Current Practices in Quantitative Literacy

doi:10.5948/UPO9780883859780

This book is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core
Cited by 9
Cited by
- 9
Crossref Citations

This Book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Hillyard, Cinnamon 2007. Using Popular Culture to Teach Quantitative Reasoning. PRIMUS, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 36.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Pugalee, David K. Hartman, Kimberly J. and Forrester, Jennifer H. 2008. Performance of Middle Grade Students on Quantitative Tasks: A Beginning Dialogue on Quantitative Literacy in Middle Schools. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. 35.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

2010. Assessment Methods in Statistical Education. p. 259.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Roohr, Katrina Crotts Graf, Edith Aurora and Liu, Ou Lydia 2014. Assessing Quantitative Literacy in Higher Education: An Overview of Existing Research and Assessments With Recommendations for Next‐Generation Assessment. ETS Research Report Series, Vol. 2014, Issue. 2, p. 1.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Wilkins, Jesse L. M. 2015. Standards-based mathematics curricula and the promotion of quantitative literacy in elementary school. International Journal of STEM Education, Vol. 2, Issue. 1,

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Tunstall, Samuel Luke Matz, Rebecca L. and Craig, Jeffrey C. 2016. Quantitative Literacy Courses as a Space for Fusing Literacies. The Journal of General Education, Vol. 65, Issue. 3-4, p. 178.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Adler, Jacob J. 2018. Students “Tackle” Quantitative Literacy in their Science Communication with Real-World Football Activity. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, Vol. 19, Issue. 1,

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Wilder, Esther Isabelle 2020. Mentoring Faculty Through a Quantitative Reasoning Professional Development Program: Why Do Faculty Participate and What Do They Get Out of It?. The Journal of General Education, Vol. 69, Issue. 3-4, p. 208.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Croce, Keri‐Anne and K. McCormick, Montana 2020. Developing Disciplinary Literacy in Mathematics: Learning From Professionals Who Use Mathematics in Their Jobs. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, Vol. 63, Issue. 4, p. 415.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Edited by Rick Gillman, Valparaiso University

Publisher:: Mathematical Association of America
Online publication date:: February 2012
Print publication year:: 2006
Online ISBN:: 9780883859780
DOI:: https://doi.org/10.5948/UPO9780883859780

Subjects:: Mathematics (general), Mathematics
Series:: MAA Notes

Export citation

Information

Contents

Metrics

Current Practices in Quantitative Literacy present a wide sampling of efforts being made on campuses across the country to achieve our common goal of having a quantitatively literate citizenry. Colleges and universities have grappled with complicated issues in order to define quantitative literacy within their own communities and to implement appropriate curriculum. It is clear that any quantitative literacy program must be responsive to the local conditions of an institution including its mission, its student clientele, its history and its resources.

This volume presents innovative solutions to the challenges of producing quantitatively literate college students. With its strong utility for college educators, this volume makes a definite contribution to the field of mathematics education.

James Pelech Source: The Mathematics Teacher

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Total number of HTML views: 0

Total number of PDF views: 0 *

Loading metrics...

Total views: 0 *

Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

Current Practices in Quantitative Literacy

Book description

Reviews

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Save Search

Contents

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Book summary page views