Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:51:40.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Behavioral Strategy

Exploring Microfoundations of Competitive Advantage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2024

Nicolai J Foss
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Ambra Mazzelli
Affiliation:
SKEMA Business School
Libby Weber
Affiliation:
University of California

Summary

Behavioral strategy has emerged as one of the most important currents in contemporary strategic management. But, what is it? Where does it come from? Why is it important? This Element provides a review of key streams in behavioral, interpreting behavioral strategy as a consistently microfoundational approach to strategy that is grounded in evidence-based insight in behaviors and interaction. We show that there is considerable room for furthering the microfoundations of behavioral strategy and point to research opportunities and methods that may realize this aim. The Element is of interest to strategy scholars in general, and to Ph.D. students in strategy research in particular.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781009566759
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 19 December 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abell, P., Felin, T., & Foss, N. 2008. Building micro‐foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29: 489502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, P. S. 2001. Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12: 215234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. 1985. Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7: 263–195.Google Scholar
Albert, S., Ashforth, B. E., & Dutton, J. E. 2000. Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. Academy of Management Review, 25: 1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, S. A., & Porac, J. 2020. Imagination, indeterminacy, and managerial choice at the limit of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 45(4): 735744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrevski, G., & Miller, D. 2022. Forbearance: Strategic nonresponse to competitive attacks. Academy of Management Review, 47: 5974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argote, L. 1999. Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Argote, L. & Greve, H. 2007. “A behavioral theory of the firm”: 40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organization Science, 18: 337349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., & Johnson, S. A. 2001. Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. In Hogg, M. A. and Terry, D. J. (eds.), Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts (pp. 3148). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14: 2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. 2008. Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3): 325374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audia, P. G., & Greve, H. R. 2006. Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Science, 52: 8394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. 1992. Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, M., Dirks, K. T., & Nickerson, J. A. 2013. Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 197214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balasubramanian, N., Ye, Y., & Xu, M. 2022. Substituting human decision-making with machine learning: Implications for organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 47(3): 448465.Google Scholar
Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. 2004. Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 523549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. H. 1984. Cognitive biases and their impact on strategic planning. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 129137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartunek, J. M. 1984. Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 355372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartunek, J. M., Balogun, J., & Do, B. 2011. Considering planned change anew: Stretching large group interventions strategically, emotionally, and meaningfully. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. 1987. First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organization development interventions: A cognitive approach. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23: 483500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, A. E., Pfarrer, M. D., Milosevic, I., & Titus, V. K. Jr 2023. Better to be loved by some? Firm flaunting as an impression management strategy. Academy of Management Review, 48: 292312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, J. A., Li, S. X., & Usher, J. M. 2000. Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 766801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, O., Schmidt, J., & Stieglitz, N. 2019. Effective search in rugged performance landscapes: A review and outlook. Journal of Management, 45: 285318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, E., & Davison, J. 2013. Visual management studies: Empirical and theoretical approaches. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15: 167184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benner, M. J., & Tripsas, M. 2012. The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management Journal, 33(3): 277302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, E., Shore, J., & Lazer, D. 2018. How intermittent breaks in interaction improve collective intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(35): 87348739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Billinger, S., Stieglitz, N., & Schumacher, T. R. 2014. Search on rugged landscapes: An experimental study. Organization Science, 25(1): 93108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, C. B. & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2011. Rational heuristics: The “simple rules” strategists learn from their process experiences. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 14371464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitektine, A. 2011. Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1): 151179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. 2016. Agency theory and bounded self-interest. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 276297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bougon, M., Weick, K., & Binkhorst, D. 1977. Cognition in organizations: An analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22: 606639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouquet, C., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Managing power in the multinational corporation: How low-power actors gain influence. Journal of Management, 34: 477508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouquet, C., Morrison, A., & Birkinshaw, J. 2009. International attention and multinational enterprise performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 40: 108131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivie, S., Lange, D., McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. 2011. Me or we: The effects of CEO organizational identification on agency costs. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3): 551576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boje, D. M. 1991. Consulting and change in the storytelling organisation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 4(3): 717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boje, D. M. (2017). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. In Minahan, S. & Cox, J. Wolfram (eds.), The Aesthetic Turn in Management (pp. 211231). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchikhi, H., & Kimberly, J. R. 2003. Escaping the identity trap. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3): 2026.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. 1991. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5): 475482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. 1996. Who is this” We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1): 8393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridoux, F., Coeurderoy, R., & Durand, R. 2011. Heterogeneous motives and the collective creation of value. Academy of Management Review, 36: 711730.Google Scholar
Bromiley, P. 2010. Looking at prospect theory. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 13571370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromiley, P., Koumakhov, R., Rousseau, D. M., & Starbuck, W. H. 2019. The challenges of March and Simon’s Organizations: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Management Studies, 56: 15171526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromiley, P., & Rau, D. 2022. Some problems in using prospect theory to explain strategic management issues. Academy of Management Perspectives, 36: 125141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookes, J., Warburton, M., Alghadier, M., Mon-Williams, M., & Mushtaq, F. 2020. Studying human behavior with virtual reality: The unity experiment framework. Behavior Research Methods, 52: 455463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. D., Stacey, P., & Nandhakumar, J. 2008. Making sense of sensemaking narratives. Human Relations, 61: 10351062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, M. E. 1994. Social interaction effects following a technological change: A longitudinal investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4): 869898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhard, B., Sirén, C., van Essen, M., Grichnik, D. & Shepherd, D. A. 2022. Nothing ventured, nothing gained: A meta-analysis of CEO overconfidence, strategic risk taking, and performance’. Journal of Management, 49(8): 26292666. https://doi.org/01492063221110203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. 2018. The science of organizational design: Fit between structure and coordination. Journal of Organization Design, 7: 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. 1997. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1): 930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinale, I. 2018. Beyond constraining and enabling: Toward new microfoundations for institutional theory. Academy of Management Review, 43: 132155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. 1999. Dual-process Theories in Social Psychology. Press, Guilford. Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and Structure. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. 1999. The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76: 893910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, G., Crossland, C., & Luo, S. 2015. Making the same mistake all over again: CEO overconfidence and corporate resistance to corrective feedback. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 15131535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Latham, G. P., Piccolo, R. F., & Itzchakov, G. 2021. An enumerative review and a meta‐analysis of primed goal effects on organizational behavior. Applied Psychology, 70: 216253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, T. S., & Hambrick, D. C. 2006. Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17: 453469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, K., & Tuckett, D. 2015. Constructing conviction through action and narrative: How money managers manage uncertainty and the consequence for financial market functioning. Socio-Economic Review, 13: 309330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. 2013. Social contagion theory: Examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Statistical Medicine, 32: 556577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, M. & Knudsen, , T. 2010. Design of decision-making organizations. Management Science, 56: 7189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, M., Dahl, C. M., Knudsen, T., & Warglien, M. 2021. Context and aggregation: An experimental study of bias and discrimination in organizational decisions. Organization Science, 34: 21632181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christianson, M. K., Farkas, M. T., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Weick, K. E. 2009. Learning through rare events: Significant interruptions at the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Museum. Organization Science, 20: 846860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, R. B. 2001. Influence: Science and Practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. 4th ed.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B. 2003. Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12: 105109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. 2004. Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55: 591621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooren, F. 2013. Interacting and Organizing: Analyses of a Management Meeting. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, F., Vaara, E., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H., eds. 2014. Language and Communication at Work: Discourse, Narrativity, and Organizing (Volume 4). Oxford: Oxford University press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. 2004. Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2): 173208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P., & Werner, M. D. 2014. Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1): 181235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croson, R., Anand, J., & Agarwal, R. 2007. Using experiments in corporate strategy research. European Management Review, 4: 173181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csaszar, F. A. & Eggers, J. P. 2013. Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Science, 59: 22572277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuevas‐Rodríguez, G., Gomez‐Mejia, L. R., & Wiseman, R. M. (2012). Has agency theory run its course?: Making the theory more flexible to inform the management of reward systems. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(6): 526546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R. M., & DeGroot, M. H. 1974. Rational expectations and Bayesian analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 82: 521536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
D’adderio, L., & Pollock, N. 2014. Performing modularity: Competing rules, performative struggles and the effect of organizational theories on the organization. Organization Studies, 35(12): 18131843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. 1984. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9: 284295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. R. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.Google Scholar
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. 1999. Cognitive biases and strategic decision processes: An integrative perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 36: 757778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daugherty, P. R., & Wilson, H. J. 2018. Human + Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, E. J. 2002. Technology frames and framing: A socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. MIS Quarterly, 26: 329358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. H. &, Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 2047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daw, N. D., Gershman, S. J., Seymour, B., Dayan, P, & Dolan, R. J. 2011. Model-based influences on humans’ choices and striatal prediction errors. Neuron, 69: 12041215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dearborn, D. C., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. Sociometry, 21: 140144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. 2012. Self-determination theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1(20): 416436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denrell, J., & Le Mens, G. 2017. Information sampling, belief synchronization, and collective illusions. Management Science, 63: 528547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denrell, J., & March, J. G. 2001. Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organization Science, 12: 523538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devers, C. E., Cannella, A. A. Jr, Reilly, G. P., & Yoder, M. E. 2007. Executive compensation: A multidisciplinary review of recent developments. Journal of Management, 33: 10161072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, D., Borrelli, L., Munir, K., & O’Sullivan, A. 2000. Systems of organizational sensemaking for sustained product innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17: 321355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. 2002. Intelligence without representation–Merleau-Ponty’s critique of mental representation The relevance of phenomenology to scientific explanation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(4): 367383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. 2014. Skillful Coping: Essays on the Phenomenology of Everyday Perception and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, J. E., & Ashford, S. J. 1993. Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review, 18: 397428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. 1994. Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2: 239263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, J. E., Fahey, L., & Narayanan, V. K. 1983. Toward understanding strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 4: 307323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, J. P. & Kaplan, S. 2013. Cognition and capabilities: A multi-level perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 7: 295340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrig, T. & Foss, N. J. 2020. Risk, uncertainty, and COVID-19 strategies. https://quillette.com/2020/05/04/risk-uncertainty-and-covid-19-strategies/Google Scholar
Ehrig, T., & Foss, N. J. 2022. Unknown unknowns and the treatment of firm-level adaptation in strategic management research. Strategic Management Review, 3: 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrig, T., Manjaly, J., Singh, A., & Sunder, S. 2022. Adaptive rationality in strategic interaction: Do emotions regulate thinking about others?. Strategy Science, 7: 330349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 543576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J. III 1988. Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 737770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elfenbein, H. A. 2014. The many faces of emotional contagion: An affective process theory of affective linkage. Organizational Psychology Review, 4: 326362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsbach, K. D. 2003. Organizational perception management. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25: 297332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsbach, K. D., Barr, P. S., & Hargadon, A. B. 2005. Identifying situated cognition in organizations. Organization Science, 16(4): 422433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. 1996. Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the Business Week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 442476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, R. M. 1976. Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1): 335362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. A., & Aceves, P. 2016. Machine translation: Mining text for social theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 42: 2150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahey, L., & Narayanan, V. K. 1989. Linking changes in revealed causal maps and environmental change: An empirical study. Journal of Management Studies, 26: 361378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 301325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feduzi, A. & Runde, J. 2014. Uncovering unknown unknowns: Towards a Baconian approach to management decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124: 268283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. 2016. Routines as process Past, present, and future. In Howard-Grenville, J. A., Rerup, C., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (eds.), Organizational Routines: How they are Created, Maintained, and Changed (pp. 2346). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 94118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T. & Foss, N. J. 2005. Strategic Organization: A field in search of microfoundations. Strategic Organization, 3: 441455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T., Foss, N. J., & Ployhart, R. E. 2015. The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 9: 575632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. 2017. The theory-based view: Economic actors as theorists. Strategy Science, 2(4): 258271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiol, C. M. 1991. Managing culture as a competitive resource: An identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 191211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiol, C. M. 1994. Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 5(3): 403420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiol, C. M. 2001. Revisiting an identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 27(6): 691699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischhoff, B. 1996. The real world: what good is it?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65: 232248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. 1984. Social Cognition. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. 2004. The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non) adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(4): 501534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, D. P. (2005). Managerial determinants of decision speed in new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4): 355366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. D., & Baucus, D. A. 1987. Organizational adaptation to performance downturns: An interpretation-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 12(2): 366380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J., Ford, L., D’Amelio, A. 2008. Resistance to change: The rest of the story. Academy of Management Review, 33(2): 362377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N., & Stea, D. 2014. Putting a realistic theory of mind into agency theory: Implications for reward design and management in principal‐agent relations. European Management Review, 11: 101116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N. J. 2001. Bounded rationality in the economics of organization: Present use and (some) future possibilities. Journal of Management & Governance, 5: 401425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N. J. 2003. The rhetorical dimensions of bounded rationality: Herbert A. Simon and organizational economics. In Rizzello, S. (ed.), Cognitive Paradigms in Economics (pp. 170171). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J. 2020. Behavioral strategy and the Covid-19 disruption. Journal of Management, 46: 13221329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N. J. 2023. Expanding the boundaries of rationality”: Knightian uncertainty and the limitations of the Savage Heuristic. European Management Review, 20(4): 626631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N. J. & Hallberg, N. 2014. How symmetrical assumptions facilitate theoretical advance in strategic management: The case of the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 903913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N. J. & Lindenberg, S. 2013. Strategy in a goal-framing perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27: 85102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N. J., & Weber, L. 2016. Moving opportunism to the back seat: Bounded rationality, costly conflict, and hierarchical forms. Academy of Management Review, 41: 6179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. 2008. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. British Medical Journal, 337, a2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, J. W., Hambrick, D. C., & Baumrin, S. 1988. A model of CEO dismissal. Academy of Management Review, 13: 255270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. & Savage, L. J. 1948. Utility analysis of choices involving risk. Journal of Political Economy, 56: 279304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaba, V., & Joseph, J. 2013. Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in M-form firms. Organization Science, 24: 11021119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, J. 1973. Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J. R. 1977. Organization Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Gamache, D. L., McNamara, G., Mannor, M. J., & Johnson, R. E. (2015). Motivated to acquire? The impact of CEO regulatory focus on firm acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 12611282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamache, D. L., Neville, F., Bundy, J., & Short, C. E. (2020). Serving differently: CEO regulatory focus and firm stakeholder strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 41: 13051335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G. 2012. Perspective—Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organization Science, 23: 267285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. 2000. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 113137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G., Levinthal, D., & Ocasio, W. 2007. Perspective—Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie school’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organization Science, 18: 523536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G., Greve, H. R., Levinthal, D. A., & Ocasio, W. 2012. The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Academy of Management Annals, 6: 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G., Levinthal, D. A. & Rivkin, J. W. 2005. Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 691712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gephart, R. P., Topal, C. & Zhang, Z. 2010. Future-oriented sensemaking: Temporalities and institutional legitimation. In Hernes, T. & Maitlis, S. (eds.), Process, Sensemaking, and Organizing (pp. 275302). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. 1996. Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giamattei, M., Yahosseini, K. S., Gächter, S., & Molleman, L. 2020. LIONESS Lab: A free web-based platform for conducting interactive experiments online. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 6: 95111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. G. 1983. Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15: 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. & Gaissmaier, W. 2011. Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62: 451482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D. G. 1996. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103: 650669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., & Pachur, T., eds. 2011. Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M. & The ABC Research Group. 1999. Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, C. G. 2006. Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist? Organization Science, 17(1): 150167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. 1991. Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 433448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1): 1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, MA: North Eastern University Press.Google Scholar
Gottschalg, O. & Zollo, M. 2007. Interest alignment and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 32: 418437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J., & Tomlinson, E. C. 2004. Situated experiments in organizations: Transplanting the lab to the field. Journal of Management, 30: 703724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, H. 1998. Performance, Aspirations, and Risky Organizational Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 5886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, H. R. 2013. Microfoundations of management: Behavioral strategies and levels of rationality in organizational action. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27: 103119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, H. R. 2003. A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 685702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, R., & Westphal, J. D. 1999. Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 473506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrick, D. C. 2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32: 334343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., & Crossland, C. 2018. A strategy for behavioral strategy: Appraisal of small, midsize, and large tent conceptions of this embryonic community. In Augier, M., Fang, C., & Rindova, V. P. (eds.), Behavioral Strategy in Perspective (Vol. 39, pp. 2339). Bingley, UK: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., Werder, A. V., & Zajac, E. J. 2008. New directions in corporate governance research. Organization Science, 19: 381385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, E., Yin, D., & Zhang, H. 2023. Bots with feelings: should AI agents express positive emotion in customer service? Information Systems Research, 34: 12961311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. 2006. When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17: 484500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, S. A., & Ellemers, N. 2005. Social identity in industrial and organizational psychology: Concepts, controversies and contributions. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 20: 39118.Google Scholar
Haunschild, P. R. 1993. Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 564592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healey, M. P., & Hodgkinson, G. P. 2017. Making strategy hot. California Management Review, 59(3): 109134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healey, M. P., Hodgkinson, G. P., & Massaro, S. 2017. Emotion regulation in organizations: Integrating neural and social processes. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2017, No. 1, p. 16741). Briarcliff Manor: Academy of Management.Google Scholar
Helfat, C. E. & Peteraf, M. A. 2015. Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 831850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. T. 1997. Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12): 1280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, E. T. 1998. Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30: 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. C., & Levenhagen, M. 1995. Metaphors and mental models: Sensemaking and sensegiving in innovative and entrepreneurial activities. Journal of Management, 21(6): 10571074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., Maule, A. J., & Bown, N. J. 2004. Causal cognitive mapping in the organizational strategy field: A comparison of alternative elicitation procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 7: 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P. 1997. The cognitive analysis of competitive structures: A review and critique. Human Relations, 50: 625654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., Bown, N. J., Maule, A. J., Glaister, K. W., & Pearman, A. D. 1999. Breaking the frame: An analysis of strategic cognition and decision making under uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 977985.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., Burkhard, B., Foss, N. J. et al. 2023. The heuristics and biases of top managers: Past, present, and future. Journal of Management Studies, 60(5): 10331063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., & Healey, M. P. 2008. Cognition in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 59: 387417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodgkinson, G. P. & Healey, M. P. 2011. Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: Reflexion and reflection in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 15001516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., & Johnson, G. 1994. Exploring the mental models of competitive strategists: The case for a processual approach. Journal of Management Studies, 31: 525552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., Wright, R. P., & Anderson, J. 2015. Emotionalizing strategy research with the repertory grid technique: Modifications and extensions to a robust procedure for mapping strategic knowledge. Advances in Strategic Management, 32: 505547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. 2000. The dynamic, diverse, and variable faces of organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 251: 150152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, R. M. Jr, Bromiley, P., Devers, C. E., Holcomb, T. R., & McGuire, J. B. 2011. Management theory applications of prospect theory: Accomplishments, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Management, 37: 10691107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horner, A. J., Bisby, J. A., Zotow, E., Bush, D., & Burgess, N. 2016. Grid-like processing of imagined navigation. Current Biology, 26: 842847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton, J. J., Rand, D. G., & Zeckhauser, R. J. 2011. The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14: 399425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskisson, R. E., Chirico, F., Zyung, J., & Gambeta, E. 2017. Managerial risk taking: A multitheoretical review and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 43: 137169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, T. D., & Aguinis, H. 2023. Conducting phenomenon-driven research using virtual reality and the metaverse. Academy of Management Discoveries, 9: 408415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, A. S. 1982. Industry influences on strategy reformulation. Strategic Management Journal, 3: 119131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, A. S. 1990. Mapping Strategic Thought. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hung, S. C. 2005. The plurality of institutional embeddedness as a source of organizational attention differences. Journal of Business Research, 58: 15431551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husted, B. W., & Folger, R. 2004. Fairness and transaction costs: The contribution of organizational justice theory to an integrative model of economic organization. Organization Science, 15: 719729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huy, Q. N. 2012. Emotions in strategic organization: Opportunities for impactful research. Strategic Organization, 10: 240247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huy, Q. N., Corley, K. G., & Kraatz, M. S. 2014. From support to mutiny: Shifting legitimacy judgments and emotional reactions impacting the implementation of radical change. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 16501680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, R. E., Sun, W., Delis, I., Garrod, O. G. B., & Schyns, P. G. 2016. Four not six: Revealing culturally common facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145: 708730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. E., & Dutton, J. E. 1988. Discerning threats and opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 370387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jay, J. 2013. Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 137159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and owner ship structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. G. B., Bilovich, & Tuckett, D. 2023. Conviction narrative theory: A theory of choice under radical uncertainty. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X22001157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, J., & Gaba, V. 2020. Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research. Academy of Management Annals, 14: 267302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, J., & Wilson, A. J. 2018. The growth of the firm: An attention‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 39: 17791800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jussim, L. 2012. Social Perception and Social Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaczmarek, S., Kimino, S., & Pye, A. 2012. Board task‐related faultlines and firm performance: A decade of evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20: 337351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47: 263291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. 1982. The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246(1): 160173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. 2003. Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics’, American Economic Review, 935: 14491475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. H. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R., Schuck, N. W., & Doeller, C. F. 2017. The role of mental maps in decision-making. Trends in Neurosciences, 40: 256259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, S. 2008. Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19: 729752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. 2011. Research in cognition and strategy: Reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3): 665695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, T., Posen, H. E., & Workiewicz, M. 2023. Aspirations, beliefs and a new idea: Building on March’s other model of performance feedback. Academy of Management Review, 48: 749771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S. & Steg, , L. 2008. The spreading of disorder. Science, 322: 16811685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S. & Steg, L. 2013. The importance of demonstratively restoring order. PLoS ONE, 8: e65137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, G. 1970. A brief introduction to personal construct theory. Reprint 2017. Costruttivismi, 4: 315.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. 2023. Competitive advantages through artificial intelligence: Toward a theory of situated AI. Academy of Management Review, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, T. 2002. Understanding the emotional experience of organizational change: Evidence from a merger. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4: 3961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, T. 2005. Feeling bad: Antecedents and consequences of negative emotions in ongoing change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26: 875897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. 1982. Managerial response to changing environments: Perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 548570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilduff, G. J. 2019. Interfirm relational rivalry: Implications for competitive strategy. Academy of Management Review, 44: 775799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. 2023. Frame restructuration: The making of an alternative business incubator amid detroit’s crisis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(3): 753805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1996. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7: 502518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, A., Mammen, J., Luger, J., Fehn, A., & Enders, A. 2018. Silver bullet or ricochet? CEOs’ use of metaphorical communication and infomediaries’ evaluations. Academy of Management Journal, 61: 11961230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R. M., & Neale, M. A. 1998. Power and Influence in Organizations. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, D., Boivie, S., & Westphal, J. D. 2015. Predicting organizational identification at the CEO level. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 12241244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lant, T. K. 1992. Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Science, 38: 623644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lant, T. K., & Mezias, S. J. 1992. An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation. Organization Science, 3: 4771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, D. C. and Murnighan, J. K. 1998. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23: 325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laureiro-Martínez, D., Brusoni, S., & Zollo, M. 2010. The neuroscientific foundations of the exploration–exploitation dilemma. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 3: 95115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laureiro‐Martínez, D., Brusoni, S., Canessa, N., & Zollo, M. 2015. Understanding the exploration–exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision‐making performance. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 319338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, B. S., & Zyphur, M. J. 2011. Identifying organizational faultlines with latent class cluster analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14(1): 3257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leicht‐Deobald, U., Huettermann, H., Bruch, H., & Lawrence, B. S. 2021. Organizational demographic faultlines: Their impact on collective organizational identification, firm performance, and firm innovation. Journal of Management Studies, 58(8): 22402274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Mens, G., Kovács, B., Hannan, M. T., & Pros, G. 2023. Uncovering the semantics of concepts using GPT-4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(49): e2309350120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, S. S., Schilke, O., Kacperczyk, O., & Zucker, L. G. 2023. Primer for experimental methods in organization theory. Organization Science, 34: 19972025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinthal, D. A. 1997. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 43: 934950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinthal, D. A. 2011. A behavioral approach to strategy—what’s the alternative? Strategic Management Journal, 32(13): 15171523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinthal, D. A. & March, J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. 2008. Homo economicus evolves. Science, 319: 909910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J., & Tang, Y. I. 2010. CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1): 4568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindebaum, D., Vesa, M., & Den Hond, F. 2020. Insights from “the machine stops” to better understand rational assumptions in algorithmic decision making and its implications for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 45(1): 247263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg, S. & Foss, N. J. 2011 Managing motivation for joint production: The role of goal framing and governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 36: 500525.Google Scholar
Liu, D., Fisher, G., & Chen, G. 2018. CEO attributes and firm performance: A sequential mediation process model. Academy of Management Annals, 12: 789816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y. & Perrewé, P. 2005. Another look at the role of emotion in the organizational change: A process model. Human Resource Management Review, 15(4): 263280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loersch, C., & Payne, B. K. 2014. Situated inferences and the what, who, and where of priming. Social Cognition, 32 (Supplement): 137151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovallo, D. & Sibony, O. 2010. The Case for Behavioral Strategy: McKinsey Quarterly. McKinsey: Boston.Google Scholar
Lovallo, D., Clarke, C., & Camerer, C. 2012. Robust analogizing and the outside view: Two empirical tests of case-based decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 496512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luan, S., Reb, J., & Gigerenzer, G. (2019). Ecological rationality: Fast-and-frugal heuristics for managerial decision making under uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 62: 17351759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. 1957. Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lyles, A. & Schwenk, C. R. 1992. Top management, strategy and organizational knowledge structures. Journal of Management Studies, 29: 155174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machlup, F. 1967. Theories of the firm: Marginalist, behavioral, managerial. American Economic Review, 57: 133.Google Scholar
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. 1992. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of organizational Behavior, 13(2): 103123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maersk. 2023. Annual Report. Accessed June 6, 2024. www.maersk.comGoogle Scholar
Maitlis, S. 2005. The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 2149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitlis, S., & Lawrence, T. B. 2007. Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 5784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitlis, S., & Sonenshein, S. 2010. Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies, 47: 551580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, A., Chen, Y., Gajos, K. Z. et al. 2012. Turkserver: Enabling synchronous and longitudinal online experiments. Proceedings of the fourth workshop on human computation. AAAI Technical Report WS-12–08. https://aaai.org/papers/aaaiw-ws0894-12-5315/.Google Scholar
March, J. G. 1962. The business firm as a political coalition. Journal of Politics, 24: 662678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 7187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. 1975. The uncertainty of the past: Organizational learning under ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research, 3: 147171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Marchetti, A. & Puranam, P. 2023. Interpreting Topic Models Using Prototypical Text: From “Telling” To “Showing”. INSEAD Working Paper No. 2020/49/STR, SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3717437.Google Scholar
Mayer, K. J., Xing, Z., & Mondal, P. 2022. Contracting for innovation: Designing contracts that account for exchange hazards and the need for innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 43: 22532278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzelli, A., Nason, R. S., De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J. 2019. Causality rules: Performance feedback on hierarchically related goals and capital investment variability. Journal of Management Studies, 56: 16301654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. 2003. Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, K. R., Tacchetti, A., Bakker, M. A. et al. 2023. Scaffolding cooperation in human groups with deep reinforcement learning. Nature Human Behaviour, 7: 17871796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, R., & Zhu, R. J. 2009. Blue or red? Exploring the effect of color on cognitive task performances. Science, 323: 12261229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, A. D. 1982. Adapting to environmental jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 515537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mezias, S. J., & Glynn, M. A. 1993. The three faces of corporate renewal: Institution, revolution, and evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 77101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., & Le Breton–Miller, I. 2011. Governance, social identity, and entrepreneurial orientation in closely held public companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35: 10511076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., Le Breton‐Miller, I., & Lester, R. H. 2011. Family and lone founder ownership and strategic behaviour: Social context, identity, and institutional logics. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Theoret, A. 1976. The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 246275.Google Scholar
Mithani, M. A., & O’Brien, J. P. 2021. So what exactly is a “coalition” within an organization? A review and organizing framework. Journal of Management, 47: 171206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monin, P., Noorderhaven, N., Vaara, E., & Kroon, D. 2013. Giving sense to and making sense of justice in postmerger integration. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1): 256284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mousavi, S. & Gigerenzer, G. 2014. Risk, uncertainty, and heuristics. Journal of Business Research, 67: 16711678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, A., Rhymer, J. E. N., & Sirmon, D. G. 2021. Humans and technology: Forms of conjoined agency in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 46(3): 552571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadkarni, S., & Chen, J. 2014. Bridging yesterday, today, and tomorrow: CEO temporal focus, environmental dynamism, and rate of new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 18101833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nag, R., Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. 2007. The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 821847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nason, R. S., Bacq, S., & Gras, D. 2018. A behavioral theory of social performance: Social identity and stakeholder expectations. Academy of Management Review, 43(2): 259283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nason, R., Mazzelli, A., & Carney, M. 2019. The ties that unbind: Socialization and business-owning family reference point shift. Academy of Management Review, 44: 846870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayak, A., Chia, R., & Canales, J. I. 2020. Noncognitive microfoundations: Understanding dynamic capabilities as idiosyncractically refined sensitivities and predispositions. Academy of Management Review, 45: 280303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, J. von & Morgenstern, O. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ndofor, H. A., Sirmon, D. G., & He, X. 2015. Utilizing the firm’s resources: How TMT heterogeneity and resulting faultlines affect TMT tasks. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 16561674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982. The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited. American Economic Review, 72: 114132.Google Scholar
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Elements of a theory of human problem solving. Psychological Review, 65: 151166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. 1972. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Nickerson, J. A., Silverman, B. S., & Zenger, T. R. 2007. The problem of creating and capturing value. Strategic Organization, 5: 211225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. 2008. Envy, comparison costs, and the economic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 14291449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, N. J. 1971. Problem-solving Methods in Artificial Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill Book.Google Scholar
Obel, B., & Burton, R. M. 1984. Designing Efficient Organizations: Modelling and Experimentation. North-Holland: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ocasio, W. 1997. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 187206.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocasio, W. (2011). Attention to attention. Organization Science22(5): 12861296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocasio, W., & Joseph, J. 2005. An attention-based theory of strategy formulation: Linking micro-and macroperspectives in strategy processes. In Szulanski, G., Porac, J., & Doz, Y. (eds.), Strategy Process (pp. 3961). Leeds, England: Emerald Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocasio, W., & Joseph, J. 2008. Rise and fall or transformation?: The evolution of strategic planning at the General Electric Company, 1940–2006. Long Range Planning, 41: 248272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oeberst, A. & Imhoff, R. 2023. Toward parsimony in bias research: A proposed common framework of belief-consistent information processing for a set of biases. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(6): 14641487. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/17456916221148147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ouchi, W. G. 1980. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1): 129141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouchi, W. G., & Barney, J. B. 1980. Efficient Boundaries. Mimeographed. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. 2010. Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5: 411419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, S. C., & Witteloostuijn, A. V. 2010. A general framework for estimating multidimensional contingency fit. Organization Science, 21: 540553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmigiani, A. & Howard-Grenville, J. 2011. Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 5: 413453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. T., Feldman, M. S., Becker, M. C. and Liu, P. 2012. Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. Journal of Management Studies, 49: 14841508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepper, A., & Gore, J. 2015. Behavioral agency theory: New foundations for theorizing about executive compensation. Journal of Management, 41: 10451068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepper, A., Gosling, T., & Gore, J. 2015. Fairness, envy, guilt and greed: Building equity considerations into agency theory. Human Relations, 68: 12911314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrow, C. 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pfarrer, M. D., Devers, C. E., Corley, K. et al. 2019. Sociocognitive perspectives in strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 44: 767774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piezunka, H., Aggarwal, V. A., & Posen, H. E. 2022. The aggregation–learning trade-off. Organization Science, 33: 10941115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piezunka, H., & Dahlander, L. 2015. Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 856880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piezunka, H., & Schilke, O. 2023. The dual function of organizational structure: Aggregating and shaping individuals’ votes. Organization Science, 34(5): 16511996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., & Baden‐Fuller, C. 1989. Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies, 26(4): 397416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., Wilson, F., Paton, D., & Kanfer, A. 1995. Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish Knitwear producers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 203227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. E. 1980. Industry structure and competitive strategy: Keys to profitability. Financial Analysts Journal, 36: 3041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posen, H. E., Keil, T., Kim, S., & Meissner, F. D. 2018. Renewing research on problemistic search—A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1): 208251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., & Fox, C. R. 2011. Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 13691386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, A., & Prasad, P. 2002. The coming of age of interpretive organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 5: 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz, K. 2022. The Smiling Chatbot: Investigating Emotional Contagion in Human-to-Chatbot Service Interactions. Koblenz: Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puranam, P., Stieglitz, N. Osman, M., & Pillutla, M. 2015. Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Annals, 9: 337392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafaeli, A. & Worline, M. 2001. Individual emotion in work organizations. Social Science Information, 40: 95123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. 2021. Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46: 192210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, D. G. 2012. The promise of Mechanical Turk: How online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 299: 172179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ravasi, D., & Schultz, M. 2006. Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 4: 433458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reger, R. K., & Huff, A. S. 1993. Strategic groups: A cognitive perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 103123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reger, R., Mullane, J., Gustafson, L. et al. 1994. Creating earthquakes to change organizational mindsets. Academy of Management Executive, 8: 3146.Google Scholar
Reinholt, M., Pedersen, T., & Foss, N. J. 2011. Why a central network position isn’t enough: The moderating roles of motivation and ability for knowledge sharing in employee networks. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 12771297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhee, M., Kim, Y. C., & Han, J. 2006. Confidence in imitation: Niche-width strategy in the UK automobile industry. Management Science, 52: 501513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riessman, C. K. 1993. Narrative Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rindova, V. P., & Fombrun, C. J. 1999. Constructing competitive advantage: the role of firm–constituent interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 691710.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rindova, V. P., & Martins, L. L. 2021. Shaping possibilities: A design science approach to developing novel strategies. Academy of Management Review, 46: 800822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rindova, V. P., & Martins, L. L. 2022. Futurescapes: Imagination and temporal reorganization in the design of strategic narratives. Strategic Organization, 20: 200224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rindova, V. P., Reger, R. K., & Dalpiaz, E. 2012. The mind of the strategist and the eye of the beholder: The socio-cognitive perspective in strategy research. In Dagnino, G. B. (eds.), Handbook of Research on Competitive Strategy (pp. 147164). Cheltenham, UK: Edgar Elgar.Google Scholar
Riordan, M. H., & Williamson, O. E. 1985. Asset specificity and economic organization. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 3: 365378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelt, R. P. 1979. Evaluation of strategies: Theory and models. In Schendel, D. E., & Hofer, C. W. (eds.), Strategic Management: A New View of Business Policy and Planning (pp. 196212). Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. 1966. Lectures on Conversation, vol. I. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sah, R. K. & Stiglitz, J. E. 1986. The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies. American Economic Review, 76: 716727.Google Scholar
Schiller, D., Eichenbaum, H., Buffalo, E. A. et al. 2015. Memory and space: Towards an understanding of the cognitive map. Journal of Neuroscience, 35: 1390413911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schilling, M. A. 2018. The cognitive foundations of visionary strategy. Strategy Science, 3: 335342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwenk, C. R. 1984. Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision‐making. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 111128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebhatu, A., Wennberg, K., Arora-Jonsson, S., & Lindberg, S. 2020. Explaining the homogeneous diffusion of COVID-19 nonpharmaceutical interventions across heterogeneous countries. PNAS, 117: 2120121208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semadeni, M., Chin, M. K., & Krause, R. 2022. Pumping the brakes: Examining the impact of CEO political ideology divergence on firm responses. Academy of Management Journal, 65: 516544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sent, E. M. 2004. Behavioral economics: How psychology made its (limited) way back into economics. History of Political Economy, 36: 735760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirado, H. & Christakis, N. A. 2020. Network engineering using autonomous agents increases cooperation in human groups. iScience, 23: 101438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, H. A. 1947. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. 1st ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1947. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1967. Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review, 74: 2939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, H. A. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69: 99118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1956. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63: 129138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, H. A. 1978. Rationality as process and as product of thought. American Economic Review, 68: 116.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1985. Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. American Political Science Review, 79(2): 293304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1991. Organizations and markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 2544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A., & Newell, A. 1971. Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970. American Psychologist, 26: 145159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A., & Newell, A. 1976. Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 19(3): 11126.Google Scholar
Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., & Fox, B. C. 2018. Interfaces of strategic leaders: A conceptual framework, review, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 44: 280324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonenshein, S. 2010. We’re changing—Or are we? Untangling the role of progressive, regressive, and stability narratives during strategic change implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 477512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spender, J. C. 1989. Industry Recipes: An Enquiry into the Nature and Sources of Managerial Judgement. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spiliopoulos, L., & Hertwig, R. 2023. Variance, skewness and multiple outcomes in described and experienced prospects: Can one descriptive model capture it all? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152: 11881222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stachenfeld, K. L., Botvinick, M. M., & Gershman, S. J. 2017. The hippocampus as a predictive map. Nature Neuroscience, 20: 16431653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starbuck, W. H., & Milliken, F. J. 1988. Executive’s perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense. In Hambrick, D. (ed.), The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers, pp. 35-66. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. 1980. Commitment in an experimenting society: A study of the attribution of leadership from administrative scenarios. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65: 249260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbach, A. L., Gamache, D. L., & Johnson, R. E. 2019. Don’t get it misconstrued: Executive construal-level shifts and flexibility in the upper echelons. Academy of Management Review, 44(4), 871895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, W. B., & Greenberg, D. 2000. Agency and social networks: Strategies of action in a social structure of position, opposition, and opportunity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 651678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoewer, P., Schilling, A., Maier, A., & Krauss, P. 2023. Neural network based formation of cognitive maps of semantic spaces and the putative emergence of abstract concepts. Scientific Reports, 13: 3644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strike, V. M., & Rerup, C. 2016. Mediated sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 880905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutcliffe, K. M. 2013 Sensemaking. In Augier, M. and Teece, D. (eds.), Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management (pp. 14). Palgrave Macmillan: London.Google Scholar
Taleb, N. N. 2007. Black swans and the domains of statistics. The American Statistician, 61: 198200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. 1978. Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel, & Austin, W. G. (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 724). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Tasselli, S., Kilduff, M., & Menges, J. I. 2015. The microfoundations of organizational social networks: A review and an agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 41: 13611387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. 1996. Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8): 776793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, S. M. B., & Patel, P. C. 2012. Group faultlines: A review, integration, and guide to future research. Journal of Management, 38: 9691009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., & Gioia, D. A. 1993. Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 239270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, J. B., Sussman, S. W., & Henderson, J. C. 2001. Understanding “strategic learning”: Linking organizational learning, knowledge management, and sensemaking. Organization Science, 12: 331345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. F. 1967. Foundations of Physiological Psychology. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Thorngate, W. 1976. Possible limits on a science of social behavior. In Strickland, L. H., Aboud, F. E., Gergen, K. J. (eds.), Social Psychology in Transition (pp. 121139). Boston, MA: Springer US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolman, E. C. 1948. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55: 189208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, S., Jia, N., Luo, X., & Fang, Z. 2021. The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42: 16001631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripsas, M. & Gavetti, G. 2000. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11): 11471161.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsay, C. J. 2021. Visuals dominate investor decisions about entrepreneurial pitches. Academy of Management Discoveries, 7(3): 343366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsvetkova, M. & Macy, M. W. 2015. The social contagion of antisocial behavior. Sociological Science, 2: 3649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuggle, C. S., Schnatterly, K., & Johnson, R. A. 2010. Attention patterns in the boardroom: How board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial issues. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 550571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. 1978. Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3: 613624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Fox, C. R. 1995. Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psychological Review, 102: 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185: 11241131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A. & Wakker, P. 1995. Risk attitudes and decision weights. Econometrica, 63: 12551280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, B. 1974. Eye fixations in prediction of recognition and recall. Memory & Cognition, 2: 275278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Knippenberg, D. & Van Kleef, G. A. 2016. Leadership and affect: Moving the hearts and minds of followers. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1): 799840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veblen, T. 1898. Why is economics not an evolutionary science? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12: 373397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vissa, B. 2010. A matching theory of entrepreneurs’ tie formation intentions and initiation of economic exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 137158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, V., van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G. A., Wisse, B. 2013. How leader displays of happiness and sadness influence follower performance: Emotional contagion and creative versus analytical performance. Leadership Quarterly, 24: 172188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Krogh, G. 2018. Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing. Academy of Management Discoveries, 4(4): 404409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuori, T. O., & Huy, Q. N. 2020. Regulating top managers’ emotions during strategy making: Nokia’s socially distributed approach enabling radical change from mobile phones to networks in 2007–2013. Academy of Management Journal, 65: 331361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, J. B., Porac, J. F., & Pollock, T. G. 1997. Worth, words, and the justification of executive pay. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 18: 641664.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, M. H., & Lynn, F. B. 2013. The embedded self: A social networks approach to identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 76: 151179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, J. P. 1995. Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6: 280321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, J. P., & Fahey, L. 1986. The role of negotiated belief structures in strategy making. Journal of Management, 12: 325338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Jia, M., Xiang, Y., & Lan, Y. 2022. Social performance feedback and firm communication strategy. Journal of Management, 48: 23822420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, T. J. 2009. Narrative, life story and manager identity: A case study in autobiographical identity work. Human relations, 62: 425452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, J. M., & Murnighan, J. K. 2008. Suckers or saviors? Consistent contributors in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95: 13401353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, L. 2017. A sociocognitive view of repeated interfirm exchanges: How the coevolution of trust and learning impacts subsequent contracts. Organization Science, 28: 744759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, L. & Bauman, C. W. 2019. The cognitive and behavioral impact of promotion and prevention contracts on trust in repeated exchanges. Academy of Management Journal, 62: 361382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, L. & Coff, R. 2023. Managers’ perceptions and microfoundations of contract design. Academy of Management Review, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, L., & Mayer, K. J. 2011. Designing effective contracts: Exploring the influence of framing and expectations. Academy of Management Review, 36: 5375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, L., & Mayer, K. J. 2014. Transaction cost economics and the cognitive perspective: Investigating the sources and governance of interpretive uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 39(3): 344363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, L., Mayer, K. J., & Macher, J. T. 2011. An analysis of extendibility and early termination provisions: The importance of framing duration safeguards. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 182202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, L., Foss, N. J., & Lindenberg, S. 2023. The role of cognition and motivation in understanding internal governance and hierarchical failure: A discriminating alignment analysis. Academy of Management Review, 48: 244263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2d ed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. 1988. Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. Journal of Management Studies, 25: 305317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. 1993. Organizational redesign as improvisation. In Huber, G. P. and Glick, W. H. (eds.), Organizational Change and Redesign (pp. 346–79). Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. 2005. Organizing and failures of imagination. International Public Management Journal, 8: 425438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. 2010. Reflections on enacted sensemaking in the Bhopal disaster. Journal of Management Studies, 47: 537550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. 1993. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 357381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesley, C. L., Martin, G. W., Rice, D. B., & Lubojacky, C. J. 2022. Do the right thing: The imprinting of deonance at the upper echelons. Journal of Business Ethics, 180: 187213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. 2013. A behavioral theory of corporate governance: Explicating the mechanisms of socially situated and socially constituted agency. Academy of Management Annals, 7: 607661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whetten, D. A. 2006. Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15: 219234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 269296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1993. Opportunism and its critics. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14(2): 97107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford: Oxford university press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, S. G. 2012. Purpose and progress in the theory of strategy: Comments on Gavetti. Organization Science, 23(1): 288297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 1998. A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23: 133153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R., Kwon, W., & Clarke, I. 2011. “Getting people on board”: Discursive leadership for consensus building in team meetings. Discourse & Society, 22: 592644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., Liden, R. C., Liao, C., & Wayne, S. J. 2021. Does manager servant leadership lead to follower serving behaviors? It depends on follower self-interest. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106: 152167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Behavioral Strategy
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Behavioral Strategy
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Behavioral Strategy
Available formats
×