Element contents
Series: Elements in Ancient Philosophy
The Hedonism of Eudoxus of Cnidus
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 November 2023
Summary
Mathematician and astronomer Eudoxus of Cnidus was a younger contemporary of Plato and an older contemporary of Aristotle, on both of whom he exerted some influence during his stays in Athens. This is perhaps most apparent with regard to his ethical doctrine that identifies the good as pleasure (hedonism). While Plato seems rather unsure how seriously to take this proposal, Aristotle provides the materials for reconstructing the battery of ingenious arguments that Eudoxus brought forward in its defence. Taken together in this Element, these arguments foreshadow almost everything that has been said in the Western tradition in favour of the positive value of pleasure, and, if taken aright, point in the direction of a hedonism that sets store by the cultivation of activities akin to those for which Eudoxus has been most renowned: mathematics and astronomy.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Ancient PhilosophyOnline ISBN: 9781009321532Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 21 December 2023
References
Primary Sources
Gellius, Aulus (1927) Noctes Atticæ (2 vols, ed. and tr. Eng.) Rolfe, J. C., Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius (Tusc.) Tusculanarum disputationum libri V (ed.) Pohlenz, M., Leipzig, Teubner (reprint Amsterdam 1957).Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius (Fin.) De finibus bonorum et malorum (ed.) Reid, J. S., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (reprint Hildesheim 1968).Google Scholar
Laertius, Diogenes (DL, Vitæ):Google Scholar
Laertius, Diogenes (2013) ed., Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, Dorandi, T., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laertius, Diogenes (2018) tr. Eng., Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, Mensch, P. (et al.), Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eudoxus of Cnidus (1966) Die Fragmente des Eudoxos von Knidos, ed. and comm., Lasserre, F., Berlin, De Gruyter (reprint 2011).Google Scholar
Iamblichus of Chalcis (1888) In Nicomachi Arithmeticam Introductionem Liber, ed. Pistelli, H., Stuttgart, Teubner (reprint 2012).Google Scholar
Iamblichus of Chalcis (1991) La vita pitagorica (ed. Deubner, L., 1937) with tr. It. Giangiullo, M., Milan, Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Lucretius, Titus Carus (1975) (DRN) De rerum natura, with tr. Eng. Rouse, W. H. D, revised Smith, M. Ferguson, Cambridge, MA and London, Harvard University Press and Heinemann.Google Scholar
Philostratus (2002) Vite dei sofisti, ed., comm. and tr. It., Civiletti, M., Milan, Bompiani.Google Scholar
Plutarch of Chaeronea (Is. et Os.,) On Isis and Osiris, in the Loeb Moralia, vol. V (1925) ed. and tr. F. C. Babbitt, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plutarch of Chaeronea (Adv. Colot.) Against Colotes in the Loeb Moralia, vol. XIV (1967) ed. and tr. B. Einarsson and P. De Lacey, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (ST: 1988) Summa Theologiæ, Balsamo, Cinisello (MI), Edizioni Paoline.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Ackrill, J. L. (1965) ‘Aristotle’s Distinction between Energeia and Kinesis’ in Bambrough, J. R. (ed.), New Essays on Plato and Aristotle, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 121–42.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958) ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’ in her Philosophical Papers (3 vols.), Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1981 III, pp. 26–42.Google Scholar
Aufderheide, J. (2020) Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics Book X: Translation and Commentary, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aufderheide, J. (2021) ‘Eudoxus’ Hedonism’ in Sattler, B. and Coope, U. (eds.), Ancient Ethics and the Natural World, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. P. (2004) ‘The Hedonic Response to Cigarette Smoking Is Proportional to Dopamine Release in the Human Striatum as Measured by Positron Tomography and [11C]rarclopride’, Synapse, 54, pp. 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belshaw, C. (2014) ‘What’s Wrong with the Experience Machine’, European Journal of Philosophy, 22, pp. 573–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bencivenga, E. (1995) Giocare per forza: Critica della società del divertimento, Milan, Mondadori.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1823) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (eds.), Oxford, Oxford University Press (reprint 1970).Google Scholar
Berti, E. (1994) ‘Il dibattito sul piacere nell’Accademia antica’ in Montoneri, L. (ed.), I filosofi greci e il piacere, Rome-Bari, Laterza, pp. 135–58.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (2020) ‘Prodicus on the Choice of Heracles, Language and Religion’ in Wolfsdorf, D. C. (ed.), Early Greek Ethics, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P. (2010) How Pleasure Works: The New Science of Why We Like What We Like, London, Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Boileau, I. (2003) ‘Alcohol Promotes Dopamine Release in the Human Nucleus Accumbens’, Synapse, 49, pp. 226–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandwood, L. (1992) ‘Stylometry and Chronology’ in Kraut, R. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 90–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1986) ‘The Cradle Argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’ in Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.), The Norms of Nature, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 113–44.Google Scholar
Cheng, W. (2020) ‘Aristotle and Eudoxus on the Argument from Contraries’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 102(4), pp. 588–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, S. M. (2021) Aristotle on Women, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, R. M. (1991) Two Studies in the Early Academy, Albany, State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Davies, R. (2017) ‘The Measure of Pleasure: A Note on the Protagoras’, Journal of the American Philosophical Association, III, 3, pp. 301–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Santillana, G. (1940) ‘Eudoxus and Plato: A Study in Chronology’, Isis, 32, pp. 248–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denyer, N. (2008) ed. and comm., Plato: Protagoras, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donner, W. (1998) ‘Utilitarianism’ in Skorupski, J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Mill, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 254–92.Google Scholar
Frede, D. (1992) ‘Disintegration and Restoration: Pleasure and Pain in Plato’s Philebus’ in Kraut, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 425–63.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. (1960) ‘Ascriptivism’ reprinted in his Logic Matters, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1972, pp. 250–4.Google Scholar
Gosling, J. C. B. (1975) ed. and comm., Plato: Philebus, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gosling, J. C. B. and Taylor, C. C. W. (1982) The Greeks on Pleasure, Oxford, Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1978) The Later Plato and the Academy (vol. V of his History of Greek Philosophy), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gwyn Griffiths, J. (1965) ‘A Translation from the Egyptian by Eudoxus’, Classical Quarterly, 15, pp. 75–8.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1975) The Emergence of Probability, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. (1986) ‘Individual Utilities and Utilitarian Ethics’ in Diekmann, A. and Mitter, P. (eds.), Paradoxical Effects of Social Behavior: Essays in Honor of Anatol Rapoport, Heidelberg-Vienna, Physica-Verlag, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Harte, V. (2014) ‘The Nicomachean Ethics on Pleasure’ in Polansky, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 288–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, R. G. (1963), ‘Electrical Self-Stimulation of the Brain in Man’, American Journal of Psychiatry, 120, pp. 571–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hume, D. (1777) An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, Selby-Bigge, L. A. and (3rd ed. rev.) Nidditch, P. H. (ed.), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1975 (following the Selby-Bigge paragraph numbers).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1784) Idea of a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Point of View, tr. Eng. L. Beck, Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill, 1963.Google Scholar
Karpp, H. (1933) Untersuchungen zur Philosophie des Eudoxos von Knidos, Würzburg-Aumühle, Triltsch.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. (1978) The Aristotelian Ethics: A Study of the Relationship between the Eudemian and the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle, Oxford, Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koepp, M. J. (1998) ‘Evidence for Striatal Dopamine Release during a Video Game’. Nature, 393, pp. 366–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolata, G. (2008) ‘Yes, Running Can Make You High’, The New York Times, 27 March. www.nytimes.com/2008/03/27/health/nutrition/27best.html.Google Scholar
Kringelbach, M. L. (2007) ‘Deep Brain Stimulation for Chronic Pain Investigated with Magnetoencephalography’, Neuroreport, 8, pp. 223–8.Google Scholar
Kringelbach, M. L. (2009) The Pleasure Centre: Trust Your Animal Instincts, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, R. J. (1991) ‘The Reinforcing and Subjective Effects of Morphine in Post-Addicts: A Dose-Response Study’, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 259, pp. 1165–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Leopardi, G. (1824) ‘Dialogo di Torquato Tasso e del suo Genio familiare’ in Orlando, S. (ed.), Operette Morali, Rizzoli, Milan, 1976, pp. 142–50.Google Scholar
Leopardi, G. (1826) ‘Dialogo di Cristoforo Colombo e di Pietro Gutierrez’ in Orlando, S. (ed.), Operette Morali, Rizzoli, Milan, 1976, pp. 224–8.Google Scholar
Leopardi, G. (1831) ‘La quiete dopo la tempesta’ in Brioschi, F. (ed.), Canti, Rizzoli, Milan, 1974, pp. 139–40.Google Scholar
Lermontov, M. Yu. (1840) Geroi Nashevo Vremeni (A Hero of Our Time) Richards, D. J. (ed.), Letchworth, Bradda Library of Russian Classics, 1962.Google Scholar
Martin, P. (2008) Sex, Drugs and Chocolate: The Science of Pleasure, London, Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Merlan, P. (1960) ‘Life of Eudoxus’, appendix to his Studies in Epicurus and Aristotle, Wiesbaden, Otto Harrassowitz, pp. 98–104.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1861) ‘Utilitarianism’ in Robson, J. M., Priestley, F. E. and Dryen, D. P. (eds.), The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1968, Vol X.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1873) ‘Ueber Wahrheit und Lüge im aussermoralischen Sinne’ in Colli, G. and Montinari, M. (eds.), Werke. Kritishche Gesamtausgabe (15 vol.), Berlin and New York, 1973, vol. I, pp. 369–84.Google Scholar
Olds, J. and Milner, P. (1954), ‘Positive Reinforcement Produced by Electrical Stimulation of the Septal Area and Other Regions of Rat Brain’, Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, pp. 419–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, A. (2014) Reading Lucretius in the Renaissance, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirsig, R. M. (1974) Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, New York, William Morrow.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1981) Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rackham, H. (1934) The Nicomachean Ethics, ed. and tr. Eng., Cambridge, MA and London, Harvard University Press and Heinemann.Google Scholar
Radice, R. and Davies, R. (1997) Aristotle’s Metaphysics: Annotated Bibliography of the Twentieth-Century, Leiden, Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, H. S. (1990) ‘Measurement, Pleasure and Practical Science in Plato’s Protagoras’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 28, pp. 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, D. (2005) Plato on Pleasure and the Good Life, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopenhauer, A. (1819) ‘Das Welt als Wille und Vorstellung’ in Hübscher, A. (ed.), Sämtliche Werke, vol. 2 and 3, Wiesbaden, Brockhaus, 1972.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, A. (1851) ‘Parerga und Paralipomena’ in Hübscher, A. (ed.) vol. 5 and 6, Sämtliche Werke, Wiesbaden, Brockhaus, 1972.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W. (1606) The Tragedie of King Lear, anastatic reprint of the First Folio, New York, Norton, 1996, pp. 791–817.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. C. (2015) Plato’s Anti-hedonism and the Protagoras, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taub, L. (1998) ‘Eudoxus of Cnidus’ in Craig, E. J. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, London, Routledge, vol. 3, pp. 452–3.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2009) ‘Aristotle on Speusippus on Eudoxus on Pleasure’ Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 36, pp. 249–81.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2014) The Pleasures of Reason in Plato, Aristotle and the Hellenistic Hedonists, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, R. (1979) ‘Aristotle’s Criticism of Eudoxan Hedonism’ Classical Philology, 74, pp. 214–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, H. R. (2004) An Introduction to Mill’s Utilitarian Ethics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. (2009) ‘Epicureanism in Early Modern Philosophy’ in Warren, J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 266–86.Google Scholar
Wodehouse, P. G. (1943) Right Ho, Jeeves reprinted in Life with Jeeves, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1981, pp. 369–557.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. (2011) ‘Prodicus on the Correctness of Names: The Case of τέρψις, χαρά and εὐφροσύνη’, Journal of Hellenic Studies, 121, pp. 131–45.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2021) ‘The Vagaries of the Superego’ in Elementa: Intersections between Philosophy, Epistemology and Empirical Perspectives (1–2), pp. 13–31.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by