Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:27:26.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Campaigns and Elections

The Power of Polls?

A Cross-National Experimental Analysis of the Effects of Campaign Polls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2021

Jason Roy ,
Shane P. Singh  and
Patrick Fournier
Jason Roy
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University, Ontario
Shane P. Singh
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Patrick Fournier
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal

Summary

Public opinion polls have become increasingly prominent during elections, but how they affect voting behaviour remains uncertain. In this work, we estimate the effects of poll exposure using an experimental design in which we randomly assign the availability of polls to participants in simulated election campaigns. We draw upon results from ten independent experiments conducted across six countries on four continents (Argentina, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States) to examine how polls affect the amount of information individuals seek and the votes that they cast. We further assess how poll effects differ according to individual-level factors, such as partisanship and political sophistication, and the content included in polls and how it is presented. Our work provides a comprehensive assessment of the power of polls and the implications for poll reporting in contemporary elections.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Campaigns and Elections
Online ISBN: 9781108877428
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 07 October 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalberg, T., Strömbäck, J., and de Vreese, C.H. (2012). “The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings.” Journalism, 13(2), 162–178.Google Scholar
Abrams, M. (1970). “The opinion polls and the 1970 British general election.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(3), 317–324.Google Scholar
Achen, C.H. and Bartels, L.M. (2017). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Agranov, M., Goeree, J., Romero, J., and Yariv, L. (2018). “What makes voters turn out: The effects of polls and beliefs.” Journal of the European Economic Association, 16(3), 825–856.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J.H., Schober, G.S., Ley, S., and Fernandez, M. (2018). “Incognizance and perceptual deviation: Individual and institutional sources of variation in citizens’ perceptions of party placements on the left-right scale.” Political Behavior, 40(2), 415–433.Google Scholar
Alt, J.E., Marshall, J., and Lassen, D.D. (2016). “Credible sources and sophisticated voters: When does new information induce economic voting?” Journal of Politics, 78(2), 327–342.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, S., and Iyengar, S. (1994). “Of horseshoes and horse races: Experimental studies of the impact of poll results on electoral behavior.” Political Communication, 11(4), 413–430.Google Scholar
Apter, A.J., Wang, X., Bogen, D., Bennett, I.M., Jennings, R.M., Garcia, L., Sharpe, T., Frazier, C., and Have, T.T. (2009). “Linking numeracy and asthma-related quality of life.” Patient Education and Counseling, 75(3), 386–391.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K. and Kolodny, R. (2009). “Educating the least informed: Group endorsements in a grassroots campaign.” American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 55–77.Google Scholar
Arnold, J.R. (2012). “The electoral consequences of voter ignorance.” Electoral Studies, 31(4): 796–815.Google Scholar
Baker, R., Blumberg, S.J., Brick, J.M., Couper, M.P., Courtright, M., Dennis, J.M., Dillman, D., Frankel, M.R., Garland, P., Groves, R.M., Kennedy, C., Krosnick, J., Lavrakas, P.J., Lee, S., Link, M., Piekarski, L., Rao, K., Thomas, R.K., and Zahs, D. (2010). “Research synthesis: AAPOR report on online panels”, Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(4), 711–781.Google Scholar
Bakker, B.N., Lelkes, Y., and Malka, A. (2020). “Understanding partisan cue receptivity: Tests of predictions from the bounded rationality and expressive utility perspectives.” Journal of Politics, 82(3),1061–1077.Google Scholar
Barabas, J., Jerit, J., Pollock, W., and Rainey, C. (2014). “The question(s) of political knowledge.” American Political Science Review, 108(4), 840–855.Google Scholar
Bartels, L.M. (1985). “Expectations and preferences in presidential nominating campaigns.” American Political Science Review, 79(3), 804–815.Google Scholar
Bartels, L.M. (1987). “Candidate choice and the dynamics of the presidential nominating process.” American Journal of Political Science, 31(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Bartels, L.M. (1988). Presidential primaries and the dynamics of public choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, L.M. (1996). “Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections.” American Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 194–230.Google Scholar
Bartels, L.M. (2000). “Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 35–50.Google Scholar
Bartels, L.M. (2002). “Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions.” Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150.Google Scholar
Beniger, J.R. (1976). “Winning the presidential nomination: National polls and state primary elections, 1936–1972.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 40(1), 22–38.Google Scholar
Bennion, E.A. (2005). “Caught in the ground wars: Mobilizing voters during a competitive congressional campaign.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601(1), 123–141.Google Scholar
Berelson, B.R., Lazarsfeld, P.F., and McPhee, W.N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bhatti, Y. (2010). “What would happen if we were better informed? Simulating increased knowledge in European Parliament (EP) elections.” Representation, 46(4), 391–410.Google Scholar
Biggers, D.R., Hendry, D.J., Gerber, A.A., and Huber, G.A. (2017). “Experimental evidence about whether (and why) electoral closeness affects turnout.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Binning, K.R., Brick, C., Cohen, G.L., and Sherman, D.K. (2015). “Going along versus getting it right: The role of self-integrity in political conformity.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56(1), 73–88.Google Scholar
Bischoff, I. and Egbert, H. (2013). “Social information and bandwagon behavior in voting: An economic experiment.” Journal of Economic Psychology, 34(1), 270–284.Google Scholar
Bisgaard, M. and Slothuus, R. (2018). “Partisan elites as culprits? How party cues shape partisan perceptual gaps.” American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 456–469.Google Scholar
Blais, A. (2000). To vote or not to vote?: The merits and limits of rational choice theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Blais, A. (2006). “What affects voter turnout?” Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 111–125.Google Scholar
Blais, A. and Bodet, M.A. (2006). “How do voters form expectations about the parties’ chances of winning the election?” Social Science Quarterly, 87(3), 477–493.Google Scholar
Blais, A., Gidengil, E., and Nevitte, N. (2006). “Do polls influence the vote?” in Brady, H. & Johnston, R. (eds.), Capturing campaign effects. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 263–279.Google Scholar
Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Fournier, P., and Nevitte, N. (2009). “Information, visibility and elections: Why electoral outcomes differ when voters are better informed.” European Journal of Political Research, 48(2), 256–280.Google Scholar
Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Nadeau, R., and Nevitte, N. (2001). “Measuring party identification: Britain, Canada, and the United States.” Political Behavior, 23(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Nadeau, R., and Nevitte, N. (2002). Anatomy of a Liberal victory. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Blais, A., Loewen, P.J., Rubenson, D., Stephenson, L.B., and Gidengil, E. (2018). “Information on party strength and strategic voting.” in Stephenson, L.B., Aldrich, J.H. & Blais, A. (eds.), The many faces of strategic voting, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 89–103.Google Scholar
Blais, A., Vowles, J., and Aarts, K. (2002). “Does the impact of polls vary across electoral systems?” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Bosch, A. and Orriols, L. (2014). “Ballot structure and satisfaction with democracy.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 24(4), 493–511.Google Scholar
Boudreau, C. and McCubbins, M.D. (2010). “The blind leading the blind: Who gets polling information and does it improve decisions?” Journal of Politics, 72(2), 513–527.Google Scholar
Brady, H.E. and Johnston, R. (1987). “What’s the primary message: Horse race or issue journalism?” In Orren, G. and Polsby, N. (eds.), Media and Momentum. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 127–86.Google Scholar
Brettschneider, F. (1997). “The press and the polls in Germany, 1980–1994 poll coverage as an essential part of election campaign reporting.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9(3), 248–265.Google Scholar
Broh, C.A. (1980). “Horse-race journalism: Reporting the polls in the 1976 presidential election.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(4), 514–529.Google Scholar
Buchanan, W. (1986). “Election predictions: An empirical assessment.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(2), 222–227.Google Scholar
Burden, B.C. (2005). “Minor parties and strategic voting in recent US presidential elections.” Electoral Studies, 24(4), 603–618.Google Scholar
Butler, D.M. and Broockman, D.E. (2011). “Do politicians racially discriminate against constituents? A field experiment on state legislators.” American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–77.Google Scholar
Bursztyn, L., Cantoni, D., Funk, P., and Yuchtman, N. (2017). “Polls, the press, and political participation: The effects of anticipated election closeness on voter turnout.” Working Paper No. 23490. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Callegaro, M., Baker, R.P., Bethlehem, J., Göritz, A.S., Krosnick, J.A., and Lavrakas, P.J. (2014). Online panel research: A data quality perspective. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E., and Stokes, D.E. (1960). The American voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cancela, J., and Geys, B. (2016). “Explaining voter turnout: A meta-analysis of national and subnational elections.” Electoral Studies, 42(1), 264–275.Google Scholar
Canes-Wrone, B. (2006). Who leads whom? Presidents, policy, and the public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. and Kubo, H. (2018). “Explaining citizen perceptions of party ideological positions: The mediating role of political contexts.” Electoral Studies, 5(1), 14–23.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, K., Huizinga, M.M., Wallston, K.A., Gebretsadik, T., Shintani, A., Davis, D., Gregory, R.P., et al. (2008). “Association of numeracy and diabetes control.” Annals of Internal Medicine, 148(10), 737–746.Google Scholar
Ceci, S.J. and Kain, E.L. (1982). “Jumping on the bandwagon with the underdog: The impact of attitude polls on polling behavior.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 46(2), 228–242.Google Scholar
Choma, B.L., Sumantry, D., and Hanoch, Y. (2019). “Right-wing ideology and numeracy: A perception of greater ability, but poorer performance.” Judgment & Decision Making, 14(4), 412–422.Google Scholar
Chung, S., Heo, Y., and Moon, J. (2018). “Perceived versus actual polling effects: Biases in perceptions of election poll effects on candidate evaluations.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(3), 420–442.Google Scholar
Cloutier, E., Nadeau, R., and Guay, J.H. (1989). “Bandwagoning and underdoging on North- American free trade: A quasi-experimental panel study of opinion movement.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1(3), 206–220.Google Scholar
Coddington, M. (2015). “Clarifying journalism’s quantitative turn: A typology for evaluating data journalism, computational journalism, and computer-assisted reporting.” Digital Journalism, 3(3), 331–348.Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1964). “The nature and belief systems in mass publics.” In Apter, D. (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press, 206–261.Google Scholar
Cook, S.A. and Welch, A.C. (1940). “Methods of measuring the practical effects of polls of public opinion.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 24(4), 441–454.Google Scholar
Craig, J. (2018). “The promises of numeracy.” Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(1), 57–71.Google Scholar
Craig, R. (2000). “Expectations and elections: How television defines campaign news.” Critical Studies in Media Communication, 17(1), 28–44.Google Scholar
Crewe, I. (2005). “The opinion polls: The election they got (almost) right.” Parliamentary Affairs, 58(4), 684–698.Google Scholar
Curtice, J. (1997). “So how well did they do? The polls in the 1997 election.” International Journal of Market Research, 39(3), 449–461.Google Scholar
Cox, G.W. and Munger, M.C. (1989). “Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 US House elections.” American Political Science Review, 83(1), 217–231.Google Scholar
Dahlgaard, J.O., Hansen, J.H., Hansen, K.M., and Larsen, M.V. (2017). “How election polls shape voting behaviour.” Scandinavian Political Studies, 40(3), 330–343.Google Scholar
Dale, A. and Strauss, A. (2009). “Don’t forget to vote: Text message reminders as a mobilization tool.” American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 787–804.Google Scholar
Daschmann, G. (2000). “Vox pop & polls: The impact of poll results and voter statements in the media on the perception of a climate of opinion.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(2), 160–181.Google Scholar
Dassonneville, R. (Forthcoming). Under Pressure: Group-Based Cross-Pressure and Voter Volatility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dassonneville, R. and McAllister, I. (2018). “Gender, political knowledge, and descriptive representation: The impact of long‐term socialization.” American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 249–265.Google Scholar
de Bock, H. (1976). “Influence of in-state election poll reports on candidate preference in 1972.” Journalism Quarterly, 53(3), 457–462.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, M.X. (1984). “Scooping the voters? The consequences of the networks’ early call of the 1980 presidential race.” Journal of Politics, 46(3), 866–885.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, M.X., and Keeter, S. (1993). “Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first.” American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 1179–1206.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, M.X., and Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dieckmann, N.F., Slovic, P., and Peters, M.E. (2009). “The use of narrative evidence and explicit likelihood by decisionmakers varying in numeracy.” Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 29(10), 1473–1488.Google Scholar
Dimitrova, D.V. and Kostadinova, P. (2013). “Identifying antecedents of the strategic game frame: A longitudinal analysis.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(1), 75–88.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Druckman, J.N. (2001). “On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame?” Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041–1066.Google Scholar
Druckman, J.N. and Nelson, K.R. (2003). “Framing and deliberation: How citizens’ conversations limit elite influence.” American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 729–745.Google Scholar
DuBois, P.L. (1983). “Election night projections and voter turnout in the west: A note on the hazards of aggregate data analysis.” American Politics Research, 11(3), 349–64.Google Scholar
Dunaway, J. and Lawrence, R.G. (2015). “What predicts the game frame? Media ownership, electoral context, and campaign news.” Political Communication, 32(1), 43–60.Google Scholar
Durand, C., Blais, A., and Larochelle, M. (2004). “The polls in the 2002 French presidential election: An autopsy.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(4), 602–622.Google Scholar
Eisinger, R.M. (2008). “The use of surveys by governments and politicians.” in Wolfgang, D. and Traugott, M.W. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of public opinion research. London: SAGE Publications, 487–95.Google Scholar
Enos, R.D. and Fowler, A. (2014). “Pivotality and turnout: Evidence from a field experiment in the aftermath of a tied election.” Political Science Research and Methods, 2(2), 309–319.Google Scholar
Epstein, L.K. and Strom, G. (1981). “Election night projections and west coast turnout.” American Politics Quarterly, 9(4), 479–491.Google Scholar
Erikson, R.S. and Sigelman, L. (1995). “Poll-based forecasts of midterm congressional election outcomes: Do the pollsters get it right?” Public Opinion Quarterly, 59(4), 589–605.Google Scholar
Erikson, R.S. and Wlezien, C. (2012). The timeline of presidential elections: How campaigns do (and do not) matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Estrada-Mejia, C., De Vries, M., and Zeelenberg, M. (2016). “Numeracy and wealth.” Journal of Economic Psychology, 54(1), 53–63.Google Scholar
Farjam, M. (Forthcoming). “The bandwagon effect in an online voting experiment with real political organizations.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research.Google Scholar
Federico, C.M. and Hunt, C.V. (2013). “Political information, political involvement, and reliance on ideology in political evaluation.” Political Behavior, 35(1), 89–112.Google Scholar
Felson, M. and Sudman, S. (1975). “The accuracy of presidential preference primary polls.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 39(2), 232–236.Google Scholar
Fisher, S.D., Lessard-Phillips, L., Hobolt, S.B., and Curtice, J. (2008). “Disengaging voters: Do plurality systems discourage the less knowledgeable from voting?” Electoral Studies, 27(1), 89–104.Google Scholar
Fiske, S.T., Kinder, D.R., and Larter, W.M. (1983). “The novice and the expert: Knowledge-based strategies in political cognition.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(4), 381–400.Google Scholar
Fiske, S.T and Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Fleitas, D.W. (1971). “Bandwagon and underdog effects in minimal-information elections.” American Political Science Review, 65(2), 434–438.Google Scholar
Forsythe, R., Myerson, R.B., Rietz, T.A., and Weber, R.J. (1993). “An experiment on coordination in multi-candidate elections: The importance of polls and election histories.” Social Choice and Welfare, 10(3), 223–247.Google Scholar
Fortunato, D. and Stevenson, R.T. (2013). “Perceptions of partisan ideologies: The effect of coalition participation.” American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 459–477.Google Scholar
Fournier, P. (2006). “The impact of campaigns on discrepancies, errors, and biases in voting behavior.” in Brady, H. & Johnston, R. (eds.), Capturing campaign effects. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 45–77.Google Scholar
Fournier, P., Cutler, F., and Soroka, S. (2019). “Who responds to election campaigns? The two-moderator model revisited.” in Loewen, P. and Rubenson, D. (eds.), Duty and choice: The evolution of the study of voting and voters. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 129–168.Google Scholar
Fowler, A. and Margolis, M. (2014). “The political consequences of uninformed voters.” Electoral Studies, 34(1), 100–110.Google Scholar
Fraile, M. and Gomez, R. (2017). “Bridging the enduring gender gap in political interest in Europe: The relevance of promoting gender equality.” European Journal of Political Research, 56(3), 601–618.Google Scholar
Fredén, A. (2017). “Opinion polls, coalition signals and strategic voting: Evidence from a survey experiment.” Scandinavian Political Studies, 40(3), 247–264.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D.A. (1966). “Election-day radio-television and western voting.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 30(2), 226–236.Google Scholar
Gaines, B.J., Kuklinski, J.H., Quirk, P.J., Peyton, B., and Verkuilen, J. (2007). “Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq.” Journal of Politics, 69(4), 957–974.Google Scholar
Geer, J.G. (1996). From tea leaves to opinion polls: A theory of democratic leadership. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Genovese, M.A. and Streb, M.J. (2005). Polls and politics: The dilemmas of democracy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, A.S., Huber, G.A., and Washington, E. (2010). “Party affiliation, partisanship, and political beliefs: A field experiment.” American Political Science Review, 104(4), 720–744.Google Scholar
Gerber, A.S. and Green, D.P. (2000). “The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment.” American Political Science Review, 94(3), 653–663.Google Scholar
Gerber, A., Hoffman, M., Morgan, J., and Raymond, C. (2020). “One in a million: Field experiments on perceived closeness of the election and voter turnout.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12(3), 287–325.Google Scholar
Geys, B. (2006). “Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research.” Electoral Studies, 25(4), 637–663.Google Scholar
Giammo, J.D. (2004). “Polls and voting behavior: The impact of polling information on candidate preference, turnout, and strategic voting.” Doctoral Dissertation. University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Gidengil, E., Blais, A., Nevitte, N., and Nadeau, R. (2004). Citizens. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Gidengil, E., Blais, A., Everitt, J., Fournier, P., and Nevitte, N. (2012). Dominance and decline: Making sense of recent Canadian elections. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Gimpel, J.G. and Harvey, D.H. (1997). “Forecasts and preferences in the 1992 general election.” Political Behavior, 19(2), 157–175.Google Scholar
Glynn, C.J., Hayes, A.F., and Shanahan, J. (1997). “Perceived support for one’s opinions and willingness to speak out: A meta-analysis of survey studies on the ‘Spiral of Silence’.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(3), 452–463.Google Scholar
Glynn, C.J. and Huge, M.E. (2014). “Speaking in spirals: An updated meta-analysis of the spiral of silence.” in Donsbach, W., Salmon, C.T. & Tsfati, Y. (eds.), The spiral of silence. New York: Routledge, 81–88.Google Scholar
Goot, M. (2010). “Underdogs, bandwagons or incumbency? Party support at the beginning and the end of Australian election campaigns, 1983–2007.” Australian Cultural History, 28(1), 69–80.Google Scholar
Gordon, S.B. and Segura, G.M. (1997). “Cross-national variation in the political sophistication of individuals: Capability or choice?” Journal of Politics, 59(1), 126–147.Google Scholar
Gosnell, H.F. (1937). “Technical research: How accurate were the polls?” Public Opinion Quarterly, 1(1), 97–105.Google Scholar
Green, D.P., Palmquist, B., and Schickler, E. (2004). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Großer, J. and Schram, A. (2010). “Public opinion polls, voter turnout, and welfare: An experimental study.” American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 700–17.Google Scholar
Hansen, K.M. (2009). “Changing patterns in the impact of information on party choice in a multiparty system.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21(4), 525–546.Google Scholar
Hart, P.S. (2013). “The role of numeracy in moderating the influence of statistics in climate change messages.” Public Understanding of Science, 22(7), 785–798.Google Scholar
Hayes, A.F. (2007). “Exploring the forms of self-censorship: On the spiral of silence and the use of opinion expression avoidance strategies.” Journal of Communication, 57(4), 785–802.Google Scholar
Hovland, C.I. and Weiss, W. (1951). “The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650.Google Scholar
Huang, H. (2005). “A cross-cultural test of the spiral of silence.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(3), 324–345.Google Scholar
Irwin, G.A. and Van Holsteyn, J.J.M. (2002). “According to the polls: The influence of opinion polls on expectations.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(1), 92–104.Google Scholar
Ismagilova, E., Slade, E., Rana, N.P., and Dwivedi, Y.K. (2020). “The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: A meta-analysis.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101736.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., Norpoth, H., and Hahn, K.S. (2004). “Consumer demand for election news: The horserace sells.” Journal of Politics, 66(1), 157–175.Google Scholar
Jackson, J.E. (1983). “Election night reporting and voter turnout.” American Journal of Political Science, 27(4), 615–35.Google Scholar
Jacoby, W.G. (2009). “Ideology and vote choice in the 2004 election.” Electoral Studies, 28(4), 584–594.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. (2019). “The polls in 2017.” in Wring, D., Mortimore, R., & Atkinson, S. (eds.), Political communication in Britain: Campaigning, media and polling in the 2017 general election. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 209–220.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. and Wlezien, C. (2018). “Election polling errors across time and space.” Nature Human Behaviour 2(4), 276–283.Google Scholar
Jerit, J. and Barabas, J. (2012). “Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment.” Journal of Politics, 74(3), 672–684.Google Scholar
Jessee, S.A. (2009). “Spatial voting in the 2004 presidential election.” American Political Science Review, 103(1), 59–81.Google Scholar
Jessee, S.A. (2010). “Partisan bias, political information and spatial voting in the 2008 presidential election.” Journal of Politics, 72(2), 327–340.Google Scholar
Johnston, R., Blais, A., Brady, H., and Crête, J. (1992). Letting the people decide: Dynamics of a Canadian election, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, R., Blais, A., Gidengil, E., and Nevitte, N. (1996). Challenge of direct democracy: The 1992 Canadian referendum. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.Google Scholar
Jowell, R., Hedges, B., Lynn, P., Farrant, G., and Heath, A. (1993). “The 1992 British election: the failure of the polls.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(2), 238–263.Google Scholar
Julious, S. A. (2004). “Using confidence intervals around individual means to assess statistical significance between two means.” Pharmaceutical Statistics, 3(3), 217–22.Google Scholar
Kahan, D.M. (2012). “Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: An experimental study.” Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 407–24.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kam, C.D. (2005). “Who toes the party line? Cues, values, and individual differences.” Political Behavior, 27(2), 163–182.Google Scholar
Kam, C.D. and Utych, S.M. (2011). “Close elections and cognitive engagement.” Journal of Politics, 73(4), 1251–1266.Google Scholar
Kam, C.D. and Trussler, M.J. (2017). “At the nexus of observational and experimental research: Theory, specification, and analysis of experiments with heterogeneous treatment effects.” Political Behavior, 39(4), 789–815.Google Scholar
Katz, C. and Baldassare, M. (1992). “Using the ‘L-word’ in public: A test of the spiral of silence in conservative Orange County, California.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(2), 232–235.Google Scholar
Katz, C. and Baldassare, M. (1994). “Popularity in a freefall: Measuring a spiral of silence at the end of the Bush presidency.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C., Blumenthal, M., Clement, S., Clinton, J.D., Durand, C., Franklin, C., McGeeney, K., et al. (2018). “An evaluation of the 2016 election polls in the United States.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
Kenney, P.J., and Rice, T.W. (1994). “The psychology of political momentum.” Political Research Quarterly, 47(4), 923–938.Google Scholar
Kittilson, M.C. and Schwindt-Bayer, L. (2010). “Engaging citizens: The role of power-sharing institutions.” Journal of Politics, 72(4), 990–1002.Google Scholar
Klor, E.F. and Winter, E. (2018). “On public opinion polls and voters’ turnout.” Journal of Public Economic Theory, 20(2), 239–256.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J.A. and Brannon, L.A. (1993). “The impact of the Gulf War on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Multidimensional effects of political involvement.” American Political Science Review, 87(4), 963–975.Google Scholar
Kuru, O., Pasek, J., and Traugott, M.W. (2017). “Motivated reasoning in the perceived credibility of public opinion polls.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(2), 422–46.Google Scholar
Kutner, M., Greenburg, E., Jin, Y., and Paulsen, C. (2006). “The health literacy of America’s adults: Results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. NCES 2006–483.” National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
Lang, K. and Lang, G.E. (1968). Voting and nonvoting: Implications of broadcasting returns before polls are closed. Waltham: Blaisdell Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Larcinese, V. (2007). “Does political knowledge increase turnout? Evidence from the 1997 British general election.” Public Choice, 131(3–4), 387–411.Google Scholar
Lasorsa, D.L. (1991). “Political outspokenness: Factors working against the spiral of silence.” Journalism Quarterly, 68(1–2), 131–140.Google Scholar
Lassen, D.D. (2005). “The effect of information on voter turnout: Evidence from a natural experiment.” American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 103–118.Google Scholar
Lau, R.R., Andersen, D.J., and Redlawsk, D.P. (2008). “An exploration of correct voting in recent US presidential elections.” American Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 395–411.Google Scholar
Lau, R.R. and Redlawsk, D.P. (2001). “Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making.” American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 951–971.Google Scholar
Lau, R.R., Patel, P., Fahmy, D.F., and Kaufman, R.R. (2014). “Correct voting across thirty-three democracies: A preliminary analysis.” British Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 239–259.Google Scholar
Laustsen, L. and Petersen, M.B. (2016). “Winning faces vary by ideology: How nonverbal source cues influence election and communication success in politics.” Political Communication, 33(2), 188–211.Google Scholar
Lengauer, G., and Höller, I. (2012). “Contest framing and its effects on voter (de) mobilisation: News exposure and its impact on voting turnout in the 2008 Austrian elections.” Javnost-The Public, 19(4), 73–91.Google Scholar
Lipkus, I.M., Samsa, G., and Rimer, B.K. (2001). “General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples.” Medical Decision Making, 21(1), 37–44.Google Scholar
Lodge, M. and Taber, C.S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, A. (1994). “Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections.” American Political Science Review, 88(1), 63–76.Google Scholar
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O.S. (2007). “Baby boomer retirement security: The roles of planning, financial literacy, and housing wealth.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(1), 205–224.Google Scholar
Luskin, R.C. (1987). “Measuring political sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science, 31(4), 856–899.Google Scholar
Luskin, R.C. (1990). “Explaining political sophistication.” Political Behavior, 12(4), 331–361.Google Scholar
Magalhães, P.C. (2005). “Pre-election polls in Portugal: Accuracy, bias, and sources of error, 1991–2004.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(4), 399–421.Google Scholar
Malka, A. and Lelkes, Y. (2010). “More than ideology: Conservative–liberal identity and receptivity to political cues.” Social Justice Research, 23(2–3), 156–188.Google Scholar
Marsh, C. (1985). “Back on the bandwagon: The effect of opinion polls on public opinion.” British Journal of Political Science, 15(1), 51–74.Google Scholar
Matthes, J. (2015). “Observing the ‘spiral’ in the spiral of silence.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27(2), 155–176.Google Scholar
Matthes, J., Morrison, K.R., and Schemer, C. (2010). “A spiral of silence for some: Attitude certainty and the expression of political minority opinions.” Communication Research, 37(6), 774–800.Google Scholar
Matthes, J., Knoll, J., and von Sikorski, C. (2018). “The ‘spiral of silence’ revisited: A meta-analysis on the relationship between perceptions of opinion support and political opinion expression.” Communication Research, 45(1), 3–33.Google Scholar
Mayne, Q. and Hakhverdian, A. (2017). “Ideological congruence and citizen satisfaction: Evidence from 25 advanced democracies.” Comparative Political Studies, 50(6), 822–849.Google Scholar
McAllister, I. and Studlar, D.T. (1991). “Bandwagon, underdog, or projection? Opinion polls and electoral choice in Britain, 1979–1987.” Journal of Politics, 53(3), 720–741.Google Scholar
McDermott, R. (2011). “Internal and external validity.” in Druckman, J.N., Green, D.P., Kuklinski, J.H. & Lupia, A. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 27–40.Google Scholar
McDonald, D.G., Glynn, C.J., Kim, S., and Ostman, R.E. (2001). “The spiral of silence in the 1948 presidential election.” Communication Research, 28(2), 139–155.Google Scholar
McKelvey, R.D. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1985). “Elections with limited information: A fulfilled expectations model using contemporaneous poll and endorsement data as information sources.” Journal of Economic Theory, 36(1), 55–85.Google Scholar
Meffert, M.F. and Gschwend, T. (2011). “Polls, coalition signals and strategic voting: An experimental investigation of perceptions and effects.” European Journal of Political Research 50(5), 636–667.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, H. (1966). “Western voting and broadcasts of results on presidential election day.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 30(2), 212–225.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, H.A. and Crespi, I. (1970). Polls, television, and the new politics. Scranton: Chandler House Press.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, M. (1993). “Television’s frames in the 1988 Canadian election.” Canadian Journal of Communication, 18(2), 149–171.Google Scholar
Mérola, V. and Hitt, M.P. (2016). “Numeracy and the persuasive effect of policy information and party cues.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(2), 554–562.Google Scholar
Merolla, J.L. (2009). “The effect of information signals on strategic voting in mock mayoral elections.” Political Behavior, 31(3), 379–399.Google Scholar
Miller, J.M. and Krosnick, J.A. (2000). “News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source.” American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 301–315.Google Scholar
Miller, P.R. (2011). “The emotional citizen: emotion as a function of political sophistication.” Political Psychology, 32(4), 575–600.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. (2012). “It’s about time: The lifespan of information effects in a multiweek campaign.” American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 298–311.Google Scholar
Mitofsky, W.J. (1998). “Was 1996 a worse year for polls than 1948?” Public Opinion Quarterly, 62(2), 230–249.Google Scholar
Mondak, J.J. (2001). “Developing valid knowledge scales.” American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 224–238.Google Scholar
Morton, R.B., Muller, D., Page, L., and Benno, T. (2015). “Exit polls, turnout, and bandwagon voting: Evidence from a natural experiment.” European Economic Review, 77(1), 65–81.Google Scholar
Mosteller, F., Hyman, H., McCarthy, P.J., Marks, E.S., and Truman, D.B. (1949). The pre-election polls of 1948: Report to the committee on analysis of pre-election polls and forecasts. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
Mutz, D.C. (1992). “Impersonal influence: Effects of representations of public opinion on political attitudes.” Political Behavior,14(2), 89–122.Google Scholar
Mutz, D.C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mutz, D.C. and Pemantle, R. (2015). “Standards for experimental research: Encouraging a better understanding of experimental methods.” Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 192–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, R., Cloutier, E., and Guay, J.H. (1993). “New evidence about the existence of a bandwagon effect in the opinion formation process.” International Political Science Review, 14(2), 203–213.Google Scholar
Navazio, R. (1977). “An experimental approach to bandwagon research.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 41(2), 217–225.Google Scholar
Nicholson, S.P. (2012). “Polarizing cues.” American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 52–66.Google Scholar
Niemi, R.G., Iusi, G. and Bianco, W. (1983). “Pre-election polls and turnout.” Journalism Quarterly, 60(3), 530–533.Google Scholar
Noëlle-Neumann, E. (1974). “The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion.” Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51.Google Scholar
Noëlle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion, our social skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oscarsson, H. (2007). “A matter of fact? Knowledge effects on the vote in Swedish general elections, 1985–2002.” Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(3), 301–322.Google Scholar
Panagopoulos, C. (2009). “Polls and elections: Preelection poll accuracy in the 2008 general elections.” Presidential Studies Quarterly, 39(4), 896–907.Google Scholar
Panagopoulos, C. and Farrer, B. (2014). “Polls and elections: Preelection poll accuracy and bias in the 2012 general elections.” Presidential Studies Quarterly, 44(2), 352–363.Google Scholar
Patterson, T.E. (1993). Out of order. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Paulos, J.A. (1988). Innumeracy: Mathematical illiteracy and its consequences. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Peters, E. and Levin, I.P. (2008). “Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options.” Judgment and Decision Making, 3(6), 435–448.Google Scholar
Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C.K., Mazzocco, K., and Dickert, S. (2006). “Numeracy and decision making.” Psychological Science, 17(5), 407–413.Google Scholar
Petersen, M.B., Skov, M., Serritzlew, S., and Ramsøy, T. (2013). “Motivated reasoning and political parties: Evidence for increased processing in the face of party cues.” Political Behavior, 35(4), 831–854.Google Scholar
Petty, R.E. and Wegener, D.T. (1998). “Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables.” in Gilbert, D.T., Fiske, S.T., and Lindzey, G. (eds.), The handbook of social psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 323–90.Google Scholar
Pons, V. and Tricaud, C. (2019). “Coordination and bandwagon effects of candidate rankings: Evidence from runoff elections.” Working Paper No. 26599. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Popkin, S.L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). “The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281.Google Scholar
Rapeli, L. (2018). “Does sophistication affect electoral outcomes?” Government and Opposition, 53(2), 181–204.Google Scholar
Reyna, V.F., Nelson, W.L., Han, P.K., and Dieckmann, N.F. (2009). “How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.” Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 943–973.Google Scholar
Rich, T.S. (2015). “Strategic voting and the role of polls: Evidence from an embedded web survey.” PS: Political Science & Politics, 48(2), 301–305.Google Scholar
Riker, W.H. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1968). “A theory of the calculus of voting.” American Political Science Review, 62(1), 25–42.Google Scholar
Rios, K. and Chen, Z. (2014). “Experimental evidence for minorities’ hesitancy in reporting their opinions: The roles of optimal distinctiveness needs and normative influence.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(7), 872–883.Google Scholar
Rothschild, D. and Malhotra, N. (2014). “Are public opinion polls self-fulfilling prophecies?” Research & Politics, 1(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
Roy, J. (2011). “Information heterogeneity, complexity and the vote calculus.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 21(1), 29–56.Google Scholar
Roy, J. and Alcantara, C. (2020). Winning and keeping power in Canadian politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Roy, J. and Alcantara, C. (2016). “Fighting fire with fire: The implications of (not) going negative in a multiparty election campaign.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 473–97.Google Scholar
Roy, J. and Alcantara, C. (2015). “The candidate effect: Does the local candidate matter?” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 25(2), 195–214.Google Scholar
Roy, J. and Singh, S.P. (2012). “Canadian and American voting strategies: Does institutional socialization matter?” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 289–312.Google Scholar
Roy, J., Singh, S.P., Fournier, P., and Andrew, B. (2015). “An experimental analysis of the impact of campaign polls on electoral information seeking.” Electoral Studies, 40(1), 146–57.Google Scholar
Sanders, D. (2003). “Pre-election polling in Britain, 1950–1997.” Electoral Studies, 22(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Beck, R. (1996). “Mass media, the electorate, and the bandwagon. A study of communication effects on vote choice in Germany.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8(3), 266–291.Google Scholar
Schmuck, D., Heiss, R., Matthes, J., Engesser, S. and Esser, F. (2017). “Antecedents of strategic game framing in political news coverage.” Journalism, 18(8), 937–955.Google Scholar
Schuck, A., Vliegenthart, R., Hajo, G., Boomgaarden, M.E., Azrout, R., van Spanje, J., and de Vreese, C.H. (2013). “Explaining campaign news coverage: How medium, time, and context explain variation in the media framing of the 2009 European parliamentary elections.” Journal of Political Marketing, 12(1), 8–28.Google Scholar
Schwartz, L.M., Woloshin, S., Black, W.C., and Welch, H.G. (1997). “The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography.” Annals of Internal Medicine, 127(11), 966–972.Google Scholar
Shamir, J. (1997). “Speaking up and silencing out in face of a changing climate of opinion.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(3), 602–614.Google Scholar
Sigelman, L. and Bullock, D. (1991). “Candidates, issues, horse races, and hoopla: Presidential campaign coverage, 1888–1988.” American Politics Quarterly, 19(1), 5–32.Google Scholar
Simon, H.A. (1954). “Bandwagon and underdog effects and the possibility of election predictions.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 18(3), 245–253.Google Scholar
Sinclair, B. and Plott, C.R. (2012). “From uninformed to informed choices: Voters, pre-election polls and updating.” Electoral Studies, 31(1), 83–95.Google Scholar
Singh, S.P. and Roy, J. (2014). “Political knowledge, the decision calculus, and proximity voting.” Electoral Studies, 34(1), 89–99.Google Scholar
Singh, S.P. and Roy, J. (2018). “Compulsory voting and voter information seeking.” Research & Politics, 5(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Skalaban, A. (1988). “Do the polls affect elections? Some 1980 evidence.” Political Behavior, 10(2), 136–150.Google Scholar
Slothuus, R. and de Vreese, C.H. (2010). “Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects.” Journal of Politics, 72(3), 630–645.Google Scholar
Smets, K. and Van Ham, C. (2013). “The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout.” Electoral Studies, 32(2), 344–359.Google Scholar
Sniderman, P.M., Brody, R.A., and Tetlock, P.E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soroka, S. and Andrew, B. (2010). “Media coverage of Canadian elections: Horse-race coverage and negativity in election campaigns.” in Sampert, S., & Trimble, L.J. (eds.), Mediating Canadian Politics, Toronto: Pearson Prentice Hall, 113–128.Google Scholar
Soroka, S., Loewen, P., Fournier, P., and Rubenson, D. (2016). “The impact of news photos on support for military action.” Political Communication, 33(4), 563–582.Google Scholar
Splendore, S., Di Salvo, P., Eberwein, T., Groenhart, H., Kus, M., and Porlezza, C. (2016). “Educational strategies in data journalism: A comparative study of six European countries.” Journalism, 17(1), 138–152.Google Scholar
Stolwijk, S.B., Schuck, A.R.T., and de Vreese, C.H. (2017). “How anxiety and enthusiasm help explain the bandwagon effect.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(4), 554–574.Google Scholar
Sturgis, P., Nick, B., Mario, C., Stephen, F., Jane, G., Jennings, W., Jouni, K., Ben, L., and Patten, S. (2016). Report of the inquiry into the 2015 British general election opinion polls. London: Market Research Society and British Polling Council.Google Scholar
Sudman, S. (1986). “Do exit polls influence voting behavior?.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(3), 331–339.Google Scholar
Tilley, J., Garry, J. and Bold, T. (2008). “Perceptions and reality: Economic voting at the 2004 European parliament elections.” European Journal of Political Research, 47(5), 665–686.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. and Hobolt, S.B. (2011). “Is the government to blame? An experimental test of how partisanship shapes perceptions of performance and responsibility.” Journal of Politics, 73(2), 316–330.Google Scholar
Tomz, M. and Van Houweling, R.P. (2008). “Candidate positioning and voter choice.” American Political Science Review, 102(3), 303–318.Google Scholar
Traugott, M.W. (2001). “Assessing poll performance in the 2000 campaign.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(3), 389–419.Google Scholar
Traugott, M.W. (2005). “The accuracy of the national preelection polls in the 2004 presidential election.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(5), 642–654.Google Scholar
Tuchman, S. and Coffin, T.E. (1971). “The influence of election night television broadcasts in a close election.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 35(3), 315–326.Google Scholar
Utych, S.M. and Kam, C.D. (2014). “Viability, information seeking, and vote choice.” Journal of Politics, 76(1), 152–166.Google Scholar
Valentino, N.A., Beckmann, M.N., and Buhr, T.A. (2001). “A spiral of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government.” Political Communication, 18(4), 347–367.Google Scholar
Vandello, J.A., Goldschmied, N.P., and Richards, D.A.R. (2007). “The appeal of the underdog.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(12), 1603–1616.Google Scholar
van der Meer, T.W.G., Hakhverdian, A., and Aaldering, L. (2016). “Off the fence, onto the bandwagon? A large-scale survey experiment on effect of real-life poll outcomes on subsequent vote intentions.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28(1), 46–72.Google Scholar
West, D.M. (1991). “Polling effects in election campaigns.” Political Behavior, 13(2), 151–163.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.J. (1981). “Media coverage of Canadian election campaigns: Horserace journalism and the meta-campaign.” Journal of Canadian Studies, 15(4), 56–68.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, R. and Linquiti, P. (1981). “Tuning in and turning out.” Public Opinion, 4(1), 56–60.Google Scholar
Wright, M.J., Farrar, D.P., and Russell, D.F. (2014). “Polling accuracy in a multiparty election.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26(1), 113–124.Google Scholar
Zaller, J.R. (1990). “Political awareness, elite opinion leadership, and the mass survey response.” Social Cognition, 8(1), 125–53.Google Scholar
Zaller, J.R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Power of Polls?
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Power of Polls?
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Power of Polls?
Available formats
×