Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:17:20.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Global Strategy in Our Age of Chaos

How Will the Multinational Firm Survive?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2024

Stephen Tallman
Affiliation:
University of Richmond, Virginia
Mitchell P. Koza
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey

Summary

Chaotic environments are producing unique and unprecedented challenges for multinational companies, challenges that raise important questions about whether and how multinationals will survive or wither away. This Element explores both the macro political, economic, technological, and social forces impacting international business and the strategic management adaptations that leading companies have deployed to respond to these challenges. We observe that a new organizational form – the Global Multi-Business – has evolved that may be especially adapted to respond to and challenge a world in which change is ubiquitous, with the direction of change unpredictable and the pace of change accelerating. It accomplishes this through the strategic assembly of the organization and the animation of its many parts.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781009384957
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 02 May 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, R. 2023. Inside the revolution at open AI. The Atlantic, September: 5276.Google Scholar
Bair, J. 2008. Analyzing economic organization: Embedded networks and global chains compared. Economy and Society, 37: 339364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, C. 1938. The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bartlett, C. A., and Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Blinder, A. S. 2006. Offshoring: The next industrial revolution? Foreign Affairs, 85/2: 113128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, P. J., and Ghauri, P. N. 2004. Globalization, economic geography, and the strategy of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 8198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, P. J., and Strange, R. 2011. The governance of the multinational enterprise: Insights from internalization theory. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 460470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, P. J., Strange, R., Timmer, M. P., and de Vries, G. 2022. Rent appropriation in local value chains: The past, present, and future of intangible assets. Global Strategy Journal, 12(4): 679696. March 31. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttonwood. 2022. The inventory cycle returns. The Economist, June 4: 68.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. 2013. Blurred boundaries between firms, and new boundaries within (large multinational) firms: the impact of decentralized networks for innovation. Seoul Journal of Economics, 26(1): 132.Google Scholar
Casson, M. 1987. The Firm and the Market. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clark, D., and Bradsher, K. 2023. China scuttles a $5.4 billion microchip deal led by US giant Intel. New York Times, August 16. www.nytimes.com/2023/08/16/business/intel-tower-semiconductor-china.html?smid=em-share.Google Scholar
Dierickx, I., and Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35: 15041511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., and Sturgeon, T. 2005. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12: 78104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghoshal, S. and Nohria, N. 1989. Internal differentiation within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 323337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action, social structure, and embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immelt, J., Govindarajan, V., and Trimble, C. 2009. How GE is disrupting itself. Harvard Business Review, 87(10): 5665.Google Scholar
Koza, Mitchell P., and Lewin, A. 1996. How to Manage in Times of Disorder . Mastering Strategy Series (November 22, 1999). London: Financial Times .Google Scholar
Koza, Mitchell P., and Lewin, A. 1998. The coevolution of strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9(3): 255264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koza, M. P., Tallman, S., and Ataay, A. 2011. The strategic assembly of global firms: A micro-structural analysis of local learning and global adaptation. Global Strategy Journal, 1(1): 2746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, A., and Volberda, H. 1999. Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational firms. Organization Science, 10(5): 519534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, G., Mudambi, R., and Parente, R. 2013. Strategic modularity and the architecture of the multinational firm. Global Strategy Journal, 3: 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudambi, R. 2007. Offshoring: Economic geography and the multinational firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (1): 206.Google Scholar
Mudambi, R. 2008. Location, control, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 8: 699725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narula, R. and Dunning, J. H. 2010. Multinational enterprises, development and globalization: Some clarifications and a research agenda. Oxford Development Studies, 38(3): 263287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petricevic, O., and Teece, D. J. 2019. The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 50: 14871512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prahalad, C. K., and Hamel, G. 1985. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68/3: 7991.Google Scholar
Rugman, A. M. 2005. The Regional Multinationals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rugman, A. M., and D’Cruz, J. 1997. The theory of the flagship firm. European Management Journal, 15: 403412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelt, R. P. 1974. Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, T. 2002. Modular production networks: A new American model of industrial organization. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11: 451496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, A. 2023. As ties to China turn toxic, even Chinese companies are breaking them. New York Times, June 15. www.nytimes.com/2023/06/15/business/economy/china-business-tiktok-shein.html?smid=em-share.Google Scholar
Tallman, S., and Koza, M. P. 2010. Keeping the global in mind: The evolution of headquarters in global multi-business firms. Management International Review, 50: 433448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallman, S. , and Koza, M. P. 2016. Strategic animation and emergent processes: Managing for efficiency and innovation in globally networked organizations. In Ambos, T., Ambos, B., and Birkinshaw, J., eds., Perspectives on Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationships in the Contemporary MNC, Research in Global Strategic Management, Vol. 17: 5985. Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallman, S. , and Koza, M. P. 2024. Reflections on global strategy in a turbulent world. In Hawk, A., Larsen, M., Leiblein, M., and Reuer, J., eds., Strategy in a Turbulent Era, pp. 217. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallman, S., and Pedersen, T. 2015. What is international strategy research and what is not? Global Strategy Journal, 5: 273277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Economist. 2022. Zero options, December 3: 1922.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2023a. America’s new best friend. June 17: 9.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2023b. BritGP. June 17: 10.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2023c. Schumpeter: Ford’s focus. June 17: 58.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2023d. Spooked. June 17: 5253.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2023e. The dragon shows its claws. July 29: 4546.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2023f. Rising tiger, hidden dragon. August 12: 5758.Google Scholar
Yen, B. 2016. Uniqlo: A Supply Chain Going Global. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Case Research Center.Google Scholar
Zenger, T. R., and Hesterly, W. S. 1997. The disaggregation of corporations: Selective intervention, high-powered incentives, and molecular units. Organization Science, 8/3: 209222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Global Strategy in Our Age of Chaos
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Global Strategy in Our Age of Chaos
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Global Strategy in Our Age of Chaos
Available formats
×