Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T15:51:01.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Creativity and Imagination

Design Thinking and Other Approaches

How Different Disciplines See, Think and Act

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2024

Nathan Crilly
Nathan Crilly
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge

Summary

Efforts to promote creativity often centre on encouraging people to engage in 'design thinking', 'systems thinking' and 'entrepreneurial thinking'. These different approaches are most often defined, taught and applied in mutual isolation, which has obscured what distinguishes them from each other, what they have in common and how they might be combined. These three approaches are also most often described in isolation from the approaches that characterize other disciplines, all of which are relevant to how problems are identified, framed and solved. These other approaches include 'computational thinking', 'engineering thinking', 'scientific thinking', 'evolutionary thinking', 'mathematical thinking', 'statistical thinking', 'geographical thinking', 'historical thinking', 'anthropological thinking' and many more. Examining these approaches as a set allows each of them to be better understood, and also reveals the connections and contrasts between them. Such comparisons provide the foundation for a more coordinated project to represent how different disciplinary approaches contribute to creative work.
Get access

Keywords

design thinkingsystems thinkingentrepreneurial thinkingcomputational thinkingmathematical thinking
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Creativity and Imagination
Online ISBN: 9781009498685
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 03 October 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acar, O. A., Tarakci, M., & van Knippenberg, D. (2019). Creativity and Innovation Under Constraints: A Cross-Disciplinary Integrative Review. Journal of Management, 45(1), 96–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318805832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aier, S., Labusch, N., & Pähler, P. (2015). Implementing Architectural Thinking. In Persson, A. & Stirna, J. (Eds.), Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops (pp. 389–400). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19243-7_36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algani, Y. M. A., & Jmal, E. (2020). The Effectiveness of a Program for Developing the Skills of Mathematical Thinking for First Year Preparatory Pupils. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 7(2), 41–51.Google Scholar
Ambole, A. (2020). Rethinking Design Making and Design Thinking in Africa. Design and Culture, 12(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2020.1788257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, T., & Burke, F. (2007). What Does It Mean to Think Historically? | Perspectives on History | AHA. www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/january-2007/what-does-it-mean-to-think-historicallyGoogle Scholar
Antle, A. N. (2017). Making Sense of Design Thinking. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(2), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.10.003.Google Scholar
Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A Definition of Systems Thinking: A Systems Approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W. B. (2009). The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves. Free Press.Google Scholar
Askeland, B. (2020). The Potential of Abductive Legal Reasoning. Ratio Juris, 33(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athreya, B. H., & Mouza, C. (2017). What Is Thinking? In Athreya, B. H. & Mouza, C. (Eds.), Thinking Skills for the Digital Generation: The Development of Thinking and Learning in the Age of Information (pp. 25–35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12364-6_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auernhammer, J., & Roth, B. (2021). The Origin and Evolution of Stanford University’s Design Thinking: From Product Design to Design Thinking in Innovation Management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(6), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barak, M., & Levenberg, A. (2016). A Model of Flexible Thinking in Contemporary Education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and Where Do We Apply What We Learn? A Taxonomy for Far Transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing Computational Thinking to K-12: What is Involved and What is the Role of the Computer Science Education Community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashford, T., Myint, P. P. N., Win, S. et al., (2018). A Systems Approach to Traumacare in Myanmar: From Health Partnership to Academic Collaboration. Future Healthcare Journal, 5(3), 171–175. https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.5-3-171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becher, T. (ed.). (2017). Professional Practices: Commitment & Capability in a Changing Environment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351289689.Google Scholar
Binah-Pollak, A., Hazzan, O., Mike, K., & Hacohen, R. L. (2024). Anthropological Thinking in Data Science Education: Thinking within Context. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12444-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, A., Church, L., & Green, T. (2008). The Abstract is ‘an Enemy’: Alternative Perspectives to Computational Thinking. In Proceedings PPIG’08, 20th Annual Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, 1, 34–43.Google Scholar
Blackwell, A., Wilson, L., Boulton, C., & Knell, J. (2010). Creating Value across Boundaries: Maximising the Return from Interdisciplinary Innovation (p. 31). Nesta. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/creating_value_across_boundaries.pdf.Google Scholar
Boland, R., & Collopy, F. (Eds.). (2004). Managing as Designing. Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
Breslin, D. (2016). What Evolves in Organizational Co-Evolution? Journal of Management & Governance, 20(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-014-9302-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, C., Butt, G., & Fargher, M. (Eds.). (2017). The Power of Geographical Thinking. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49986-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. (2008, June 1). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 1–9. https://hbr.org/2008/06/design-thinking.Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. (2019). Systems Thinking and Design Thinking: The Search for Principles in the World We Are Making. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(2), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.001.Google Scholar
Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing Alternative Conceptualizations of Functional Diversity in Management Teams: Process and Performance Effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, L. (1984). Mathematical Thinking: The Struggle for Meaning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.15.1.0035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camelia, F., & Ferris, T. L. J. (2016). Systems Thinking in Systems Engineering. INCOSE International Symposium, 26(1), 1657–1674. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2016.00252.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, L. (2018). Data Science Thinking: The Next Scientific, Technological and Economic Revolution. Springer. https://cam.ldls.org.uk/vdc_100069555981.0x000001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511895555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlgren, L., Elmquist, M., & Rauth, I. (2016). The Challenges of Using Design Thinking in Industry – Experiences from Five Large Firms. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(3), 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlgren, L., Rauth, I., & Elmquist, M. (2016). Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaleri, S., & Sterman, J. D. (1997). Towards Evaluation of Systems-Thinking Interventions: A Case Study. System Dynamics Review, 13(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199722)13:2<171::AID-SDR123>3.0.CO;2-9.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chance, B. L. (2002). Components of Statistical Thinking and Implications for Instruction and Assessment. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2002.11910677.Google Scholar
Chandler, J. (2009). Introduction: Doctrines, Disciplines, Discourses, Departments. Critical Inquiry, 35(4), 729–746. https://doi.org/10.1086/599585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C.-C., & Crilly, N. (2016). Describing Complex Design Practices with a Cross-Domain Framework: Learning from Synthetic Biology and Swarm Robotics. Research in Engineering Design, 27(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-016-0219-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, B. T., Arendt, K. M., McElheron, P., & Ball, L. J. (2023). The Design Entrepreneur: How Adaptive Cognition and Formal Design Training Create Entrepreneurial Self-efficacy and Entrepreneurial Intention. Design Studies, 86, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, L. (2008). Possibilistic Thinking: A New Conceptual Tool for Thinking about Extreme Events. Social Research, 75(3), 669–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelen, J., & Smulders, F. E. H. M. (2023). Educating Entrepreneurship through Design. In Block, J. H., Halberstadt, J., Högsdal, N., Kuckertz, A., & Neergaard, H. (Eds.), Progress in Entrepreneurship Education and Training: New Methods, Tools, and Lessons Learned from Practice (pp. 401–415). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28559-2_26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M., & Means, B. (1981). Comparative Studies of how People Think: An Introduction. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, H. (2018). Studies of Expertise and Experience. Topoi, 37(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9412-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collopy, F. (2019). Why the Failure of Systems Thinking Should Inform the Future of Design Thinking (06.07.09). Design Issues, 35(2), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2008). Learning and Leading with Habits of Mind: 16 Essential Characteristics for Success. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Craft, A. (2015). Possibility Thinking. In Wegerif, R., Li, L., & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking (pp. 153–167). Routledge.Google Scholar
Crilly, N. (2010). The Structure of Design Revolutions: Kuhnian Paradigm Shifts in Creative Problem Solving. Design Issues, 26(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crilly, N. (2021a). The Evolution of “Co-evolution” (Part I): Problem Solving, Problem Finding, and Their Interaction in Design and Other Creative Practices. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 7(3), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2021.07.003.Google Scholar
Crilly, N. (2021b). The Evolution of ‘Co-evolution’ (Part II): The Biological Analogy, Different Kinds of Co-evolution, and Proposals for Conceptual Expansion. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 7(3), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2021.07.004.Google Scholar
Crilly, N., Blackwell, A. F., & Clarkson, P. J. (2006). Graphic Elicitation: Using Research Diagrams as Interview Stimuli. Qualitative Research, 6(3), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106065007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombie, A. C. (1988). Designed in the Mind: Western Visions of Science, Nature and Humankind. History of Science, 26(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/007327538802600101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, M. A., & George, E. (2023). The Why and How of the Integrative Review. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1), 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120935507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, N. (1982). Designerly Ways of Knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, N. (2023). Design Thinking: What Just Happened? Design Studies, 86, 101187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crudo, B. (2020, April 30). How to Embrace ‘Entrepreneurial Thinking’ Even If You’re Not an Entrepreneur. Fast Company. www.fastcompany.com/90498511/how-to-embrace-entrepreneurial-thinking-even-if-youre-not-an-entrepreneur.Google Scholar
Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, P. E., & Mark, J. (1996). Habits of Mind: An Organizing Principle for Mathematics Curricula. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(4), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(96)90023-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daspit, J. J., Fox, C. J., & Findley, S. K. (2023). Entrepreneurial Mindset: An Integrated Definition, a Review of Current Insights, and Directions for Future Research. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1907583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Savigny, D., & Taghreed, A. (eds.). (2009). Systems Thinking for Health Systems Strengthening. World Health Organization. http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/RG.2.1.4720.4325.Google Scholar
Denning, P. J. (2013). Design Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 56(12), 29–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2535915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denning, P. J., & Tedre, M. (2019). Computational Thinking. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denning, P. J., & Tedre, M. (2021). Computational Thinking for Professionals. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, J. G. (2002). Learning To Think: Disciplinary Perspectives. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Dorst, K. (2011). The Core of ‘Design Thinking’ and its Application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, K., & Fugelsang, J. (2005). Scientific Thinking and Reasoning. In Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 705–725). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design Thinking and How It Will Change Management Education: An Interview and Discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512–523. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2006.23473212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzombak, R., & Beckman, S. (2020). Unpacking Capabilities Underlying Design (thinking) Process. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(2), 574–585.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, S. (2014). From Computational Thinking to Systems Thinking: A Conceptual toolkit for Sustainability Computing. ICT for Sustainability 2014 (ICT4S-14), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.2991/ict4s-14.2014.28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, C., Blackwell, A., Stacey, M., Earl, C., & Church, L. (2012). Sketching across Design Domains: Roles and Formalities. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 26(3), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060412000133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endy, D. (2005). Foundations for Engineering Biology. Nature, 438(7067), 449–453. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engelke, M. (2019). How to Think Like an Anthropologist. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
English, L. (2023). Ways of Thinking in STEM-based Problem Solving. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 55, 1219–1230 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01474-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennis, R. H. (1964). A Definition of Critical Thinking. The Reading Teacher, 17(8), 599–612.Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: Clarification and Needed Research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018003004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2013). Reasoning to and from Belief: Deduction and Induction are still Distinct. Thinking & Reasoning, 19(3–4), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2012.745450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, R., & Hooker, C. (2013). Design, Science and Wicked Problems. Design Studies, 34(6), 681–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, J. (2016). Managing Research Environments: Heterarchies in Academia. A Response to Cumming. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(12), 900–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanagan, D. P., & Dixon, S. G. (2014). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory of Cognitive Abilities. In Reynolds, C. R., Vannest, K. J., and Fletcher-Janzen, E. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Special Education. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118660584.ese0431.Google Scholar
Ford, D. N., & Sterman, J. D. (1998). Expert Knowledge Elicitation to Improve Formal and Mental Models. System Dynamics Review, 14(4), 309–340.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frascari, M. (2009). Lines as Architectural Thinking. Architectural Theory Review, 14(3), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13264820903341605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederiksen, D. L., & Brem, A. (2017). How Do Entrepreneurs Think They Create Value? A Scientific Reflection of Eric Ries’ Lean Startup approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(1), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0411-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galle, P., & Kroes, P. (2014). Science and Design: Identical Twins? Design Studies, 35(3), 201–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbuio, M., Dong, A., Lin, N., Tschang, T., & Lovallo, D. (2018). Demystifying the Genius of Entrepreneurship: How Design Cognition Can Help Create the Next Generation of Entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2016.0040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to Science: A Review. Studies in Science Education, 2(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267508559818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauld, C. F., & Hukins, A. A. (1980). Scientific Attitudes: A Review. Studies in Science Education, 7(1), 129–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268008559877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Maravilla, F. (2018). Analogical Reasoning. In Ball, L. J. & Thompson, V. A. (Eds.), International Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 186–203). Routledge & CRC Press.Google Scholar
Geva-May, I. (2005). Thinking Like a Policy Analyst. In Geva-May, I. (ed.), Thinking Like a Policy Analyst: Policy Analysis as a Clinical Profession (pp. 15–50). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980939_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gharajedaghi, J. (2011). Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity: A Platform for Designing Business Architecture. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Gibbs, K. D., Han, A., & Lun, J. (2019). Demographic Diversity in Teams: The Challenges, Benefits, and Management Strategies. In Hall, K. L., Vogel, A. L., & Croyle, R. T. (Eds.), Strategies for Team Science Success: Handbook of Evidence-Based Principles for Cross-Disciplinary Science and Practical Lessons Learned from Health Researchers (pp. 197–205). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20992-6_15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glen, R., Suciu, C., & Baughn, C. (2014). The Need for Design Thinking in Business Schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(4), 653–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodchild, M. (2021). Relational Systems Thinking: That’s How Change is Going to Come, From Our Earth Mother. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 1(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.47061/jabsc.v1i1.577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodyear, P., & Markauskaite, L. (2017). Epistemic Fluency and Professional Education: Innovation, Knowledgeable Action and Working Knowledge. Springer. https://cam.ldls.org.uk/vdc_100068972000.0x000001.Google Scholar
Gorman, M. E. (2006). Scientific and Technological Thinking. Review of General Psychology, 10(2), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.10.2.113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gornall, S., Chambers, M. R., & Claxton, G. (2005). Building Learning Power in Action. TLO .Google Scholar
Gould, R. (2021). Toward Data-Scientific Thinking. Teaching Statistics, 43(S1), S11–S22. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grégoire, D. A., Corbett, A. C., & McMullen, J. S. (2011). The Cognitive Perspective in Entrepreneurship: An Agenda for Future Research. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1443–1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00922.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, D. (1997). The Case for Theoretical Pluralism. Educational Management & Administration, 25(4), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X97254003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, M. G., & Vogus, T. J. (2021). Inconceivable! Possibilistic Thinking and the Sociocognitive Underpinnings of Entrepreneurial Responses to Grand Challenges. Organization Theory, 2(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211005780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groth, C. (2016). Design- and Craft Thinking Analysed as Embodied Cognition. Form Akademisk, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1994). Styles of Scientific Thinking or Reasoning: A New Analytical Tool for Historians and Philosophers of the Sciences. In Gavroglu, K., Christianidis, J., & Nicolaidis, E. (Eds.), Trends in the Historiography of Science (Vol. 151, pp. 31–48). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3596-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, D. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2020). An Introduction to Critical Thinking: Maybe It Will Change Your Life. In Sternberg, R. J. & Halpern, D. F. (eds.), Critical Thinking in Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1–9). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684354.002.Google Scholar
Hassi, L., & Laakso, M. (2011). Design Thinking in the Management Discourse: Defining the Elements of the Concept. 18th International Product Development Management Conference, Innovate Through Design. https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/design-thinking-in-the-management-discourse-defining-the-elements.Google Scholar
Hay, L., Cash, P., & McKilligan, S. (2020). The Future of Design Cognition Analysis. Design Science, 6, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D., Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2010). A Situated Metacognitive Model of the Entrepreneurial Mindset. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heylighen, A., & Dong, A. (2019). To Empathise or not to Empathise? Empathy and its Limits in Design. Design Studies, 65, 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyne, P. T., Boettke, P. J., & Prychitko, D. L. (2013). The Economic Way of Thinking (13th ed.). Pearson. https://cam.ldls.org.uk/vdc_100048053355.0x000001.Google Scholar
Higgins, M. (2020, November 5). Council Post: The Benefits of Incorporating Design Thinking Into Business. Forbes. www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2020/11/05/the-benefits-of-incorporating-design-thinking-into-business/.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, D. (2020). Critical Thinking. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/critical-thinking/.Google Scholar
Hoberman, B. (2015, March 3). Business Starts at School in This Golden Age for Young Founders. Financial Times. www.ft.com/content/1f050bd6-c0d0-11e4-876d-00144feab7de.Google Scholar
Hua, M., Harvey, S., & Rietzschel, E.F. (2022). Unpacking ‘Ideas’ in Creative Work: A Multidisciplinary Review. Academy of Management Annals, 16(2), 621–656. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illari, P., Russo, F., Williamson, J., & Lagnado, D. (2011). Causal Thinking. In Illari, P. M., Russo, F., Williamson, J. (Eds.), Causality in the Sciences (pp. 129–149). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ings, W. (2015). Malleable Thought: The Role of Craft Thinking in Practice-Led Graphic Design. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 34(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inns, T., & Mountain, R. (2020). Designing ‘Realistic’ Healthcare Improvement. Design Management Review, 31, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/drev.12206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2007). A Cross-Disciplinary Exploration of Entrepreneurship Research. Journal of Management, 33(6), 891–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307307643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. Wiley.Google Scholar
Jackson, P. (2006). Thinking Geographically. Geography, 91(3), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2006.12094167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial Transformations in the Swedish University System: The Case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, 32(9), 1555–1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00024-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design Thinking: Past, Present and Possible Futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A., Buntting, C., Hipkins, R. et al. (2012). Developing Students’ Futures Thinking in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 42(4), 687–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9214-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, W. A. (2011). Variation among Academic Disciplines: An Update on Analytical Frameworks and Research. The Journal of the Professoriate, 6(1), 9–27.Google Scholar
Karkdijk, J., van der Schee, J., & Admiraal, W. (2013). Effects of Teaching with Mysteries on Students’ Geographical Thinking Skills. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 22(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2013.817664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur, M., & Craven, L. (2020). Systems Thinking: Practical Insights on Systems-Led Design in Socio-Technical Engineering Systems. In Maier, A., Oehmen, J., & Vermaas, P. E. (Eds.), Handbook of Engineering Systems Design (pp. 189–217). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46054-9_36-3.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, S. (2021). Entrepreneurial Thinking in Local Government. City of Lancaster, California. www.gfoa.org/materials/entrepreneurial-thinking-in-local-government.Google Scholar
Keleşzade, G., Güneyli, A., & Özkul, A. E. (2018). Effectiveness of History Teaching Based on Social Constructivist Learning and Development of Historical Thinking Skills. TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM, 43(195), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7479.Google Scholar
Kelly, N., & Gero, J. S. (2021). Design Thinking and Computational Thinking: A Dual Process Model for Addressing Design Problems. Design Science, 7, e8. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2021.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klenner, N. F., Gemser, G., & Karpen, I. O. (2022). Entrepreneurial Ways of Designing and Designerly Ways of Entrepreneuring: Exploring the Relationship between Design Thinking and Effectuation Theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(1), 66–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, T. F. (2005). Engineering Novel Life. Molecular Systems Biology, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolko, J. (2018). The Divisiveness of Design Thinking. Interactions, 25(3), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3194313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, S.-C. (2019). Components and Methods of Evaluating Computational Thinking for Fostering Creative Problem-Solvers in Senior Primary School Education. In Kong, S.-C. & Abelson, H. (Eds.), Computational Thinking Education (pp. 119–141). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6528-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnan, A. (2009). What are Academic Disciplines? Some Observations on the Disciplinarity vs. Interdisciplinarity Debate (ESRC National Centre for Research Methods (NCRM) Working Paper Series). https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/783/.Google Scholar
Krueger, N. F. (2007). What Lies Beneath? The Experiential Essence of Entrepreneurial Thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00166.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtmollaiev, S., Pedersen, P. E., Fjuk, A., & Kvale, K. (2018). Developing Managerial Dynamic Capabilities: A Quasi-Experimental Field Study of the Effects of Design Thinking Training. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17(2), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2016.0187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, J. A. (1998). Thinking and Doing Literature: An Eight-Year Study. The English Journal, 87(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.2307/821546.Google Scholar
Langer, J. A., Confer, C., & Sawyer, M. (1993). Teaching Disciplinary Thinking in Academic Coursework (2.19, p. 46). National Research Centre on Literature Teaching and Learning.Google Scholar
Lavrsen, J. C., Daalhuizen, J., & Carbon, C.-C. (2023). The Design Mindset Inventory (D-Mindset0): A Preliminary Instrument For Measuring Design Mindset. Proceedings of ICED23, 3, 3355–3364. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.336.Google Scholar
Lewens, T. (2009) What Is Wrong with Typological Thinking?. Philosophy of Science, 76(3), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1086/649810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewens, T. (2015). Cultural Evolution: Conceptual Challenges. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewrick, M., Link, P., & Leifer, L. (2018). The Design Thinking Playbook: Mindful Digital Transformation of Teams, Products, Services, Businesses and Ecosystems. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Liedtka, J., King, A., & Bennett, K. (2013). Solving Problems with Design Thinking: Ten Stories of What Works. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Liedtka, J., & Ogilvie, T. (2011). Designing for Growth: A Design Thinking Tool Kit for Managers. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Liedtka, J., Sheikh, A., Gilmer, C., Kupetz, M., & Wilcox, L. (2020). The Use of Design Thinking in the U.S. Federal Government. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(1), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1657916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O., Basterfield, C., Bowes, S. M., & Costello, T. H. (2020). Nobelists Gone Wild: Case Studies in the Domain Specificity of Critical Thinking. In Halpern, D. F. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Critical Thinking in Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 10–38). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684354.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litster, G., Hurst, A., & Cardoso, C. (2023). A Systems Thinking Inspired Approach to Understanding Design Activity. In Gero, J. S. (Ed.), Design Computing and Cognition DCC’22 (pp. 161–177). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftus, S. (2018). Thinking Like a Scientist and Thinking Like a Doctor. Medical Science Educator, 28(1), 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0498-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, B., Hanson, J., & Claxton, G. (2014). Thinking Like an Engineer: Implications for the Education System: (A Report for the Royal Academy of Engineering Standing Committee for Education and Training). Royal Academy of Engineering (United Kingdom).Google Scholar
Madson, M. J. (2021). Making Sense of Design Thinking: A Primer for Medical Teachers. Medical Teacher, 43(10), 1115–1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1874327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mamakani, K., & Ruskey, F. (2012). A New Rose: The First Simple Symmetric 11-Venn Diagram (arXiv:1207.6452). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6452.Google Scholar
Mankiw, N. G., & Taylor, M. P. (2014). Economics (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning EMEA. http://cws.cengage.co.uk/mankiw_taylor2/.Google Scholar
McComb, C., & Jablokow, K. (2022). A Conceptual Framework for Multidisciplinary Design Research with Example Application to Agent-Based Modeling. Design Studies, 78, 101074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCool, S. F., Freimund, W. A., Breen, C. et al. (2015). Benefiting from complexity thinking. In Worboys, G. L., Lockwood, M., Kothari, A., Feary, S., & Pulsford, I. (Eds.), Protected Area Governance and Management (pp. 291–326). ANU Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1657v5d.17.Google Scholar
McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2000). The Entrepreneurial Mindset: Strategies for Continuously Creating Opportunity in an Age of Uncertainty. Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
McKim, R. H. (1980). Experiences in Visual Thinking. PWS.Google Scholar
McPeck, J. E. (1981). Critical Thinking and Education. St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
McPeck, J. E. (1990). Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: A Reply to Ennis. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 10–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
Mello, A. L., & Rentsch, J. R. (2015). Cognitive Diversity in Teams: A Multidisciplinary Review. Small Group Research, 46(6), 623–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496415602558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messer-Davidow, E., Shumway, D. R., & Sylvan, D. (1993). Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Micheli, P., Wilner, S. J. S., Bhatti, S. H., Mura, M., & Beverland, M. B. (2019). Doing Design Thinking: Conceptual Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(2), 124–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milani, A., & Farinella, P. (1994). The Age of the Veritas Asteroid Family Deduced by Chaotic Chronology. Nature, 370(6484), Article 6484. https://doi.org/10.1038/370040a0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momsen, J., Speth, E. B., Wyse, S., & Long, T. (2022). Using Systems and Systems Thinking to Unify Biology Education. CBE Life Sciences Education, 21(2), es3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. J. (2011). Critical Thinking and Disciplinary Thinking: A Continuing Debate. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.501328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesvorný, D., Bottke, W. F., Vokrouhlický, D., Morbidelli, A., & Jedicke, R. (2005). Asteroid Families. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 1(S229), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921305006800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, D. (2005). The Nature of Thinking and Thinking Skills. In Moseley, D., Newton, D. P., Miller, J. et al. (Eds.), Frameworks for Thinking: A Handbook for Teaching and Learning (pp. 8–32). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489914.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noll, V. H. (1935). Measuring the Scientific Attitude. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 30(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novick, L. R., & Catley, K. M. (2016). Fostering 21st-Century Evolutionary Reasoning: Teaching Tree Thinking to Introductory Biology Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), ar66. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-06-0127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, B. (2004). The Power of Design: A Tiny Firm Called IDEO Redefined Good Design by Creating Experiences, Not Just Products. Now It’s Changing the Way Companies Innovate. (Cover Story). Business Week, 1–9.Google Scholar
O’Hara, R. J. (1997). Population Thinking and Tree Thinking in Systematics. Zoologica Scripta, 26(4), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.1997.tb00422.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, S., & Mehta, K. (2017). Systems, Design, and Entrepreneurial Thinking: Comparative Frameworks. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 30(5), 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-016-9404-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, V. L., Arocha, J. F., & Zhang, J. (2005). Thinking and Reasoning in Medicine. In Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 727–750). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perkins, D. N. (1997). Epistemic Games. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(97)88443-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are Cognitive Skills Context-Bound? Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peschl, H., Deng, C., & Larson, N. (2021). Entrepreneurial Thinking: A Signature Pedagogy for an Uncertain 21st Century. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pourdehnad, J., Wilson, D., & Wexler, E. (2011, September 23). Systems & Design Thinking: A Conceptual Framework for Their Integration. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS, 55(1), 1–15. https://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings55th/article/view/1650.Google Scholar
Praslova, L. N. (2023, January 10). Today’s Most Critical Workplace Challenges Are about Systems. Harvard Business Review, 55(1), 1–15. https://hbr.org/2023/01/todays-most-critical-workplace-challenges-are-about-systems.Google Scholar
Pressman, A. (2018). Design Thinking: A Guide To Creative Problem Solving For Everyone. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, N. B. (2002). Is Thinking Like a Lawyer Really What We Want to Teach? Journal of the Association of Legal Writing Directors, 1, 91–108.Google Scholar
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, K. A. (2008). Managing Complex Organizations: Complexity Thinking and the Science and Art of Management. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 10(2), 15.Google Scholar
Richmond, B. (1993). Systems Thinking: Critical Thinking Skills for the 1990s and Beyond. System Dynamics Review, 9(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260090203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richmond, B. (2016, February 27). The ‘Thinking’ in Systems Thinking: How Can We Make It Easier to Master? The Systems Thinker. https://thesystemsthinker.com/the-thinking-in-systems-thinking-how-can-we-make-it-easier-to-master/.Google Scholar
Riess, W., & Mischo, C. (2010). Promoting Systems Thinking through Biology Lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902769946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining Reflection: Another Look at John Dewey and Reflective Thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roehling, M. V., Cavanaugh, M. A., Moynihan, L. M., & Boswell, W. R. (2000). The Nature of the New Employment Relationship: A Content Analysis of the Practitioner and Academic Literatures. Human Resource Management, 39(4), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-050X(200024)39:4<305::AID-HRM3>3.0.CO;2-V.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural Categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosvall, M., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2011). Multilevel Compression of Random Walks on Networks Reveals Hierarchical Organization in Large Integrated Systems. PLOS ONE, 6(4), e18209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruggiero, V. R. (1996). A Guide to Sociological Thinking. SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rycroft-Smith, L., & Connolly, C. (2019). Talking Point: What Are Mathematical Thinking and Computational Thinking and What Is the Relationship between Them? (Espresso 24). Cambridge Mathematics. www.cambridgemaths.org/Images/espresso_24_mathematical_and_computational_thinking.pdf.Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency. The Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/259121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2009). Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2021). Even-If: Sufficient, Yet Unnecessary Conditions for Worldmaking. Organization Theory, 2(2), 26317877211005785. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211005785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saward, M. (2021). Democratic Design. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayeed, O. B., & Gazdar, M. K. (2003). Intrapreneurship: Assessing and Defining Attributes of Intrapreneurs. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/097135570301200104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayre, E. C., & Irving, P. W. (2015). Brief, Embedded, Spontaneous Metacognitive Talk Indicates Thinking Like a Physicist. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 11(2), 020121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Sánchez Viveros, B. (2019). The Cognitive Benefits of Learning Computer Programming: A Meta-Analysis of Transfer Effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 764–792. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroyer, T. (1984). On Finalization in Science. Theory and Society, 13(5), 715–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, J., Groeger, L., & Sobel, L. (2016). The Design Thinking Mindset: An Assessment of What We Know and What We See in Practice. Journal of Design, Business & Society, 2(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs.2.1.71_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seiler, J. H., & Kowalsky, M. (2011). Systems Thinking Evidence from Colleges of Business and their Universities. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 4(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajbe.v4i3.4113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seixas, P. (2017). A Model of Historical Thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(6), 593–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1101363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selby, C. C., & Woollard, J. (2014). Computational Thinking: The Developing Definition. Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 1–6.Google Scholar
Sevian, H., & Talanquer, V. (2014). Rethinking Chemistry: A Learning Progression on Chemical Thinking. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00111C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, N., Bowers, J., Roderick, S. et al. (2022). A Framework for Supporting Systems Thinking and Computational Thinking Through Constructing Models. Instructional Science, 50(6), 933–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09590-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature Pedagogies in the Professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumway, D. R., & Messer-Davidow, E. (1991). Disciplinarity: An Introduction. Poetics Today, 12(2), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shute, V. J. (1994). Learning Processes and Learning Outcomes. In Husén, T. & Postlethwaite, T. N. (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., pp. 3315–3325). Pergamon; Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying Computational Thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, J. C., Ethington, C. A., Umbach, P. D., & Rocconi, L. M. (2009). Faculty Emphases on Alternative Course-Specific Learning Outcomes in Holland’s Model Environments: The Role of Environmental Consistency. Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9125-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneider, C., Stephenson, C., Schafer, B., & Flick, L. (2014). Computational Thinking in High School Science Classrooms: Exploring the Science ‘Framework’ and ‘NGSS’. Science Teacher, 81(5), 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokol, A., Oget, D., Sonntag, M., & Khomenko, N. (2008). The Development of Inventive Thinking Skills in the Upper Secondary Language Classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speicher, S., Murray, A., & McGirt, E. (2022, March 9). IDEO’s CEO Is Applying Design Thinking to Find Balance in the Pandemic Era. Fortune. https://fortune.com/2022/03/09/ideo-ceo-sandy-speicher-design-thinking-covid-pandemic/.Google Scholar
Spiller, C., Wolfgramm, R. M., Henry, E., & Pouwhare, R. (2020). Paradigm Warriors: Advancing a Radical Ecosystems View of Collective Leadership from an Indigenous Māori Perspective. Human Relations, 73, 516–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719893753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, M., & Eckert, C. (2003). Against Ambiguity. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12(2), 153–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning Independently of Prior Belief and Individual Differences in Actively Open-Minded Thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stave, K., & Hopper, M. (2007, August 29). What Constitutes Systems Thinking: A Proposed Taxonomy. 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, 1–24. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/sea_fac_articles/201.Google Scholar
Stearns, S. C. (2006). Evolutionary Thinking in the Medical Sciences. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (pp. 1–3). John Wiley & Son. www.wiley.com/en-gb/Encyclopedia+of+Life+Sciences%2C+26+Volume+Set-p-9780470066515.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). What is Mathematical Thinking? In Sternberg, R. J. & Ben-Zeev, T. (Eds.), The Nature of Mathematical Thinking (pp. 303–318). Routledge.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Critical Thinking in STEM Disciplines. In Sternberg, R. J. & Halpern, D. F. (Eds.), Critical Thinking in Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 309–327). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684354.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Ben-Zeev, T. (Eds.). (1996). The Nature of Mathematical Thinking. Routledge.Google Scholar
Stiling, P. (1994). What Do Ecologists Do? Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 75(2), 116–121.Google Scholar
Strober, M. H. (2006). Habits of the Mind: Challenges for Multidisciplinary Engagement. Social Epistemology, 20(3–4), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720600847324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strober, M. H. (2011). Interdisciplinary Conversations: Challenging Habits of Thought. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, G. (2001). Artistic Thinking as Transcognitive Practice: A Reconciliation of the Process-Product Dichotomy. Visual Arts Research, 27(1), 2–12.Google Scholar
Suzuki, D. G. (2021). Homology Thinking Reconciles the Conceptual Conflict between Typological and Population Thinking. Biology & Philosophy, 36(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-021-09800-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tank, A. (2020, December 18). This One Style of Thinking Helps My Team Solve Problems More Creatively. Fast. www.fastcompany.com/90587741/how-my-company-uses-systems-thinking-to-solve-problems-faster.Google Scholar
Tanner, C. A. (2006). Thinking Like a Nurse: A Research-Based Model of Clinical Judgment in Nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20060601-04.Google Scholar
Tedre, M., & Denning, P. J. (2022). Computational Thinking: A Professional and Historical Perspective. In Yadav, A. & Berthelsen, U. D. (Eds.), Computational Thinking in Education: A Pedagogical Perspective (pp. 1–17). Routledge. www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003102991-1/computational-thinking-matti-tedre-peter-denning.Google Scholar
Tett, G. (2021). Anthro-Vision: A New Way to See in Business and Life. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, C. (2020). What Is ‘Good Science’? In Bertolaso, M. & Sterpetti, F. (Eds.), A Critical Reflection on Automated Science: Will Science Remain Human? (pp. 279–292). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25001-0_14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Stead-Dorval, K. B. (2006). Creative Problem Solving: An Introduction. Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
UK Government Office for Science. (2022). Systems Thinking: An Introductory Toolkit for Civil Servants. UK Government Office for Science. www.gov.uk/government/publications/systems-thinking-for-civil-servants.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme. (2017). Design Thinking | United Nations Development Programme. UNDP. www.undp.org/arab-states/publications/design-thinking.Google Scholar
Valerio, A., Parton, B., & Robb, A. (2014). Entrepreneurship Education and Training Programs around the World. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/237611468151500808/pdf/Entrepreneurship-education-and-training-programs-around-the-world-dimensions-for-success.pdfGoogle Scholar
Varadarajan, A. (2019). Uncovering the Link Between Effectuation and Design Thinking in Early Stage Startups [Master’s Programme in International Design Business Management (IDBM), Aalto University]. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/42688/master_Varadarajan_Adithya_2020.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.Google Scholar
Vermaas, P. (2016). A Logical Critique of the Expert Position in Design Research: Beyond Expert Justification of Design Methods and Towards Empirical Validation. Design Science, 2, e7 (23 pages). https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2016.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waks, S., Trotskovsky, E., Sabag, N., & Hazzam, O. (2011). Engineering Thinking: The Expert’s Perspective. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27, 838–851.Google Scholar
Warton, D. I., Foster, S. D., De’ath, G., Stoklosa, J., & Dunstan, P. K. (2015). Model-Based Thinking for Community Ecology. Plant Ecology, 216(5), 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0366-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, P. R. (1990). Creativity as Creative Thinking. Music Educators Journal, 76(9), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3401073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic Education and Technology: Expanding the Space of Learning. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-0-387-71142-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegerif, R., Li, L., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2015). The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M. et al. (2016). Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesche, M., Leifer, L., Uebernickel, F. et al. (2018). Teaching Innovation in Interdisciplinary Environments: Toward a Design Thinking Syllabus. AIS SIGED International Conference on Information Systems Education and Research. www.alexandria.unisg.ch/255309/.Google Scholar
Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical Thinking in Empirical Enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.1999.tb00442.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421303064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willingham, D. T. (2007). Critical Thinking: Why Is It So Hard to Teach? American Educator, 31, 8–19.Google Scholar
Willingham, D. T. (2019). Occasional Paper Series: How to Teach Critical Thinking. Education: Future Frontiers, State of New South Wales (Department of Education), 1–17.Google Scholar
Wineburg, S. (2010). Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(4), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational Thinking and Thinking about Computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical Investigations (Third ed.). Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wrigley, C., Mosely, G., & Mosely, M. (2021). Defining Military Design Thinking: An Extensive, Critical Literature Review. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 7(1), 104–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2020.12.002.Google Scholar
Wrigley, C., Mosely, G., & Tomitsch, M. (2018). Design Thinking Education: A Comparison of Massive Open Online Courses. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 4(3), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2018.06.002.Google Scholar
Wrigley, C., Nusem, E., & Straker, K. (2020). Implementing Design Thinking: Understanding Organizational Conditions. California Management Review, 62(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619897606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, C., & Straker, K. (2017). Design Thinking Pedagogy: The Educational Design Ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1108214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Design Thinking and Other Approaches
  • Nathan Crilly, University of Cambridge
  • Online ISBN: 9781009498685
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Design Thinking and Other Approaches
  • Nathan Crilly, University of Cambridge
  • Online ISBN: 9781009498685
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Design Thinking and Other Approaches
  • Nathan Crilly, University of Cambridge
  • Online ISBN: 9781009498685
Available formats
×