Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T04:07:39.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in European Politics

The European Ideological Space in Voters' Own Words

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2025

Noam Gidron  and
Thomas Tichelbaecker
Noam Gidron
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Thomas Tichelbaecker
Affiliation:
Princeton University

Summary

There is a broad consensus that the ideological space of Western democracies consists of two distinct dimensions: one economic and the other cultural. In this Element, the authors explore how ordinary citizens make sense of these two dimensions. Analyzing novel survey data collected across ten Western democracies, they employ text analysis techniques to investigate responses to open-ended questions. They examine variations in how people interpret these two ideological dimensions along three levels of analysis: across countries, based on demographic features, and along the left-right divide. Their results suggest that there are multiple two-dimensional spaces: that is, different groups ascribe different meanings to what the economic and cultural political divides stand for. They also find that the two dimensions are closely intertwined in people's minds. Their findings make theoretical contributions to the study of electoral politics and political ideology.
Get access

Keywords

ideologypublic opinionvoterspartiesdimensions
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in European Politics
Online ISBN: 9781009439305
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 16 January 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abou-Chadi, T., Cohen, D., and Wagner, M. (2022). The centre-right versus the radical right: The role of migration issues and economic grievances. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(2):366–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abou-Chadi, T. and Wagner, M. (2020). Electoral fortunes of social democratic parties: Do second dimension positions matter? Journal of European Public Policy, 27(2):246–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D., and Sanford, N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper.Google Scholar
Aspide, A., Brown, K. J., DiGiuseppe, M., and Slaski, A. (2023). Age and support for public debt reduction. European Journal of Political Research, 62(4): 1191–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, R., De Vries, C., Edwards, E., et al. (2015). Measuring party positions in Europe: The chapel hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics, 21(1):143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, R., Jolly, S., and Polk, J. (2022). Analyzing the cross-national comparability of party positions on the socio-cultural and EU dimensions in Europe. Political Science Research and Methods, 10(2):408–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, R., Jolly, S., Polk, J., and Poole, K. (2014). The European common space: Extending the use of anchoring vignettes. The Journal of Politics, 76(4):1089–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldassarri, D. and Goldberg, A. (2014). Neither ideologues nor agnostics: Alternative voters’ belief system in an age of partisan politics. American Journal of Sociology, 120(1):45–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bale, T. and Kaltwasser, C. R. (2021). Riding the populist wave: Europe’s mainstream right in crisis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberá, P., Casas, A., Nagler, J., et al. (2019). Who leads? Who follows? Measuring issue attention and agenda setting by legislators and the mass public using social media data. American Political Science Review, 113(4):883–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartolini, S. (2000). The political mobilization of the European left, 1860–1980: The class cleavage. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, K. and Laver, M. (2006). Party policy in modern democracies. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, K. and Laver, M. (2015). The politics of advanced capitalism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1996). Left and right: The significance of a political distinction. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bochsler, D., Green, E., Jenne, E., Mylonas, H., and Wimmer, A. (2021). Exchange on the quantitative measurement of ethnic and national identity. Nations and Nationalism, 27(1):22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolet, D. (2021). Drinking alone: Local socio-cultural degradation and radical right support – the case of British pub closures. Comparative Political Studies, 54(9):1653–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolet, D. (2023). The janus-faced nature of radical voting: Subjective social decline at the roots of radical right and radical left support. Party Politics, 29(3):475–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonikowski, B., Luo, Y., and Stuhler, O. (2022). Politics as usual? Measuring populism, nationalism, and authoritarianism in US presidential campaigns (1952–2020) with neural language models. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(4):1721–1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bormann, N.-C. and Golder, M. (2013). Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2011. Electoral Studies, 32(2):360–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornschier, S. (2010a). Cleavage politics and the populist right: The new cultural conflict in Western Europe. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Bornschier, S. (2010b). The new cultural divide and the two-dimensional political space in Western Europe. West European Politics, 33(3):419–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, B. and Rennwald, L. (2023). Who still likes social democracy? The support base of social democratic parties reconsidered. Party Politics, 29(4): 741–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, E. G. and D’Amico, N. J. (2015). The new look in political ideology research. Annual Review of Political Science, 18:205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughey, D., O’Grady, T., and Warshaw, C. (2019). Policy ideology in European mass publics, 1981–2016. American Political Science Review, 113(3): 674–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaillé, C. and Trump, K.-S. (2015). The two facets of social policy preferences. The Journal of Politics, 77(1):146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantone, I., Di Lonardo, L., Margalit, Y., and Percoco, M. (2024). The political consequences of green policies: Evidence from Italy. American Political Science Review, 118(1): 108–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condon, M. and Wichowsky, A. (2020). The economic other: Inequality in the American political imagination. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, K. J. (2012). Putting inequality in its place: Rural consciousness and the power of perspective. American Political Science Review, 106(3):517–532.Google Scholar
Cramer, K. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, R. J. (2010). Left–right orientations, context, and voting choices. In Citizens, context, and choice: How context shapes citizens’ electoral choices, eds. Russell J. Dalton, and Anderson, Christopher J.. Oxford University Press. pages 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, R. M. and Margalit, Y. (2020). The evolution of the immigration debate: Evidence from a new dataset of party positions over the last half-century. Comparative Political Studies, 53(5):734–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, R. M. and Donnelly, M. J. (2013). Sectoral economies, economic contexts, and attitudes toward immigration. The Journal of Politics, 75(1):17–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dassonneville, R. (2021). Change and continuity in the ideological gender gap a longitudinal analysis of left-right self-placement in OECD countries. European Journal of Political Research, 60(1):225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dassonneville, R., Fournier, P., and Somer-Topcu, Z. (2023). Partisan attachments in a multidimensional space. West European Politics, 46(4): 678–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, C. E., Hobolt, S. B., Proksch, S.-O., and Slapin, J. B. (2021). Foundations of European politics: A comparative approach. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.Google Scholar
Diamond, E. P. (2023). Understanding rural identities and environmental policy attitudes in America. Perspectives on Politics, 21(2): 502–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, P. and Chwalisz, C. (2015). The predistribution agenda: Tackling inequality and supporting sustainable growth. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Dolezal, M., Eder, N., Kritzinger, S., and Zeglovits, E. (2013). The structure of issue attitudes revisited: A dimensional analysis of Austrian voters and party elites. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 23(4):423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drutman, L. (2020). Breaking the two-party doom loop: The case for multiparty democracy in America. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrario, B. and Stantcheva, S. (2022). Eliciting people’s first-order concerns: Text analysis of open-ended survey questions. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 112:163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, R. and Jennings, W. (2020). The changing cleavage politics of Western Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 23:295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadarian, S. K., Goodman, S. W., and Pepinsky, T. B. (2022). Pandemic politics: The deadly toll of partisanship in the age of COVID. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (2012). Mere description. British Journal of Political Science, 42(4):721–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gest, J. (2016). The new minority: White working class politics in an age of immigration and inequality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gethin, A., Martínez-Toledano, C., and Piketty, T. (2022). Brahmin left versus merchant right: Changing political cleavages in 21 western democracies, 1948–2020. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 137(1):1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidron, N. (2022). Many ways to be right: Cross-pressured voters in Western Europe. British Journal of Political Science, 52(1):146–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidron, N. and Hall, P. A. (2017). The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. The British Journal of Sociology, 68: S57–S84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gidron, N. and Hall, P. A. (2020). Populism as a problem of social integration. Comparative Political Studies, 53(7):1027–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidron, N., Sheffer, L., and Mor, G. (2022). Validating the feeling thermometer as a measure of partisan affect in multi-party systems. Electoral Studies, 80: 102542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidron, N. and Ziblatt, D. (2019). Center-right political parties in advanced democracies. Annual Review of Political Science, 22:17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givens, T. and Luedtke, A. (2005). European immigration policies in comparative perspective: Issue salience, partisanship and immigrant rights. Comparative European Politics, 3(1):1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonthier, F. and Guerra, T. (2023). How party polarization shapes the structuring of policy preferences in Europe. Party Politics, 29(2): 384–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grootendorst, M. (2022). Bertopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based tf-idf procedure. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05794.Google Scholar
Haaland, I. K., Roth, C., Stantcheva, S., and Wohlfart, J. (2024). Measuring what is top of mind. National Bureau of Economic Research, w32421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, J. and Hopkins, D. J. (2014). Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science, 17: 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A. (2013). The political origins of our economic discontents. In Politics in the new hard times: The great recession in comparative perspective, eds. Miles Kahler, and Lake, David A.. pages 129–149. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. (2020). The electoral politics of growth regimes. Perspectives on Politics, 18(1):185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A., Evans, G., and Kim, S. I. (2023). Political change and electoral coalitions in western democracies. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A., Evans, G., and Kim, S. I. (2015). What do voters want? Dimensions and configurations in individual-level preferences and party choice. In The politics of advanced capitalism, eds. Hanspeter Kriesi, Herbert Kitschelt, Pablo Beramendi, and Silja Häusermann. pages 202–230. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A., Evans, G., and Kim, S. I. (2022). Class and social policy in the knowledge economy. European Journal of Political Research, 61(2):462–484.Google Scholar
Hillen, S. and Steiner, N. D. (2020). The consequences of supply gaps in two-dimensional policy spaces for voter turnout and political support: The case of economically left-wing and culturally right-wing citizens in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 59(2):331–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1):109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L., Marks, G., and Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8):965–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutter, S. and Kriesi, H. (2019). European party politics in times of crisis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1984). The changing structure of political cleavages in western society. In Electoral change in advanced industrial democracies: Realignment or dealignment?, eds. Russell J. Dalton, and Flanagan, Scott E., pages 25–69. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. and Flanagan, S. C. (1987). Value change in industrial societies. American Political Science Review, 81(4):1289–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2006). Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review, 100(2):165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jankowski, M., Schneider, S. H., and Tepe, M. (2023). How stable are “left” and “right”? A morphological analysis using open-ended survey responses of parliamentary candidates. Party Politics 29(1): 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, S., Bakker, R., Hooghe, L., et al. (2022). Chapel hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2019. Electoral Studies, 75:102420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., and Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1):307–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kersch, K. I. (2011). Ecumenicalism through constitutionalism: The discursive development of constitutional conservatism in national review, 1955–1980. Studies in American Political Development, 25(1):86–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, D. R. and Kalmoe, N. P. (2017). Neither liberal nor conservative: Ideological innocence in the American public. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (1994). The transformation of European social democracy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H. and Hellemans, S. (1990). The left-right semantics and the new politics cleavage. Comparative Political Studies, 23(2):210–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H. and Rehm, P. (2014). Occupations as a site of political preference formation. Comparative Political Studies, 47(12):1670–1706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H. and Rehm, P. (2016). Who responds? Voters, parties and issue attention. British Journal of Political Science, 46(3):633–654.Google Scholar
Koedam, J. (2022). A change of heart? Analysing stability and change in European party positions. West European Politics, 45(4):693–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., et .al. (2006). Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research, 45(6):921–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., et al. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, D. (2019). Comparing America: Reflections on democracy across subfields. Perspectives on Politics, 17(3):788–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, M. (2009). The dignity of working men: Morality and the boundaries of race, class, and immigration. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, M., Park, B. Y., and Ayala-Hurtado, E. (2017). Trump’s electoral speeches and his appeal to the American white working class. The British Journal of Sociology, 68:S153–S180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauterbach, F. and De Vries, C. E. (2020). Europe belongs to the young? Generational differences in public opinion towards the European Union during the Eurozone crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(2):168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkofridi, Z., Wagner, M., and Willmann, J. E. (2014). Left-authoritarians and policy representation in Western Europe: Electoral choice across ideological dimensions. West European Politics, 37(1):65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, R. C., Mettler, S., Pepinsky, T. B., Roberts, K. M., and Valelly, R. (2019). The Trump presidency and American democracy: A historical and comparative analysis. Perspectives on Politics, 17(2):470–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (1990). Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: In The west European party system, Oxford readings in politics and government, ed. Peter Mair, . Oxford [England]; New York: Oxford University Press, 91–138.Google Scholar
Lucas, C., Nielsen, R. A., Roberts, M. E., et al. (2015). Computer-assisted text analysis for comparative politics. Political Analysis, 23(2):254–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, N., Margalit, Y., and Mo, C. H. (2013). Economic explanations for opposition to immigration: Distinguishing between prevalence and conditional impact. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2):391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., and Soto, C. J. (2019). Are cultural and economic conservatism positively correlated? A large-scale cross-national test. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3):1045–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manow, P. (2009). Electoral rules, class coalitions and welfare state regimes, or how to explain Esping-Andersen with Stein Rokkan. Socio-Economic Review, 7(1):101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitteregger, R. (2024). Socialized with “old cleavages” or “new dimensions”: An Age-Period-Cohort analysis on electoral support in Western European multiparty systems (1949–2021). Electoral Studies, 87:102744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neundorf, A. and Adams, J. (2018). The micro-foundations of party competition and issue ownership: The reciprocal effects of citizens’ issue salience and party attachments. British Journal of Political Science, 48(2):385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neundorf, A. and Adams, J. (2008). Left and right in global politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, P. and Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oesch, D. and Rennwald, L. (2018). Electoral competition in Europe’s new tripolar political space: Class voting for the left, centre-right and radical right. European Journal of Political Research, 57(4):783–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, T. (2023). Is ideological polarisation by age group growing in Europe? European Journal of Political Research, 62(4): 1389–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oser, J., Hooghe, M., and Marien, S. (2013). Is online participation distinct from offline participation? A latent class analysis of participation types and their stratification. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1):91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennwald, L. and Evans, G. (2014). When supply creates demand: Social democratic party strategies and the evolution of class voting. West European Politics, 37(5):1108–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, M., Navarre, R., and Utych, S. (2023). The age of discontent. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., et al. (2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4):1064–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodden, J. A. (2019). Why cities lose: The deep roots of the urban-rural political divide. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. and Stantcheva, S. (2021). A policy matrix for inclusive prosperity. National Bureau of Economic Research, w28736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, J. E., Howat, A. J., Shafranek, R. M., and Busby, E. C. (2019). Pigeonholing partisans: Stereotypes of party supporters and partisan polarization. Political Behavior, 41(2):423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatz, E. (2009). Ethnographic immersion and the study of politics. In Schatz, E., editor, Political ethnography: What immersion contributes to the study of politics, pages 1–22. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeberg, H. B. and Adams, J. (2024). Citizens’ issue priorities respond to national conditions, less so to parties’ issue emphases. Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sides, J., Tausanovitch, C., and Vavreck, L. (2022). The bitter end: The 2020 presidential campaign and the challenge to American democracy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sides, J., Tesler, M., and Vavreck, L. (2019). Identity crisis: The 2016 presidential campaign and the battle for the meaning of America. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spies, D. and Franzmann, S. T. (2011). A two-dimensional approach to the political opportunity structure of extreme right parties in Western Europe. West European Politics, 34(5):1044–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoon, J.-J. and Williams, C. J. (2021). “It’s the economy, stupid”: When new politics parties take on old politics issues. West European Politics, 44(4):802–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stantcheva, S. (2022). Understanding of trade. National Bureau of Economic Research, w30040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stantcheva, S. (2024). Why do we dislike inflation? National Bureau of Economic Research, w32300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tichelbaecker, T., Gidron, N., Horne, W., and Adams, J. (2023). What do we measure when we measure affective polarization across countries? Public Opinion Quarterly, 87(3):803–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Brug, W. and Van Spanje, J. (2009). Immigration, Europe and the “new” cultural dimension. European Journal of Political Research, 48(3):309–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicinanza, P., Goldberg, A., and Srivastava, S. B. (2023). A deep-learning model of prescient ideas demonstrates that they emerge from the periphery. PNAS Nexus, 2(1): pgac275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volkens, A., Krause, W., Lehmann, P., et al. (2017). The manifesto data collection: Manifesto project (mrg/cmp/marpor). Version 2017b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für sozialforschung (wzb). Bron, 1(1990):15.Google Scholar
Weyland, K. (2020). Populism’s threat to democracy: Comparative lessons for the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 18(2):389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, K. and Madrid, R. L. (2019). When democracy trumps populism: European and Latin American lessons for the United States. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollinger, D. (2024). Cleavage identities in voters’ own words: Harnessing open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 68(1): 139–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The European Ideological Space in Voters' Own Words
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The European Ideological Space in Voters' Own Words
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The European Ideological Space in Voters' Own Words
Available formats
×