Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:22:42.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Quantitative and Computational Methods for the Social Sciences

Bayesian Social Science Statistics

From the Very Beginning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2024

Jeff Gill  and
Le Bao
Jeff Gill
Affiliation:
American University
Le Bao
Affiliation:
Georgetown University

Summary

In this Element, the authors introduce Bayesian probability and inference for social science students and practitioners starting from the absolute beginning and walk readers steadily through the Element. No previous knowledge is required other than that in a basic statistics course. At the end of the process, readers will understand the core tenets of Bayesian theory and practice in a way that enables them to specify, implement, and understand models using practical social science data. Chapters will cover theoretical principles and real-world applications that provide motivation and intuition. Because Bayesian methods are intricately tied to software, code in both R and Python is provided throughout.
Get access

Keywords

Bayesian statisticsprobabilityprior distributionposterior distributionlikelihood function
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Quantitative and Computational Methods for the Social Sciences
Online ISBN: 9781009341189
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 24 October 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartels, L. M. (1996). Pooling disparate observations. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 905–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayes, T. (1763). Lii. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. By the late Rev. Mr. Bayes, frs communicated by Mr. Price, in a letter to John Canton, amfr s. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, (53), 370–418.Google Scholar
Berk, R. A., Western, B., & Weiss, R. E. (1995). Statistical inference for apparent populations. Sociological Methodology, 421–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, A. (1962). On the foundations of statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(298), 269–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, B., Brady, D. W., & Cogan, J. F. (2002). Out of step, out of office: Electoral accountability and house members’ voting. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, W. F., & Florence, L.W. (2008). Predicting presidential and other multistage election outcomes using state-level pre-election polls. The American Statistician, 62(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copas, J. (1969). Compound decisions and empirical bayes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 31(3), 397–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, A. I. (2012). A history of inverse probability: From Thomas Bayes to Karl Pearson. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Diaconis, P., & Freedman, D. (1986). On the consistency of bayes estimates. The Annals of Statistics, 14(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1922). On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 222(594–604), 309–368.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1925). Theory of Statistical Estimation. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 22(5), 700–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Founta, A.-M., Djouvas, C., Chatzakou, D. et al. (2018). Large scale crowdsourcing and characterization of Twitter abusive behavior. In 11th international conference on web and social media, ICWSM 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). CRC Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, A., Hullman, J., Wlezien, C., & Morris, G. E. (2020). Information, incentives, and goals in election forecasts. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(5), 863–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, J. (1999). The insignificance of null hypothesis significance testing. Political Research Quarterly, 52(3), 647–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, J. (2014). Bayesian methods: A social and behavioral sciences approach (Vol. 20). CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, J., & Freeman, J. R. (2013). Dynamic elicited priors for updating covert networks. Network Science, 1(1), 68–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, J., & Torres, M. (2019). Generalized linear models: A unified approach (Vol. 134). Sage.Google Scholar
Gill, J., & Walker, L. D. (2005). Elicited priors for Bayesian model specifications in political science research. The Journal of Politics, 67(3), 841–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, R. M., & Lyberg, L. (2010). Total survey error: Past, present, and future. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 849–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isakov, M., & Kuriwaki, S. (2020). Towards principled unskewing: Viewing 2020 election polls through a corrective lens from 2016. Harvard Data Science Review, 2(4).Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. (1933). Grundbegriffe der wahrscheinlichkeitreichnung. Ergebnisse der Mathematik.Google Scholar
Lauderdale, B. E., Bailey, D., Blumenau, J., & Rivers, D. (2020). Model-based pre-election polling for national and sub-national outcomes in the US and UK. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(2), 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leamer, E. E. (1972). A class of informative priors and distributed lag analysis. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 40(6), 1059–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madson, G. J., & Hillygus, D. S. (2020). All the best polls agree with me: Bias in evaluations of political polling. Political Behavior, 42(4), 1055–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, R. M., Mann, C., Stewart III, C. et al. (2020). Waiting to vote in the 2016 presidential election: Evidence fromamulti-county study. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 439–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, S.M. (1982). Thomas Bayes’s Bayesian inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 145(2), 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, S. M. (1983). Who discovered Bayes’s theorem? The American Statistician, 37(4a), 290–296.Google Scholar
Stoetzer, L. F., Leemann, L., & Traunmueller, R. (2024). Learning from polls during electoral campaigns. Political Behavior, 46(1), 543–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stunt, J., van Grootel, L., Bouter, L., Trafimow, D., Hoekstra, T., & de Boer, M. (2021). Why we habitually engage in null-hypothesis significance testing: A qualitative study. Plos One, 16(10), e0258330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, K., & Gill, J. (2005). Bayesian inference in public administration research: Substantive differences from somewhat different assumptions. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(1–2), 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellner, A. (1996). An introduction to Bayesian inference in econometrics. Wiley.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Bayesian Social Science Statistics
  • Jeff Gill, American University, Le Bao, Georgetown University
  • Online ISBN: 9781009341189
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Bayesian Social Science Statistics
  • Jeff Gill, American University, Le Bao, Georgetown University
  • Online ISBN: 9781009341189
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Bayesian Social Science Statistics
  • Jeff Gill, American University, Le Bao, Georgetown University
  • Online ISBN: 9781009341189
Available formats
×