Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Adorno's Practical Philosophy
  • Cited by 106
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
August 2013
Print publication year:
2013
Online ISBN:
9781139567763
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139567763
Subjects:
History of Philosophy, Twentieth-Century Philosophy, Ethics, Philosophy
Series:
Modern European Philosophy
Information

Book description

Adorno notoriously asserted that there is no 'right' life in our current social world. This assertion has contributed to the widespread perception that his philosophy has no practical import or coherent ethics, and he is often accused of being too negative. Fabian Freyenhagen reconstructs and defends Adorno's practical philosophy in response to these charges. He argues that Adorno's deep pessimism about the contemporary social world is coupled with a strong optimism about human potential, and that this optimism explains his negative views about the social world, and his demand that we resist and change it. He shows that Adorno holds a substantive ethics, albeit one that is minimalist and based on a pluralist conception of the bad - a guide for living less wrongly. His incisive study does much to advance our understanding of Adorno, and is also an important intervention into current debates in moral philosophy.

Reviews

'Freyenhagen has written a lucidly argued, patient, and relentless defense of Adorno's negative ethics that provides both an excellent addition to the secondary literature on Adorno, and, more importantly, a spirited intervention into current debates in contemporary moral philosophy. This work will be of interest to scholars and graduate students working in the area of moral philosophy, making available as never before the bold structures of Adorno's negative ethics, and with its clear and direct writing and argument, this work would be entirely suitable for advanced undergraduates.'

J. M. Bernstein - The New School for Social Research

'Fabian Freyenhagen has written an exceptionally clear, insightful, and comprehensive treatment of Adorno's intense dissatisfactions with modern societies. This is likely the best philosophical reconstruction of Adorno's actual, often unstated and unclear ‘moral theory' that we will ever get, and that certainly makes this an important book. Both defenders of Adorno and his critics will now have a much better picture of Adorno's basic normative commitments and why he felt entitled to them.'

Robert Pippin - University of Chicago

'Freyenhagen's diligence is extraordinary. Just about every proposition in Adorno's writings with normative import is painstakingly considered.'

Source: The Times Literary Supplement

'Freyenhagen offers a sustained and nuanced defence of what he calls Adorno's 'negativism'. Essentially an anti-utopian epistemology, it shows how radical social criticism is still possible despite the mystifying effects of oppressive social relations.'

Source: Marx and Philosophy Review of Books

'[An] intricate, tightly focused study … Recommended. Advanced graduate students and researchers.'

M. Donougho Source: Choice

'In this significant contribution concerning the practical concerns that orient Adorno’s overall project, Freyenhagen corrects the common understanding of Adorno as a melancholic, pessimistic thinker by reconsidering his engaged confrontations with the systematically produced pathologies of capitalistically and bureaucratically managed social life.'

Eric S. Nelson Source: Journal of the History of Philosophy

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References

Bibliography

Works by Adorno

Adorno, T. W. 1966. Negative Dialektik, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Repr. in 1970–: Vol. VI, 1–412; trans. E. B. Ashton as Negative Dialectics, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973. Alternative translation used: http://www.efn.org/~dredmond/ndtrans.html, last accessed 3 December 2012.
Adorno, T. W. 1970–. Gesammelte Schriften, 20 vols., ed. R. Tiedemann, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Adorno, T. W. 1971. Erziehung zur Mündigkeit: Vorträge und Gespräche mit Hellmut Becker 1959–1969, ed. G. Kadelbach, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Adorno, T. W. 1974. Philosophische Terminologie: Zur Einleitung, Band 2, ed. R. zur Lippe, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Adorno, T. W. 1977. ‘The Actuality of Philosophy’, Telos 10, 1: 120–33.
Adorno, T. W. 1978. Minima Moralia, trans. E. F. N. Jephcott, London: NLB, [1974]; repr. London: Verso.
Adorno, T. W. 1982. Against Epistemology: A Metacritique: Studies in Husserl and the Phenomenological Antinomies, trans. W. Domingo, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Adorno, T. W. 1984. ‘Essay as Form’, trans. B. Hullot-Kentor and F. Will, New German Critique 32: 151–71.
Adorno, T. W. 1989. ‘Society’, in S. E. Bronner and D. M. Kellner (eds.), Critical Theory and Society: A Reader, New York: Routledge, 267–75.
Adorno, T. W. 1993a. Einleitung in die Soziologie, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Trans. E. Jephcott as Introduction to Sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.
Adorno, T. W. 1993b. Hegel: Three Studies, trans. S. Weber Nicholson, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Adorno, T. W. 1995. Kants ‘Kritik der reinen Vernunft’ (1959), ed. R. Tiedemann, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Trans. R. Livingstone as Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.
Adorno, T. W. 1996. Probleme der Moralphilosophie (1963), ed. T. Schröder, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Trans. R. Livingstone as Problems of Moral Philosophy, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.
Adorno, T. W. 1998a. Critical Models, trans. H. W. Pickford, New York: Columbia University Press.
Adorno, T. W. 1998b. Metaphysik: Begriff und Probleme (1965), ed. R. Tiedemann, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Trans. E. Jephcott as Metaphysics: Concepts and Problems, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.
Adorno, T. W. 2001. Zur Lehre von der Geschichte und der Freiheit (1964/65), ed. R. Tiedemann, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Trans. R. Livingstone as History and Freedom, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006.
Adorno, T. W. 2003a. Can One Live after Auschwitz? A Philosophical Reader, ed. R. Tiedemann, trans. R. Livingstone et al., Stanford University Press.
Adorno, T. W. 2003b. Vorlesung über Negative Dialektik: Fragmente der Vorlesung 1965/66, ed. R. Tiedemann, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Trans. R. Livingstone as Lectures on Negative Dialectics, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008.
Adorno, T. W. 2004. Aesthetic Theory, trans. R. Hullot-Kentor, London: Athlone, [1997]; repr. London: Continuum.
Adorno, T. W.Probleme der Moralphilosophie (1956/7), unpublished manuscript, Adorno Archiv Vo1289–1520, Frankfurt am Main.
Adorno, T. W. and Becker, H. 1983. ‘Education for Autonomy’ [1969], Telos 56: 103–10.
Adorno, T. W. and Gehlen, A. 1983. ‘Ist die Soziologie eine Wissenschaft vom Menschen?’, repr. in Grenz 1983: 225–51.
Adorno, T. W. and Haselberg, P. von 1983. ‘On the Historical Adequacy of Consciousness’ [1965], Telos 56: 97–103.
Adorno, T. W. and Horkheimer, M. [1944, 1947] 1972. Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. J. Cumming, New York: Herder and Herder.
Adorno, T. W. et al. 1976. The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, trans. G. Adey and D. Frisby, New York (etc.): Harper & Row.

General bibliography

Allison, H. 1990. Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge University Press.
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, Philosophy 33: 1–19.
Aquinas, St Thomas [c.1265–73] 1947. Summa Theologica, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province, New York: Benziger Brothers.
Arendt, H. [1963] 1994. Eichmann in Jerusalem, London: Penguin.
Arneson, R. J. 1994. ‘Autonomy and Preference Formation’, in J. L. Coleman and A. Buchanan (eds.), In Harm’s Way: Essays in Honor of Joel Feinberg, Cambridge University Press.
Arpaly, N. 2000. ‘On Acting Rationally against One’s Best Judgment’, Ethics 110, 3: 488–513.
Arpaly, N. 2003. Unprincipled Virtue: An Enquiry into Moral Agency, Oxford University Press.
Badiou, A. [1998] 2001. Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil, trans. P. Hallward, London: Verso. [French orig., L’Éthique: Essai sur la conscience du mal, Paris: Éditions Hatier, 1998.]
Bahr, E. 1978. ‘The Anti-Semitism Studies of the Frankfurt School: The Failure of Critical Theory’, German Studies Review 1, 2: 125–38.
Barnes, J. (ed.) 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, 2 vols., Princeton University Press.
Bauman, Z. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Benhabib, S. 1986. Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory, Guildford, NY: Columbia University Press.
Benhabib, S. 2009. ‘From “The Dialectic of Enlightenment” to “The Origins of Totalitarianism” and the Genocide Convention: Adorno and Horkheimer in the Company of Arendt and Lemkin’, in W. Breckman, P. E. Gordon, A. D. Moses, S. Moyn, and E. Neaman (eds.), The Modernist Imagination: Intellectual History and Critical Theory, Oxford: Berghahn Books, 299–330.
Bennett, J. 1974. ‘The Conscience of Huckleberry Finn’, Philosophy 49: 123–34.
Bennett, J. 1984. ‘Kant’s Theory of Freedom’, in A. W. Wood (ed.), Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 102–12.
Berman, R. A. 1983. ‘Adorno’s Radicalism: Two Interviews from the Sixties’, Telos 56: 94–7.
Berman, R. A. 2002. ‘Adorno’s Politics’, in Gibson and Rubin 2002: Ch. 5.
Bernstein, J. M. 2001. Adorno: Disenchantment & Ethics, Cambridge University Press.
Bloch, E. 1978. Tendenz – Latenz – Utopie, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Bolton, G. 2008. Aid and Other Dirty Business: How Good Intentions Have Failed the World’s Poor, London: Ebury Press.
Brecht, B. 1967. Gesammelte Werke, 20 vols., Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Brecht, B. 1976. Poems, ed. J. Willett and R. Manheim with the co-operation of E. Fried, London: Eyre Methuen.
Breuer, S. 1985. ‘Adorno’s Anthropology’, Telos 64: 15–31.
Browning, C. 1992. Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland, New York: HarperCollins.
Brunkhorst, H. 1999. Adorno and Critical Theory, Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Butler, J. 2003. Kritik der ethischen Gewalt, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Canguilhem, G. [1966] 1989. The Normal and the Pathological, trans. C. R. Fawcett with R. S. Cohen, New York: Zone Books.
Cohen, G. A. 1988. History, Labour and Freedom: Themes from Marx, Oxford University Press.
Cook, D. 2011. Adorno on Nature, Durham: Acumen Press.
Cornell, D. 1987. ‘The Ethical Message of Negative Dialectics’, Social Concept 4, 1: 3–38.
Dews, P. 1995. ‘Adorno, Poststructuralism and the Critique of Identity’, in The Limits of Disenchantment: Essays on Contemporary European Philosophy, London: Verso, 19–38.
Dews, P. 2008. The Idea of Evil, Oxford: Blackwell.
Durkheim, E. [1897] 1989. Suicide: A Study in Sociology, ed. G. Simpson, trans. J. A. Spaulding and G. Simpson, London: Routledge.
Easterly, W. 2006. The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good, Oxford University Press.
Elster, J. 1985. Making Sense of Marx, Cambridge University Press.
Fink, H. 2006. ‘Three Sorts of Naturalism’, European Journal of Philosophy 14, 2: 202–21.
Finlayson, J. G. 2002. ‘Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable’, European Journal of Philosophy 10, 1: 1–25.
Foot, P. 1978. Virtues and Vices, Oxford: Blackwell.
Foot, P. 2001. Natural Goodness, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Frankfurt, H. 1969. ‘Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility’, Journal of Philosophy 66, 23: 829–39.
Freyenhagen, F. 2006. ‘Adorno’s Negative Dialectics of Freedom’, Philosophy & Social Criticism 32, 3: 429–40.
Freyenhagen, F. 2008. ‘Reasoning Takes Time: On Allison and the Timelessness of the Intelligible Self’, Kantian Review 13, 2: 67–84.
Freyenhagen, F. 2009. ‘No Easy Way Out: Adorno’s Negativism and the Problem of Normativity’, in S. Giacchetti Ludovisi (ed.), Nostalgia for a Redeemed Future: Critical Theory, Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.
Freyenhagen, F. 2011a. ‘Adorno’s Ethics Without the Ineffable’, Telos 155: 127–49.
Freyenhagen, F. 2011b. ‘Empty, Useless, and Dangerous? Recent Kantian Replies to the Empty Formalism Objection’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 63: 163–86.
Freyenhagen, F. 2012. ‘Adorno’s Politics: Theory and Praxis in Germany in the 1960s’, unpublished.
Früchtl, J. 1991. ‘“Moral begründen ist schwer”: Die Rolle der Mitleidsethik bei Adorno und Habermas’, Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 72: 36–44.
Früchtl, J. 1993. ‘“Leben wie ein gutes Tier” Ethik zwischen Mitleid und Diskurs’, Deutsche Zeitung für Philosophie 41, 6: 981–94.
Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C. (eds.) 1948. From Max Weber, London: Routledge.
Geuss, R. 2005. Outside Ethics, Princeton University Press.
Geuss, R. 2010. Politics and the Imagination, Princeton University Press.
Gibson, N. and Rubin, A. (eds.) 2002. Adorno: A Critical Reader, Oxford: Blackwell.
Goethe, J. W. von 1964. Selected Verse, trans. D. Luke, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Goodin, R. E. 1995. ‘Political Ideals and Political Practice’, British Journal of Political Science 25: 37–56.
Grenz, F. 1983. Adornos Philosophie in Grundbegriffen: Auflösung einiger Deutungsprobleme, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Günther, K. 1985. ‘Dialektik der Aufklärung in der Idee der Freiheit: Zur Kritik des Freiheitsbegriffs bei Adorno’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 29: 229–60.
Habermas, J. 1983. Philosophical-Political Profiles, trans. F. G. Lawrence, London: Heinemann.
Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. I: Reason, and the Rationalization of Society, trans. T. McCarthy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, trans. F. G. Lawrence, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. 2005. ‘“Ich selber bin ja ein Stück Natur” – Adorno über die Naturverflochtenheit der Vernunft: Überlegungen zum Verhältnis von Freiheit und Unverfügbarkeit’, in A. Honneth (ed.), Dialektik der Freiheit: Frankfurter Adorno-Konferenz 2003, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 13–40.
Hampshire, S. 1992. Innocence and Experience, London: Penguin Books.
Han-Pile, B. 2011. ‘Nietzsche and Amor Fati’, European Journal of Philosophy 19, 2: 224–61.
Hegel, G. W. F. [1837, 1840] 1975. Lectures on the Philosophy of World History: Introduction, trans. H. B. Nisbet, Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. [1807] 1977. The Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller, Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. [1821] 1991. Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, ed. A. Wood, trans. H. B. Nisbet, Cambridge University Press.
Herman, B. 1993. The Practice of Moral Judgement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Herman, B. 2007. Moral Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hill, T. E., Jr, 1992. Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Honneth, A. 1995. The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy, ed. C. Wright, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Horkheimer, M. [1937] 1972. ‘Traditional and Critical Theory’ (including ‘Postscript’), trans. M. J. O‘Connell in Critical Theory: Selected Essays, New York: Herder and Herder, 188–252.
Huhn, T. (ed.) 2004. Cambridge Companion to Adorno, Cambridge University Press.
Hume, D. [1748, 1751] 1975. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge, 3rd edn, rev. P. H. Nidditch, Oxford University Press.
Hume, D. [1739, 1740] 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge, 2nd edn, rev. P. H. Nidditch, Oxford University Press.
Ibsen, H. [1884] 1960. The Wild Duck: A Play in Five Acts, trans. J. W. McFarlane, Oxford University Press.
Jaeggi, R. 2005. ‘“No Individual Can Resist”: Minima Moralia as Critique of Forms of Life’, Constellations 12, 1 (March 2005): 65–82.
James, A. 2005. ‘Constructing Justice for Existing Practice: Rawls and the Status Quo’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 33: 281–316.
Jarvis, S. 1998. Adorno: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jay, M. 1980. ‘The Jews and the Frankfurt School: Critical Theory’s Analysis of Anti-Semitism’, New German Critique 19: 137–49.
Jay, M. 1984. Adorno, London: Fontana.
Jütten, T. 2012. ‘Adorno on Kant, Freedom and Determinism’, European Journal of Philosophy 20, 4: 548–74.
Kant, I. 1900–. Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Deutsche (formerly Königlich-Preussische) Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter (and predecessors).
Kant, I. 1996. Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. M. J. Gregor, Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. 1998. Religion within the Bounds of Mere Reason and other Writings, trans. and ed. A. Wood and G. di Giovanni, Cambridge University Press.
Kennedy, D. 2004. The Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism, Princeton University Press.
Kluge, A. and Negt, O. [1972] 1976. Öffentlichkeit und Erfahrung, 4th edn, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Knoll, M. 2002. Theodor W. Adorno: Ethik als erste Philosophie, Munich: Wilhelm Fink.
Kohlmann, U. 1997. Dialektik der Moral:Untersuchungen zur Moralphilosophie Adornos, Lüneburg: zu Klampen.
Korsgaard, C. 1996. Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge University Press.
Korsgaard, C. et al. 1996. The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge University Press.
Krahl, H. J. 1975. ‘The Political Contradiction in Adorno’s Critical Theory’, Sociological Review 23, 4: 831–4.
Lenman, J. 1999. ‘Michael Smith and the Daleks: Reason, Morality, and Contingency’, Utilitas 11, 2: 164–77.
Lenman, J. 2005. ‘The Saucer of Mud, the Kudzu Vine and the Uxorious Cheetah: Against Neo-Aristotelian Naturalism in Metaethics’, European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 1, 2: 37–50.
Levi, P. [1958] 1996. If This is a Man, in If This is a Man, The Truce, trans. of 1958 reprint by S. Woolf, London: Vintage. [Ital. orig., Se questo è un uomo, Turin: F. de Silva, 1947; repr. Einaudi,1958.]
Lukács, G. [1923] 1971a. History and Class Consciousness, trans. R. Livingstone, London: Merlin Press.
Lukács, G. [1916] 1971b. The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature, trans. from the German by Anna Bostock, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McDowell, J. 1994. Mind and World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McDowell, J. 1998. Mind, Value and Reality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
MacIntyre, A. [1981] 1985. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd edn, London: Duckworth.
MacIntyre, A. [1967] 1998. A Short History of Ethics: A History of Moral Philosophy from the Homeric Age to the Twentieth Century, 2nd edn, London, Routledge.
MacIntyre, A. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals, London: Duckworth.
Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, London: Penguin.
Marcuse, H. [1964] 1968. One-Dimensional Man, London: Sphere Books.
Maren, M. 1997. The Road to Hell: The Ravaging Effects of Foreign Aid and International Charity, New York: The Free Press.
Margalit, A. 2011. ‘Why Are You Betraying Your Class?’, European Journal of Philosophy 19, 2: 171–83.
Marrus, M. R. 1989. The Holocaust in History, London: Penguin.
Martin, W. 2009. ‘Ought but Cannot’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109, 2: 103–28.
Marx Engels Collected Works [MECW]. 1975–2005. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Marx Engels Werke [MEW]. 1956–90. Berlin: Dietz.
Menke, C. 2004. ‘Genealogy and Critique: Two Forms of Ethical Questioning of Morality’, in Huhn 2004: Ch. 12.
Menke, C. 2005. ‘Virtue and Reflection: The “Antinomies of Moral Philosophy”’, Constellations 12, 1: 36–49.
Meyers, D. 2004. Being Yourself: Essays on Identity, Action, and Social Life, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Moyo, D. 2009. Dead Aid: Why Aid is Not Working and How There is Another Way for Africa, London: Allen Lane.
Müller-Dohm, S. 2005. Adorno: An Intellectual Biography, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Nagel, T. 1986. The View from Nowhere, Oxford University Press.
Narveson, J. 2002. ‘Collective Responsibility’, The Journal of Ethics 6: 179–98.
Nietzsche, F. 1979. Philosophy and Truth: Selections from Nietzsche’s Notebook of the Early 1870s, trans. and ed. D. Breazeale, Sussex: Harvester Press.
Nietzsche, F. 1980. Sämtliche Werke, Kritische Studienausgabe in 15 Bänden, ed. Giorgio Colli and Mazzino Montinari, Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch.
Noerr, G. Schmid 1995. ‘Adornos Verhältnis zur Mitleidsethik Schopenhauers’, in G. Schweppenhäuser and M. Wischke (eds.), Impulse und Negativität: Ethik and Ästhetik bei Adorno, Hamburg: Argument, 13–28.
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.
O’Connor, B. 2004. Adorno’s Negative Dialectics: Philosophy and the Possibility of Critical Rationality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
O’Connor, B. 2012. Adorno: Routledge Philosophers, London: Routledge.
O’Neill, O. 2007. ‘Normativity and Practical Judgement’, Journal of Moral Philosophy 4, 3: 393–405.
Oshana, M. 1998. ‘Personal Autonomy and Society’, Journal of Social Philosophy 29, 1: 81–102.
Pickford, H. W. 2002. ‘The Dialectic of Theory and Practice: On Late Adorno’, in Gibson and Rubin 2002: Ch. 13.
Pippin, R. B. 2008. Hegel’s Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life, Cambridge University Press.
Pogge, T. [2002] 2008. World Poverty and Human Rights, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rabinbach, A. 2002. ‘“Why Were the Jews Sacrificed?” The Place of Antisemitism in Adorno and Horkheimer’s Dialectic of Enlightenment’, in Gibson and Rubin 2002: Ch. 5.
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. [1993] 1996. Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.
Raz, J. 1986. Morality as Freedom, Oxford University Press.
Raz, J. 1999. ‘Explaining Normativity: On Rationality and the Justification of Reason’, Ratio 12, 4: 354–79.
Reginster, B. 2006. The Affirmation of Life: Nietzsche on Overcoming Nihilism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reijen, W. van and Noerr, G. Schmid (eds.) 1987. Vierzig Jahre Flaschenpost: ‘Dialektik der Aufklärung’ 1947–1987, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
Rescher, N. 1958. ‘Reasoned Justification of Moral Judgements’, Journal of Philosophy 55, 6: 248–55.
Rieff, D. 2002. A Bed for the Night: Humanitarianism in Crisis, London: Vintage.
Rosen, M. 1996. On Voluntary Servitude, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rousseau, J. J. [1755] 1913. The Social Contract and Discourses, ed. and trans. G. D. H. Cole, London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd.
Sangiovanni, A. 2010. ‘Normative Political Theory: A Flight from Reality?’, in D. Bell (ed.), Political Thought and International Relations: Realist Themes, Oxford University Press, Ch. 12: 219–39.
Scheffler, S. 1994. ‘The Appeal of Political Liberalism’, Ethics 105, 1: 4–22.
Schnädelbach, H. 1986. ‘Max Horkheimer und die Moralphilosophie des deutschen Idealismus’, in Max Horkheimer heute: Werk und Wirkung, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 52–78.
Schweppenhäuser, G. 1992. ‘Zur kritischen Theorie der Moral bei Adorno’, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 40, 12: 1403–17.
Schweppenhäuser, G. 1993. Ethik nach Auschwitz: Adornos negative Moralphilosophie, Hamburg: Argument (Argument-Sonderband Neue Folge AS 231).
Schweppenhäuser, G. 2004. ‘Adorno’s Negative Moral Philosophy’, in Huhn 2004: 328–53.
Seel, M. 2004. Adornos Philosophie der Kontemplation, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Sen, A. 1981. Poverty and Famine: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford University Press.
Stern, R. 2004. ‘Does ‘ought’ imply ‘can’? And did Kant think it does?’, Utilitas 16, 1: 42–61.
Stern, R. 2006. ‘Hegel’s Doppelsatz: A Neutral Reading’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 44: 235–66.
Stern, R. 2009. ‘The Autonomy of Morality and the Morality of Autonomy’, Journal of Moral Philosophy 6, 3: 395–415.
Sussman, D. 2005. ‘What’s Wrong with Torture?’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 22, 1: 1–33.
Tassone, G. 2005. ‘Amoral Adorno: Negative Dialectics Outside Ethics’, European Journal of Social Theory 8, 3: 251–67.
Taylor, C. 1985. Philosophy and the Human Sciences, Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, C. 1993. ‘Explanation and Practical Reason’, in M. C. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds.), The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 208–31.
Terry, F. 2002. Condemned to Repeat? The Paradox of Humanitarian Action, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Theunissen, M. 1983. ‘Negativität bei Adorno’, in L. von Friedeburg and J. Habermas (eds.), Adorno-Konferenz 1983, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 41–65.
Thompson, M. 2004. ‘Apprehending Human Form’, in A. O’Hear (ed.), Modern Moral Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 47–74.
Thompson, M. 2008. Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thyen, A. 1989. Negative Dialektik der Erfahrung: Zur Rationalität des Nichtidentischen bei Adorno, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Timmermann, J. 2003. ‘Sollen und Können: “Du Kannst, denn du sollst” und “Sollen impliziert Können” im Vergleich’, Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse/Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 6 (Geschichte der Ethik/History of Ethics): 113–22.
Waal, A. de 1997. Famine Crimes: Politics & the Disaster Relief Industry in Africa, Bloomsbury, IN: Indiana University Press.
Wellmer, A. 2007. ‘Adorno and the Difficulties of a Critical Reconstruction of the Historical Present’, Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory 8, 2: 135–56.
Whitebook, J. 2003. ‘Theodor W. Adornos Interpretation von Kant und Freud’, Psyche: Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse und ihre Anwendungen 57, 8: 681–707. English version: ‘Weighty Objects: On Adorno’s Kant-Freud Interpretation’, in Huhn 2004: 51–78.
Wiggershaus, R. 1994. The Frankfurt School: Its History, Theories and Political Significance, trans. M. Robertson, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wiggins, D. 1991. ‘Claims of Need’, in Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, Ch. 1.
Williams, B. 1981. Moral Luck, Cambridge University Press.
Williams, B. 1993. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, rev. edn, London: Fontana Press.
Williams, B. 1996. ‘History, Morality and the Test of Reflection’, in Korsgaard et al. 1996: Ch. 8.
Williams, B. 2002. Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy, Princeton University Press.
Williams, B. 2005. In the Beginning was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, Princeton University Press.
Wolff, J. 2002. Why Read Marx Today?Oxford University Press.
Wood, A. W. 1981. Karl Marx, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.