Element contents
Series: Elements in Philosophy of Mind
Mindreading and Social Cognition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 January 2022
Summary
The cognitive ability to think about other people's psychological states is known as `mindreading'. This Element critiques assumptions that have been formative in shaping philosophical theories of mindreading: that mindreading is ubiquitous, underpinning the vast majority of our social interactions; and that its primary goal is to provide predictions and explanations of other people's behaviour. It begins with an overview of key positions and empirical literature in the debate. It then introduces and motivates the pluralist turn in this literature, which challenges the core assumptions of the traditional views. The second part of the Element uses case studies to further motivate the pluralist framework, and to advocate the pluralist approach as the best way to progress our understanding of social cognitive phenomena.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Philosophy of MindOnline ISBN: 9781108946766Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 10 February 2022
References
Abelson, R. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36(7), 715–729. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.7.715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, K. (2003). Knowing mental states: The asymmetry of psychological prediction and explanation. In Smith, Q. & Jokic, A. (Eds.), Consciousness: New philosophical perspectives (pp. 201–219). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, K. (2012). Do apes read minds?: Toward a new folk psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, K. (2015). The folk psychological spiral: Explanation, regulation, and language. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 53(S1), 50–67. http://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12121.Google Scholar
Andrews, K. (2016). Pluralistic folk psychology in humans and other apes. In Kiverstein, J. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of the social mind (pp. 117–138). Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Andrews, K. , Spaulding, S., & Westra, E. (2020). Introduction to folk psychology: Pluralistic approaches. Synthese (Vol. 198, pp. 1–16). http://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02837-3.Google Scholar
Apperly, I. A. (2010). Mindreaders: The cognitive basis of ‘theory of mind’. Hove: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apperly, I. A., & Butterfill, S. A. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review, 116(4), 953–970. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0016923.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, H. C., Bolyanatz, A., Crittenden, A. N., Fessler, D. M., Fitzpatrick, S., Gurven, M., … Laurence, S. (2016a). Small-scale societies exhibit fundamental variation in the role of intentions in moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(17), 4688–4693. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522070113.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. C., Bolyanatz, A., Crittenden, A. N., Fessler, D. M., Fitzpatrick, S., Gurven, M., … Laurence, S. (2016b). Small-scale societies exhibit fundamental variation in the role of intentions in moral judgment: Supplementary information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(17), 1–71. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522070113.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. C., Broesch, T., Scott, R. M., He, Z., Baillargeon, R., Wu, D., … Laurence, S. (2013a). Early false-belief understanding in traditional non-Western societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1755), 1–6. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2654.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. C., Broesch, T., Scott, R. M., He, Z., Baillargeon, R., Wu, D., … Laurence, S. (2013b). Early false-belief understanding in traditional non-western societies: Supplementary material. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1755), 1–29. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2654.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D. (2012). The empathy-altruism hypothesis: Issues and implications. In Decety, J. (Ed.), Empathy: From bench to bedside (pp. 40–54). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bennet, J. (1978). Commentary on three papers about animal cognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526.Google Scholar
Botero, Maria. (2016) Tactless scientists: Ignoring touch in the study of joint attention. Philosophical Psychology 29, 1200–1214.Google Scholar
Botero, M. (2018). Bringing touch back to the study of emotions in human and non-human primates: A theoretical exploration. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 31, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bräuer, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Chimpanzees really know what others can see in a competitive situation. Animal Cognition, 10(4), 439–448. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0088-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2013). How to construct a minimal theory of mind. Mind and Language, 28(5), 606–637. http://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12036.Google Scholar
Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2016). Is goal ascription possible in minimal mindreading? Psychological Review, 123(2), 228–233. http://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000022.Google Scholar
Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 187–192. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.010.Google Scholar
Callaghan, T., Rochat, P., Lillard, A., Claux, M. L., Odden, H., Itakura, S., … Singh, S. (2005). Synchrony in the onset of mental-state reasoning: Evidence from five cultures. Psychological Science, 16(5), 378–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, S. (2009b). Where our number concepts come from. Journal of Philosophy, 106(4), 220–254. http://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2009106418.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2011). The opacity of mind: An integrative theory of self-knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2013). Mindreading in infancy. Mind and Language, 28(2), 141–172. http://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12014.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2017). Mindreading in adults: Evaluating two-systems views. Synthese, 194(3), 673–688. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0792-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2020). How mindreading might mislead cognitive science. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 27(7–8), 195–219.Google Scholar
Christensen, S. M., & Turner, D. R. (1993). Introduction. In Christensen, S. M. & Turner, D. R. (Eds.), Folk psychology and the philosophy of mind (pp. xv–xxx). Taylor and Francis, New York.Google Scholar
Christensen, W., & Michael, J. (2016). From two systems to a multi-systems architecture for mindreading. New Ideas in Psychology, 40, 48–64.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. M. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clayton, N. S., Dally, J. M., & Emery, N. J. (2007). Social cognition by food-caching corvids. The western scrub-jay as a natural psychologist. Philosophical Transactions. Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 507–522. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1992.Google Scholar
Conway, J. R., Coll, M.-P., Cuve, H. C., Koletsi, S., Bronitt, N., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2020). Understanding how minds vary relates to skill in inferring mental states, personality, and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(6), 1032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csibra, G. (2008). Action mirroring and action understanding: An alternative account. In Haggard, P. & Rossetti, Y. (Eds.), Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition: Attention and performance xxii (pp. 435–459). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1963). Actions, reasons and causes. Journal of Philosophy, 60(23), 685–700.Google Scholar
Davies, M., & Stone, T. (2001). Mental simulation, tacit theory, and the threat of collapse. Philosophical Topics, 29(1/2), 127–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jaegher, H. (2009). Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(2), 535–542. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.10.007.Google Scholar
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9.Google Scholar
De Villiers, J. (2007). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua, 117(11), 1858–1878.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1978). Consciousness in nonhuman species: Open peer commentary and authors’ responses. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4(May 2016), 568–570. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00027862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, V. M. (2010). Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview. In Dovidio, J. F., Miles, H., Glick, P., & Esses, V. (Eds.), The sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 3–28). Sage http://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919.Google Scholar
Drayson, Z. (2012). The uses and abuses of the personal/subpersonal distinction. Philosophical Perspectives, 26, 1–18.Google Scholar
Fabricius, W. V., & Imbens-Bailey, A. (2014). False beliefs about false beliefs. In Mitchell, P. & Riggs, K. (Eds.), Children’s reasoning and the mind (pp. 281–264). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Fabricius, W. V., & Khalil, S. L. (2003). False beliefs or false positives? Limits on children’s understanding of mental representation. Journal of Cognition and Development, 4(3), 239–262.Google Scholar
Fenici, M., & Zawidzki, T. W. (2021). The origins of mindreading: How interpretive socio-cognitive practices get off the ground. Synthese (Vol. 198, pp. 8365–8387).Google Scholar
Fiebich, A., Gallagher, S., & Hutto, D. D. (2016). Pluralism, interaction and the ontogeny of social cognition. In Kiverstein, J. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of the social mind (pp. 208–221). Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A., & Fodor, J. A. (1987). Psychosemantics: The problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind (British Psychological Society, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2001a). The practice of mind. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5), 83–108.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2001b). The practice of mind. Theory, simulation or primary interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5–6), 83–108.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2004). Understanding interpersonal problems in autism. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, 11, 199–217.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2005). Folk psychology as a model. Philosopher’s Imprint, 5(6), 1–16.Google Scholar
Goldie, P. (2000). The emotions: A philosophical exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Astington, J. W. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development, 59, 26–37.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (2012). Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory theory. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1085–1108. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0028044.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (2000). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hare, B., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2001). Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? Animal Behaviour, 61(1), 139–151. http://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1518.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (1978). Studying the chimpanzee’s theory of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 576–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heal, J. (2005). Joint attention and understanding the mind. In Eilan, N., Hoerl, C., McCormack, T., & Roessler, J. (Eds.), Joint attention: Communication and other minds (pp. 34–44). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation, and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 135.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.Google Scholar
Hertenstein, M. J., Keltner, D., App, B., Bulleit, B. A., & Jaskolka, A. R. (2006). Touch communicates distinct emotions. Emotion, 6(3), 528–533. http://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.528.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. (2014a). False belief in infancy: A fresh look. Developmental Science, 17(5), 647–659. http://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C. (2014b). Submentalizing: I am not really reading your mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(2), 131–143. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613518076.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. (2015). Animal mindreading: What’s the problem? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 313–327.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. (2018). Enquire within: Cultural evolution and cognitive science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1743), 20170051.Google Scholar
Hobson, P. (2007). We share, therefore we think. In D. Hutto, D. & Ratcliffe, M. J. (Eds.), Folk psychology re-assessed (pp. 41–61). Springer.Google Scholar
Holt, R. A., & Lawton, J. (1994). The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 25(1), 495–520.Google Scholar
Hood, B. M. (2004). Is looking good enough or does it beggar belief? Developmental Science, 7(4), 415–417. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00358.x.Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D. (2004). The limits of spectatorial folk psychology. Mind & Language, 19(5), 548–573.Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D. (2008). Folk psychological narratives: The sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D., & Hutto, D. D. (2008). Folk psychological narratives: The sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ilgaz, H., & Allen, J. W. (2020). (Co-)Constructing a theory of mind: From language or through language? Synthese (Vol. 198, pp. 8463–8484). http://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02581-8.Google Scholar
Jussim, L., Crawford, J. T., & Rubinstein, R. S. (2015). Stereotype (in)accuracy in perceptions of groups and individuals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 490–497. http://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415605257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampis, D., Kármán, P., Csibra, G., Southgate, V., & Hernick, M. (2020). A two-lab direct replication attempt of Southgate, Senju and Csibra (2007). PsyArXiv Preprints. http://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gzy26.Google Scholar
Knobe, J. (2003). Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigation. Philosophical Psychology, 16(2), 309–324.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., & Keltner, D. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1716–1723.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krupenye, C., Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Great apes anticipate that other individuals will act according to false beliefs. Science, 354(6308), 110–114.Google Scholar
Kulke, L., & Hinrichs, M. A. B. (2021). Implicit theory of mind under realistic social circumstances measured with mobile eye-tracking. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Kulke, L., Johannsen, J., & Rakoczy, H. (2019). Why can some implicit theory of mind tasks be replicated and others cannot? A test of mentalizing versus submentalizing accounts. PloS One, 14(3), e0213772.Google Scholar
Kulke, L., Wübker, M., & Rakoczy, H. (2019). Is implicit theory of mind real but hard to detect? Testing adults with different stimulus materials. Royal Society Open Science, 6(7), 190068.Google Scholar
Kuntoro, I. A., Saraswati, L., Peterson, C., & Slaughter, V. (2013). Microcultural influences on theory of mind development: A comparative study of middle-class and pemulung children in Jakarta, Indonesia. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37(3), 266–273. http://doi.org/10.1177/0165025413478258.Google Scholar
Kushnir, T., Xu, F., & Wellman, H. M. (2010). Young children use statistical sampling to infer the preferences of other people. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1134–1140.Google Scholar
Lavelle, J. S. (2016). Cross-cultural differences and similarities in mindreading. In Kiverstein, J. (Ed.), The routledge handbook of philosophy of the social mind (pp. 172–188). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lavelle, J. S. (2019a). The impact of culture on mindreading. Synthese (Vol. 198, pp. 6351–6374). http://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02466-5.Google Scholar
Lavelle, J. S. (2019b). The social mind: A philosophical introduction. London; Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Lavelle, J. S. (2020). When a crisis becomes an opportunity: The role of replications in making better theories. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1–39.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1972). Psychophysical and theoretical identifications. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 50(3), 249–258.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Luo, R., & Su, Y. (2016). From the external to the internal: Behavior clarifications facilitate theory of mind (ToM) development in Chinese children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(1), 21–30. http://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414562484.Google Scholar
Low, J., Apperly, I. A., Butterfill, S. A., & Rakoczy, H. (2016). Cognitive architecture of belief reasoning in children and adults: A primer on the two-systems account. Child Development Perspectives, 10(3), 184–189. http://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12183.Google Scholar
Luo, Y., & Baillargeon, R. (2007). Do 12.5-month-old infants consider what objects others can see when interpreting their actions? Cognition, 105(3), 489–512.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. E., Young, A. G., & Keil, F. C. (2007). The hidden structure of overimitation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(50), 19751–19756.Google Scholar
Maibom, H. (2009). In defence of (model) theory theory. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(6), 360–378. http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199334919.003.0006.Google Scholar
Mameli, M. (2001). Mindreading, mindshaping, and evolution. Biology and Philosophy, 16(5), 595–626.Google Scholar
Mayer, A., & Träuble, B. E. (2013). Synchrony in the onset of mental state understanding across cultures? A study among children in Samoa. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37(1), 21–28. http://doi.org/10.1177/0165025412454030.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Chan, W., Jussim, L., De Fruyt, F., Löckenhoff, C. E., De Bolle, M., … Terracciano, A. (2013). The inaccuracy of national character stereotypes. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 831–842. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.08.006.Google Scholar
McGeer, V. (2001). Psycho-practice, psycho-theory and autism. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 109–132.Google Scholar
McGeer, V. (2007). The regulative dimension of folk psychology. In Hutto, D. D. & Ratcliffe, M. J. (Eds.), Folk psychology re-assessed (pp. 137–156). Springer.Google Scholar
McGlone, F., Vallbo, A. B., Olausson, H., Loken, L., & Wessberg, J. (2007). Discriminative touch and emotional touch. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(3), 173–183. http://doi.org/10.1037/cjep2007019.Google Scholar
Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 961–978. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.961.Google Scholar
Miller, J. G. (2002). Bringing culture to basic psychological theory–beyond individualism and collectivism: Comment on oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 97–109.Google Scholar
Miller, J. G., Das, R., & Chakravarthy, S. (2011). Culture and the role of choice in agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 46–61. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0023330.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories: New foundations for realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Morton, A. (2003). The importance of being understood: Folk psychology as ethics. Hoboken: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nawaz, S., Hanif, R., & Lewis, C. (2015). ‘Theory of mind’ development of Pakistani children: Do preschoolers acquire an understanding of desire, pretence and belief in a universal sequence? European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(2), 177–188.Google Scholar
Nawaz, S., & Lewis, C. (2018). Mother–child conversation and social understanding in Pakistan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(5), 496–505. http://doi.org/10.1177/0165025417741365.Google Scholar
Nelson, K., & Gruendel, J. M. (1979). At morning it’s lunchtime: A scriptal view of children’s dialogues. Discourse Processes, 2(2), 73–94. http://doi.org/10.1080/01638537909544456.Google Scholar
Nichols, A. L., & Maner, J. K. (2008). The good-subject effect: Investigating participant demand characteristics. The Journal of General Psychology, 135(2), 151–166.Google Scholar
Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2003). Mindreading: An integrated account of pretence, self-awareness, and understanding other minds. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Nielsen, M., & Tomaselli, K. (2010). Overimitation in Kalahari Bushman children and the origins of human cultural cognition. Psychological Science, 21(5), 729–736.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. (2004). The geography of thought: How asians and westerners think differently… and why. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Nissani, M. (2004). Theory of mind and insight in chimpanzees, elephants, and other animals? In Rogers, L. J & Kaplan, G. (Eds.), Comparative vertebrate cognition: Are primates superior to non-primates? (pp. 227–261). Springer US. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8913-0_7.Google Scholar
O’Grady, C. J. (2020). Theory of mind and language evolution: An exploration of rapid and involuntary perspective-taking (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). School of PPLS, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
O’Grady, C. J., Scott-Phillips, T., Lavelle, J. S., & Smith, K. (2020). Perspectivetaking is spontaneous but not automatic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(10), 1605–1628.Google Scholar
Olausson, H., Wessberg, J., Morrison, I., McGlone, F., & Vallbo, A. (2010). The neurophysiology of unmyelinated tactile afferents. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 185–191.Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3.Google Scholar
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: ERIC.Google Scholar
Pavarini, G. de Hollanda Souza, D & Hawk, C. K. (2013). Parental practices and theory of mind development. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22(6), 844–853.Google Scholar
Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 181.Google Scholar
Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2008). Darwin’s mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(2), 109–130. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08003543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penn, D. C., & Povinelli, D. J. (2013). The comparative delusion: The ‘behavioristic/mentalistic’ dichotomy in comparative theory of Mind Research. In Metcalfe, J. & Terrace, H. S (Eds.), Agency and joint attention (pp. 62–82). Oxford University Press. https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199988341.001.0001/acprof-9780199988341-chapter-4. http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199988341.003.0004.Google Scholar
Perner, J., & Roessler, J. (2010). Teleology and causal understanding in childrens’ theory of mind. In Aguilar, J. & Buckareff, A. (Eds.), Causing human action: New perspectives on the causal theory of action (pp. 199–228). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Povinelli, D. J. (1996). What young chimpanzees know about seeing (Povinelli, D. J, Eddy, T. J., & Society for Research in Child Development, Eds.). Chicago: Society for Research in Child Development.Google Scholar
Povinelli, D. J., & Vonk, J. (2003). Chimpanzee minds: Suspiciously human? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 157–160. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00053-6.Google Scholar
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515–526. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512.Google Scholar
Priewasser, B., Rafetseder, E., Gargitter, C., & Perner, J. (2018). Helping as an early indicator of a theory of mind: Mentalism or teleology? Cognitive Development, 46(August), 69–78. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.08.002.Google Scholar
Quadflieg, S., Mason, M. F., & Macrae, C. N. (2010). Social cognitive neural processes. In Dovidio, J. F, Miles, H., Glick, P., & Esses, V. (Eds.), The sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 65–80). Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1972). Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory. In Davidson, Donald and Harman, Gilbert (Eds.), Semantics of natural language (pp. 442–454). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, M. J. (2006). Rethinking commonsense psychology: A critique of folk psychology, theory of mind and simulation. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Repacholi, B. M., & Gopnik, A. (1997). Early reasoning about desires: Evidence from 14-and 18-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 12.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M., & Wellman, H. (2013). Constructing a new theory from old ideas and new evidence. Cognitive Science, 37(3), 592–604.Google Scholar
Rizzo, M. T., & Killen, M. (2018). How social status influences our understanding of others’ mental states. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 169, 30–41. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.12.008.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 169–192.Google Scholar
Robbins, J., & Rumsey, A. (2008). Cultural and linguistic anthropology and the opacity. Anthropological Quarterly, 81(2), 407–421.Google Scholar
Roessler, J., & Perner, J. (2015). Pro-social cognition: Helping, practical reasons, and ‘theory of mind’. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 755–767.Google Scholar
Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Braithwaite, J. J., Andrews, B. J., & Bodley Scott, S. E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1255.Google ScholarPubMed
Schick, B., De Villiers, P., De Villiers, J., & Hoffmeister, R. (2007). Language and theory of mind: A study of deaf children. Child Development, 78(2), 376–396. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01004.x.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B. (2008). Speaking only your own mind: Reflections on talk, gossip and intentionality in bosavi (png). Anthropological Quarterly, 81(2), 431–441.Google Scholar
Schneider, D., Slaughter, V. P., & Dux, P. E. (2017). Current evidence for automatic theory of mind processing in adults. Cognition, 162, 27–31.Google Scholar
Schuwerk, T., Kampis, D., Baillargeon, R., Biro, S., Bohn, M., Byers-Heinlein, K., … Franchin, L. (2021). Action anticipation based on an agent’s epistemic state in toddlers and adults. http://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/x4jbm.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21(2), 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. M., & Baillargeon, R. (2017). Early false-belief understanding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(4), 237–249.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In Feigl, H. & Scriven, M. (Eds.), Studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 1, pp. 253–329). University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sheehy, E., & Lawton, C. (2014). Population crash in an invasive species following the recovery of a native predator: The case of the American grey squirrel and the European pine marten in Ireland. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23(3), 753–774. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0632-7.Google Scholar
Sheehy, E., Sutherland, C., O’Reilly, C., & Lambin, X. (2018). The enemy of my enemy is my friend: Native pine marten recovery reverses the decline of the red squirrel by suppressing grey squirrel populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1874), 1–9. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2603.Google Scholar
Southgate, V., Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2007). Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by 2-year-olds. Psychological Science, 18(7), 587–592.Google Scholar
Southgate, V., & Vernetti, A. (2014). Belief-based action prediction in preverbal infants. Cognition, 130(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Spaulding, S. (2013). Mirror neurons and social cognition. Mind and Language, 28(2), 233–257. http://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12017.Google Scholar
Stasch, R. (2008). Knowing minds is a matter of authority: Political dimensions of opacity statements in korowai moral psychology. Anthropological Quarterly, 81(2), 443–453.Google Scholar
Stich, S., & Ravenscroft, I. (1994). What is folk psychology? Cognition, 50(1–3), 447–468.Google Scholar
Surian, L., Caldi, S., & Sperber, D. (2007). Attribution of beliefs by 13-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 18(7), 580–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theimer, C. E., Killen, M., & Stangor, C. (2001). Young children’s evaluations of exclusion in gender-stereotypic peer contexts. Developmental Psychology, 37(1), 18.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1979a). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In Bullowa, M. (Ed.), Before speech. the beginning of interpersonal communication (pp. 321–348). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1979b). The concept and foundation of infant intersubjectivity. In Braten, S. (Ed.), Before speech. the beginning of interpersonal communication (pp. 15–46). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tschudin, A. J.-P. (2006). Belief attribution tasks with dolphins: What social minds can reveal about animal rationality. In Nudds, M. & Hurley, S. (Eds.), Rational Animals? (pp. 413–430). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Udell, M. A., Dorey, N. R., & Wynne, C. D. (2011). Can your dog read your mind? Understanding the causes of canine perspective taking. Learning & Behavior, 39(4), 289–302.Google Scholar
Vinden, P. G., & Vinden, G. (1996). Junin Quechua children’s understanding of mind. Child Development, 67(4), 1707–1716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, M. (2007). Who is a modeler? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 58(2),207–233. http://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axm011.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M. (2014). Making minds: How theory of mind develops. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M., Fang, F., Liu, D., Zhu, L., & Liu, G. (2006). Scaling of theory-of-mind understandings in Chinese children. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1075–1081. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS%26PAGE=reference%26D=emed7%26NEWS=N%26AN=17201790.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M., & Miller, J. G. (2006). Developing conceptions of responsive intentional agents. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6(1–2), 27–55. http://doi.org/10.1163/156853706776931394.Google Scholar
Westra, E. (2018). Character and theory of mind: an integrative approach. Philosophical Studies, 175(5), 1217–1241.Google Scholar
Westra, E. (2019). Stereotypes, theory of mind, and the action–prediction hierarchy. Synthese, 196(7), 2821–2846. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1575-9.Google Scholar
Westra, E. (2020). When is mindreading accurate? A commentary on shannon spaulding’s how we understand others: Philosophy and social cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 33(6), 868–882.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128. http://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5.Google Scholar
Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685.Google Scholar
Zawidzki, T. W. (2008). The function of folk psychology: Mind reading or mind shaping? Philosophical Explorations, 11(3), 193–210.Google Scholar
Zawidzki, T. W. (2013). Mindshaping: A new framework for understanding human social cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zawidzki, T. W. (2018). Mindshaping. In Newen, A., Bruin, L. D, & Gallagher, S. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 14
- Cited by