Element contents
Series: Elements of Paleontology
Follow the Fossils
Developing Metrics for Instagram as a Natural Science Communication Tool
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2021
Summary
The ability for people to connect, learn, and communicate about science has been enhanced through the Internet, specifically through social media platforms. Facebook and Twitter are well-studied, while Instagram is understudied. This Element provides insight into using Instagram as a science education platform by pioneering a set of calculated metrics, using a paleontology-focused account as a case study. Framed by the theory of affinity spaces, the authors conducted year-long analyses of 455 posts and 139 stories that were created as part of an informal science learning project. They found that team activity updates and posts outside of their other categories perform better than their defined categories. For Instagram stories, the data show that fewer slides per story hold viewers' attention longer, and stories using the poll tool garnered the most interaction. This Element provides a baseline to assess the success of Instagram content for science communicators and natural science institutions.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements of PaleontologyOnline ISBN: 9781009157476Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 09 December 2021
References
Baker, S. A., and Walsh, M. J. (2018). “Good Morning Fitfam”: top posts, hashtags and gender display on Instagram. New Media & Society, 20(12), 1461444818777514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818777514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bex, R. T., Lundgren, L., and Crippen, K. J. (2019). Scientific Twitter: the flow of paleontological communication across a topic network. PLoS ONE, 14(7), e0219688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219688Google Scholar
Cardoso, M., Warrick, E., Golbeck, J., and Preece, J. (2016). Motivational impact of Facebook posts on environmental communities. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion. New York: ACM, 237–40.Google Scholar
Catalani, J. (2014). Contributions by amateur paleontologists in 21st century paleontology. Palaeontol. Electron., 17(2), 3E. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26879/143Google Scholar
Clark, D. (2014). Engaging professionals and the public: outreach efforts of the Friends of the University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology. The Paleontological Society Special Publications, 13, 126–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2475262200012703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. (2011). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Crippen, K. J., Ellis, S., Dunckel, B. A., Hendy, A. J. W., and MacFadden, B. J. (2016). Seeking shared practice: a juxtaposition of the attributes and activities of organized fossil groups with those of professional paleontology. J. Sci. Educ. Technol., 25(5), 731–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9627-3Google Scholar
Falk, J. H., and Dierking, L. D. (2016). The museum experience revisited. New York: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2004). Affinity spaces, situated language and learning: a critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge, 77–83.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2005). Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces: from the Age of Mythology to today’s schools. In Barton, D. & Tusting, K., eds., Beyond communities of practice: language power and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 214–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610554.012Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2017). Affinity spaces and 21st century learning. Educational Technology, 57(2), 27–31.Google Scholar
Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M. L., and Marek, E. A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 23(5), 535–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690116971Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, S. P., Rosenberg, J. M., Staudt Willet, K. B., Koehler, M. J., and Akcaoglu, M. (2020). Identifying multiple learning spaces within a single teacher-focused Twitter hashtag. Comput. Educ., 148, 103809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hines, H. N. (2019). Cell-fies: sharing microbiology with global audiences through Instagram. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 366(16). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnz205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hines, H. N., and Warring, S. (2019). How we use Instagram to communicate microbiology to the public. Nature Community. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00493-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hootsuite and We Are Social. (2021). Digital 2021: global overview report. Accessed at https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-global-overview-reportGoogle Scholar
Jarreau, P. B., Cancellare, I. A., Carmichael, B. J. et al. (2019). Using selfies to challenge public stereotypes of scientists. PLoS ONE, 14(5), e0216625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216625CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, A., Bauer, J. E., Fraass, S. et al. (2019). Time Scavengers: an educational website to communicate climate change and evolutionary theory to the public through blogs, web pages, and social media platforms. JSTEM, 2(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v2i1.05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 89–118.Google Scholar
Lundgren, L., and Crippen, K. J. (2017). Developing social paleontology: a case study implementing innovative social media applications. In D. Remenyl, ed., The Social Media in Practice Excellence Awards 2017 at ECSM 2017: an anthology of case histories, pp. 11–26. Reading, UK: Academic Conferences and Publishing International, Ltd.Google Scholar
Lundgren, L., Crippen, K. J., and Bex, R. T. (2018). Digging into the PIT: a new tool for characterizing the social paleontological community. Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. Las Vegas, NV: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 76–83.Google Scholar
Lundgren, L., Crippen, K. J., and Bex, R. T. (2020). Social media interaction as informal science learning: a comparison of message design in two niches. Res. Sci. Educ. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09911-yGoogle Scholar
MacFadden, B., Lundgren, L., Crippen, K., Dunckel, B., and Ellis, S. (2016). Amateur paleontological societies and fossil clubs, interactions with professional paleontologists, and social paleontology in the United States. Palaeontol. Electron., 19(2), 1E. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26879/161EGoogle Scholar
Marsick, V. J., and Watkins, K. E. (2001) Informal and incidental learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 25–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.5Google Scholar
Morgan, E. M., Snelson, C., and Elison-Bowers, P. (2010). Image and video disclosure of substance use on social media websites. Comput. Human Behav., 26(6), 1405–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.017Google Scholar
Nobles, A. L., Leas, E. C., Noar, S. et al. (2020). Automated image analysis of Instagram posts: implications for risk perception and communication in public health using a case study of #HIV. PLoS ONE, 15(5), e0231155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231155Google Scholar
Perez, V. J., Leder, R. M., Lundgren, L. et al. (2020). The Belgrade PaleoBlitz: a pilot project to engage amateur paleontologists. Palaeontologica Electronica, 23(1), A18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26879/1013Google Scholar
Perrin, A., and Anderson, M. (2019). Social media usage in the U.S. in 2019. Accessed at www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/10/share-of-u-s-adults-using-social-media-including-facebook-is-mostly-unchanged-since-2018/Google Scholar
Plotnick, R. E., Stigall, A. L., and Stefanescu, I. (2014). Evolution of paleontology: long-term gender trends in an earth-science discipline. GSAT, 24(11), 44–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG219GW.1Google Scholar
Schuch, J. C., Harden, S. B., Bostick, K., and Smith, H. A. (2018). Museums engaging diverse Millennials in community dialogue. Museums & Social Issues, 13(2), 58–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15596893.2018.1610648Google Scholar
Sharma, P., and Land, S. (2018). Patterns of knowledge sharing in an online affinity space for diabetes. Education Tech Research Dev., 67(2), 247–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9609-7Google Scholar
Sheffield, S. L., and Bauer, J. E. (2017). Darwin Day in deep time: promoting evolutionary science through paleontology. Evo. Edu. Outreach, 10(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-017-0073-3Google Scholar
Staudt Willet, K. B. (2019). Revisiting how and why educators use Twitter: tweet types and purposes in #edchat. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 273–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1611507Google Scholar
Stoneburg, B., Perez, V., Lundgren, L., Ziegler, M., and Santos, G.-P. (2020). Cosplay for Science: leveraging pop culture to make science more accessible. Exhibition, 39(2).Google Scholar
Thelwall, M., and Vis, F. (2017). Gender and image sharing on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat and WhatsApp in the UK. Aslib Journal of Info. Mgmt., 69(6): 702–20.Google Scholar
Villaespesa, E., and Wowkowych, S. (2020). Ephemeral storytelling with social media: Snapchat and Instagram stories at the Brooklyn Museum. Social Media + Society, 6(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2056305119898776Google Scholar