Element contents
Intercultural Communication in Virtual Exchange
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 November 2024
Summary
Virtual exchange is an educational approach that uses technology to bring together people from geographically and/or culturally distant locations in sustained online interactions, often intended to develop their intercultural awareness and understanding. Though the practice has existed for several decades, it has gained popularity in recent years, in part due to the recent Covid-19 pandemic and recourse to online tools for international and intercultural learning. This Element explores intercultural communication in virtual exchange by looking at how and why culture is made relevant in the pedagogical design and framing of virtual exchanges and what impact this might have on student positioning, power dynamics, and on intercultural learning. From this framework three broad approaches are outlined, which are defined as comparative, challenge-based, and dialogue-based. Each approach is explored through examples and the opportunities, limitations, and risks for intercultural learning.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009385589Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 09 January 2025
References
Abrahamse, A., Johnson, M., Levinson, N., et al. (2015). A virtual educational exchange: A north–south virtually shared class on sustainable development. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(2), 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315314540474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, M. (2021). Comparative disciplines: An introduction. In Adams, M. & Hoecke, M. V., eds., Comparative methods in law, humanities and social sciences. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Akkari, A., & Maleq, K. (2020). Global citizenship education: Critical and international perspectives. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al Mqadma, A., & Al Karriri, A. (2020). Erasmus+ virtual exchange for internationalisation in besieged areas: A case study of the Islamic University of Gaza. In Helm, F. & Beaven, A., eds., Designing and implementing virtual exchange – a collection of case studies. Dublin/Voillans: Research-publishing.net, pp. 167–178. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2020.45.1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alami, N., Albuquerque, J., Ashton, L., et al. (2022). Marginalization and underrepresentation in virtual exchange: Reasons and remedies. Journal of International Students, 12(S3), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcoff, L. (2011). An epistemology for the next revolution. TRANSMODERNITY: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.5070/T412011808.Google Scholar
Andreotti, V., & de Souza, L. M. T. M. (2008). Translating theory into practice and walking minefields: Lessons from the project ‘through other eyes’. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 1, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.18546/IJDEGL.01.1.03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreotti, V., & Souza, L. M. , M. de (Eds.). (2014). Postcolonial perspectives on global citizenship education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Appel, H. B., Martínez-Fernández, M. C., & Fernández-Martínez, E. (2023). Implementation of COIL in mental health education: Outcomes of a collaboration between Spain and the United States nursing students. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 6, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.21827/jve.6.39836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argo, N., Idriss, S., & Fancy, M. (2009). Media and intergroup relations: Research on media and social change. Dubai: Soliya and the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations. https://dokumen.tips/documents/media-and-intergroup-relations-research-on-media-and-social-change.html.Google Scholar
Avgousti, M. I. (2018). Intercultural communicative competence and online exchanges: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 819–853. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1455713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagga-Gupta, S. (2023). Epistemic and existential, E2-sustainability. On the need to un-learn for re-learning in contemporary spaces. Frontiers in Communication, 8. www.frontiersin.org/journals/communication/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1081115/full.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagga-Gupta, S., & Dahlberg, G. M. (2021). On studying peoples’ participation across contemporary timespaces: Disentangling analytical engagement. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 22, 49–88. https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v22i.125861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, W. (2015). Culture and identity through English as a Lingua Franca: Rethinking concepts and goals in intercultural communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, W. (2022). Intercultural and transcultural awareness in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Elements in Language Teaching).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, S., Shaw, D., & Sparke, M. (2023). Collaborative online international learning, social innovation and global health: Cosmopolitical COVID lessons as global citizenship education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2023.2209585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, M. W., & Ferreira-Lopes, L. (2023). Emerging trends in telecollaboration and virtual exchange: A bibliometric study. Educational Review, 75(3), 558–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1907314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baroni, A., Dooly, M., Garcés García, P., et al. (2019). Evaluating the impact of virtual exchange on initial teacher education: A European policy experiment. Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2019.29.9782490057337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baroni, A. & Helm, F. (forthcoming). Virtual exchange as a pedagogy of listening and of possibilities. In Martinez, J. Z. & Silva, K., eds., Entre diálogos, sensibilidades e aprendizagens: os múltiplos chapéus de Lynn Mario Trindade Menezes de Souza. Campinas: Mercado de Letras.Google Scholar
Beaven, A., & Borghetti, C. (2016). Interculturality in study abroad. Language and Intercultural Communication, 16(3), 313–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2016.1173893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beelen, J., & Jones, E. (2015). Redefining internationalization at home. In Curaj, A., Matei, L., Pricopie, R., Salmi, J., & Scott, P., eds., The European higher education area: Between critical reflections and future policies. Cham: Springer, pp. 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60–81.Google Scholar
Belz, J. A., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston, MA: Thomson Heinle.Google Scholar
Belz, J., & Vyatkina, N. (2005). Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked inter-cultural language study: The case of German modal particles. Canadian Modern Language Review, 62(1), 17–48. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.62.1.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benini, S., Giralt, M., & Murray, L. (2022). Global citizenship and virtual exchange practices: Promoting critical digital literacies and intercultural competence in language education. In Lütge, C., Merse, T., & Rauschert, P., eds., Global citizenship in foreign language education. New York: Routledge, pp. 151–173.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. M. (Ed.). (2015). The Sage encyclopedia of intercultural competence. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhambra, G. K., Gebrial, D., & Nişancıoğlu, K. (Eds.). (2018). Decolonising the university. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourne, D. (Ed.). (2020). The Bloomsbury handbook of global education and learning. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, K., Barry, M., Jowell, A., Maddah, D., & Alami, N. H. (2021). Virtual exchange in global health: An innovative educational approach to foster socially responsible overseas collaboration. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(32), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00266-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, R., Courtois, A., Faas, D., Jayadeva, S., & Beech, S. (2024). International student mobility within Europe: Responding to contemporary challenges. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01222-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruneau, E., Hameiri, B., Moore-Berg, S. L., & Kteily, N. (2020). Intergroup contact reduces dehumanization and meta-dehumanization: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and quasi-experimental evidence from 16 samples in five countries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(6), 906–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220949004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruneau, E., & Saxe, R. (2012). The power of being heard: The benefits of ‘perspective-giving’ in the context of intergroup conflict. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 855–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, T. (2020). Integrating Soliya’s connect programmes into a language course and into a liberal arts and sciences degree. In Helm, F. & Beaven, A., eds., Designing and implementing virtual exchange – a collection of case studies. Research-publishing.net, pp. 205–216. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2020.45.1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbules, N. C. (2006). Rethinking dialogue in networked spaces. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 6(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708605282817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship: Essays and reflections. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carolin, A., & Johnson, L., C. (2023). Final Report – Transnational Virtual Exchange for Social Justice Education. www.stevensinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Stevens-Initiative-Sponsored-Research-Final-Report-Transnational-Virtual-Exchange-for-Social-Justice-Education.pdf.Google Scholar
Castillo, T. I. L., King, L. F. E., & Ruíz, L. P. Á. (2021). El intercambio virtual: Experiencias desde instituciones en el Caribe colombiano. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 75, 90–109. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2021.75.1893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, D. M. (2011). Developing intercultural communicative competence through online exchanges. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 392–419. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.2.392-419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, D. M. (Ed.). (2014). Cultura-inspired intercultural exchanges: Focus on Asian and Pacific languages. National Foreign language Resource Center (NFLRC): University of Hawai’i at Mānoa.Google Scholar
Chun, D. M. (2015). Language and culture learning in higher education via telecollaboration. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 10(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2014.999775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çiftçi, E. Y., & Savaş, P. (2018). The role of telecollaboration in language and intercultural learning: A synthesis of studies published between 2010 and 2015. ReCALL, 30(3), 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cioltan-Drăghiciu, A., & Stanciu, D. (2020). Virtual exchange: Romania and Hungary 100 years later. In Helm, F. & Beaven, A., eds., Designing and implementing virtual exchange – a collection of case studies. Research-publishing.net, pp. 37–46. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2020.45.1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogburn, D. L., & Levinson, N. S. (2008). Teaching globalization, globally: A 7-year case study of South Africa–U.S. virtual teams. Information Technologies and International Development, 4(3), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1162/itid.2008.00018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogburn, D., Levinson, N., Ramnarine-Rieks, A., & Espinoza Vasquez, F. (2010). A decade of globally distributed collaborative learning: Lessons learned from cross-national virtual teams. 43rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu, HI, USA, pp.1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.11.Google Scholar
Cole, T. (2012, March 21). The White-Savior Industrial Complex. The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/03/the-white-savior-industrial-complex/254843/.Google Scholar
Colpaert, J. (2020). Editorial position paper: How virtual is your research? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(7), 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1824059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2023). The decolonial turn in data and technology research: What is at stake and where is it heading? Information, Communication & Society, 26(4), 786–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1986102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J., & Sayers, D. (1997). Brave new schools: Challenging cultural illiteracy through global learning networks. Gordonsville, VA: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Darvin, R. (2016). Language and identity in the digital age. In Preece, S., ed., The Routledge handbook of language and identity. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 523–540.Google Scholar
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darvin, R., & Sun, T. (2024). Intercultural communication and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Elements in Intercultural Communication). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009206754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deardorff, D. K. (Ed.). (2009). The Sage handbook of intercultural competence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deardorff, D. (2022). Communicating successfully across differences within COIL virtual exchange. In Rubin, J. & Guth, S. P., eds., The guide to COIL virtual exchange. Sterling, VA: Stylus, pp. 274–286.Google Scholar
Dooly, M., & O’Dowd, R. (2018). In this together: Teachers’ experience with transnational, telecollaborative language learning projects. Bern: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2013). Filling in the gaps: Linking theory and practice through telecollaboration in teacher education. ReCALL, 25(01), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dooly, M., & Vinagre, M. (2022). Research into practice: Virtual exchange in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 55(3), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovchin, S., Pennycook, A., & Sultana, S. (2018). Popular culture, voice and linguistic diversity: Young adults on- and offline. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2020, November 1). Getting serious about diversity: Enough already with the business case. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/11/getting-serious-about-diversity-enough-already-with-the-business-case.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2023). Europe on the move – A proposal on the future of learning mobility | European Education Area. https://education.ec.europa.eu/node/2736.Google Scholar
Ferri, G. (2018). Intercultural communication. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73918-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferri, G. (2022). The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house: Decolonising intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication, 22(3), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2022.2046019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, C. (2019). Critical incidents and cultures-of-use in a Hong Kong-Germany telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 23(3), 74–97.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, G., & English, K. (2016). Cultura revisited. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 172–178.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K., & Maillet, K. (2001). Giving a virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The Cultura project. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 55–102. https://doi.org/10125/25113.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. E., & Savage, T. (2023). Challenge-based learning in higher education: An exploratory literature review. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), 1135–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcìa, J. S., & Crapotta, J. (2007). Models of telecollaboration (2): Cultura. In O’Dowd, R., ed., Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 62–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giralt, M. (2020). Communication across cultures: When the virtual meets the classroom. In Helm, F. & Beaven, A., eds., Designing and implementing virtual exchange – a collection of case studies. Research-publishing.net, pp. 191–203. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2020.45.1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giralt, M., Bets, A., Pittarello, S., & Stefanelli, C. (2022). Scenarios for the integration of virtual exchange in higher education. Journal of International Students, 12(S3), 116–134. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v12iS3.4629ojed.org/jis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glimäng, M. R. (2022). Safe/brave spaces in virtual exchange on sustainability. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 5, 61–81. https://doi.org/10.21827/jve.5.38369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godar, S., & van Ryssen, S. (2022). A brief history of global virtual teams. In Taras, V., ed., The X-culture handbook of collaboration and problem solving in global virtual teams. Greensboro: UNC Greensboro University Libraries, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Telecollaboration as an approach to developing intercultural communication competence. Language Learning & Technology, 23(3), 8–28.Google Scholar
Grosfoguel, R. (2015). Epistemic racism/sexism, westernized universities and the four genocides/epistemicides of the long sixteenth century. In Araújo, M. & Maeso, S. R., eds., Eurocentrism, racism and knowledge: Debates on history and power in Europe and the Americas. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilherme, M., & Souza, L. M. M. de. (2019). Glocal languages and intercultural critical awareness. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guimarães, F. F., & Finardi, K. R. (2021). Global citizenship education (GCE) in internationalisation: COIL as alternative thirdspace. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(5), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1875808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guth, S., & Helm, F. (2017). SUNY COIL Stevens Initiative Assessment FINAL REPORT. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35940.27529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hantrais, L. (2008). International comparative research: Theory, methods and practice. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hauck, M. (2019). Virtual exchange for (critical) digital literacy skills development. European Journal of Language Policy, 11(2), 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauck, M. (2023). From virtual exchange to critical virtual exchange and critical internationalization at home. The Global Impact Exchange, 9–12.Google Scholar
Hauck, M., Müller-Hartmann, A., Rienties, B., & Rogaten, J. (2020). Approaches to researching digital-pedagogical competence development in VE-based teacher education. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 3, 5–35. https://doi.org/10.21827/jve.3.36082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heleta, S., & Chasi, S. (2022). Rethinking and redefining internationalisation of higher education in South Africa using a decolonial lens. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 45(3), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2022.2146566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heleta, S., & Chasi, S. (2024). Curriculum decolonization and internationalization: A critical perspective from South Africa. Journal of International Students, 14(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v14i2.6383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heleta, S., & Jithoo, D. (2023). International research collaboration between South Africa and rest of the world: An analysis of 2012–2021 trends. Transformation in Higher Education, 8(0), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/the.v8i0.246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, F. (2013). A dialogic model for telecollaboration. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 6(2), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, F. (2015). The practices and challenges of telecollaboration in higher education in Europe. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 192–217. https://doi.org/10125/44424.Google Scholar
Helm, F. (2016). Facilitated dialogue in OIE. In O’Dowd, R. & Lewis, T., eds., Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 150–172.Google Scholar
Helm, F. (2017). Critical approaches to online intercultural language education. In Thorne, S. L. & May, S., eds., Language, education and technology, 3rd ed. New York: Springer, pp. 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, F. (2018a). Emerging identities in virtual exchange. Dublin/Voillans: Research-publishing.net.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, F. (2018b). The long and winding road … . Journal of Virtual Exchange, 1, 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, F. (2021). Dialogue facilitation: Learning to listen. In Beaven, T. & Rosell-Aguilar, F., eds., Innovative language pedagogy report. Research-publishing.net, pp. 11–15. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.50.1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, F., & Acconcia, G. (2019). Interculturality and language in Erasmus+ virtual exchange. European Journal of Language Policy, 11(2), 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, F., Baroni, A., & Acconcia, G. (2023). Global citizenship online in higher education. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 23, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-023-09351-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, F., & Guth, S. (2010). The multifarious goals of Telecollaboration 2.0: Theoretical and practical implications. In Guth, S. & Helm, F., eds., Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 69–106.Google Scholar
Helm, F., Guth, S., & Farrah, M. (2012). Promoting dialogue or hegemonic practice? Power issues in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 16(2), 103–127.Google Scholar
Helm, F., & Hauck, M. (2022). Language, identity and positioning in virtual exchange. In Klimanova, L., ed., Identity, multilingualism and CALL: Responding to new global realities. Sheffield: Equinox, pp. 24–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, F., & Velden, B. van der. (2021). Erasmus+ virtual exchange: Intercultural learning experiences: 2020 impact report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/870428.Google Scholar
Himelfarb, S. (2014, January 2). The Real eHarmony. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2014/01/02/the-real-eharmony/.Google Scholar
Himelfarb, S., & Idriss, S. (2011). Exchange 2.0 (272). United States Institute for Peace. www.usip.org/sites/default/files/Exchange2.0.pdf.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. (1996). The stories my country told me. Arena, BBC. www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyO2hbvxx8s&t=5s.Google Scholar
Hoecke, M. V. (2021). Comparing across societies and disciplines. In Adams, M. & Hoecke, M. V., eds., Comparative methods in law, humanities and social sciences. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 221–245.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. (1999). Small cultures. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 237–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.2.237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, A. (2011). Intercultural communication and ideology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, A. (2020). Culture, communication, context, and power. In Jackson, J., ed., The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, pp. 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Z. (ed.). (2015). Research methods in intercultural communication: A practical guide, 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Z. (2018). Exploring intercultural communication: Language in action, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Icaza Garza, R., & Vázquez, R. (2018). Diversity or decolonization? Researching diversity at the university of Amsterdam. In Bhambra, G. K., Gebrial., D., & Nişancıoğlu, K., eds., Decolonising the university. London: Pluto Press, pp. 108–128. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/25936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imperiale, M. G. (2021). Intercultural education in times of restricted travel: Lessons from the Gaza Strip. Intercultural Communication Education, 4(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.29140/ice.v4n1.446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imperiale, M. G., Phipps, A., & Fassetta, G. (2021). On online practices of hospitality in higher education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 40(6), 629–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-021-09770-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. (Ed.). (2003). Human values and social change: Findings from the values surveys. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, G., Phipps, A., & Arriaga, O. B. (2020). Intercultural communication in tourism. In Jackson, J., ed., The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, pp. 535–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. (2018). Intervening in the intercultural learning of L2 study abroad students: From research to practice. Language Teaching, 51(3), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. (2020). Introduction and overview. In Jackson, J., ed., The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, pp. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, A. Bayraktar, S., & Taras, V. (2022). Learning to collaborate across borders: Insights from the X-culture project and the emergence of global virtual teams. In Palma, A. M. & Brotons, R. C., eds., International education narratives. Transdisciplinary educative innovation experiences based on bilingual teaching. Ed. France: University of Burgos, pp. 99–108.Google Scholar
Jithoo, D. (2020). The contribution of virtual engagement. In Study South Africa – The guide to South African higher education, 19th ed. South Africa: IEASA, pp. 11–12. https://ieasa.studysa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/SSA-19th-edition-final-artwork_compressed.pdf.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H., & Hafner, C. A. (2021). Online cultures and intercultural communication. In R.H. Jones & C.A. Hafner, eds., Understanding digital literacies, 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joris, M., Simons, M., & Agirdag, O. (2022). Citizenship as competence, what else? Why European citizenship education policy threatens to fall short of its aims. European Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 484–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904121989470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karabati, S. (2022). Theories of virtual teams, international teams, and global virtual collaboration. In Taras, V., ed., The X-culture handbook of collaboration and problem solving in global virtual team. Greensboro: UNC Greensboro University Libraries, pp. 21–31.Google Scholar
Kern, R. (2014). Technology as Pharmakon: The promise and perils of the internet for foreign language education. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12065.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2004). Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 243 –260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khoo, S., Mucha, W., Pesch, C., & Wielenga, C. (2020). Epistemic (in)justice and decolonisation in higher education: Experiences of a crosssite teaching project. Acta Academica, 52(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa52i1/sp4.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Merrill, K., Xu, K., & Sellnow, D. D. (2020). My teacher is a machine: Understanding students’ perceptions of AI teaching assistants in online education. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(20), 1902–1911. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1801227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King de Ramirez, C. (2021). Global citizenship education through collaborative online international learning in the borderlands: A case of the Arizona–Sonora Megaregion. Journal of Studies in International Education, 25(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319888886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King Ramírez, C. (2020). Influences of academic culture in collaborative online international learning (COIL): Differences in Mexican and U.S. students’ reported experiences. Foreign Language Annals, 53(3), 438–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. (2002). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In Block, D. & Cameron, D., eds., Globalization and language teaching. London: Routledge, pp. 83–100.Google Scholar
Ladegaard, H. J., & Phipps, A. (2020). Intercultural research and social activism. Language and Intercultural Communication, 20(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1729786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamy, M., & Goodfellow, R. (2010). Telecollaboration and learning 2.0. In Guth, S. & Helm, F., eds., Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st Century. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 107–138.Google Scholar
Lederach, J. P. (1995). Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Lederach, J. P. (2003). Conflict transformation. In Burgess, G. & Burgess, H., eds., Beyond intractability. Boulder, CO: Conflict Information Consortium. www.beyondintractability.org/essay/transformation.Google Scholar
Leeds‐Hurwitz, W. (2010). Writing the intellectual history of intercultural communication. In Nakayama, T. K. & Halualani, R. T., eds., The handbook of critical intercultural communication, 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444390681.ch2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leone, P. (2022). Teletandem. Apprendere le lingue in telecollaborazione. Cesena: Caissa Italia.Google Scholar
Levine, G., & Phipps, A. (Eds.). (2012). Critical and intercultural theory and language pedagogy. Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Macfadyen, L. P., Roche, J., & Doff, S. (2004). Communicating across cultures in cyberspace: A bibliographical review of intercultural communication online. Münster: LIT.Google Scholar
Magi Educational Services. (1992). Evaluation of the New York State/Moscow schools telecommunications project. https://iearn.org/assets/general/NY_State_Moscow_Evaluation.pdf.Google Scholar
Malmqvist, J., Rådberg, K. K., & Lundqvist, U. (2015). Comparative analysis of challenge-based learning experiences. Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China, June 8–11.Google Scholar
Marginson, S. (2022). What is global higher education? Oxford Review of Education, 48(4), 492–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2022.2061438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, G. S., & Crichton, J. (2020). Intercultural communication in health care settings. In Jackson, J., ed., The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, pp. 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, E. (2014). The culture map: Breaking through the invisible boundaries of global business. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Mignolo, W. (2002). The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 101(1), 57–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignolo, W. D. (2012). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691156095.001.0001.Google Scholar
Nagda, B. (Ratnesh), A., & Gurin, P. (2007). Intergroup dialogue: A critical‐dialogic approach to learning about difference, inequality, and social justice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2007(111), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NICE (2020). The NICE programme: Your roadmap to starting virtual exchange. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. https://edglobal.egnyte.com/dl/kKzQCHKLIH.Google Scholar
Nolte-Laird, R. (2022). Peacebuilding online: Dialogue and enabling positive peace. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6013-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odeny, B., & Bosurgi, R. (2022). Time to end parachute science. PLoS Med, 19(9), 1–3, e1004099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Dowd, R. (2006). Telecollaboration and the development of intercultural communicative competence. Munich: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (Ed.). (2007). Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2018). From telecollaboration to virtual exchange: State-of-the‑art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving forward. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 1, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.jve.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2020). A transnational model of virtual exchange for global citizenship education. Language Teaching, 53(4), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2021). Virtual exchange: Moving forward into the next decade. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1902201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2023). Internationalising higher education and the role of virtual exchange. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R., & Dooly, M. (2020). Intercultural communicative competence development through telecollaboration and virtual exchange. In Jackson, J., ed., The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication. London: Routledge, pp. 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Dowd, R., & Lewis, T. (2016). Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2006). Understanding and working with ‘failed communication’ in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 623–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Dowd, R., & Ware, P. (2009). Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(2), 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. (n.d.). Global competence – PISA. Retrieved 30 November 2023, from www.oecd.org/pisa/innovation/global-competence/.Google Scholar
OECD. (2018). Preparing our youth for an inclusive and sustainable world: The OECD PISA global competence framework. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/topics/policy-sub-issues/global-competence/Handbook-PISA-2018-Global-Competence.pdf.Google Scholar
Olsen, J., Zimmer, A., & Behr, M. (2006). Real success with a virtual exchange: The German and American politics electronic classroom. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39(02), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096506060562.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, B. (2007). Models of telecollaboration (1): eTandem. In O’Dowd, R., ed., Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., & Zyzik, E. (2008). Online interactions and L2 learning: Some ethical challenges for L2 researchers. In Magnan, S. S., ed., AILA applied linguistics series, Vol. 3, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 331–355.Google Scholar
Pais, A., & Costa, M. (2020). An ideology critique of global citizenship education. Critical Studies in Education, 61(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1318772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panina, D. (2022). Focusing on culture in X-culture. In Taras, V., ed., The X-culture handbook of collaboration and problem solving in global virtual teams. Greensboro: UNC Greensboro University Libraries, pp. 75–86. https://doi.org/10.5149/9781469669809_Taras.Google Scholar
Paolini, S., Harwood, J., Hewstone, M., & Neumann, D. L. (2018). Seeking and avoiding intergroup contact: Future frontiers of research on building social integration. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(12), 1–19, e12422. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2007). The myth of English as an international language. In Makoni, S. & Pennycook, A., eds., Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Piller, I. (2016). Linguistic diversity and social justice: An introduction to applied sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piller, I. (2017). Intercultural communication: A critical introduction, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porto, M., Houghton, S. A., & Byram, M. (2018). Intercultural citizenship in the (foreign) language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 22(5), 484–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817718580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez, C. K. (2022). Virtual exchange in Latin America: A profile of faculty and staff participants. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 5, 105–132. https://doi.org/10.21827/jve.5.38284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampazzo, L., & Cunha, J. N. C. (2021). Telecollaborative practice in Brazil: What has been published about teletandem? BELT – Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 12(1), e40023–e40023. https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2021.1.40023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, N. F., Martin, J., Hansen, S. V., Taras, V., & Alon, I. (2021). Motivational configurations of cultural intelligence, social integration, and performance in global virtual teams. Journal of Business Research, 129, 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rings, G., & Rasinger, S. M. (2022). The Cambridge introduction to intercultural communication, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108904025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, J., & Guth, S. P. (Eds.). (2022). The guide to COIL virtual exchange. Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
Rubin, J., Wimpenny, K., Portillo, B. G., et al. (2022). Taking coil virtual exchange to scale: 2004 to 2020. In Rubin, J. & Guth, S., eds., The guide to COIL virtual exchange. Sterling, VA: Stylus, pp. 152–184.Google Scholar
Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the south: Justice against epistemicide, 1st ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Satar, M., Hauck, M., & Bilki, Z. (2023). Multimodal representation in virtual exchange: A social semiotic approach to critical digital literacy. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 72–96.Google Scholar
Saunders, H. H. (1999). A public peace process: Sustained dialogue to transform racial and ethnic conflicts, 1st ed. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, H. (2001). The virtue of sustained dialogue among civilizations. International Journal on World Peace, 13(1), 35–44.Google Scholar
Schneider, J., & Emde, von der, S. (2006). Conflicts in cyberspace: From communication breakdown to intercultural dialogue in online collaborations. In Belz, J. A. & Thorne, S. L., eds., Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston, MA: Thomson Heinle, pp. 178–206.Google Scholar
Schratz, M. (2014). The European Teacher: Transnational perspectives in teacher education policy and practice. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 4(4), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, U., Adami, E., & Dailey-O’Cain, J. (Eds.). (2023). Multimodal communication in intercultural interaction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, K. (2003). Listening: A framework for teaching across differences. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Schumann, S., & Moore, Y. (2022). What can be achieved with online intergroup contact interventions? Assessing long-term attitude, knowledge, and behaviour change. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 22(3), 1072–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. B. K. (2001). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shahjahan, R. A., Estera, A. L., Surla, K. L., & Edwards, K. T. (2022). ‘Decolonizing’ curriculum and pedagogy: A comparative review across disciplines and global higher education contexts. Review of Educational Research, 92(1), 73–113. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211042423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sindoni, M. G. (2023). Multimodality and translanguaging in video interactions. Elements in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009286947.Google Scholar
Sorrells, K. (2020). Social justice, diversity, and intercultural – global citizenship education in the global context. In Jackson, J., ed., The routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, pp. 376–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, L. M. T. M. de. (2019). Glocal languages, coloniality and globalization from below. In Guilherme, M. & de Souza, L.M.T.M., eds., Glocal languages and critical intercultural awareness. New York: Routledge, pp.17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, L. M. T. M. de, & Duboc, A. P. M. (2021). De-universalizing the decolonial: Between parentheses and falling skies. Gragoatá, 26(56), 876–911. https://doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.v26i56.51599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, L. M. M. de. (2022). Internationalization: On cosmopolitanism, cosmopolitics and communication otherwise. Critical Internationalization Studies Masterclass. www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVSG550MiAg.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. C. (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjsf541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starke-Meyerring, D., & Wilson, M. (2008). Designing globally networked learning environments: Visionary partnerships, policies, and pedagogies. Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, S., & de Andreotti, V. O. (2016). Cash, competition, or charity: International students and the global imaginary. Higher Education, 72(2), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9949-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens Initiative. (2021). Virtual Exchange Typology. www.stevensinitiative.org/resource/virtual-exchange-typology/.Google Scholar
Stevens Initiative. (2024). 2024 Survey of the Virtual Exchange Field Report. www.stevensinitiative.org/resource/2024-survey-of-the-virtual-exchange-field-report/.Google Scholar
Symeonidis, V., & Impedovo, M. A. (2023). Where internationalisation and digitalisation intersect: Designing a virtual exchange to enhance student teachers’ professional awareness as European teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(5), 821–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2023.2243644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taras, V. (2022a). Known problems in GVTs and best ways to address them: The X-culture experience. In Taras, V., ed., The X-culture handbook of collaboration and problem solving in global virtual teams. Greensboro: UNC Greensboro University Libraries, pp. 162–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taras, V. (Ed.). (2022b). The X-culture handbook of collaboration and problem solving in global virtual teams. Greensboro: UNC Greensboro University Libraries. https://doi.org/10.5149/9781469669809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taras, V., Rowney, J., & Steel, P. (2009). Half a century of measuring culture: Review of approaches, challenges, and limitations based on the analysis of 121 instruments for quantifying culture. Journal of International Management, 15(4), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2008.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taras, V., Steel, P., & Stackhouse, M. (2023). A comparative evaluation of seven instruments for measuring values comprising Hofstede’s model of culture. Journal of World Business, 58(1), 1–11, 101386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavoletti, E., & Kochkina, N. (2022). Dealing with ethnocentrism in global virtual teams. In Taras, V., ed., The X-culture handbook of collaboration and problem solving in global virtual teams. Greensboro: UNC Greensboro University Libraries, pp.102–117.Google Scholar
Tavoletti, E., Stephens, R. D., Taras, V., & Dong, L. (2022). Nationality biases in peer evaluations: The country-of-origin effect in global virtual teams. International Business Review, 31(2), 1–13, 101969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavoletti, E., & Taras, V. (2023). From the periphery to the centre: A bibliometric review of global virtual teams as a new ordinary workplace. Management Research Review, 46(8), 1061–1090. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-12-2021-0869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telles, J. A., & Vassalo, M. L. (2006). Foreign language learning In-Tandem: Teletandem as an alternative proposal in CALLT1. The ESPecialist, 27(2), 189–212. https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/esp/article/view/1629.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2016). Cultures-of-use and morphologies of communicative action. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 185–191. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44473.Google Scholar
Train, R. (2006). A critical look at technologies and ideologies in internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. In Belz, J. A. & Thorne, S. L., eds., Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston, MA: Thomson, Heinle, pp. 247–284.Google Scholar
Train, R. (2012). Postcolonial complexities in foreign language education and the humanities. In Levine, G. & Phipps, A., eds., Critical and intercultural theory and language pedagogy. Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Learning, pp. 141–160.Google Scholar
Trompenaars, A., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1997). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business, 2nd ed. London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
Tyszblat, R. (2019). Taking dialoghe online. In Gruener, S., Smith, S., & Hald, M., eds., Dialogue in peacebuilding: Understanding different perspectives. Uppsala: The Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, pp. 179–187.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (2014). Global citizenship education: Preparing learners for the challenges of the twenty-first century. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000227729.Google Scholar
Uvarov, A. Yu. , & Prussakova, A. A. (1992). The international telecommunication project in the schools of Moscow and New York State. Educational technology research and development, 40(4), 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, C. E. (2018). Interculturality and decoloniality. In Mignolo, W. D. & Walsh, C. E., eds., On decoloniality. New York: Duke University Press, pp. 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822371779-005.Google Scholar
Ware, P. (2005). ‘Missed’ communication in online communication: Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 64–89.Google Scholar
Ware, P., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. The Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 190–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1995). Virtual connections: Online activities & projects for networking language learners. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J. (2012). The intercultural speaker and the acquisition of intercultural/global competence. In Jackson, J., ed., The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication. London: Routledge, pp. 283–298.Google Scholar
Williams, R. (1985). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society (Rev. ed). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wimpenny, K., Finardi, K. R., Orsini-Jones, M., & Jacobs, L. (2022). Knowing, being, relating and expressing through third space global south-north COIL: Digital inclusion and equity in international higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 26(2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153221094085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lenartowicz, T. (2011). Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(3–4), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2011.578059.Google Scholar
Yuan, M., Dervin, F., Liang, Y., & Layne, H. (2023). ‘Just take your time and talk to us, okay?’ – International education students facilitating and promoting interculturality in online initial interactions. British Journal of Educational Studies, 71(6), 637–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2023.2231526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwerg-Villegas, A. M., & Martínez-Díaz, J. H. (2016). Experiential learning with global virtual teams: Developing intercultural and virtual competencies. Magis. Revista Internacional de Investigación En Educación, 9(18), 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by