Manuel, eds., pp. 126–65, 204–19, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vargas, Manuel. (2015). “Desert, Responsibility, and Justification: A Reply to Doris, McGeer, and Robinson,” Philosophical Studies 172: 2659–78.Google Scholar
Vilhauer, Benjamin. (2004). “Hard Determinism, Remorse, and Virtue Ethics,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 42: 547–64.Google Scholar
Vilhauer, Benjamin. (2009a). “Free Will and Reasonable Doubt,” American Philosophical Quarterly 46: 131–40.Google Scholar
Vilhauer, Benjamin. (2009b). “Free Will Skepticism and Personhood as a Desert Base,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39: 489–511.Google Scholar
Vilhauer, Benjamin. (2012). “Taking Free Will Skepticism Seriously,” Philosophical Quarterly 62: 833–52.Google Scholar
Vilhauer, Benjamin. (2013a). “The People Problem,” in Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility, Caruso, Gregg D., ed., pp. 141–60, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Vilhauer, Benjamin. (2013b). “Persons, Punishment, and Free Will Skepticism,” Philosophical Studies 162: 143–63.Google Scholar
Walen, Alec. (2021). “Determinism, Compatibilism, and Basic Desert: A Reply to Gregg Caruso,” Journal of Legal Philosophy 46(2): 144–48.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. Jay. (1994). Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Waller, Bruce. (1989). “Denying Responsibility: The Difference it Makes,” Analysis 49(1): 44–47.Google Scholar
Waller, Bruce. (1990). Freedom without Responsibility, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Waller, Bruce. (2004). “Virtue Unrewarded: Morality without Moral Responsibility,” Philosophia 31(3–4): 427–47.Google Scholar
Waller, Bruce. (2014). The Stubborn System of Moral Responsibility, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Gary. (1987). “Responsibility and the Limits of Evil,” in Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions, Schoeman, Ferdinand, ed., pp. 256–86, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan. (2011). “Blame, Italian Style,” in Reasons and Cognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T.M. Scanlon, Jay Wallace, R., Kumar, Rahul, and Freeman, Samuel, eds., pp. 332–47 New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Michael. (2011). The Immorality of Punishment, Petersborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
- 10
- Cited by