Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:15:08.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Ancient Egypt in Context

Scribal Culture in Ancient Egypt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2023

Niv Allon  and
Hana Navratilova
Niv Allon
Affiliation:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Hana Navratilova
Affiliation:
University of Oxford and University of Reading

Summary

This Element seeks to characterize the scribal culture in ancient Egypt through its textual acts, which were of prime importance in this culture: writing, list-making, drawing, and copying. Drawing upon texts, material objects, and archeological evidence, this Element will touch upon main themes at the heart of the study of this culture, while building on current discussions in literacy and literary as well as social history.
Get access

Keywords

Egyptcultureliteracyknowledgewriting
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Ancient Egypt in Context
Online ISBN: 9781009070614
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 21 December 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelmoniem, Ahmed H. 2020. ‘The Professions and Hierarchy of Nekhebu’. Journal of the General Union of Arab Archaeologists 5 (2): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, James P. 1992. ‘Rē’wer’s accident’. In Studies in Pharaonic Religion and Society in Honour of J. Gwyn Griffiths, edited by Lloyd, Alan B., 14–20. London: Egypt Exploration Society.Google Scholar
Allen, James P. 2010. ‘Language, Scripts, and Literacy’. In A Companion to Ancient Egypt, vol. 2, edited by Lloyd, Alan B., 641–62. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Allen, James P. 2002. The Heqanakht Papyri. Publications of the Metropolitan Museum of Art Egyptian Expedition 27. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Allon, Niv. 2013. ‘The Writing Hand and the Seated Baboon: Tension and Balance in Statue MMA 29.2.16’. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 49: 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allon, Niv 2019. Writing, Violence, and the Military: Images of Literacy in Eighteenth Dynasty Egypt (1550–1295 BCE). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allon, Niv 2021. ‘Finding a Voice in a Hymn to Ramesses IX (MMA 59.51a, b)’. Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur 50: 1–17.Google Scholar
Allon, Niv, and Navratilova, Hana. 2017. Ancient Egyptian Scribes: A Cultural Exploration. Bloomsbury Egyptology. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Altenmüller, Hartwig. 2015. Zwei Annalenfragmente aus dem frühen Mittleren Reich. Studien Zur Altägyptischen Kultur, Beihefte 16. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Andreu, Guillemette. 2013. L’Art du contour: Le dessin dans l’Egypte ancienne, cat. exp. (Paris, Musée du Louvre, 2013; Bruxelles, Musée Royaux d’Art et d’Histoire, 2013–2014). Paris: Louvre éditions.Google Scholar
Arnold, Dorothea. 2008. ‘Egyptian Art: A Performing Art?’ In Servant of Mut: Studies in Honor of Richard A. Fazzini, edited by D’Auria, Sue H., 1–18. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Assmann, Jan. 1983. Re und Amun: Die Krise des polytheistischen Weltbilds im Ägypten Der 18.–20. Dynastie. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 51. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Assmann, Jan 1995. Egyptian Solar Religion in the New Kingdom: Re, Amun and the Crisis of Polytheism, translated by Alcock, Anthony. London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Assmann, Jan 1999a. Ägyptische Hymnen und Gebete. 2nd ed. Orbis biblicus et orientalis. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Backes, Burkhard. 2011. ‘Zur Anwendung der Textkritik in der Ägyptologie: Ziele, Grenzen und Akzeptanz’. In Methodik und Didaktik in der Ägyptologie: Herausforderungen eines kulturwissenschaftlichen Paradigmenwechsels in den Altertumswissenschaften, edited by Backes, Burkhard, Verbovsek, Alexandra, and Jones, Catherine, 451–79. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Bács, Tamás A. 2011. ‘“ … Like Heaven in Its Interior”: Late Ramesside Painters in Theban Tomb 65’. In Proceedings of the Colloquium on Theban Archaeology at the Supreme Council of Antiquities, November 5, 2009, edited by Hawass, Zahi, Bács, Tamás A, and Schreiber, Gábor, 33–41. Cairo: Conseil Suprême des antiquités de l’Égypte.Google Scholar
Bács, Tamás A. 2021. ‘A Painter’s Version: Amenhotep, Son of Amunnakhte and Pictorial Tradition’. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 107 (1–2): 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, John. 1983. ‘Literacy and Ancient Egyptian Society’. Man 18 (3): 572–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, John 1997. ‘Kingship before Literature: The World of the King in the Old Kingdom’. In Selbstverständnis und Realität: Akten des Symposiums zur Ägyptischen Königsideologie in Mainz 15.–17.6.1995, edited by Gundlach, Rolf and Raedler, Christine, 125–74. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Baines, John 2003. ‘Research on Egyptian Literature: Background, Definitions, Prospects’. In Egyptology at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century: Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Egyptologists, Cairo, 2000, vol. 3, edited by Brock, Lyla Pinch and Hawass, Zahi, 1–26. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar
Baines, John 2007. ‘Ancient Egyptian Concepts and Uses of the Past: Third to Second Millennium Evidence’. In Visual and Written Culture in Ancient Egypt, edited by Baines, John, 179–201. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, John 2011a. ‘Ancient Egypt’. In The Oxford History of Historical Writing, Volume 1: Beginnings to AD 600, edited by Hardy, Grant and Feldherr, Andrew, 53–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baines, John 2011b. ‘Egyptology and the Social Sciences: Thirty Years On’. In Methodik und Didaktik in der Ägyptologie: Herausforderungen eines Kulturwissenschaftlichen Paradigmenwechsels in den Altertumswissenschaften, edited by Backes, Burkhard, Verbovsek, Alexandra, and Jones, Catherine, 573–97. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Baines, John, and Lacovara, Peter. 2002. ‘Burial and the Dead in Ancient Egyptian Society: Respect, Formalism, Neglect’. Journal of Social Archaeology 2: 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakir, , ‘Abd el-Moḥsen. 1970. Egyptian Epistolography from the Eighteenth to the Twenty-First Dynasty. Bibliothèque d’étude 48. Cairo: Institut français d’Archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Barta, Winfried. 1963. Die altägyptische Opferliste, von der Frühzeit bis zur griechisch-römischen Epoche. Berlin: BHessling.Google Scholar
Barta, Winfried 1968. Aufbau und Bedeutung der Altägyptischen Opferformel. Ägyptologische Forschungen 24. Glueckstadt: J. J. Augustin.Google Scholar
Rizzo, Bazin, Laure, Annie Gasse, Frédéric, Servajean, and Musée Henri Prades de Montpellier agglomération. 2016. À l’école des scribes: Les écritures de l’Égypte ancienne. Cahiers de l’ENIM (CENIM) 15. Cinisello Balsamo: SilvanaEditoriale.Google Scholar
Bednarski, Andrew. 2020. ‘The Nature and History of Egyptology’. In The Oxford Handbook of Egyptology, edited by Bednarski, Andrew, Shaw, Ian, and Bloxam, Elizabeth, 32–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bednarski, Andrew, Dodson, Aidan, and Ikram, Salima. 2021. A History of World Egyptology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belknap, Robert E. 2004. The List: The Uses and Pleasures of Cataloguing. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlev, Oleg. 1997. ‘Bureaucrats’. In The Egyptians, edited by Bianchi, Robert, Donadoni, Sergio, Ritter, Thomas, Crone, Anna Lisa, and Lambert, Charles, 87–119. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Elke. 2011. ‘Privater Buchbesitz im Pharaonischen Ägypten’. In Bibliotheken im Altertum, edited by Blumenthal, Elke and Schmitz, Wolfgang, 51–85. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Boon, Marcus. 2010. In Praise of Copying. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Borchardt, Ludwig. 1907. ‘Das Dienstgebäude des auswärtigen Amtes unter den Ramessiden’. Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache Und Altertumskunde 44: 59–61.Google Scholar
Borchardt, Ludwig 1910. Das Grabdenkmal des Königs Śaȝḥu-Reʿ I: Der Bau. Ausgrabungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft in Abusir 1902–1908. Wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 14. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Borchardt, Ludwig 1937. Denkmäler des Alten Reiches (außer den Statuen) im Museum von Kairo, Nr. 1295–1808. Teil 1: Text und Tafeln zu Nr. 1295–1541. Catalogue général des antiquités égyptiennes du Musée du Caire. Berlin: Reichsdruckerei.Google Scholar
Borges, Jorge L. 1962 (1956). Ficciones, translated by Anthony Kerrigan. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Bowman, Alan K., and Woolf, Greg (eds.). 1994. Literacy and Power in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, Asa, and Burke, Peter. 2020. A Social History of the Media: From Gutenberg to Facebook. 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Brovarski, Edward 2001. The Senedjemib Complex I: The Mastabas of Senedjemib Inti (G 2370), Khnumenti (G 2374), and Senedjemib Mehi (G 2378), Giza Mastabas 7. Boston, MA: Art of the Ancient World, Museum of Fine Arts.Google Scholar
Brunner-Traut, Emma. 1990. Frühformen des Erkennens: am Beispiel Altägyptens. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Burkard, Günter. 1977. Textkritische Untersuchungen zu Ägyptischen Weisheitslehren des Alten und Mittleren Reiches: Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 34. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Callender, Vivienne Gae. 2019. El-Hawawish: Tombs, Sarcophagi, Stelae. Palaeography. Paléographie hiéroglyphique 8. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Caminos, Ricardo A. 1954. Late-Egyptian Miscellanies. Brown Egyptological Studies I. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cancik, Hubert, Helmuth, Schneider, and Christine, F. Salazar. 2002. Brill’s New Pauly: Encyclopaedia of the Ancient World. English ed. Managing editor Salazar, Christine F.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cancik-Kirschbaum, Eva Christiane. 2018. Erste Philologien: Archäologie einer Disziplin vom Tigris bis zum Nil. Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candea, Matei. 2019. Comparison in Anthropology: The Impossible Method. New Departures in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary. 2008. The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. 1979. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Černý, Jaroslav. 1929. ‘Dělnictvo ve dtarém Egyptě’. Orient 2 (5): 29–31.Google Scholar
Černý, Jaroslav 1931. ‘Les Ostraca Hiératiques, Leur Intérêt et La Nécessité de Leur Étude’. Chronique d’Égypte 6 (12): 212–24.Google Scholar
Černý, Jaroslav 1963. ‘The Contribution of the Study of Unofficial and Private Documents to the History of Pharaonic Egypt’. In Le Fonti Indirette Della Storia Egiziana / Les Sources Indirectes de l’histoire Égyptienne / Indirect Sources of Egyptian History / Die Indirekten Quellen Der Ägyptischen Geschichte, edited by Donadoni, Sergio, 31–57. Rome: Centro di studi semitici, Università.Google Scholar
Černý, Jaroslav, Sauneron, Serge, and Valbelle, Dominique. 1973. A Community of Workmen at Thebes in the Ramesside Period. Bibliothèque d’étude 50. Cairo: Institut français d’Archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Cerquiglini, Bernard. 1999. In Praise of the Variant: A Critical History of Philology. Parallax. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Challis, Debbie. 2013. The Archaeology of Race: The Eugenic Ideas of Francis Galton and Flinders Petrie. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Chantrain, Gaëlle. 2014. ‘The Use of Classifiers in the New Kingdom: A Global Reorganization of the Classifiers System?’ Lingua Aegyptia 22: 39–59.Google Scholar
Chantrain, Gaëlle, and Di Biase-Dyson, Camilla. 2017. ‘Making a Case for Multidimensionality in Ramesside Figurative Language’. Lingua Aegyptia 25: 41–66.Google Scholar
Chioffi, Marco, and Rigamonti., Giuliana 2020. Antico Regno ‘i decreti reali’ I: decreti del II Pepy: decreto 24 Copto B, decreto 28 Dakhla, decreto dell’Horo Demedjibtaui (decreto Copto R). Collana sš wr – il grande scriba 11. Imola: La Mandragora.Google Scholar
Cohen, Henri, and Lefebvre, Claire. 2005. Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Colla, Elliott. 2008. ‘Egyptology: The Missing Millennium, Ancient Egypt in Medieval Arabic Writings’. International Journal of Middle East Studies 40 (1): 135–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contardi, Federico. 2016. ‘The Emergence of Writing and the Construction of Cultural Memory in Egypt’. In Envisioning the Past through Memories: How Memory Shaped Ancient Near Eastern Societies, edited by Nadali, Davide, 21–36. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Corsi, Pietro. 2012. ‘Idola Tribus: Lamarck, Politics and Religion in the Early Nineteenth Century’. In The Theory of Evolution and Its Impact, edited by Fasolo, Aldo, 11–39. Milan: Springer Milan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Rupert A. 2008. The Culture of Copying in Japan: Critical and Historical Perspectives. Japan Anthropology Workshop Series. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ćwiek, Andrzej. 2014. ‘Old and Middle Kingdom Tradition in the Temple of Hatshepsut at Deir El-Bahari’. Études et Travaux 27: 61–93.Google Scholar
Czapkiewicz, Andrzej. 1968. ‘Z historii badań nad toponomastyka Egiptu’. Onomastica 13: 345–52.Google Scholar
Daly, El Okasha. 2005. Egyptology: The Missing Millennium. Ancient Egypt in Medieval Arabic Writings. London: UCL Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnell, John C. 2014. ‘The Stela of the Viceroy Usersatet (Boston MFA 25.632), His Shrine at Qasr Ibrim, and the Festival of Nubian Tribute under Amenhotep II’. Égypte Nilotique et Méditerranéenne 7: 239–76.Google Scholar
Davies, Norman de Garis. 1901. The Rock Tombs of Sheikh Saïd. Archaeological Survey of Egypt 10. London: Egypt Exploration Fund.Google Scholar
Davies, Norman de Garis 1905. The Rock Tombs of el Amarna III: The Tombs of Huya and Ahmes. Archaeological Survey of Egypt 15. London: Egypt Exploration Fund.Google Scholar
Davies, Norman de Garis 1943. The Tomb of Rekh-mi-Rē’ at Thebes. Publications of the Metropolitan Museum of Art Egyptian Expedition 11. New York: Plantin Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Vanessa, and Laboury, Dimitri. 2020. The Oxford Handbook of Egyptian Epigraphy and Palaeography. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deicher, Susanne. 2015. ‘Einführung’. In Die Liste: Ordnungen von Dingen Und Menschen in Ägypten, edited by Deicher, Susanne and Maroko, Erik, 7–28. Berlin: Kadmos.Google Scholar
Deicher, Susanne, and Maroko, Erik. 2015. Die Liste: Ordnungen von Dingen und Menschen in Ägypten. Berlin: Kadmos.Google Scholar
Den Doncker, Alexis. 2017. ‘Identifying Copies in the Private Theban Necropolis: Tradition As Reception under the Influence of Self-Fashioning Processes’. In (Re)Productive Traditions in Ancient Egypt: Proceedings of the Conference Held at the University of Liège, 6th–8th February 2013, edited by Gillen, Todd, 333–70. Liege: Presses universitaires de Liège.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Writing and Difference, translated by Alan Bass. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Doležalová, Lucie. 2009. The Charm of a List: From the Sumerians to Computerised Data Processing. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Donadoni, Sergio. 1997. The Egyptians. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Donker van Heel, Koenraad, and Haring, Ben. 2003. Writing in a Workmen’s Village: Scribal Practice in Ramesside Deir El-Medina. Egyptologische Uitgaven 16. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten.Google Scholar
Dorn, Andreas. 2004. ‘Die Lehre Amunnachts’. Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache Und Altertumskunde 131: 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorn, Andreas, and Polis, Stéphane. 2016. ‘Nouveaux Textes Littéraires Du Scribe Amennakhte (et Autres Ostraca Relatifs Au Scribe de La Tombe)’. Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale 116: 57–96.Google Scholar
Dunham, Dows. 1938. ‘The Biographical Inscriptions of Nekhebu in Boston and Cairo’. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 24 (1): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1989 (1962). The Open Work, translated by Annapaola Cancogni and David Robey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto 1995. The Search for the Perfect Language: Making of Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto 2009. The Infinity of Lists. New York: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Edwards, Elizabeth. 2012. The Camera As Historian: Amateur Photographers and Historical Imagination, 1885–1918. Objects/Histories. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Elizabeth 2015. ‘Anthropology and Photography: A Long History of Knowledge and Affect’. Photographies 8 (3): 235–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enmarch, Roland. 2008. A World Upturned: Commentary on and Analysis of The Dialogue of Ipuwer and the Lord of All. British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship Monograph. Oxford: Published for The British Academy by Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erman, Adolf. 1927. The Literature of the Ancient Egyptians: Poems, Narratives, and Manuals of Instruction from the Third and Second Millennia BC, translated by Aylward M. Blackman. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Eschenbrenner-Diemer, Gersande. 2017. ‘From the Workshop to the Grave: The Case of Wooden Funerary Models’. In Company of Images: Modelling the Imaginary World of Middle Kingdom Egypt (2000–15000 BC). Proceedings of the International Conference of the EPOCHS Project Held 18th–20th September 2014 at UCL, London, edited by Quirke, Stephen, Miniaci, Gianluca, and Betrò, Marilina, 133–91. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Eyre, Christopher. 2013. The Use of Documents in Pharaonic Egypt. Oxford Studies in Ancient Documents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzamel, Mahmoud. 1997. ‘Accounting, Control and Accountability: Preliminary Evidence from Ancient Egypt’. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 8 (6): 563–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzamel, Mahmoud. 2012. Accounting and Order. Routledge Studies in Accounting. London: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasolo, Aldo (ed.). 2012. The Theory of Evolution and Its Impact. Milan: Springer Milan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, Raymond O. 1962. A Concise Dictionary of Middle Egyptian. Oxford: Griffith Institute.Google Scholar
Fischer-Elfert, Hans-Werner. 1986. Die Satirische Streitschrift des Papyrus Anastasi I: Übersetzung und Kommentar. Vol. 44. Ägyptologische Abhandlungen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Fischer-Elfert, Hans-Werner 2017. ‘Cross-Genre Correspondences: Wisdom, Medical, Mathematical and Oneirological Compositions from the Middle Kingdom to the Late New Kingdom’. In (Re)Productive Traditions in Ancient Egypt: Proceedings of the Conference Held at the University of Liège, 6th–8th February 2013, edited by Gillen, Todd, 149–61. Liege: Presses universitaires de Liège.Google Scholar
Fischer-Elfert, Hans-Werner 2021. Grundzüge einer Geschichte des Hieratischen, Einführungen und Quellentexte zur Ägyptologie 14. Munster: Lit.Google Scholar
Fitzenreiter, Martin. 1995. ‘Totenverehrung und soziale Repräsentation im thebanischen Beamtengrab der 18. Dynastie’. Studien zur altägyptischen Kultur 22: 95–130.Google Scholar
Frood, Elizabeth. 2007. Biographical Texts from Ramessid Egypt. Writings from the Ancient World 26. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Frood, Elizabeth 2010. ‘Social Structure and Daily Life: Pharaonic’. In A Companion to Ancient Egypt, vol. 1, edited by Alan, B. Lloyd, 469–90. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Galán, José M., and Díaz-Iglesias Llanos, Lucía 2020. ‘The Overseer of the Treasury Djehuty in TT 11, Speos Artemidos, and Deir el-Bahari’. In Text-Bild-Objekte im archäologischen Kontext: Festschrift für Susanne Bickel edited by Gabler, Kathrin, Gautschy, Rita, Bohnenkämper, Lukas et al., 151–69. Hamburg: Widmaier.Google Scholar
Gange, David. 2013. Dialogues with the Dead: Egyptology in British Culture and Religion, 1822–1922. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Alan H. 1916. Notes on the Story of Sinuhe. Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Alan H. 1937. Late-Egyptian Miscellanies. Bibliotheca Aegyptiaca 7. Brussels: Fondation égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Alan H. 1947. Ancient Egyptian Onomastica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Alan H. 1948. Ramesside Administrative Documents. London: Published on behalf of the Griffith Institute, Ashmolean Museum, Oxford by Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geoga, Margaret. 2021. ‘New Insights into Papyrus Millingen and the Reception History of The Teaching of Amenemhat’. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 107 (1–2): 225–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/03075133211050658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertzen, Thomas L. 2017. Nathaniel Julius Reich: Arbeit im Turm zu Babel. 1. Auflage. Jüdische Miniaturen (Hentrich and Hentrich); Bd. 197. Berlin: Hentrich and Hentrich.Google Scholar
Gertzen, Thomas L. 2020. ‘Some Remarks on the “De-colonization” of Egyptology’. Göttinger Miszellen 261: 189–203.Google Scholar
Gestermann, Louise. 2005. Die Überlieferung ausgewählter Texte altägyptischer Totenliteratur (‘Sargtexte’) in spätzeitlichen Grabanlagen. Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 68. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Gillen, Todd J. 2014. ‘Ramesside Registers of Égyptien de Tradition: The Medinet Habu Inscriptions’. In On Forms and Functions: Studies in Ancient Egyptian Grammar, edited by Winand, Jean, Polis, Stéphane, Grossman, Eitan, and Stauder, Andréas, 41–86. Hamburg: Widmaier.Google Scholar
Gillen, Todd J. 2017. (Re)Productive Traditions in Ancient Egypt: Proceedings of the Conference Held at the University of Liège, 6th–8th February 2013. Aegyptiaca Leodiensia 10. Liege: Presses universitaires de Liège.Google Scholar
Glanville, Stephen Ranulph Kingdon. 1932. ‘Scribes’ Palettes in the British Museum: Part I’. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 18 (1/2): 53–61.Google Scholar
Gnirs, Andrea M. 1996. ‘Die Ägyptische Autobiographie’. In Ancient Egyptian Literature: History and Forms, edited by Loprieno, Antonio, 191–241. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedicke, Hans. 1967. Königliche Dokumente aus dem alten Reich. Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 14. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Goedicke, Hans 1977. The Protocol of Neferyt (The Prophecy of Neferti). Johns Hopkins Near Eastern Studies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Goelet, Ogden Jr. 2008. ‘Writing Ramesside Hieratic: What the Late Egyptian Miscellanies Tell Us about Scribal Education’. In Servant of Mut: Studies in Honor of Richard A. Fazzini, edited by D’Auria, Sue H., 102–10. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Goelet, Ogden Jr. 2010. ‘Observations on Copying and the Hieroglyphic Tradition in the Production of the Book of the Dead’. In Offerings to the Discerning Eye: An Egyptological Medley in Honor of Jack A. Josephson, edited by D’Auria, Sue H., 121–32. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Goelet, Ogden Jr. 2015. ‘Verse Points, Division Markers, and Copying’. Bulletin of the Egyptological Seminar 19: 347–58.Google Scholar
Goldwasser, Orly. 2002. Prophets, Lovers and Giraffes: Wor(l)d Classification in Ancient Egypt. Classification and Categorization in Ancient Egypt 3; Göttinger Orientforschungen, 4. Reihe: Ägypten 38. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Goldwasser, Orly, and Colette, Grinevald. 2012. ‘What Are “Determinatives” Good For?’ In Lexical Semantics in Ancient Egyptian, edited by Grossman, Eitan, Polis, Stéphane, and Winand, Jean, 17–53. Hamburg: Widmaier.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. 1977. The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Themes in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack, and Watt, Ian. 1963. ‘The Consequences of Literacy’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 5 (3): 304–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graefe, Erhart, and van Voss, Matthieu Heerma. 1993. ‘Papyrus Leiden T3 Oder: Über das Kopieren von Texten durch Altägyptische Schreiber’. Oudheidkundige Mededelingen Uit Het Rijksmuseum van Oudheden 73: 23–8.Google Scholar
Grandet, Pierre. 1994. Le Papyrus Harris I (BM 9999). Bibliothèque d’étude 109. Cairo: Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale.Google Scholar
Grandet, Pierre 2018. ‘The “Chapter on Hierarchy” in Amenope’s Onomasticon (# 67–125)’. In The Ramesside Period in Egypt: Studies into Cultural and Historical Processes of the 19th and 20th Dynasties, edited by Kubisch, Sabine and Rummel, Ute, 127–37. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Griffin, Carrie, and Purcell, Emer. 2018. Text, Transmission, and Transformation in the European Middle Ages, 1000–1500. Cursor Mundi (Turnhout, Belgium), vol. 34. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, Francis Llewellyn 1897. Egyptian Literature. New York: J. A. Hill and Company.Google Scholar
Griffith, Francis Llewellyn, and Bradbury Griffith, Kate. 1917. ‘Egyptian Literature. Critical Introduction’. In The Library of the World’s Best Literature: An Anthology in Thirty Volumes. New York: Warner Library Company.Google Scholar
Griffith, Francis Llewellyn, and Petrie, Flinders. 1889. Two Hieroglyphic Papyri from Tanis. London: Trübner and Company.Google Scholar
Grimal, Nicolas. 2006. ‘Les Listes de Peuples Dans l’Égypte Du Deuxième Millénaire Av. J.-C. et La Géopolitique Du Proche-Orient’. In Timelines: Studies in Honour of Manfred Bietak, vol. 1, edited by Czerny, Ernst, Hein, Irmgard, Schwab, Angela, Melman, Dagmar, and Hunger, Hermann, 107–19. Leuven: Peeters en Departement Oosterse Studies.Google Scholar
Gunn, Battiscombe. 1906. The Instruction of Ptah-Hotep and the Instruction of Ke’gemni: The Oldest Books in the World. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Hafemann, , Ingelore with contributions by Altägyptisches Wörterbuch, Anja Weber, ‘pMMA 27.3.560’ (Object ID J47XXWESOVF7DI52K5Z7SDNOQM) https://thesaurus-linguae-aegyptiae.de/object/J47XXWESOVF7DI52K5Z7SDNOQM. In Thesaurus Linguae Aegyptiae, Corpus issue 17, Web app version 2.01, 12/15/2022, edited by Tonio Sebastian Richter and Daniel A. Werning by order of the Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften and Hans-Werner Fischer-Elfert and Peter Dils by order of the Sächsische Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig (accessed 30 April 2023).Google Scholar
Hagen, Fredrik. 2012. An Ancient Egyptian Literary Text in Context: The Instruction of Ptahhotep. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 218. Leuven: Peeters en Departement Oosterse Studies.Google Scholar
Hagen, Fredrik 2013. ‘Constructing Textual Identity: Framing and Self-Reference in Egyptian Texts’. In Ancient Egyptian Literature: Theory and Practice, edited by Enmarch, Roland and Lepper, Verena M., 185–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hagen, Fredrik 2019a. ‘Libraries in Ancient Egypt, c.1600–800 BCE’. In Libraries before Alexandria: Ancient Near Eastern Traditions, edited by Ryholt, Kim and Barjamovic, Gojko, 244–318. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, Fredrik 2019b. ‘New Copies of Old Classics: Early Manuscripts of Khakheperreseneb and The Instruction of a Man for His Son’. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 105 (2): 177–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, Fredrik, and Daniel, Soliman. 2018. ‘Archives in Ancient Egypt, 2500–1000 BCE’. In Manuscripts and Archives: Comparative Views on Record-Keeping, edited by Friedrich, Michael, Bausi, Alessandro, Brockmann, Christian, and Kienitz, Sabine, 71–170. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hannig, Rainer. 2003. Ägyptisches Wörterbuch I. Altes Reich und Erste Zwischenzeit. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Haring, Ben J. J. 2015. ‘Hieratic Drafts for Hieroglyphic Texts?’ In Ägyptologische ‘Binsen’-Weisheiten I–II: Neue Forschungen und Methoden der Hieratistik. Akten Zweier Tagungen in Mainz im April 2011 und März 2013, edited by Verhoeven, Ursula, 67–84. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Haring, Ben J. J. 2020. ‘The Survival of Pharaonic Ostraca: Coincidence or Meaningful Patterns?’ In Using Ostraca in the Ancient World: New Discoveries and Methodologies, vol. 32, edited by Caputo, Clementina and Lougovaya, Julia, 89–108. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harnad, Stevan. 2005. ‘To Cognize Is to Categorize: Cognition Is Categorization’. Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, January: 19–43.Google Scholar
Harpur, Yvonne 1987. Decoration in Egyptian Tombs of the Old Kingdom: Studies in Orientation and Scene Content. Studies in Egyptology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Harpur, Yvonne, and Scremin, Paolo. 2006. The Chapel of Kagemni: Scene Details. Egypt in Miniature 1. Reading: Oxford Expedition to Egypt.Google Scholar
Harpur, Yvonne, and Scremin, Paolo 2010. The Chapel of Niankhkhnum & Khnumhotep: Scene Details. Egypt in Miniature 3. Reading: Oxford Expedition to Egypt.Google Scholar
Hartwig, Melinda K. 2004. Tomb Painting and Identity in Ancient Thebes, 1419–1372 BCE. Monumenta Aegyptiaca 10. Brussels: Fondation égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
Hassan, Khaled. 2016. ‘An 18th Dynasty Wooden Board in the Egyptian Museum of Cairo, JE 95750 – CG 25366’. Egyptian Journal of Archaeological and Restoration Studies 6 (2): 125–32.Google Scholar
Hassan, Khaled 2016. ‘Some 18th Dynasty Hieratic Ostraca from Deir El-Bahri’. Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale 115: 179–229.Google Scholar
Hassan, Khaled 2017. ‘An 18th Dynasty Writing-Board from Saqqara in the Cairo Museum (Prophety of Neferti – CGC 25224, JE 32972)’. Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale 117: 261.Google Scholar
Hassan, Selim. 1943. Excavations at Gîza IV: 1932–1933. Cairo: Government Press, Bulaq.Google Scholar
Hayes, William C. 1957. ‘Varia from the Time of Hatshepsut’. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Abteilung Kairo 15: 78–90.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Eva. 1995. Das Grab des Neferrenpet gen. Kenro (TT 178). Theben 9. Mainz: Zabern. Nach Vorarbeiten von Machmud Abd el-Raziq, mit Beiträgen von Karl-J. Seyfried.Google Scholar
Hornung, Erik. 2001. The Secret Lore of Egypt: Its Impact on the West. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Erik. 1961. The Myth of Egypt and Its Hieroglyphs in European Tradition. Copenhagen: G. E. C. Gad.Google Scholar
Jakeman, Jane. 2005. ‘Sketched Symbols (Egyptology: The Missing Millennium: Ancient Egypt in Medieval Arabic Writings)(Book Review)’. Times Literary Supplement 5353: 8.Google Scholar
Janssen, Jac. J. 1987. ‘On Style in Egyptian Handwriting’. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 73, 161–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, Jac. J. 1992. ‘Literacy and Letters at Deir El-Medîna’. In Village Voices: Proceedings of the Symposium ‘Texts from Deir El-Medîna and Their Interpretation’, Leiden, May 31–June 1, 1991, edited by Demarée, Robert Johannes and Egberts, Arno, 81–94. Leiden: Centre of Non-Western Studies, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Jéquier, Gustave. 1938. Le monument funéraire de Pepi II. vol. II. Fouilles à Saqqarah. Cairo: Imprimérie de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Jirásková, Lucie. 2020. ‘The Reception of Ancient Egypt and Its Script in Renaissance Europe’. In The Oxford Handbook of Egyptian Epigraphy and Palaeography, edited by Laboury, Dimitri and Davies, Vanessa, 193–204. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Dilwyn. 2000. An Index of Ancient Egyptian Titles, Epithets and Phrases of the Old Kingdom. BAR International Series 866 (1–2). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Kahl, Jochem. 1999. Siut - Theben. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahl, Jochem, and von Falck, Martin. 2000. ‘Die Rolle von Saqqara und Abusir bei der Überlieferung altägyptischer Jenseitsbücher’. In Abusir and Saqqara in the Year 2000, edited by Bárta, Miroslav and Krejčí, Jaromír, 215–28. Prague: Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Kanawati, Naguib. 2011. ‘Art and Gridlines: The Copying of Old Kingdom Scenes in Later Periods’. In Abusir and Saqqara in the Year 2010, vol. 2, edited by Bárta, Miroslav, Coppens, Filip, and Krejčí, Jaromír, 483–96. Prague: Czech Institute of Egyptology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague.Google Scholar
Kanawati, Naguib, and Abder-Raziq, Mahmud. 1999. The Teti Cemetery at Saqqara. Volume V: The Tomb of Hesi. Australian Centre for Egyptology: Reports 13. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Kanawati, Naguib, and Hassan, Ali. 1997. The Teti Cemetery at Saqqara. Volume II: The Tomb of Ankhmahor. Australian Centre for Egyptology: Reports 9. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Kanawati, Naguib, and Woods., Alexandra 2009. Artists of the Old Kingdom: Techniques and Achievements. [Cairo]: Supreme Council of Antiquities.Google Scholar
Kanawati, Naguib, Woods, Alexandra, Shafik, Sameh, and Alexakis, Effy. 2010. Mereruka and His Family, Part III.1: The Tomb of Mereruka. Australian Centre for Egyptology: Reports 29. Oxford: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Keller, Cathleen A. 1997. ‘Private Votives in Royal Cemeteries: The Case of KV 9’. Varia Aegyptiaca 10 (2–3): 139–15.Google Scholar
Kessler, Dieter. 1990. ‘Zur Bedeutung der Szenen des täglichen Lebens in den Privatgräbern (II): Schreiber und Schreiberstatue in den Gräbern des AR’. Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache Und Altertumskunde 117: 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, David, and Stauder, Andréas. 2020. Enigmatic Writing in the Egyptian New Kingdom I: Revealing, Transforming, and Display in Egyptian Hieroglyphs. Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache Und Altertumskunde – Beihefte 12. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krutzsch, Myriam. 2008. ‘Falttechniken an altägyptischen Handschriften’. In Ägypten lesbar machen – die klassische Konservierung/Restaurierung von Papyri und neuere Verfahren: Beiträge des 1. Internationalen Workshops der Papyrusrestauratoren, Leipzig 7.–9. September 2006, edited by Graf, Jörg and Krutzsch, Myriam, 71–83. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krutzsch, Myriam 2014. ‘Materialtechnische Beobachtungen während der Restaurierung’. In Magika hieratika in Berlin, Hannover, Heidelberg und München, edited by Fischer-Elfert, Hans-W, 1–74. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krutzsch, Myriam 2016. ‘Reading Papyrus As Writing Material’. British Museum Studies in Ancient Egypt and Sudan 23: 57–69.Google Scholar
Laboury, Dimitri. 2012. ‘Tracking Ancient Egyptian Artists, a Problem of Methodology: The Case of the Painters of Private Tombs in the Theban Necropolis during the Eighteenth Dynasty’. In Art and Society: Ancient and Modern Contexts of Egyptian Art: Proceedings of the International Conference Held at the Museum of Fine Arts, Budapest, 13–15 May 2010, edited by Katalin Anna Kóthay, 199–208. Budapest: Museum of Fine Arts.Google Scholar
Laboury, Dimitri 2016. ‘Le scribe et le peintre: À propos d’un scribe qui ne voulait être pris pour un peintre’. In Aere perennius: mélanges égyptologiques en l’honneur de Pascal Vernus, edited by Collombert, Philippe, Lefèvre, Dominique, Polis, Stéphane, and Winand, Jean, 371–96. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Laboury, Dimitri 2017. ‘Tradition and Creativity: Toward a Study of Intericonicity in Ancient Egyptian Art’. In (Re)Productive Traditions in Ancient Egypt: Proceedings of the Conference Held at the University of Liège, 6th–8th February 2013, edited by Gillen, Todd, 229–58. Liege: Presses universitaires de Liège.Google Scholar
Laboury, Dimitri 2022a. ‘Artistes et écriture hiéroglyphique dans l’Égypte des pharaons’. Bulletin de la Société Française d’Égyptologie 207: 37–67.Google Scholar
Laboury, Dimitri 2022b. ‘Le signe comme image… ’. In Guide des écritures de l’Égypte ancienne, edited by Polis, Stéphane, 144–9. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Laboury, Dimitri 2022c. ‘… ou l’image comme signe’. In Guide des écritures de l’Égypte ancienne, edited by Polis, Stéphane, 150–3. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Laboury, Dimitri, and Alisée, Devillers. 2022. ‘The Ancient Egyptian Artist: A Non-existing Category?’ In Ancient Egyptian Society: Challenging Assumptions, Exploring Approaches, edited by Candelora, Danielle, Ben-Marzouk, Nadia, and Cooney, Kara. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lacau, Pierre, and Chevrier, Henri. 1977. Une chapelle d’Hatshepsout à Karnak I. Cairo: IFAO.Google Scholar
Landgráfová, Renata. 2015. ‘“Creative Copying”: Notes on Text Tradition and Alteration Evidenced in Multiple-Occuring Texts in the Shaft Tomb of Iufaa at Abusir’. In Text: Wissen - Wirkung - Wahrnehmung: Beiträge des Vierten Münchner Arbeitskreises Junge Ägyptologie (MAJA 4), 29.11. Bis 1.12.2013, edited by Burkhard Backes, Alexandra Verbovsek, Gregor Neunert et al., 31–58. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LD = Lepsius, C. R. 1849–59. Denkmaeler aus Aegypten und Aethiopien, Nach den Zeichnungen der von Seiner Majestät dem Koenige von Preussen, Friedrich Wilhelm IV., nach diesen Ländern gesendeten und in den Jahren 1842–1845 ausgeführten wissenschaftlichen Expedition. Berlin: Nicolaische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Leitz, Christian. 2014. Die Gaumonographien in Edfu und ihre Papyrusvarianten: Ein überregionaler Kanon kultischen Wissens im spätzeitlichen Ägypten: Soubassementstudien III. Studien zur spätägyptischen Religion 9. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Lesko, Leonard H. 1994. ‘Literature, Literacy, and Literati’. In Pharaoh’s Workers: The Villagers of Deir El Medina, edited by Lesko, Leonard H., 131–44, 185–8. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtheim, Miriam. 1988. Ancient Egyptian Autobiographies Chiefly of the Middle Kingdom: A Study and an Anthology. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 84. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Lincke, Eliese-Sophia, and Kammerzell., Frank 2012. ‘Egyptian Classifiers at the Interface of Lexical Semantics and Pragmatics’. In Lexical Semantics in Ancient Egyptian, edited by Grossman, Eitan, Polis, Stéphane, and Winand, Jean, 55–112. Hamburg: Widmaier.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Alan B. 2010. A Companion to Ancient Egypt. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loprieno, Antonio. 1996. ‘Defining Egyptian Literature: Ancient Texts and Modern Literary Theory’. In The Study of the Ancient Near East in the Twenty-First Century: The William Foxwell Albright Centennial Conference, edited by Cooper, Jerrold S. and Schwartz, Glenn M., 209–32. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Loprieno, Antonio 2001. La pensée et l’écriture: pour une analyse sémiotique de la culture égyptienne: Quatre séminaires à l’école pratique des hautes études, section des sciences religieuses, 15–27 mai 2000. Paris: Cybele.Google Scholar
Luft, Ulrich, Büsing, Margarete, and Szücs, Marianna. 2006. Urkunden zur Chronologie der Späten 12. Dynastie: Briefe aus Illahun. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Denkschriften der Gesamtakademie 34. Wien: Verl. der Österr. Akad. der Wiss.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüscher, Barbara. 2015. ‘Kursivhieroglyphische Ostraka als Textvorlagen: Der (Glücks-)Fall TT 87’. In Ägyptologische ‘Binsen’-Weisheiten I–II: Neue forschungen und Methoden der Hieratistik. Akten zweier Tagungen in Mainz im April 2011 Und März 2013, edited by Verhoeven, Ursula, 85–117. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Lydon, Jane, Edwards, Elizabeth, Tucker, Jennifer, and Hayes, Patricia. 2016. Photography, Humanitarianism, Empire. London: Taylor and Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, John M. 1995. Orientalism: History, Theory and the Arts. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Malek, Jaromir. 2000. ‘Old Kingdom Rulers As “Local Saints” in the Memphite Area during the Middle Kingdom’. In Abusir and Saqqara in the Year 2000, edited by Bárta, Miroslav and Krejčí, Jaromír, 241–58. Prague: Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Manuelian, Peter der. 1993. Living in the Past: Studies in Archaism of the Egyptian Twenty-Sixth Dynasty. Studies in Egyptology. London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Manuelian, Peter der. 1996. ‘Presenting the Scroll: Papyrus Documents in Tomb Scenes of the Old Kingdom’. In Studies in Honor of William Kelly Simpson, vol. 2, edited by Manuelian, Peter der, 561–88. Boston, MA: Department of Ancient Egyptian, Nubian and Near Eastern Art, Museum of Fine Arts.Google Scholar
Manuelian, Peter der 2003. Slab Stelae of the Giza Necropolis. Publications of the Pennsylvania–Yale Expedition to Egypt 7. New Haven, CT: Peabody Museum of Natural History of Yale University.Google Scholar
Martin, Geoffrey T. 1979. The Tomb of Ḥetepka and Other Reliefs and Inscriptions from the Sacred Animal Necropolis, North Saqqâra, 1964–1973. London: Egypt Exploration Society.Google Scholar
Martin, Geoffrey T. 1989. The Memphite Tomb of Ḥoremḥeb Commander-in-Chief of Tutʿankhamūn: I, The Reliefs, Inscriptions, and Commentary. Excavation Memoir. London: Egypt Exploration Society.Google Scholar
Maspero, Gaston. 1895. Histoire ancienne des peuples de l’Orient classique. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Massart, Adhémar. 1959. ‘À Propos des “Listes” dans les textes Égyptiens funéraires et magiques’. In Studia Biblica et Orientalia, Edita a Pontificio Instituto Biblico Ad Celebrandum Annum L Ex Quo Conditum Est Institutum, Volumen III: Oriens Antiquus, 227–46. Rome: Pontificio Istituto biblico.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Bernard. 2013. ‘Grammaire et politique: réflexions sur quelques empreintes idéologiques dans la terminologie linguistique des grammaires de l’égyptien ancien’. In Ägyptologen und Ägyptologien zwischen Kaiserreich und Gründung der beiden Deutschen Staaten: Reflexionen zur Geschichte und Episteme eines Altertumswissenschaftlichen Fachs im 150. Jahr der Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde, edited by Bickel, Susanne, Fischer-Elfert, Hans-Werner, Loprieno, Antonio, Richter, Sebastian, and Popko, Lutz, 437–56. Berlin: Akademie Verlag Berlin.Google Scholar
McDowell, Andrea. 1996. ‘Student Exercises from Deir El-Medina: The Dates’. In Studies in Honor of William Kelly Simpson, vol. 2, edited by Manuelian, Peter der, 601–8. Boston, MA: Department of Ancient Egyptian, Nubian and Near Eastern Art, Museum of Fine Arts.Google Scholar
Meeks, Dimitri. 1980–2. Année lexicographique, tome 1–3 (1977–9).Google Scholar
Morales, Antonio J. 2017. The Transmission of the Pyramid Texts of Nut: Analysis of Their Distribution and Role in the Old and Middle Kingdoms. Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur, Beihefte 19. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Morenz, Ludwig D. 2022. ‘Hieroglyphische Hermeneutik: ein dreifacher Kulturkontakt im Byzantinischen 12. Jh. n. Chr’. Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache Und Altertumskunde 149 (1): 72–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Rune R. 2018. ‘Socioeconomic Aspects of Ancient Egyptian Private Tomb Construction: A Study on New Kingdom Tomb Volumetrics As Economic Markers’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Osing, Jürgen. 1997. ‘School and Literature in the Ramesside Period’. In L’impero Ramesside: Convegno Internazionale in onore di Sergio Donadoni, edited by Brancolli, Isabella, Ciampini, Emanuele M., Roccati, Alessandro, and Sist, Loredana, 131–42. Rome: Università degli Studi di Roma.Google Scholar
Osterhammel, Jürgen. 2015. The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century. America in the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Richard B. 1996a. ‘Individual and Society in Middle Kingdom Literature’. In Ancient Egyptian Literature: History and Forms, edited by Loprieno, Antonio, 137–55. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Richard B. 1996b. ‘Types of Literature in the Middle Kingdom’. In Ancient Egyptian Literature: History and Forms, edited by Loprieno, Antonio, 298–312. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Richard B. 1996c. ‘Khakheperreseneb and Traditional Belles Lettres’. In Studies in Honor of William Kelly Simpson 2, edited by der Manuelian, Peter, 647–54. Boston, MA: Department of Ancient Egyptian, Nubian and Near Eastern Art, Museum of Fine Arts.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Richard B. 1997. The Tale of Sinuhe and Other Ancient Egyptian Poems, 1940–1640 BC. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Richard B. 2002. Poetry and Culture in Middle Kingdom Egypt: A Dark Side to Perfection. Athlone Publications in Egyptology and Ancient Near Eastern Studies. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Richard B. 2009. Reading Ancient Egyptian Poetry: Among Other Histories. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Richard B. 2012. The Tale of the Eloquent Peasant: A Reader’s Commentary. Lingua Aegyptia, Studia Monographica 10. Hamburg: Widmaier.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Richard, and Quirke., Stephen 1995. Papyrus. Egyptian Bookshelf. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Richard, and Neal, Spencer. 2017. ‘The Teaching of Amenemhat I at Amara West: Egyptian Literacy Culture in Upper Nubia’. In Nubia in the New Kingdom: Lived Experience, Pharaonic Control and Indigenous Traditions, edited by Spencer, Neal, Binder, Michaela, and Stevens, Anna, 213–23. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Patch, Diana Craig. 2005. ‘The Shrines to Hathor at Deir el-Bahri’. In Hatshepsut: From Queen to Pharaoh, edited by Roehrig, Catharine H., Dreyfus, Renée, and Keller, Cathleen A., 173. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Peet, T. Eric. 1931. A Comparative Study of the Literatures of Egypt, Palestine, and Mesopotamia: Egypt’s Contribution to the Literature of the Ancient World. Schweich Lectures 1929. London: Published for the British Academy by HMilford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pinarello, Massimiliano S. 2015. An Archaeological Discussion of Writing Practice: Deconstruction of the Ancient Egyptian Scribe. GHP Egyptology 23. London: Golden House.Google Scholar
Polis, S. (ed.). 2022. Guide des écritures de l’Égypte antique. Cairo: Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale.Google Scholar
Popko, Lutz. 2014. ‘History-Writing in Ancient Egypt’. UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology 1 (1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/73v96940#author.Google Scholar
Posener, Georges. 1950. ‘Section Finale d’une Sagesse Inconnue (Recherches Littéraires, II)’. Revue d’égyptologie 7: 71–84.Google Scholar
Posener-Kriéger, Paule. 1991. ‘Aspects économiques des nouveaux papyrus d’Abousir’. In Akten des vierten internationalen Ägyptologen Kongresses München 1985. Band 4: Geschichte, Verwaltungs- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte, Rechtsgeschichte, Nachbarkulturen, edited by Sylvia Schoske, 167–76. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Posener-Kriéger, Paule, Verner, Miroslav, and Vymazalová, Hana. 2006. Abusir X: The Pyramid Complex of Raneferef. The Papyrus Archive. Excavations of the Czech Institute of Egyptology. Prague: Czech Institute of Egyptology, Charles University.Google Scholar
Power, Arthur. 2001 (1974). Conversations with James Joyce. Dublin: Dalkey Archive Press.Google Scholar
Ptaḥ-hetep, , and Battiscombe, George Gunn. 1906. The Instruction of Ptah-Hotep and the Instruction of Ke’gemni: The Oldest Books in the World, translated with an introduction by Battiscombe George Gunn. Wisdom of the East. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Quack, Joachim F. 2008. ‘Geographie als Struktur in Literatur und Religion’. In Altägyptische Weltsichten: Akten des Symposiums zur historischen Topographie und Toponymie Altägyptens vom 12.–14.Mai in München, edited by Schlüter, Arnulf, Schlüter, Katrin, and Adrom, Faried, 131–57. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Quack, Joachim F. 2011. ‘Textedition, Texterschließung, Textinterpretation’. In Methodik und Didaktik in der Ägyptologie: Herausforderungen eines kulturwissenschaf tlichen Paradigmenwechsels in den Altertumswissenschaften, edited by Backes, Burkhard, Verbovsek, Alexandra, and Jones, Catherine, 533–49. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Quack, Joachim F. 2015. ‘Ägyptische Listen und ihre Expansion in Unterricht und Repräsentation’. In Die Liste: Ordnungen von Dingen und Menschen in Ägypten, edited by Deicher, Susanne and Maroko, Erik, 51–86. Berlin: Kadmos.Google Scholar
Quack, Joachim F. 2020a. ‘Eine spätzeitliche Handschrift der Lehre des Cheti (Papyrus Berlin P 14423)’. In Ein Kundiger, der in die Gottesworte Eingedrungen ist: Festschrift für den Ägyptologen Karl Jansen-Winkeln Zum 65. Geburtstag, edited by Moje, Jan, Laisney, Vincent Pierre-Michel, and Hsu, Shih-Wei, 233–51. Munster: Zaphon.Google Scholar
Quack, Joachim F. 2020b. ‘Zwei Fragmente religiöser Geographie’. In The Carlsberg Papyri 15: Hieratic Texts from Tebtunis. Including a Survey of Illustrated Papyri, edited by Kucharek, Andrea, Quack, Joachim F., Ryholt, Kim et al., 135–40. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Quirke, Stephen. 1996. ‘Archive’. In Ancient Egyptian Literature: History and Forms, edited by Loprieno, Antonio, 379–401. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirke, Stephen 2004a. Egyptian Literature 1800 BC: Questions and Readings. Egyptology (Golden House) 2. London: Golden House.Google Scholar
Quirke, Stephen 2004b. Titles and Bureaux of Egypt, 1850–1700 BC. Egyptology (Golden House) 1. London: Golden House.Google Scholar
Quirke, Stephen 2009. ‘Contexts for the Lahun Lists’. In Verba Manent: Recueil d’études Dédiées à Dimitri Meeks Par Ses Collègues et Amis, vol. 2, edited by Servajean, Frédéric and Régen, Isabelle, 363–86. Montpellier: Université Paul Valéry.Google Scholar
Ragazzoli, Chloé C. D. 2013. ‘The Social Creation of a Scribal Place: The Visitors’ Inscriptions in the Tomb Attributed to Antefiqer (TT 60) (with Newly Recorded Graffiti)’. Studien Zur Altägyptischen Kultur 42: 269–323.Google Scholar
Ragazzoli, Chloé C. D. 2016. ‘Toponymie et Listes: Un Onomasticon Fragmentaire de Basse Époque (P.BnF Ms. Égyptien 245, 1–2)’. In Décrire, Imaginer, Constuire l’espace: Toponymie Égyptienne de l’Antiquité Au Moyen Âge, edited by Somaglino, Claire and Dhennin, Sylvain, 69–91. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Ragazzoli, Chloé C. D. 2017a. ‘Beyond Authors and Copyists: The Role of Variation in Ancient Egyptian and New Kingdom Literary Production’. In (Re)Productive Traditions in Ancient Egypt: Proceedings of the Conference Held at the University of Liège, 6th–8th February 2013, edited by Gillen, Todd, 95–126. Liege: Presses universitaires de Liège.Google Scholar
Ragazzoli, Chloé C. D. 2017b. ‘Présence divine et obscurité de la tombe au Nouvel Empire: À propos des graffiti des Tombes TT 139 et TT 112 à Thèbes (Avec Édition et Commentaire)’. Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale 117: 357–407.Google Scholar
Ragazzoli, Chloé C. D. 2019. Scribes: les artisans du texte en Égypte ancienne, preface by Jacob, Christian. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Ragazzoli, Chloé, Harmanşah, Ömür, Salvador, Chiara, and Frood, Elizabeth (eds.). 2018. Scribbling through History: Graffiti, Places and People from Antiquity to Modernity. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Redford, Donald B. 1986. Pharaonic King-Lists, Annals and Day-Books: A Contribution to the Study of the Egyptian Sense of History. SSEA Publications 4. Mississauga: Benben.Google Scholar
Regulski, Ilona. 2010. A Palaeographic Study of Early Writing in Egypt. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 195. Leuven: Peeters en Departement Oosterse Studies.Google Scholar
Ritner, Robert K. 1993. The Mechanics of Ancient Egyptian Magical Practice. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 54. Chicago, IL: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Robins, Gay. 1991. ‘Composition and the Artist’s Squared Grid’. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 28: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, Gay 2001. ‘The Use of the Squared Grid As a Technical Aid for Artists in Eighteenth Dynasty Painted Theban Tombs’. In Colour and Painting in Ancient Egypt, edited by Davies, W. Vivian, 60–2. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Roehrig, Catharine H. 2005. ‘Painting in the Early Eighteenth Dynasty’. In Hatshepsut: From Queen to Pharaoh, edited by Roehrig, Catharine H., Dreyfus, Renée, and Keller, Cathleen A., 44–5. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Ryholt, Kim, and Barjamovic, Gojko. 2019. Libraries before Alexandria: Ancient Near Eastern Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryholt, Kim, Kucharek, Andrea, Quack, Joachim F. et al. 2020. The Carlsberg Papyri 15: Hieratic Texts from Tebtunis. Including a Survey of Illustrated Papyri. CNI Publications 45. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Scalf, Foy. 2016. ‘From the Beginning to the End: How to Generate and Transmit Funerary Texts in Ancient Egypt’. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions 15 (2): 202–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirley, J. J. 2010. ‘Viceroys, Viziers & the Amun Precinct: The Power of Heredity and Strategic Marriage in the Early 18th Dynasty’. Journal of Egyptian History 3 (1): 73–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Henrike. 2013. ‘Textaufgaben’: Kulturwissenschaftliche Konzepte in Anwendung auf die Literatur der Ramessidenzeit. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Spalinger, Anthony J. 2002. The Transformation of an Ancient Egyptian Narrative: P.Sallier III and the Battle of Kadesh. Göttinger Orientforschungen, 4. Reihe: Ägypten 40. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Spalinger, Anthony J. 2003. ‘New Kingdom Eulogies of Power: A Preliminary Analysis’. In Es werde niedergelegt als Schriftstück: Festschrift für Hartwig Altenmüller zum 65. Geburtstag, edited by Kloth, Nicole, Martin, Karl, and Eva Pardey, 415–28. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Staring, Nico. 2019. ‘From Landscape Biography to the Social Dimension of Burial: A View from Memphis, Egypt, c. 1539–1078 BCE.’ In Perspectives on Lived Religion: Practices – Transmission – Landscape, edited by Staring, Nico, Weiss, Lara, and Davies, Huw Twiston, 207–23. Leiden: Sidestone.Google Scholar
Stauder, Andréas. 2013a. ‘L’émulation du passé à l’ère thoutmoside: La dimension linguistique’. In Vergangenheit und Zukunft: Studien zum historischen Bewusstsein in der Thutmosidenzeit, edited by Bickel, Susanne, 77–125. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Stauder, Andréas 2013b. Linguistic Dating of Middle Egyptian Literary Texts: Dating Egyptian Literary texts, Göttingen, 9–12 June 2010, 2. Lingua Aegyptia, Studia Monographica 12. Hamburg: Widmaier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauder, Andréas 2018. ‘Staging Restricted Knowledge: The Sculptor Irtysen’s Self-Presentation (ca. 2000 BC)’. In The Arts of Making in Ancient Egypt: Voices, Images, and Objects of Material Producers 2000–1550 BC, edited by Miniaci, Gianluca, García, Juan Carlos Moreno, Quirke, Stephen, and Andréas Stauder, 239–71. Leiden: Sidestone.Google Scholar
Stauder, Andréas 2020. ‘Scripts’. In The Oxford Handbook of Egyptology, edited by Bloxam, Elizabeth and Shaw, Ian, 869–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stauder-Porchet, Julie. 2021a. ‘Werre: A Royal Inscription of the Early Fifth Dynasty’. Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur 50: 309–27.Google Scholar
Stauder-Porchet, Julie 2021b. ‘L’inscription lapidaire de la parole royale chez les particuliers à la Ve dynastie’. In Questionner le sphinx: Mélanges offerts à Christiane Zivie-Coche, vol. 1, edited by Guermeur, Ivan, Thiers, Christophe, Coulon, Laurent, Philippe Collombert, 137–64. Bibliothèque d’étude 178. Cairo: Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale.Google Scholar
Stauder-Porchet, Julie, Frood, Elizabeth, and Stauder, Andréas. 2020. Ancient Egyptian Biographies: Contexts, Forms, Functions. Wilbour Studies in Egyptology and Assyriology 6. Atlanta, GA: Lockwood.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strudwick, Nigel. 1985. The Administration of Egypt in the Old Kingdom: The Highest Titles and Their Holders. London: KPI.Google Scholar
Sundermeyer, Annette. 2020. ‘Interpretations and Reuse of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs in the Arabic Period (Tenth–Sixteenth Centuries CE)’. In The Oxford Handbook of Egyptian Epigraphy and Palaeography, edited by Laboury, Dimitri and Davies, Vanessa, 176–92. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John H. 2010. Spells for Eternity: The Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Töpfer, Susanne, Vesco, Paolo Del, and Poole, Federico (eds.). 2022. Deir el-Medina: Through the kaleidoscope. Proceedings of the International Workshop, Turin 8th–10th October 2018. Museo Egizio: Formazione e ricerca. Torino: Museo Egizio; Franco Cosimo Panini.Google Scholar
Traunecker, Claude. 2014. ‘The “Funeral Palace” of Padiamenope: Tomb, Place of Pilgrimage, and Library. Current Research’. In Thebes in the First Millennium BC, edited by Budka, Julia, Pischikova, Elena, and Griffin, Kenneth, 205–34. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Urk I = Kurt Sethe, Urkunden des Alten Reichs. Urkunden des aegyptischen Altertums, I. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1903–84.Google Scholar
Urk IV = Kurt Sethe, H.Wolfgang Helck et al. Urkunden der 18. Dynastie. Urkunden des aegyptischen Altertums, IV. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1903–84.Google Scholar
Vandier, J. 1964. Manuel d’archéologie Égyptienne, Tome IV: Bas-Reliefs et Peintures – Scènes de La Vie Quotidienne. Paris: Éditions A. et J. Picard et Cie.Google Scholar
Velde, Herman te. 1986. ‘Scribes and Literacy in Ancient Egypt’. In Festschrift J. H. Hospers: Scripta Signa Vocis. Studies about Scripts, Scriptures, Scribes and Languages in the Near East, edited by H. L. J. Vanstiphout, 253–64. Groningen:Google Scholar
Verhoeven, Ursula, 2020. Dipinti von Besuchern des Grabes N13.1 in Assiut. The Asyut Project. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Vernus, Pascal. 1995. Essai sur la conscience de l’histoire dans l’égypte pharaonique. Bibliothèque de l’École des hautes études. IVe section, Sciences historiques et philologiques 332. Paris: HChampion.Google Scholar
Vernus, Pascal 2013. ‘The Royal Command (wD-nsw): A Basic Deed of Executive Power’. In Ancient Egyptian Administration, edited by Juan Carlos García, Moreno, 259–340. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernus, Pascal 2022. ‘Script and Figurativity: Modelling the Relationship between Image and Writing in Ancient Egypt’. In Wege zur frühen Schrift: Niltal und Zweistromland, edited by Morenz, Ludwig D., Stauder, Andréas, and Büma, Beryl, 335–421. Berlin: EB-Verlag Dr. Brandt.Google Scholar
Vymazalová, Hana. 2015. ‘The Administration and Economy of the Pyramid Complexes and Royal Funerary Cults in the Old Kingdom’, unpublished PhD thesis, Charles University in Prague.Google Scholar
Walle, Baudouin van de. 1963. ‘Problèmes Relatifs Aux Méthodes d’enseignement Dans l’Égypte Ancienne.’ In Les Sagesses Du Proche-Orient Ancien: Colloque de Strasbourg 17–19 Mai 1962, 191–207. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Wb = Adolf, Erman and Hermann, Grapow. 1926–31. Wörterbuch der ägyptische Sprache. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Webb, David. 2012. Foucault’s Archaeology: Science and Transformation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, Kent R. 1979. ‘Art, Word, and the Egyptian World View’. In Egyptology and the Social Sciences: Five Studies, edited by Weeks, Kent R., 59–81. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar
Wengrow, David. 2020. ‘Egyptology and Cognate Disciplines’, in The Oxford Handbook of Egyptology, edited by Shaw, Ian and Bloxam, Elizabeth, 48–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Westerfeld, Jennifer T. 2019. Egyptian Hieroglyphs in the Late Antique Imagination. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. 1986. ‘Historical Pluralism’, Critical Inquiry 12 (3): 480–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, John G. 1878. The Manners and Customs of the Ancient Egyptians. New ed. Revised and corrected by Birch, Samuel. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Winand, Jean. 2022. ‘Athanasius Kircher et Le Déchiffrement Des Hiéroglyphes: Réalité Ou Fiction?’ Revue de l’histoire Des Religions 239 (2): 217–55.Google Scholar
Winlock, Herbert E. 1923. ‘The Egyptian Expedition 1922–1923: The Museum’s Excavations at Thebes’. Bulletin of the Metropolitan Museum of Art 18 (12.2): 11–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winlock, Herbert E. 1955. Models of Daily Life in Ancient Egypt, from the Tomb of Meket-Rēʿ at Thebes. Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York). Egyptian Expedition. Publications of the Metropolitan Museum of Art Egyptian Expedition 18. Cambridge, MA: Published for the Metropolitan Museum of Art by Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953 (2009). Philosophische Untersuchungen = Philosophical Investigations. 4th ed. Revised by Hacker, Peter M. S. and Schulte, Joachim. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wyrick, Jean. 2016. Steps to Writing Well with Additional Readings. 10th ed. Fort Collins: Colorado State University.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances A. 2014. The Art of Memory. London: The Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Ziegler, Christiane. 1990. Catalogue des stèles, peintures et reliefs égyptiens de l’Ancien Empire et de la Première Période Intermédiaire: vers 2686–2040 avant J.-C. Paris: Éditions de la Réunion des musées nationaux.Google Scholar
Ziegler, Christiane 1993 Le mastaba d’Akhethetep: Une chapelle funéraire de l’Ancien Empire. Paris: Éditions de la Réunion des musées nationaux.Google Scholar
Zivie, Alain. 2013. La tombe de Thoutmes, directeur des peintres dans la Place de Maât (BUB. I.19). Les tombes du Bubasteion à Saqqara 2. Toulouse: Caracara.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Scribal Culture in Ancient Egypt
  • Niv Allon, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Hana Navratilova, University of Oxford and University of Reading
  • Online ISBN: 9781009070614
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Scribal Culture in Ancient Egypt
  • Niv Allon, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Hana Navratilova, University of Oxford and University of Reading
  • Online ISBN: 9781009070614
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Scribal Culture in Ancient Egypt
  • Niv Allon, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Hana Navratilova, University of Oxford and University of Reading
  • Online ISBN: 9781009070614
Available formats
×