Abney, Steven P. (1989) ‘A computational model of human parsing’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18: 129–44.
Abney, Steven P. and Mark Johnson (1991) ‘Memory requirements and local ambiguities of parsing strategies’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20: 233–50.
Ackema, Peter (1995) Syntax Below Zero, Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.
Åfarli, Tor A. (1985) ‘Norwegian verb particle constructions as causative constructions’, Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 75–98.
Åfarli, Tor A. (1992) The Syntax of Norwegian Passive Constructions, Amsterdam:Benjamins.
Alexiadou, Artemis (1994) Issues in the Syntax of Adverbs, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Potsdam.
Alexiadou, Artemis and Elena Anagnostopoulou (1998) ‘Parametrizing Agr: word order, verb movement and EPP-checking’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16(3): 491–539.
Andersen, Henning (1973) ‘Abductive and deductive change’ Language 49: 765–93.
ANS (1984) Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, see Geerts et al.
ANS2 (1997) = second, revised edition of ANS (two volumes), see Haeseryn et al.
Aoun, Joseph, Norbert Hornstein, David Lightfoot and Amy Weinberg (1987) ‘Two types of locality’, Linguistic Inquiry 18: 537–77.
Aoun, Joseph and Yen-Hui Audrey Li (1993) ‘Scope and constituency’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 141–72.
Askedal, John Ole (1986) ‘Über Stellungsfelder und Satztypen im Deutschen’, Deutsche Sprache 3: 193–223.
Baker, Mark C. (1988) Incorporation – A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, University of Chicago Press.
Baker, Mark C. (1991) ‘On the relation of serialization to verb extension’ in Claire Lefèbre (ed.) Serial Verbs, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 79–102.
Baker, Mark C. (2003) ‘Linguistic differences and language design’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(8): 349–53.
Barss, Andrew and Howard Lasnik (1986) ‘A note on anaphora and double-objects’, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 347–54.
Bartos, Huba (2004) ‘Verbal complexes and morpho-syntactic merger’ in Katalin É. Kiss and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.) Verb Clusters: A Study of Hungarian, German, and Dutch, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 395–415.
Bayer, Josef (1998) ‘Final complementizers in hybrid languages’, Journal of Linguistics 35: 233–71.
Bayer, Josef (
2001) ‘Two grammars in one: sentential complements and complementizers in Bengali and other South Asian languages’ in
Peri Bhaskararao and
Karumuri V. Subbarao (eds.)
The Yearbook of South Asian Languages: Tokyo Symposium on South Asian Languages – Contact, Convergence and Typology,
New Delhi:
Sage Publications, pp. 11–36.
Bech, Gunnar (1955) Studien über das deutsche verbum infinitum, Copenhagen: Munksgaard, Tübingen: Niemeyer. [Second unchanged edition (1983), introduced by Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen.]
Berthold Delbrück (1901) Grundfragen der Sprachforschung, Strassburg: Trübner.
Berwick, Robert C., Paul Pietroski, Beracah Yankama and Noam Chomsky (2011) ‘Poverty of the stimulus revisited’, Cognitive Science 35: 1,207–42.
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg and Ian Roberts (2009) ‘Linearization and the architecture of grammar: a view from the final-over-final constraint’ in Vincenzo Moscati and E. Servidio (eds.) StiL – Studies in Linguistics (Proceedings of XXXV Incontro di Grammatica Generativa), pp. 78–91.
Biberauer, Theresa and Ian Roberts (2005) ‘Changing EPP-parameters in the history of English: accounting for variation and change’, English Language and Linguistics 9: 5–46.
Bierwisch, Manfred (2000) ‘Evolutionstheorie und Linguistik – Drei Probleme’ in Klaus Richter (ed.) Evolutionstheorie und Geisteswissenschaften, University of Erfurt: Acta Academia Scientiarum 5, pp. 129–89.
Blom, Corrien (2002) ‘Word order in Middle Dutch: the interpretation of different types of data’, Linguistics in the Netherlands 2002: 13–24.
Boeckx, Cedric (2006) Linguistic Minimalism, Oxford University Press.
Bonet, Eulàlia (1990) ‘Subjects in Catalan’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 13: 1–26.
Bouchard, Denis (1995) The Semantics of Syntax, University of Chicago Press.
Carrier, Jill and Janet Randall: (1992) ‘The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 173–235.
Chomsky, Noam (1968) Language and Mind, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Chomsky, Noam (1973) ‘Conditions on transformations’ in Steven Anderson and Paul Kiparsky (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 232–86.
Chomsky, Noam (1975) Reflections on Language, New York: Pantheon.
Chomsky, Noam (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, Noam (1982) Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam (1992) ‘A minimalist program for linguistic theory’, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 1, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Chomsky, Noam (1995) The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam (2008) ‘On phases’ in Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.) Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 133–66.
Cinque, Guglielmo (1999) Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo (
2004a) ‘
Issues in adverbial syntax’,
Lingua 114:
683–710.
Cinque, Guglielmo (2004b) ‘Restructuring and functional structure’ in Adriana Belletti (ed.) Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. III, Oxford University Press, pp. 132–91.
Citko, Barbara (2011) Symmetry in Syntax: Merge, Move and Label (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics), Cambridge University Press.
Colarusso, John (1979) ‘Rightward movement, question formation and the nature of transformational processes: the Circassian case’, Papiere zur Linguistik 21: 27–73.
Corver, Norbert (1997) ‘The internal syntax of the Dutch extended adjectival projection’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 289–368.
Corver, Norbert and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (1997) ‘The position of the head and the domain of scrambling’ in Bohumil Palek (ed.) Typology: Prototypes, Item Orderings and Universals, Prague: The Carolinum Press, pp. 57–90.
Costa, João (1998) Word Order Variation: A Constrained Approach, The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
Croft, William (2009) ‘Language use and the evolution of languages’ in Kenny Smith and Philippe Binder (eds.) The Language Phenomenon, Berlin: Springer.
Dahl, Östen (1979) ‘Typology of sentence negation’, Linguistics 17: 79–106.
Darwin, Charles (1871) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation with Sex, London: John Murray, Albemarle Street.
Deacon, Terrence W. (1997) The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain, New York: Norton.
Dehé, Nicole (2002) Particle Verbs in English, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Delbrück, Berthold (1901) Grundfragen der Sprachforschung, Straßburg: Trübner.
Delfitto, Denis, Antonio Fábregas and Chiara Melloni (2008) Compounding at the Interfaces, unpublished ms., University of Verona and CASTL, University of Tromsö.
Dennet, Daniel C. (2002) ‘The new replicators’ in Mark Pagel (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Evolution, vol. I, Oxford University Press, pp. E83–E92.
Devitt, Michael (2006) Ignorance of Language, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Diesing, Molly (1997) ‘Yiddish VP order and the typology of object movement in Germanic’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 369–427.
den Dikken, Marcel (1992) Particles, doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden [published 1995 OxfordUniversity Press].
DiSciullo, Anna Maria (ed.) (2003) Asymmetry in Grammar, 2 vols, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Donohue, Mark and Søren Wichmann (2009) External Pressure Prompts Language Change: A Polynesian Case Study, ms., Monash University and MPI for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig.
Downing, Bruce (1978) ‘Some universals of relative clause structure’ in Joseph Greenberg (ed.) Universals of Human Language, vol. IV: Syntax, Stanford University Press, pp. 375–418.
Dressler, Wolfgang U. (1988) ‘Preferences vs. strict universals in morphology: word-based rules’ in Michael Hammond and Michael Noonan (eds.) Theoretical Morphology. Approaches in Modern Linguistics, New York: Academic Press, pp. 143–54.
Dryer, Matthew S. (
1988) ‘Universals of negative position’ in
Michael Hammond,
Edith Moravcsik and
Jessica Wirth (eds.)
Studies in Syntactic Typology,
Amsterdam:
Benjamins, pp. 93–124.
Dryer, Matthew S. (2009) ‘The branching direction theory of word order correlations revisited’ in Sergio Scalise, Elisabetta Magni and Antonietta Bisetto (eds.) Universals of Language Today (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 76), Berlin: Springer, pp. 185–207.
Dryer, Matthew S. (2011) ‘Position of negative morpheme with respect to subject, object, and verb’ in Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 144. Available online: wals.info/chapter/144 (last accessed on 2 July 2012).
Edelman, Gerald M. (1998) ‘Building a picture of the brain’, Dædalus 127: 37–69.
Emonds, Joseph (1985) A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories, Dordrecht, Foris.
Ernst, Thomas (1984) Towards an Integrated Theory of Adverb Positions in English, Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana.
Ernst, Thomas (2002) The Syntax of Adjuncts, CambridgeUniversity Press.
Evers, Arnold (1975) The Transformational Cycle in Dutch and German, doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht (distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana).
Falk, Cecilia (1990) ‘On double-object constructions’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 46: 53–100.
Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman and Wim van der Wurff (2000) The Syntax of Early English, Cambridge University Press.
Fortmann, Christian (2007) ‘Bewegungsresistente Verben’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 26: 1–40.
Fox, Danny and David Pesetsky (2005) ‘Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure’, Theoretical Linguistics 31: 1–45.
Fraser, Bruce (2000) Syntax, Semantics, and the Justification of Linguistic Methodology: An Investigation into the Source and Nature of the Disagreement Between Noam Chomsky and W.V.O. Quine, dissertation, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Boston University.
Frazier, Lyn (1985) ‘Syntactic complexity’ in David Dowty, Lauri Karttunen and Arnold Zwicky (eds.) Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational and Theoretical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, pp.129–89.
Frazier, Lyn (1987) ‘Sentence processing: a tutorial review’ in Max Coltheart (ed.) Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 559–86.
Frey, Werner (1993) Syntaktische Bedingungen für die semantische Interpretation (Studia Grammatica 35), Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Frey, Werner (2003) ‘Syntactic conditions on adjunct classes’ in Ewald Lang, Claudia Maienborn and Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen (eds.) Modifying Adjuncts, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 163–209.
Frey, Werner and Karin Pittner (1998) ‘Zur Positionierung von Adverbialen’, Linguistische Berichte 176: 489–534.
Frey, Werner and Karin Pittner (1999) ‘Adverbialpositionen im Deutsch-Englischen Vergleich’ in Monika Doherty (ed.) Sprachspezifische Aspekte der Informationsverarbeitung (Studia Grammatica 47), Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 14–40.
Fukui, Naoki and Yuji Takano (1998) ‘Symmetry in syntax: merge and demerge’, Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 27–86.
Geerts, Guido, Walter Haeseryn, Jaap de Rooij and Maarten C. van den Toorn (1984) Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
Geilfuß, Jochen (1991) ‘Jiddisch als SOV-Sprache’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 9: 170–83.
Gibson, Edward (1991) A Computational Theory of Human Language Processing: Memory Limitations and Processing Breakdown, Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg.
Grimshaw, Jane and Armin Mester (1988) ‘Light verbs and theta-marking’, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 205–32.
Groseclose, Mike (1998) ‘Formation of compounds in Spanish and German’, paper presented at GLAC 4 Conference, Ohio State University, 19 April 1998.
Haegeman, Liliane (2001) ‘Antisymmetry and verb-final order in West Flemish’, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3: 207–32.
Haeseryn, Walter, J. de Rooij, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij and Maarten C. van den Toorn (1997) Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst (tweede geheel herziene druk), Groningen/Deurne: Martinus Nijhoff/Wolters Plantyn.
Haider, Hubert (1985) ‘The case of German’ in Jindrich Toman (ed.) Studies in German Grammar, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 65–101.
Haider, Hubert (1986) ‘Affect alpha’, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 113–26.
Haider, Hubert (1990) ‘Topicalization and other puzzles of German syntax’ in Günther Grewendorf and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.) Scrambling and Barriers, Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 93–112.
Haider, Hubert (1991) ‘Die menschliche Sprachfähigkeit – exaptiv und kognitiv opak’, Kognitionswissenschaft 2: 11–26.
Haider, Hubert (1992) ‘Branching and discharge’, Working Papers of the SFB 340, #23, Univ. Stuttgart and Tübingen and IBM Heidelberg [reprinted in Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert and Jane Grimshaw (eds.) (2000) Lexical Specification and Insertion, Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 135–64].
Haider, Hubert (1993) Deutsche Syntax, generativ – Vorstudien zur Theorie einer projektiven Grammatik, Tübingen: Narr.
Haider, Hubert (1995a) ‘Downright down to the right’ in Uli Lutz and Jürgen Pafel (eds.) On Extraction and Extraposition in German, Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 145–271.
Haider, Hubert (1995b) ‘The basic branching conjecture’, Studies on Phrase Structure and Economy. Working Papers of the SFB 340 (University of Stuttgart, University of Tübingen and IBM Heidelberg) 70: 3–31.
Haider, Hubert (1996) ‘Wenn die Semantik arbeitet – und die Syntax sie gewähren läßt’ in Gisela Harras and Manfred Bierwisch (eds.) Wenn die Semantik arbeitet, Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 7–27.
Haider, Hubert (1997a) ‘Extraposition’ in Dorothee Beerman, David LeBlanc and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.) Rightward Movement, Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 115–51.
Haider, Hubert (
1997b) ‘
Precedence among predicates’,
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1:
3–41.
Haider, Hubert (1997c) ‘Scrambling – locality, economy, and directionality’ in Shigeo Tonoike (ed.) Scrambling, Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers (Linguistics Workshop Series 5), pp. 61–91.
Haider, Hubert (1997d) ‘Typological implications of a directionality constraint on projections’ in Artemis Alexiadou and Tracy A. Hall (eds.) Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation, Amsterdam: Benjamins (Linguistics Today 13), pp. 17–33.
Haider, Hubert (1997e) ‘Economy in syntax is projective economy’ in Chris Wilder, Hans-Martin Gaertner and Manfred Bierwisch (eds.) The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory, (Studia Grammatica 40) Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 205–26.
Haider, Hubert (1997f) ‘Towards a superior account of superiority’, Working Papers of the Sonderforschungsbereich 340 (Univ. of Stuttgart, Univ. of Tübingen, IBM Heidelberg) 76: 327–9.
Haider, Hubert (1998) ‘Form follows function fails – as a direct explanation for properties of grammars’ in Paul Weingartner, Gerhard Schurz and Georg Dorn (eds.) The Role of Pragmatics in Contemporary Philosophy, Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, pp. 92–108.
Haider, Hubert (1999) ‘On the survival of the fittest grammar (theory)’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18: 216–18.
Haider, Hubert (2000a) ‘Adverb placement – convergence of structure and licensing’, Theoretical Linguistics 26: 95–134.
Haider, Hubert (2000b) ‘OV is more basic than VO’ in Peter Svenonius (ed.) The Derivation of VO and OV, Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 45–67.
Haider, Hubert (2000c) ‘The license to license’ in Eric Reuland (ed.) Argument and Case: Explaining Burzio’s Generalization, Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 31–54.
Haider, Hubert (2000d) ‘Towards a superior account of superiority’ in Uli Lutz, Gereon Müller and Arnim von Stechow (eds.) Wh-scope Marking, Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 231–48.
Haider, Hubert (2001a) ‘Not every why has a wherefore – notes on the relation between form and function’ in Walter Bisang (ed.) Aspects of Typology and Universals, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 37–52.
Haider, Hubert (2001b) ‘Why are there no complex head-initial compounds?’ in Chris Schaner-Wolles, John Rennison and Friedrich Neubart (eds.) Naturally!, Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier, pp. 165–74.
Haider, Hubert (2001c) ‘Prosodic signals for reconstructing the basic item order. On the interplay between structure and prosody’ in Bohumil Palek and Osamu Fujimura (eds.) Item Order: Its Variety and Linguistic and Phonetic Consequences, Proceedings of LP 2000, Prague: The Karolinum Press, pp. 347–66.
Haider, Hubert (2002) ‘Adverbials at the syntax–semantics interface’ in Hans Kamp and Uwe Reyle (eds.) How We Say WHEN It Happens, Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 53–70.
Haider, Hubert (2003) ‘V-clustering and clause union: causes and effects’ in Pieter Seuren and Gerard Kempen (eds.) Verb Constructions in German and Dutch, Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 91–126.
Haider, Hubert (
2004a) ‘The superiority conspiracy’ in
Arthur Stepanov,
Gisbert Fanselow and
Ralf Vogel (eds.)
The Minimal Link Condition,
Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 147–75.
Haider, Hubert (2004b) ‘Pre and postverbal adverbials in VO and OV’, Lingua 114(6): 779–807.
Haider, Hubert (2005) ‘How to turn German into Icelandic – and derive the VO – OV contrasts’, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8: 1–53.
Haider, Hubert (2009) ‘The thin line between facts and fiction’ in Sam Featherston and Susanne Winkler (eds.) The Fruits of Empirical Linguistics, vol. I: Process, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 75–102.
Haider, Hubert (2010a) The Syntax of German, Cambridge University Press.
Haider, Hubert (2010b) ‘Wie wurde Deutsch OV? Zur diachronen Dynamik eines Strukturparameters der germanischen Sprachen’ in Arne Ziegler (ed.) Historische Textgrammatik und Historische Syntax des Deutschen – Traditionen, Innovationen, Perspektiven, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 11–32.
Haider, Hubert (2011) ‘Grammatische Illusionen, lokal wohlgeformt, global deviant’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 30(2): 223–57.
Haider, Hubert (forthcoming) ‘Cognitive evolution – why language systems are society-based and usage-friendly adaptations of robust, autonomous, structural systems’, in Aria Adli, Marco García García and Göz kanfmann (eds.) System, Usage, and Society. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
Haider, Hubert, Sue Olsen and Sten Vikner (eds.) (1995) Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Haider, Hubert and Inger Rosengren (1998) Scrambling, (Sprache und Pragmatik 49) Lund: Germanistisches Institut, University of Lund.
Haider, Hubert and Inger Rosengren (2003) ‘Scrambling – non-triggered chain formation in OV languages’, Journal of Germanic Linguistics 15: 203–67.
Haider, Hubert and Luka Szucsich (forthcoming) ‘Scrambling and V-positioning in Slavic languages – exceptionally VO or regular T3?’ in Kristine Bentzen, Roland Hinterhoelzl, Augustin Speyer and Luka Szucsich (eds.) Word order variation and typology. Berlin: De Guyter.
Han, Chung-Hye, Jeffrey Lidz and Julien Musolino (2007) ‘V-Raising and grammar competition in Korean: evidence from negation and quantifier scope’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 1–47.
Hawkins, John A. (1994) A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency, CambridgeUniversity Press.
Herslund, Michael (1986) ‘The double-object construction in Danish’ in Lars Hellan and Kirsti Koch-Christensen (eds.) Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 125–47.
Hoeksema, Jack (1992) ‘The head parameter in morphology and syntax’ in Dicky G. Gilbers and S. Looyenga (eds.) Language and Cognition II (Yearbook of the research group for linguistic theory and knowledge representation of the University of Groningen), Groningen: De Passage, pp. 119–32.
Hoekstra, Teun (1988) ‘Small clause results’, Lingua 74: 101–39.
Höhle, Tilman N. (1991) Projektionsstufen bei V-Projektionen, unpublished ms., University of Tübingen.
Hoji, Hajime (1985) Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structures in Japanese, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.
Holmberg, Anders (
1999) ‘
Remarks on Holmberg’s Generalization’,
Studia Linguistica 53(1):
1–39.
Holmberg, Anders (2000) ‘Deriving OV order in Finnish’ in Peter Svenonius (ed.) The Derivation of VO and OV, Oxford University Press, pp. 123–52.
Holmberg, Anders (2012) ‘Verb second’ in Tibor Kiss and Artemis Alexiadou (eds.) Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (HSK Series), 2nd edition, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Holmberg, Anders and Christer Platzack (1995) The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax, OxfordUniversity Press.
Horvath, Julia and Tal Siloni (2002) ‘Against the little-v hypothesis’, Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 27: 107–22.
Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg (2000) Word Order Change in Icelandic. From OV to VO, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Huang, James C.-T. (1982) Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Jackendoff, Ray (1990) ‘On Larson’s account of the double-object construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 427–56.
Jacobson, Pauline (1987) ‘Phrase structure, grammatical relations, and discontinuous constituents’ in Geoffrey J. Huck and Almerindo E. Ojeda (eds.) Discontinuous Constituency (Syntax and Semantics 20), New York: Academic Press, pp. 27–69.
Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle (1993) From Discourse to Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Karl, Susanne (2010) Erwerb deverbaler Rektionskomposita, Master’s thesis, Dept. of Linguistics, University of Salzburg.
Katamba, Francis (1993) Morphology, London: Macmillan.
Kayne, Richard S. (1984) Connectedness and Binary Branching, Dordrecht: Foris.
Kayne, Richard S. (1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, Richard S. (1998) ‘Overt vs. covert movement’, Syntax 1: 128–91.
Kayne, Richard S. (2005) ‘Antisymmetry and Japanese’ in Richard Kayne Movement and Silence, Oxford University Press, pp. 215–40.
Kenstowicz, Michael (1987) ‘The phonology and syntax of wh-expressions in Tagale’, Phonology Yearbook 4: 229–41.
Keyser, Samuel J. and Tom Roeper (1992) ‘Re: the abstract clitic hypothesis’ Linguistic Inquiry 23: 89–125.
Kinsella, Anna R. and Gary F. Marcus (2009) ‘Evolution, perfection, and theories of language’, Biolinguistics 3(2–3): 186–212.
Kiparsky, Paul (1996) ‘The shift to head-initial VP in Germanic’ in Höskuldur Thraínsson, Samuel Epstein and Steve Peter (eds.) Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 140–79.
Kiss, Katalin É. (2002) The Syntaxof Hungarian, Cambridge University Press.
Koch, Wolfgang and Inger Rosengren (1995) ‘Secondary predication’, Sprache und Grammatik 35, Lund: University of Lund.
Koopman, Hilda (1984) The Syntax of Verbs, Dordrecht: Foris.
Koopman, Hilda and Anna Szabolcsi (2000) Verbal Complexes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Koster, Jan (1988) The Residual SOV Structure of English, ms., University of Groningen.
Koster, Jan (
1989) ‘Left–right asymmetries in the Dutch complementizer system’ in
Dany Jaspers,
Wim Klosters,
Yvan Putsys and
Pieter Seuren (eds.)
Sentential Complementation and the Lexicon,
Dordrecht:
Foris, pp. 171–82.
Koster, Jan (2000) ‘Pied piping and the word orders of English and Dutch’ in Masako Hirotani, A. Coetzee, N. Hall and J.-Y. Kim (Hg.), Proceedings of the NELS 30, GLSA, Amherst, pp. 415–26.
Koster, Jan (
2001) ‘Mirror symmetry in Dutch’ in Marc van Oostendorp and Elena Anagnostopoulou (eds.)
Grammar in Progress: Articles Presented at the 20th Anniversary of the Comparison of Grammatical Models Group in Tilburg. Available online:
www.meertens.knaw.nl/books/progressingrammar/ (last accessed 3 July 2012).
Kratzer, Angelika (2005) ‘Building resultatives’ in Claudia Maienborn and Angelika Wöllstein (eds.) Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications, Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 177–212.
Kress, Bruno (1982) Isländische Grammatik, Munich: Hueber.
Kroch, Anthony S. (1994) ‘Morphosyntactic variation’ in CLS 30/2: Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. II: The Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory, pp. 180–201.
Kroch, Anthony. S. and Ann Taylor (2000) ‘Verb-complement order in Middle English’ in Susan Pintzuk, G. Tsoulas and A. Warner (eds.) Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, Oxford University Press, pp. 132–63.
Kural, Murat (1997) ‘Postverbal constituents in Turkish and the Linear Correspondence Axiom’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 498–519.
Lakatos, Imre (1977) The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Volume 1, Cambridge University Press.
Larson, Richard (1988) ‘On the double-object construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–91.
Larson, Richard (1990) ‘Double-objects revisited: reply to Jackendoff’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 589–632.
Larson, Richard and Robert May (1990) ‘Antecedent containment or vacuous movement: reply to Baltin’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 103–22.
Li, Yafei (1990) ‘On V–V compounds in Chinese’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 177–207.
Liao, Wei-wen (2011) The Symmetry of Syntactic Relations, unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.
Lightfoot, David (1999) The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution, Malden, MA: Basil Blackwell.
Mahajan, Anoop (1997) ‘Toward a unified theory of scrambling’ in Norbert Corver and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.) Studies on Scrambling, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 301–30.
May, Robert (1985) Logical Form, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mayr, Ernst (1991) One Long Argument, CambridgeUniversity Press.
McCawley, James and K. Momoi (1986) ‘The constituent structure of -te complements’ in Shige-Yuki Kuroda (ed.) Working Papers from the First SDF Workshop in Japanese Syntax, La Jolla, Dept. of Linguistics, UC San Diego, pp. 97–116.
McCloskey, James (
1991) ‘
Clause structure, ellipsis and proper government in Irish’,
Lingua 85:
259–302.
McCloskey, James (2005) ‘Predicates and heads in Irish clausal syntax’ in Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley and Sheila Ann Dooley (eds.) Verb First: On the Syntax of Verb-Initial Languages, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 155–74.
Monachesi, Paola (1999) A Lexical Approach to Italian Cliticization (CSLI Lecture Notes 84), Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Montermini, Fabio (2008) ‘La composition en italien dans un cadre de morphologie lexematique’ in Dany Amiot (ed.) La composition dans une perspective typologique, Arras: Artois Presses Université, pp. 161–87.
Neeleman, Ad (1995) ‘Complex predicates in Dutch and English’ in Hubert Haider, Sue Olsen and Sten Vikner (eds.) Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 219–40.
Neeleman, Ad and Hans van de Koot (2002) ‘Bare resultatives’, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6(1): 1–52.
Neeleman, Ad and Fred Weerman (1993) ‘The balance between syntax and morphology: Dutch particles and resultatives’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 433–75.
Newmeyer, Frederick J. (2001) ‘Where is functional explanation?’ in Mary Andronis, Christopher Ball, Heidi Elston and Sylvain Neuvel (eds.) Papers from the Thirty-Seventh Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Part 2: The Panels, Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 99–122.
NewmeyerFrederick J. (2008) ‘Universals in syntax’, The Linguistic Review 25: 35–82.
Nilsen, Øystein (2003) Eliminating Positions: Syntax and Semantics of Sentential Modification, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Ordóñez, Francisco (1997) Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and Other Romance Languages, Ph.D. dissertation, CUNY Graduate Center, New York.
Ouhalla, Jamal (1991) Functional Categories and Parametric Variation, London: Routledge.
Palmer, Frank R. (1974) The English Verb, London: Longman.
Pesetsky, David (1995) Zero Syntax. Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Phillips, Colin (1995) ‘Right association in parsing and grammar’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (Papers on Language Processing and Acquisition), 26: 37–93.
Phillips, Colin (1999) Linear Order and Constituency, ms., University of Delaware (revised version 2003 in Linguistic Inquiry).
Phillips, Colin (2003) ‘Linear order and constituency’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 37–90.
Piera, Carlos (1995) ‘On compounding in English and Spanish’ in Hector Campos and Paula Kempchinsky (eds.) Evolution and Revolution in Linguistics. Essays in Honor of Carlos Otero, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 302–15.
Pinker, Steven and Ray Jackendoff (2005) ‘The faculty of language: what’s special about it?’, Cognition 95: 201–36.
Pintzuk, Susan (1991) Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Pintzuk, Susan (
1999)
Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order,
New York:
Garland (revised and expanded version of Pintzuk (1991)).
Pintzuk, Susan (2002) ‘Verb–object order in Old English: variation as grammatical competition’ in David Lightfoot (ed.) Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, Oxford University Press, pp. 276–99.
Pintzuk, Susan and Ann Taylor (2006) ‘The loss of OV order in the history of English’ in Ans van Kemenade and B. Los (eds.) The Handbook of the History of English, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 249–78.
Prell, Heinz Peter (2003) ‘Typologische Aspekte der Mittelhochdeutschen Prosasyntax. Der Elementarsatz und die Nominalphrase’ in Anja Lobenstein-Reichmann and Oskar Reichmann (eds.) Neue historische Grammatiken, Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 241–56.
Quine, Willard V. O. (1960) Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Quine, Willard V. O. (1970) ‘Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory’, Synthese 21 and 22: 386–98.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman.
Resnik, Philip (1992) ‘Left-corner parsing and psychological plausibility’ in Proceedings of Coling 92, pp. 191–7.
Ritter, Elizabeth and Sara Thomas Rosen (1993) ‘Deriving causation’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 519–55.
Rizzi, Luigi (1982) Issues in Italian Syntax, Dordrecht: Foris.
Rizzi, Luigi (1990) Relativized Minimality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roberts, Ian (1997) ‘Restructuring, head movement and locality’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 423–60.
Roberts, Ian (2000) ‘Caricaturing dissent’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 849–57.
Roeper, Thomas and William Snyder (2005) ‘Language learnability and the forms of recursion’ in Anna Maria DiSciullo and Roberto Delmonte (eds.) UG and External Systems: Language, Brain and Computation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 155–69.
Roeper, Thomas, William Snyder and Kazuko Hiramatsu (2002) ‘Learnability in a Minimalist framework: root compounds, merger, and the syntax–morphology interface’ in Inge Lasser (ed.) The Process of Language Acquisition, Frankfurt (Proceedings of the 1999 GALA Conference), Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur (1982) Um orðaröð og færslur í íslensku, Master’s thesis, Reykjavik: University of Iceland. [Published 1990 as vol. II of Málfræðirannsóknir, Málvísindastofnum Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík.]
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur (1996) ‘Word order variation in Old Icelandic’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 58: 55–86.
Saito, Mamoru (1994) ‘Additional wh-effects and the adjunction site theory’, Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3: 195–240.
Saito, Mamoru and Naoki Fukui (1998) ‘Order in phrase structure and movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 29: 439–74.
Sapir, Edward (1921) Language, New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Schallert, Oliver (2006) Hybride OV/VO Systeme und syntaktischer Wandel zu OV und VO in den germanischen Sprachen, Master’s thesis, FB Linguistik, University of Salzburg.
Schneider, David Andrew (
1999)
Parsing and Incrementality, Ph.D. dissertation,
University of Delaware, Newark.
Sells, Peter (1990) ‘VP in Japanese: evidence from -te complements’ in Hajime Hoji (ed.) Japanese Korean Linguistics, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 319–33.
Simpson, Jane (1983) ‘Resultatives’ in Lorraine Levin, Malka Rappaport and Annie Zaenen (eds.) Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club, pp. 143–57.
Singh, Uday N. (1980) ‘Bole: an unresolved problem in Bengali Syntax’, Indian Linguistics 41: 188–95.
Slezak, Peter (2009) ‘Linguistic explanation and psychological reality’, Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9: 3–21.
Speas, Margaret (1990) Phrase Structure in Natural Language, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Stabler, Edward P. (1991) ‘Avoid the pedestrian’s paradox’ in Robert C. Berwick (ed.) Principle-based Parsing: Computation and Psycholinguistics, Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 199–237.
Stabler, Edward P. (1994) ‘The finite connectivity of linguistic structure’ in Charles Clifton Jr., Lyn Frazier and Keith Rayner (eds.) Perspectives on Sentence Processing, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 303–36.
Stepanov, Arthur and Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai (2008) ‘Cartography and licensing of wh-adjuncts: a cross-linguistic perspective’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26(3): 589–638.
Stich, Stephen (1979) ‘Between Chomskyan rationalism and Popperian empiricism’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30(4): 329–47.
Stowell, Tim (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Stroik, Thomas (1990) ‘Adverbs as V-sisters’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 654–61.
Stroik, Thomas (1996) Minimalism, Scope, and VP Structure, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Svenonius, Peter (1996) ‘The optionality of the verb–particle construction’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 57: 47–75.
Svenonius, Peter (2003) ‘Swedish particles and directional prepositions’ in Lars-Olof Delsing, Cecilia Falk, Gunlög Josefsson and Halldór Ármann Sigurdsson (eds.) Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack, University of Lund, Dept. of Scandinavian Studies, pp. 343–51.
Szabolcsi, Anna and Frans Zwarts (1993) ‘Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope-taking’, Natural Language Semantics 1: 235–85.
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald (2000) ‘V-movement and VP-movement in derivations leading to VO-order’ in Peter, Svenonius (ed.) The Derivation of VO and OV, Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 97–122.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur (2010) ‘Predictable and unpredictable sources of variable verb and adverb placement in Scandinavian’, Lingua 120: 1,062–88.
Travis, Lisa (1984) Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Travis, Lisa (1989) ‘Parameters of phrase structure’ in Mark R. Baltin and Anthony S. Kroch (eds.) Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, University of Chicago Press, pp. 263–79.
Trips, Carola (2001) From OV to VO in Early Middle English, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Tuller, Laurie (1992) ‘The syntax of postverbal focus constructions in Chadic’, Natural Language and LinguisticTheory 10: 303–34.
Van Chình, Tru’o’ng (1970) Structure de la langue vietnamienne, Paris: Imprimerie nationale librairie orientaliste Paul Geuthner.
Van Kemenade, Ans (1987) Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vikner, Sten (1995) Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages, Oxford University Press.
Wilson, John and Alison Henry (1995) ‘Parameter setting within socially realistic linguistics’, Language in Society 27: 1–21.
Winkler, Susanne (1994) Secondary Predication in English: A Syntactic and Focus-Theoretic Approach, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tübingen.
Winkler, Susanne (1996) Focus and Secondary Predication, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wundt, Wilhelm (1888) ‘Selbstbeobachtung und innere Wahrnehmung’, Philosophische Studien 4: 292–309.
Wundt, Wilhelm (1901) Sprachgeschichte und Sprachpsychologie. Mit Rücksicht auf B. Delbrücks ‘Grundfragen der Sprachforschung’, Leipzig: Engelmann.
Wurmbrand, Susi (2006) ‘Verb clusters, verb raising, and restructuring’ in Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.) Syncom (The Blackwell Companion to Syntax), Chapter 75, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 227–341.
Yatsushiro, Kazuko (2000) ‘VP-internal scrambling’, Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, #160, University of Stuttgart, University of Tübingen, IBM Heidelberg.
Zaenen, A., J. Maling and H. Thráinsson (1985) ‘Case and grammatical functions: the Icelandic passive’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 441–83.
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (1993) Dutch Syntax: A Minimalist Approach, doctoral dissertation, Groningen University.
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (1996) Morphosyntax of Verb Movement: A Minimalist Approach to the Syntax of Dutch, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (1997) ‘The Germanic SOV languages and the Universal Base Hypothesis’ in Liliane Haegeman (ed.) The New Comparative Syntax, London: Longman, pp. 246–67.
