The World Imagined Collective Beliefs and Political Order in the Sinocentric, Islamic and Southeast Asian International Societies
Book contents
- The World Imagined
- LSE International Studies
- The World Imagined
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- A Note on Transliteration
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Beyond the Westphalian Gaze
- Part II The East Asian Sino-centric Order
- Part III The Islamic Cultural–Historical Community
- Part IV Collective Imagination among the Polities of Southeast Asia
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2020
Book contents
- The World Imagined
- LSE International Studies
- The World Imagined
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- A Note on Transliteration
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Beyond the Westphalian Gaze
- Part II The East Asian Sino-centric Order
- Part III The Islamic Cultural–Historical Community
- Part IV Collective Imagination among the Polities of Southeast Asia
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The World ImaginedCollective Beliefs and Political Order in the Sinocentric, Islamic and Southeast Asian International Societies, pp. 353 - 389Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Aalberts, Tanja. 2014. Rethinking the Principle of (Sovereign) Equality as a Standard of Civilisation. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 42 (3): 767–89.Google Scholar
Abbès, Makram. 2014. Can We Speak of Just War in Islam? History of Political Thought 35 (2): 234–61.Google Scholar
Abo-Kazleh, Mohammad. 2006. Rethinking International Relations Theory in Islam: Toward a More Adequate Approach. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 5 (4): 41–56.Google Scholar
Abou-el Haj, Rifaat. 1969. The Formal Closure of the Ottoman Frontier in Europe: 1699–1703. Journal of the American Oriental Society 89 (3): 467–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aboul-Enein, Youssef and Zuhur, Sherifa. 2004. Islamic Rulings on Warfare. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Abu-Lughod, Janet L. 1989. Before European Hegemony. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2003/2004. Will Asia’s Past Be Its Future? International Security 28 (3): 149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2012. The Making of Southeast Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry. 2010. Non-Western International Relations Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry. 2017. Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? Ten Years On. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 17 (3): 341–70.Google Scholar
Acri, Andrea. 2011. Alternative Approaches to Eighth-Century Central Javanese Buddhist Architecture. BKI 167 (2–3): 313–21.Google Scholar
Acuff, Jonathan. 2012. Spectacle and Space in the Creation of Premodern and Modern Polities. International Political Sociology 6 (2): 132–48.Google Scholar
Adanir, Fikret. 2005. Turkey’s Entry into the Concert of Europe. European Review 13 (3): 395–417.Google Scholar
Adler, Emmanuel and Barnett, Michael. 1998. Security Communities. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhavi, Shahrough. 2003. Islam and the West in World History. Third World Quarterly 24 (3): 545–62.Google Scholar
Aksan, Virginia H. and Goffman, Daniel. 2007. Introduction: Situating the Early Modern Ottoman World. In The Early Modern Ottomans, edited by Aksan, Virginia H. and Goffman, Daniel, 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alam, Muzaffar. 1997. State Building under the Mughals: Religion, Culture and Politics. Cahiers d’Asie Centrale 3/4: 105–28.Google Scholar
Alexandrowicz, Charles H. 1967. An Introduction to the History of the Law of Nations in the East Indies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Alexandrowicz, Charles H. 1969. New and Original States: The Issue of Reversion to Sovereignty. International Affairs 45 (3): 465–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alker, Hayward R. 1992. The Humanistic Moment in International Studies: Reflections on Machiavelli and Las Casas. International Studies Quarterly 36 (4): 347–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkire, William H. 1972. Concepts of Order in Southeast Asia and Micronesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History 14 (4): 484–93.Google Scholar
Alkopher, Tal Dingott. 2005. The Social (and Religious) Meanings That Constitute War: The Crusades as Realpolitik vs. Socialpolitik. International Studies Quarterly 49 (4):715–37.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. and Genco, Stephen J. 1977. Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics. World Politics 29 (4): 489–522.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amoretti, B. S. 1986. Religion in the Timurid and Safavid Periods. In Cambridge History of Iran, vol. 6, edited by Jackson, Peter and Lockhart, Laurence, 610–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anand, R. P. 1966. Attitude of the Asian-African States toward Certain Problems of International Law. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 15 (1): 55–75.Google Scholar
Anand, R. P. 1981. Maritime Practice in South-East Asia until 1600 A.D. and the Modern Law of the Sea. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 30: 440–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andaya, Leonard. 1978. Treaty Conceptions and Misconceptions: A Case Study from South Sulawesi. BKI 134 (2/3): 275–95.Google Scholar
Andaya, Leonard. 1993a.The World of Maluku: Eastern Indonesia in the Early Modern Period. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Andaya, Leonard. 1993b. Cultural State Formation in Eastern Indonesia. In Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era, edited by Reid, Anthony, 23–41. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Andaya, Leonard. 1999. Interactions with the Outside World and Adaptation in Southeast Asian Society, 1500–1800. In The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, vol. 2, edited by Tarling, Nicholas, 1–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Andaya, Leonard. 2004. Nature of War and Peace among the Bugis-Makassar People. South East Asia Research 12 (1): 53–80.Google Scholar
Anderson, James. 2013. Distinguishing between China and Vietnam: Three Relational Equilibriums in Sino-Vietnamese Relations. Journal of East Asian Studies 13: 259–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. S. 1954. Great Britain and the Russo-Turkish War of 1768–74. The English Historical Review 69 (270): 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anghie, Anthony. 2004. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Asher, Catherine B. 2014. Delhi, Architecture. In Encyclopaedia of Islam, vol. 3, edited by Fleet, Kate, Krämer, Gudrun, Matringe, Denis, Nawas, John, and Rowson, Everett. Leiden: Brill. Accessed at http://referenceworks.brillonline.com.Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard. 1986. The Poverty of Neorealism. In Neorealism and Its Critics, edited by Keohane, Robert, 255–300. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ateş, Sabri. 2013. The Ottoman–Iranian Borderlands. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atwill, David. 2003. Blinkered Visions: Islamic Identity, Hui Ethnicity, and the Panthay Rebellion in Southwest China, 1856–1873. The Journal of Asian Studies 62 (4): 1079–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atwood, Christopher. 2004a. Encyclopedia of Mongolia and the Mongol Empire. New York: Facts on File.Google Scholar
Atwood, Christopher. 2004b. Validation by Holiness or Sovereignty: Religious Toleration as Political Theology in the Mongol World Empire of the Thirteenth Century. The International History Review 26 (2): 237–56.Google Scholar
Atwood, Christopher. 2013. Partners in Profit: Empires, Merchants, and Local Governments in the Mongol Empire and Qing Mongolia. Conference Paper for SSRC Inter-Asia Connections IV. Koç University, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Aung-Thwin, Michael and Aung-Thwin., Maitrii 2012. A History of Myanmar since Ancient Times. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1981. The Emergence of Cooperation among Egoists. American Political Science Review 75 (2): 306–318.Google Scholar
Aydin, Cemil. 2013. Transformation of Inter-Asian Regional Connections from Early Modern to Modern Period. Conference Paper for SSRC Inter-Asia Connections IV. Koç University, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Aydin, Cemil. 2017. The Idea of the Muslim World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bacharach, Jere L. 2010. Signs of Sovereignty: The “Shahada,” Qur’anic Verses, and the Coinage of Abd al-Malik. Muqarnas 2: 1–30.Google Scholar
Badie, Bertrand and Birnbaum, Pierre. 1983. The Sociology of the State. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baechler, Jean, Hall, John, and Mann, Michael, eds. 1988. Europe and the Rise of Capitalism. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bafna, Sonit. 2000. On the Idea of the Mandala as a Governing Device in Architecture. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 59 (1): 26–49.Google Scholar
Baker, Chris and Phongpaichit, Pasuk, eds. and trans. 2016. The Palace Law of Ayutthaya and the Thammasat. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhash, Shaul. 1991. In Search of the Arab Soul. New York Review of Books 38 (15): 50–55.Google Scholar
Balabanlilar, Lisa. 2007. Lords of the Auspicious Conjunction: Turco-Mongol Imperial Identity on the Subcontinent. Journal of World History 18 (1): 1–39.Google Scholar
Bang, Peter F. and Kolodziejczy, Darius, eds. 2012. Universal Empire. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barbieri, Katherine. 2002. The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace? Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Barbour, Richmond. 1998. Power and Distant Display: Early English Ambassadors in Moghul India. Huntington Library Quarterly 61 (3/4): 343–68.Google Scholar
Barfield, Thomas. 1989. The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barkawi, Tarak and Laffey, Mark. 2006. The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies. Review of International Studies 32 (2): 329–52.Google Scholar
Barnes, R. H. 2001. Alliance and Warfare in an Eastern Indonesian Principality Kédang in the Last Half of the Nineteenth Century. BKI 157 (2): 271–311.Google Scholar
Baumer, Franklin L. 1944. England, the Turk, and the Common Corps of Christendom. The American Historical Review 50 (1): 26–48.Google Scholar
Bell, Catherine. (1992) 2009. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bellenoit, Hayden. 2012. Paper, Pens and Power between Empires in North India, 1750–1850. South Asian History and Culture 3 (3): 348–72.Google Scholar
Bellenoit, Hayden. 2013. Paper, Revenue Administration and Munshi-Gari in 18th Century India. Conference Paper for SSRC Inter-Asia Connections IV. Koç University, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Ben-Bassat, Yuval and Ben-Artzi., Yossi 2015. The Collision of Empires as Seen from Istanbul: The Border of British-Controlled Egypt and Ottoman Palestine as Reflected in Ottoman Maps. Journal of Historical Geography 50: 25–36.Google Scholar
Benda, Harry. 1970. Indonesia’s History between the Myths: Essays in Legal History and Historical Theory by G. J. Resink. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 1 (2): 134–36.Google Scholar
Benedict, Ruth. 1946. The Chrysanthemum and the Sword. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Benn, Stanley. 1967. Sovereignty. In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 7/8, edited by Edwards, Paul, 501–5. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bentley, Jerry H. 1996. Cross-Cultural Interaction and Periodization in World History. The American Historical Review 101 (3): 749–70.Google Scholar
Berman, Harold. 1983. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 2001. Ideas, Norms and Culture in Political Analysis. Comparative Politics 33 (2): 231–50.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard. 1976. The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard, ed. 1986. Philosophical Profiles. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Betts, Raymond. 1985. Uncertain Dimensions. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bevir, Mark and Rhodes, Rod A.. 2010. The State as Cultural Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biswas, Shampa. 2007. Empire and Global Public Intellectuals: Reading Edward Said as an International Relations Theorist. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 36 (1): 117–33.Google Scholar
Blake, Stephen P. 1979. The Patrimonial-Bureaucratic Empire of the Mughals. The Journal of Asian Studies 39 (1): 77–94.Google Scholar
Blaney, David and Inayatullah, Naeem. 1994. Prelude to a Conversation of Cultures in International Society? Todorov and Nandy on the Possibility of Dialogue. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 19 (1): 23–51.Google Scholar
Blech, Edward C. and Sherwood, Harry I., eds. 1915. British and Foreign State Papers. Vol. 105. London: H.M. Stationery Office. Accessed at www.fas.nus.edu.sg/hist/eia/documents_archive/zuhab.php.Google Scholar
Boesche, Roger. 2003. Kautilya’s “Arthasastra” on War and Diplomacy in Ancient India. The Journal of Military History 67 (1): 9–37.Google Scholar
Bohnet, Adam. 2014. A New Discussion of Sino-Korean Relations during the Chosŏn Period. Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review, no. 12.Google Scholar
Borofsky, Robert. 1997. Cook, Lono, Obeyesekere, and Sahlins: Forum on Theory in Anthropology. Current Anthropology 38 (2): 255–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouzenita, Anke I. 2007. The Siyar – An Islamic Law of Nations? Asian Journal of Social Science 35 (1): 19–46.Google Scholar
Bowden, Brett. 2009. The Empire of Civilization: The Evolution of an Imperial Idea. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bowering, Gerhard, ed. 2013. The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, Edward. 2016. Imperial Practice and the Making of Modern Japan’s Territory: Towards a Reconsideration of Empire’s Boundaries. Geographical Review of Japan, Series B 88 (2): 66–79.Google Scholar
Bozeman, Adda. 1960, Politics and Culture in International History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bozeman, Adda. 1984. The International Order in a Multicultural World. In The Expansion of International Society, edited by Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam, 387–406. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Branch, Jordan. 2014. The Cartographic State: Maps, Territory, and the Origins of Sovereignty. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. 1980. On History. Translated by Sarah Matthews. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. 1984. The Perspective of the World. Translated by Sian Reynolds. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Brooks, Rosa E. 2005. Failed States, or the State as Failure? University of Chicago Law Review 72 (4): 1159–96.Google Scholar
Brose, Michael. 2006. Realism and Idealism in the “Yuanshi” Chapters on Foreign Relations. Asia Minor 19 (1/2): 327–47.Google Scholar
Broucek, Peter. 1987. Österreich als Führende Macht der Heiligen Liga in Krieg gegen das Osmanische Reich. Acta Historica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 33 (2/4): 351–60.Google Scholar
Brummet, Palmira. 2007. Imagining the Early Modern Ottoman Space, from World History to Piri Reis. In The Early Modern Ottomans, edited by Aksan, Victoria and Goffman, Daniel, 15–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bukovansky, Mlada. 2002. Legitimacy and Power Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam, eds. 1984. The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burgis, Michelle. 2009. Faith in the State? Traditions of Territoriality, International Law and the Emergence of Modern Arab Statehood. Journal of the History of International Law 11: 37–79.Google Scholar
Butcher, Charles and Griffiths, Ryan. 2017. Between Eurocentrism and Babel: A Framework for the Analysis of States, State Systems, and International Orders. International Studies Quarterly 61 (2): 328–36.Google Scholar
Butcher, John G. 2008. Resink Revisited: A Note on the Territorial Waters of the Self-Governing Realms of the Netherlands Indies in the late 1800s. BKI 164 (1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert. 1966. The Balance of Power. In Diplomatic Investigations, edited by Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin, 132–48. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 1993. From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School. International Organization 47(3): 327–52.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Goh, Evelyn. Forthcoming. History Problems and Historical Opportunities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George. 2015. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Little, Richard. 2000. International Systems in World History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Little, Richard. 2010. World History and the Development of Non-Western International Relations Theory. In Non-Western International Relations Theory, edited by Achary, Amitav and Buzan, Barry, 197–220. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Jones, Charles, and Little, Richard. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Callahan, William. 2008. Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-hegemonic or a New Hegemony? International Studies Review 10 (4): 749–61.Google Scholar
Callahan, William. 2012. Sino-speak: Chinese Exceptionalism and the Politics of History. The Journal of Asian Studies 71 (1): 33–55.Google Scholar
Carrai, Maria A. 2017a. Translating Authority: In Search of Commensurability between Tianxia World Order and Western Sovereignty. In Translation and Modernization in East Asia in the 19th and early 20th Century, edited by Wong, Lawrence Wang-chi, 131–63. Hong Kong: Research Centre for Translation and the Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Carrai Maria, A. 2017b. Learning Western Techniques of Empire: Republican China and the New Legal Framework for Managing Tibet. Leiden Journal of International Law 30 (4): 801–24.Google Scholar
Carrai, Maria Adele. 2019. Sovereignty in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Çelik, Nihat. 2011. Muslims, Non-Muslims and Foreign Relations: Ottoman Diplomacy. International Review of Turkish Studies 1 (3): 8–31.Google Scholar
Cha, Hyewon. 2011. Was Joseon a Model or an Exception? Reconsidering the Tributary Relations During Ming China. Korea Journal 51 (4): 33–58.Google Scholar
Chagnon, Napoleon. 1968. Yanomamö: The Fierce People. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Chishen. 2011. Tianxia System on a Snail’s Horns. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 12 (1): 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chann, Naindeep. 2013. Searching for the Sahib-Qiran: Claims, Contestations, and Connections in the Early Modern Islamicate Empires. Conference Paper for SSRC Inter-Asia Connections IV. Koç University, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Charney, Michael W. 2004a. Southeast Asian Warfare: 1300–1900. Handbook of Oriental Studies 16. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Chauduri, K. N. 1991. Reflections on the Organizing Principle of Premodern Trade. In The Political Economy of Merchant Empires, edited by Tracy, James, 421–42. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, Thomas J. 2006. Fostering Stability or Creating a Monster? The Rise of China and U.S. Policy toward East Asia. International Security 31(1): 81–126.Google Scholar
Chutintaranond, Sunait. 1990. Mandala, “Segmentary State,” and Politics of Centralization in Medieval Ayudhya. Journal of the Siam Society 78 (1): 89–100.Google Scholar
Cipolla, Carlo. 1965. Guns, Sails, and Empires. Manhattan, KS: Sunflower University Press.Google Scholar
Cipolla, Carlo, ed. 1972. The Fontana Economic History of Europe: The Middle Ages. Glasgow, Scotland: Collins/Fontana.Google Scholar
Clarence-Smith, William G. 2010. South-East Asia and China to 1910. In The New Cambridge History of Islam, vol. 5, edited by Robinson, Francis, 240–68. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Donald. 1998. Sino-Korean Tributary Relations under the Ming. In Cambridge History of China, vol. 8, part 2, edited by Twitchett, Dennis, 272–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Stuart. 1985. The Annales Historians. In The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences, edited by Skinner, Quentin, 177–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coedès, George. (1964) 1975. The Indianized States of Southeast Asia. Edited by F. Vella, Walter. Translated by Susan Brown Cowing. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Juan. 2002. A Distorted Picture of the Islamic World. Global Dialogue 4 (2): 128–33.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander and Spruyt, Hendrik. 2009. Contracting States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cranmer-Byng, J. L. 1972. The Establishment of the Tsungli Yamen: A Translation of the Memorial and Edict of 1861. Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 12: 41–54.Google Scholar
Crossley, Pamela Kyle. 1992. The Rulerships of China. The American Historical Review 97(5): 1468–83.Google Scholar
Crossley, Pamela Kyle. 2008. Pluralité Impériale et Identités Subjectives dans la Chine des Qing. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 63 (3): 597–621.Google Scholar
Crumley, Carole L. 1995. Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies. In Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, edited by Ehrenreich, Robert M., Crumley, Carole L., and Levy, Janet E., 1–5. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Curtin, Philip. 1984. Cross-Cultural Trade in World History. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
D’souza, Rohan. 2002. Crisis before the Fall: Some Speculations on the Decline of the Ottomans, Safavids and Mughals. Social Scientist 30 (9/10): 3–30.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred and Thomas, McCarthy. 1977. Understanding and Social Inquiry. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred. 1981. Twilight of Subjectivity. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Darling, Linda T. 2000. Contested Territory: Ottoman Holy War in Comparative Context. Studia Islamica 91: 133–63.Google Scholar
Day, Tony. 2002. Fluid Iron: State Formation in Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
De Josselin de Jong, P. E. 1952. Minangkabau and Negri Sembilan. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Deans, Phil. 1999. The Capitalist Developmental State in East Asia. In State Strategies in the Global Political Economy, edited by Palan, Ronen and Abbott, Jason, 78–102. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Dellios, Rosita. 2003. Mandala: From Sacred Origins to Sovereign Affairs in Traditional Southeast Asia. CEWCES Research Paper 8, Bond University, Centre for East-West Cultural and Economic Studies.Google Scholar
Der Derrian, James. 1990. The Space of International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 34 (3): 295–310.Google Scholar
Dessler, David. 1989. What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate? International Organization 43 (3): 441–73.Google Scholar
Devlen, Balkan, James, Patrick, and Özgür, Özdamar. 2005. The English School, International Relations, and Progress. International Studies Review 7: 171–97.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul and Powell, Walter, eds. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48: 147–60.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul and Powell, Walter, eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Doran, Charles and Parsons, Wes. 1980. War and the Cycle of Relative Power. American Political Science Review 74 (4): 947–65.Google Scholar
Doumanis, Nicholas. 2006. Durable Empire: State Virtuosity and Social Accommodation in the Ottoman Mediterranean. The Historical Journal 49 (3): 953–66.Google Scholar
Dozier, Edward. 1967. The Kalinga of Northern Luzon, Philippines. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Dressler, Markus. 2005. Inventing Orthodoxy: Competing Claims for Authority and Legitimacy in the Ottoman-Safavid Conflict. In Legitimizing the Order: The Ottoman Rhetoric of State Power, edited by Karateke, Hakan T. and Reinkowski, Maurus, 151–73. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Duara, Prasenjit. 2015. The Crisis of Global Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duara, Prasenjit. 2017. Afterword: The Chinese World Order as a Language Game. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 77 (1): 123–29.Google Scholar
Duby, Georges. 1980. The Three Orders: Feudal Society Imagined. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim and Devetak, Richard. 2017. Civilising Statecraft: Andrew Linklater and Comparative Sociologies of States-Systems. Review of International Studies 43 (4): 686–99.Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim and Reus-Smit, Christian, eds. 2017. The Globalization of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1915. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Translated by Joseph Ward Swain. London: George Allen and Unwin. Project Guttenberg e-Book 41360.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. (1893) 1964. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method, edited by Lukes, Steven. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1957. An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems. World Politics 9 (3): 383–400.Google Scholar
Ebrey, Patricia. 1981. The Chinese Family and the Spread of Confucian Values. In The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation, edited by Rozman, Gilbert, 45–83. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. Case Study and Theory in Political Science. In Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7, edited by Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson S., 79–137. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1964. The Symbolic Use of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Eikenberry, Karl and Krasner, Stephen D.. 2018. Ending Civil Wars: Constraints and Possibilities. Conclusion. Daedalus 147 (1): 197–211.Google Scholar
Eiran, Ehud. 2015. The Indonesian Settlement Project in East Timor. In Settlers in Contested Lands, edited by Haklai, Oded and Loizedes, Neophytos, 97–113. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
El Amine, Loubna. 2015. Classical Confucian Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
El Amine, Loubna. 2016. Beyond East and West: Reorienting Political Theory through the Prism of Modernity. Perspectives on Politics 14 (1): 102–20.Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. 1959. The Sacred and the Profane. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Elliott, Mark. 2001. The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, Richard M. 1976. Social Exchange Theory. Annual Review of Sociology 2: 335–62.Google Scholar
Englehart, Neil A. 2001. Culture and Power in Traditional Siamese Government. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Eriksen, Thomas H. and Neumann, Iver B.. 1993. International Relations as a Cultural System: An Agenda for Research. Cooperation and Conflict 28 (3): 233–64.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, Robert. 2002. Of Civilization and Savages: The Mimetic Imperialism of Japan’s 1874 Expedition to Taiwan. The American Historical Review 107 (2): 388–418.Google Scholar
Esmi, Amir and Saremi, Hamidreza. 2014. Mysticism and Its Impact on Safavid Dynasty Architecture (Mosque of Sheikh Lotfollah in Isfahan). Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences 6 (6): 333–39.Google Scholar
Fairbank, J. K. 1942. Tributary Trade and China’s Relations with the West. The Far Eastern Quarterly 1 (2): 129–49.Google Scholar
Fairbank, J. K. and Chên, Ta-tuan, eds. 1968. The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations. Harvard East Asian Series. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fairbank, J. K. and Têng, S. Y.. 1941. On the Ch’ing Tributary System. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 6 (2): 135–246.Google Scholar
Farooqi, Naim R. 2004. Diplomacy and Diplomatic Procedure under the Mughals. The Medieval Journal 7 (1): 59–86.Google Scholar
Faroqhi, Suraiya. 1985. Civilian Society and Political Power in the Ottoman Empire: A Report on Research in Collective Biography (1480–1830). International Journal of Middle East Studies 17 (1): 109–17.Google Scholar
Faroqhi, Suraiya. 2015. The Ottoman Empire and the Islamic World. In Empires and Encounters 1350–1750, edited by Reinhard, Wolfgang, 221–338. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Febvre, Lucien. 1977. Life in Renaissance France. Edited and translated by Marian Rothstein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Yale and Mansbach, Richard. 1996. Polities: Authority, Identities, and Change. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Findley, Carter. 1972. The Foundation of the Ottoman Foreign Ministry: The Beginnings of Bureaucratic Reform under Selim III and Mahmud II. International Journal of Middle East Studies 3 (4): 388–416.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2003. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2001. Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 4: 391–416.Google Scholar
Fischer, Markus. 1992. Feudal Europe, 800–1300: Communal Discourse and Conflictual Practices. International Organization 46 (2): 427–66.Google Scholar
Fischerkeller, Michael P. 1998. David versus Goliath: Cultural Judgments in Asymmetric Wars. Security Studies 7 (4): 1–43.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Cornell. 1992. The Lawgiver as Messiah. In Soliman le Magnifique et son temps, edited by Veinstein, Gilles, 159–77. Paris: Ecole du Louvre and EHESS.Google Scholar
Fodor, Pál. 2016. Army, Ottoman (700–1100/1300–1700). In Encyclopaedia of Islam, vol. 3, edited by Fleet, Kate, Krämer, Gudrun, Matringe, Denis, Nawas, John, and Rowson, Everett. Leiden: Brill. Accessed at http://referenceworks.brillonline.com.Google Scholar
Fortna, Benjamin. 2005. Change in the School Maps of the Late Ottoman Empire. Imago Mundi 57 (1): 23–34.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2009. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–78. Edited by Senellart, Michel. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Friedberg, Aaron. 1993–94. Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia. International Security 18 (3): 5–33.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis. 1986. The Long Peace: Elements of Stability in the Postwar International System. International Security 10 (4): 99–142.Google Scholar
Gartzke, Erik, Quan, Li and Boehmer, Charles. 2001. Investing in the Peace: Economic Interdependence and International Conflict. International Organization 55 (2): 391–438.Google Scholar
Garza, Andrew, de la. 2010. Mughals at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, 1500–1605. PhD diss., Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1980. Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gellner, David N. 1999. Religion, Politics, and Ritual. Remarks on Geertz and Bloch. Social Anthropology 7 (2): 135–53.Google Scholar
George, Jim and Campbell, David. 1990. Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of Difference: Critical Social Theory and International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 34 (3): 269–93.Google Scholar
Gerbenzon, P. and Algra, N. 1975. Voortgangh des Rechtes. Groningen, Netherlands: Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2003. Interview with Clifford Geertz. Qualitative Methods 1 (2): 24–28.Google Scholar
Gerth, Hans and Mills, C. Wright, eds. and trans. 1946. From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gesick, Lorraine, ed. 1983. Centres, Symbols, and Hierarchies: Essays on the Classical States of Southeast Asia. Southeast Asia Studies Monograph 26. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibb, H. A. R. (1939) 1947. Some Considerations on the Sunni Theory of the Caliphate. Archives d’Histoire du Droit Oriental 3: 401–10.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1987. The Nation-State and Violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Michael A. 1984. Hegel, Heidegger and the Ground of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1986. The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. In Neorealism and Its Critics, edited by Keohane, Robert, 301–21. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gismondi, Michael A. 1985. The Gift of Theory: A Critique of the Histoire des Mentalités. Social History 10 (2): 211–30.Google Scholar
Goffman, Daniel. 2007. Negotiating with the Renaissance state: the Ottoman Empire and the New Diplomacy. In The Early Modern Ottomans, edited by Aksan, Virginia and Goffman, Daniel, 61–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goh, Geok Yian. 2015. The Wheel-Turner and His House. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Gommans, Jos. 1995. Indian Warfare and Afghan Innovation during the Eighteenth Century. Studies in History 11 (2): 261–80.Google Scholar
Gonda, J. 1974. Dumézil’s Tripartite Ideology: Some Critical Observations. The Journal of Asian Studies 34 (1): 139–49.Google Scholar
Gong, Gerrit. 1984. China’s Entry into International Society. In The Expansion of the International Society, edited by Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam, 171–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodrich, L. Carrington. 1969. A Short History of the Chinese People. 4th ed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Gordon, Stewart. 1998. The Limited Adoption of European-Style Military Forces by Eighteenth Century Rulers in India. The Indian Economic and Social History Review 35 (3): 229–45.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1987. Time’s Arrow, Time’s Cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1989. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner. 1992. Institutions and International Trade: Lessons from the Commercial Revolution. The American Economic Review 82: 128–33.Google Scholar
Greiner, Peter. 1977. Thronbesteigung und Thronfolge im China der Ming (1368–1644). Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutsche Morgenländische Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Gries, Peter H., Zhang, Qingmin, Masui, Yasuki, and Lee, Yong Wook. 2009. Historical Beliefs and the Perception of Threat in Northeast Asia: Colonialism, the Tributary system, and China–Japan–Korea Relations in the Twenty-First Century. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 9: 245–65.Google Scholar
Gross, Leo. 1968. The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948. In International Law and Organization, edited by Falk, Richard and Hanrieder, Wolfram, 45–67. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
Guilmartin, John. 1988. Ideology and Conflict: The Wars of the Ottoman Empire, 1453–1606. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18 (4): 721–47.Google Scholar
Gūndoǧdu, Birol. 2017. Political and Economic Transition of Ottoman Sovereignty from a Sole Monarch to Numerous Ottoman elites, 1683-1750s. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 70 (1): 49–90.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G. 1969. Deduction, Explanation, and Social Scientific Inquiry. The American Political Science Review 63 (4): 1233–46.Google Scholar
Gvosdev, Nikolas. 2000. Finding the Roots of Religious Liberty in the “Asian Tradition.” Journal of Church and State 42 (3): 507–27.Google Scholar
Gyallay-Pap, Peter. 2007. Reconstructing the Cambodian Polity: Buddhism, Kingship and the Quest for Legitimacy. In Buddhism, Power and Political Order, edited by Harris, Ian, 71–103. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1977. A Review of Gadamer’s Truth and Method. In Understanding and Social Inquiry, edited by Dallmayr, Fred and McCarthy, Thomas, 335–63. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by Charles Taylor. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habib, Irfan. 1982. Population. In The Cambridge Economic History of India, vol. 1, edited by Kumar, Dharma and Raychaudhuri, Tapan, 163–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Rodney B. 1999. National Collective Identity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Rodney B. and Kratochwil, Friedrich V.. 1993. Medieval Tales: Neorealist “Science” and the Abuse of History. International Organization 47 (3): 479–91.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. 2010. Islamic Law: History and Transformation. The New Cambridge History of Islam, vol. 4, edited by Irwin, Robert, 142–83. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamashita, Takeshi. 2001. Tribute and Treaties: East Asian Treaty Ports Networks in the Era of Negotiation, 1834–1894. European Journal of East Asian Studies 1 (1): 59–87.Google Scholar
Hamashita, Takeshi, Grove, Linda, and Selden, Mark. 2008. China, East Asia and the Global Economy: Regional and Historical Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haneda, Masashi. 1986. Army III. Safavid Period. Encyclopedia Iranica 2, fasc. 5: 503–6. Accessed at www.iranicaonline.org.Google Scholar
Hao, Yen-P’ing and Wang, Erh-min. 1980. Changing Chinese Views of Western Relations, 1840–95. In The Cambridge History of China, vol. 11, part 2, edited by Fairbank, John K. and Liu, Kwang-Ching, 142–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harbsmeier, Michael. 1985. On Travel Accounts and Cosmological Strategies: Some Models in Comparative Xenology. Ethnos 50 (3–4): 273–312.Google Scholar
Harmon, Roger. 1979. Review of Stanley Tambiah’s World Conqueror and World Renouncer. The American Journal of Sociology 84 (4): 1042–44.Google Scholar
Harris, Marvin. 1966. The Cultural Ecology of India’s Sacred Cattle. Current Anthropology 7 (1): 51–55.Google Scholar
Hattox, Ralph S. 2000. Mehmed the Conqueror, the Patriarch of Jerusalem, and Mamluk Authority. Studia Islamica 90: 105–23.Google Scholar
Heeres, J. H., ed. 1907–38. Corpus Diplomaticum Neerlando-Indicum (1596–1650). 5 vols. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Heine-Geldern, Robert. 1942. Conceptions of State and Kingship in Southeast Asia. The Far Eastern Quarterly 2 (1): 15–30.Google Scholar
Hemmer, Christopher and Katzenstein, Peter. 2002. Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism. International Organization 56 (3): 575–607.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl. 1942. The Function of General Laws in History. The Journal of Philosophy 39 (2): 35–48.Google Scholar
Henley, David. 2004. Conflict, Justice, and the Stranger-King Indigenous Roots of Colonial Rule in Indonesia and Elsewhere. Modern Asian Studies 38 (1): 85–144.Google Scholar
Heuschert, Dorothea. 1998. Legal Pluralism in the Qing Empire: Manchu Legislation for the Mongols. The International History Review 20 (2): 310–24.Google Scholar
Hevia, James. 1995. Cherishing Men from Afar: Qing Guest Ritual and the Macartney Embassy of 1793. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hevia, James. 2009. Tribute, Asymmetry, and Imperial Formations: Rethinking Relations of Power in East Asia. Journal of American-East Asian Relations 16 (1–2): 69–83.Google Scholar
Heywood, Colin. 1988. Wittek and the Austrian Tradition. The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1: 7–25.Google Scholar
Hiltebeitel, Alf. 1974. Dumézil and Indian Studies. The Journal of Asian Studies 34 (1): 129–37.Google Scholar
Hinsley, F. H. 1969. The Concept of Sovereignty and the Relations between States. In Defense of Sovereignty, edited by Stankiewicz, W, 275–88. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert. 1977. The Passions and the Interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawn, Eric. 1990. Nations and Nationalism since 1780. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence, eds. 1983. The Invention of Tradition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, John. 2000. The State in International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, John. 2012. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, John M. and Sharman, Jason C.. 2005. The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change. European Journal of International Relations 11(1): 63–98.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Marshall G. 1963. The Interrelations of Societies in History. Comparative Studies in Society and History 5 (2): 227–50.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Marshall G. 1974. The Venture of Islam: The Gunpowder Empires and Modern Times. 3 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hollis, Martin and Lukes, Steven. 1982. Introduction. In Rationality and Relativism, edited by Martin, Hollis and Lukes, Steven, 1–20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi. 1991. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648–1989. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holzgrefe, J. L. 1989. The Origins of Modern International Relations Theory. Review of International Studies 15 (1): 11–26.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Richard S. 2004. International Law and State Transformation in China, Siam, and the Ottoman Empire during the Nineteenth Century. Journal of World History 15 (4): 445–86.Google Scholar
Hourani, Albert. 1991. A History of the Arab Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Howland, Douglas. 2009. Japan’s Civilized War: International Law as Diplomacy in the Sino-Japanese War (1894–1895). Journal of the History of International Law 9: 179–201.Google Scholar
Hucker, Charles. 1958. Governmental Organization of the Ming Dynasty. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 21: 1–66.Google Scholar
Hui, Victoria Tin-Bor. 2005. War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hurd, Elizabeth. 2007. The Politics of Secularism in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hurewitz, J. C. 1961. Ottoman Diplomacy and the European State System. Middle East Journal 15 (2): 141–52.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, John G. 2008. The Rise of China and the Future of the West – Can the Liberal System Survive? Foreign Affairs 87 (1): 23–37.Google Scholar
Inalcik, Halil. 1960. Mehmed the Conqueror (1432–1481) and His Time. Speculum 35 (3): 408–27.Google Scholar
Inalcik, Halil. 1976. The Rise of the Ottoman Empire. In A History of the Ottoman Empire to 1730, edited by Cook, M. A., 10–53. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inayatullah, Naeem and Blaney, David. 2004. International Relations and the Problem of Difference. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
International Court of Justice. 1960. Case Concerning Right of Passage over Indian Territory, Portugal v. India. April 12. I.C.J. Reports (Judgment 12 IV 60).Google Scholar
Iriye, Akira. 1989. Japan’s Drive to Great Power Status. In The Cambridge History of Japan, vol. 5, edited by Jansen, Marius, 721–85. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Isom-Verhaaren, Christine. 2007. Barbarossa and His Army Who Came to Succor All of Us: Ottoman and French Views of Their Joint Campaign of 1543–1544. French Historical Studies 30 (3): 395–425.Google Scholar
Jacob, Margaret. 1976. The Newtonians and the English Revolution 1689–1720. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
James, Lawrence. 1994. The Rise and Fall of the British Empire. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Allen and Earle, Timothy. 1987. The Evolution of Societies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair. 1995. Thinking about Strategic Culture. International Security 19 (4): 32–64.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair. 2016–17. Is Chinese Nationalism Rising? International Security 41 (1): 7–43.Google Scholar
Jones, W. T. 1975. The Twentieth Century to Wittgenstein and Sartre, vol. 5, The History of Western Philosophy. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Kagan, Donald. 1969. The Outbreak of the Peloponnesian War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Káldy-Nagy, Gy. 1979–80. The Holy War (jihād) in the First Centuries of the Ottoman Empire. Harvard Ukrainian Studies 3/4 (1): 467–73.Google Scholar
Kämmerer, Jörn Axel. 2006. Das Völkerrecht des Kolonialismus: Genese, Bedeutung und Nachwirkungen. Verfassung und Recht in Übersee/Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America 39 (4): 397–424.Google Scholar
Kang, David C. 2010a. East Asia before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, David C. 2010b. Hierarchy and Legitimacy in International Systems: The Tribute System in Early Modern East Asia. Security Studies 19 (4): 591–622.Google Scholar
Karamustafa, Ahmet. 1992. Military, Administrative, and Scholarly Maps and Plans. In The History of Cartography, vol. 2, book 1, edited by Hartley, J and Woodward, David, 209–27. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Karateke, Hakan. 2005. Legitimizing the Ottoman Sultanate: A Framework for Analysis. In Legitimizing the Order: The Ottoman Rhetoric of State Power, edited by Karateke, Hakan and Reinkowski, Maurus, 13–52. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kathirithamby-Wells, Jeyalamar. 1993. Restraints on the Development of Merchant Capitalism in Southeast Asia before c. 1800. In Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era, edited by Reid, Anthony, 123–48. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter. 1989. International Relations Theory and the Analysis of Change. In Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges, edited by Czempiel, Ernst-Otto and Rosenau, James. Washington, DC: Heath.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Alison A. 2010. The “Century of Humiliation,” Then and Now: Chinese Perceptions of the International Order. Pacific Focus 25 (1): 1–33.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. 2002. Beyond the Anarchical Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keens-Soper, Maurice. 1981–82. The Practice of a States System. Studies in History and Politics 2 (2): 15–36.Google Scholar
Kellner Alan, J. 2019. Nature and Civilization in Immanuel Kant’s Global Politics. PhD diss., Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Kelsay, John. 2013. Jihad. In The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Thought, edited by Bowering, Gerhard, 273–81. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul. 1984. The First World War and the International Power System. International Security 9 (1): 7–40.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1983. Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond. In Political Science: State of the Discipline, edited by Finifter, Ada, 503–40. Washington DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, ed. 1986. Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1992. International Theory: The Three Traditions. American Political Science Review 86 (4): 1112–13.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert and Goldstein, Judith, eds. 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert and Nye, Joseph. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kern, H. 1905. Een Oudjavaansche Inscriptie van den Jare 1273 Caka. BKI 58 (1): 655–62.Google Scholar
Khadduri, Majid. 1956. Islam and the Modern Law of Nations. The American Journal of International Law 50 (2): 358–72.Google Scholar
Khadduri, Majid. 1959. The Islamic System: Its Competition and Co-existence with Western Systems. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 53: 49–52.Google Scholar
Khadduri, Majid. 1972. The Impact of International Law upon the Islamic World Order. The American Journal of International Law 66 (4): 46–50.Google Scholar
Khong, Yuen Foong. 2013. The American Tributary System. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 6: 1–47.Google Scholar
Khoury, Philip and Kostiner, Joseph. 1990. Introduction: Tribes and the Complexities of State Formation in the Middle East. In Tribes and State Formation in the Middle East, edited by Khoury, Philip and Kostiner, Joseph, 1–24. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kier, Elizabeth. 1997. Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine between the Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1973. The World in Depression, 1929–1939. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kinra, Rajeev. 2013. Handling Diversity with Absolute Civility: The Global Historical Legacy of Mughal Suhl-I Kull. The Medieval History Journal 16 (2): 251–95.Google Scholar
Kinra, Rajeev. 2015. Writing Self, Writing Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 1957. A World Restored; Metternich, Castlereagh and the Problems of Peace, 1812–22. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. 1999. Six Varieties of Cosmopolitanism in Late Eighteenth-Century Germany. Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (3): 505–24.Google Scholar
Knipe, David. 1974. American Aid to Dumézil: A Critical Review of Recent Essays. The Journal of Asian Studies 34 (1): 159–67.Google Scholar
Koch, Ebba. 2012. How the Mughal Padshahs Referenced Iran in Their Visual Construction of Universal Rule. In Universal Empire, edited by Bang, Peter Fibiger and Kolodziejczyk, Darius, 194–209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul, Evans, Peter, Katzenstein, Peter J., Przeworski, Adam, Rudolph, Susanne Hoeber, Scott, James C., and Skocpol, Theda. 1995. The Role of Theory in Comparative Politics: A Symposium. World Politics 48 (1): 1–49.Google Scholar
Kolodziejczyk, Dariusz. 2012. Khan, Caliph, Tsar and Imperator: The Multiple Identities of the Ottoman Sultan. In Universal Empire, edited by Bang, Peter Fibiger and Kolodziejczyk, Darius, 175–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kracke, E. A. 1953. Civil Service in Early Sung China, 960–1067. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kramrisch, Stella. 1955. The Four-Cornered Citadel of the Gods. Journal of the American Oriental Society 75 (3): 184–87.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen, ed. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1986. Of Systems, Boundaries and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the State System. World Politics 39 (1): 27–52.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1990. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kulke, Hermann. 1986. The Early and the Imperial Kingdom in Southeast Asian History. In Southeast Asia in the 9th to 14th Centuries, edited by Marr, David and Milner, A. C., 1–22. Singapore: Institute for Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles. 1994. The Vulnerability of Empire. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 2004. Islamic Statecraft and the Middle East’s Delayed Modernization. In Political Competition, Innovation and Growth in the History of Asian Civilizations, edited by Bernholz, Peter and Vaubel, Roland, 150–93. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kurat, A. and Bromley, J. 1976. The Retreat of the Turks. In A History of the Ottoman Empire to 1730, edited by Cook, M. A., 178–220. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan, eds. 1970. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David. 1984. Beneath the Commerce of Nations: A Theory of International Economic Structures. International Studies Quarterly 28 (2): 143–70.Google Scholar
Lake, David. 1996. Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations. International Organization 50 (1): 1–34.Google Scholar
Lake, David. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David. 2011. Why “isms” Are Evil: Theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress. International Studies Quarterly 55 (2): 465–80.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2011. Framing: The Role of the Brain in Politics. In Emotions in Politics and Campaigning. Berkeley: University of California. Accessed at https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4wf1n73v.Google Scholar
Lal, Deepak. 2004. India. In Political Competition, Innovation and Growth in the History of Asian Civilizations, edited by Bernholz, Peter and Vaubel, Roland, 128–49. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Lam, Truong Buu. 1968. Intervention versus Tribute in Sino-Vietnamese Relations, 1788–1790. In The Chinese World Oder: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations, edited by Fairbank, John King, 165–79. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Landa, Janet. 1981. A Theory of the Ethnically Homogeneous Middleman Group: An Institutional Alternative to Contract Law. Journal of Legal Studies 10: 349–62.Google Scholar
Larsen, Kirk W. 2013. Comforting Fictions: The Tribute System, the Westphalian Order, and Sino-Korean Relations. Journal of East Asian Studies 13 (2): 233–57.Google Scholar
Lavy, Paul. 2003. As in Heaven, So on Earth: The Politics of Viṣṇu, Śiva and Harihara Images in Preangkorian Khmer Civilisation. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 34 (1): 21–39.Google Scholar
Law, Narendra Nath. 1985. Studies in Indian History and Culture. Delhi: B. R. Publishing.Google Scholar
Lawson, George. 2017. The Untimely Historical Sociologist. Review of International Studies 43 (4): 671–85.Google Scholar
Layne, Christopher. 1993. The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise. International Security 17 (4): 5–51.Google Scholar
Le Goff, Jacques. 1980. Time, Work and Culture in the Middle Ages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2008. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Jeong-Mi. 2010. Chosŏn Korea as Sojunghwa, the Small Central Civilization: Sadae kyorin Policy and Relations with Ming/Qing China and Tokugawa Japan in the Seventeenth Century. Asian Cultural Studies 36: 305–18.Google Scholar
Lee, Ji-Young. 2013. Diplomatic Ritual as a Power Resource: The Politics of Asymmetry in Early Modern Chinese–Korean Relations. Journal of East Asian Studies 13 (2): 309–36.Google Scholar
Lee, Ji-Young. 2016. Hegemonic Authority and Domestic Legitimation: Japan and Korea under Chinese Hegemonic Order in Early Modern East Asia. Security Studies 25 (2): 320–52.Google Scholar
Leplin, Jarrett, 1984. Introduction. In Scientific Realism, edited by Leplin, Jarrett, 1–7. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 2003. Economic Interdependence, Opportunity Costs, and Peace. In Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate, edited by Mansfield, Edward D. and Pollins, Brian M., 127–47. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Archibald and Runyan, Timothy. 1985. European Naval and Maritime History 300–1500. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark. 2006. Construction of Space in Early China. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Li, Mingjiang. 2011. Rising from Within: China’s Search for a Multilateral World and Its Implications for Sino-US Relations. Global Governance 17 (3): 331–51.Google Scholar
Li, Zhaojie. 2002. Traditional Chinese World Order. Chinese Journal of International Law 1 (1): 20–58.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Victor. 1987. Reinterpreting Burmese History. Comparative Studies in Society and History 29 (1): 162–94.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Victor. 1993. Was the 17th Century a Watershed in Burmese History? In Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era, edited by Reid, Anthony, 214–49. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Victor. 2003a. Some Comparative Thoughts on Pre-Modern Southeast Asian Warfare. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 46 (2): 215–25.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Victor. 2003b. Strange Parallels: South East Asia in Global Context, c. 800–1830. Vol. 1. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1971. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. The American Political Science Review 65 (3): 682–93.Google Scholar
Lin, Justin. 1995. The Needham Puzzle: Why the Industrial Revolution Did Not Originate in China. Economic Development and Cultural Change 43 (2): 269–92.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew. 2016. Violence and Civilization in the Western States-Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1959. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. The American Political Science Review 53 (1): 69–105.Google Scholar
Littleton, C. Scott. 1974. “Je ne suis pas … Structuraliste”: Some Fundamental Differences between Dumézil and Levi-Strauss. The Journal of Asian Studies 34 (1): 151–58.Google Scholar
Liu, Kwang-Ching and Smith, Richard. 1980. The Military Challenge: The North-West and the Coast. In The Cambridge History of China, vol. 11, part 2, edited by Fairbank, John K. and Liu, Kwang-Ching, 202–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lorge, Peter A. 2008. The Asian Military Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lubis, Mochtar. 1987. Indonesia: Land under the Rainbow. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1982. Relativism in Its Place. In Rationality and Relativism, edited by Hollis, Martin and Lukes, Steven, 261–305. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 2000. Different Cultures, Different Rationalities? History of the Human Sciences 13 (1): 3–18.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1976. Is a Science of Comparative Politics Possible? In The Philosophy of Social Explanation, edited by Ryan, Alan, 171–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahmoudi, Said. 2005. The Islamic Perception of the Use of Force in the Contemporary World. Journal of the History of International Law 7: 55–68.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen. 2010. A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In Explaining Institutional Change, edited by Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, 1–37. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maier, Charles S. 2000. Consigning the Twentieth Century to History: Alternative Narratives for the Modern Era. The American Historical Review 105 (3): 807–31.Google Scholar
Manggala, Pandu. 2013. The Mandala Culture of Anarchy: The Pre-Colonial Southeast Asian International Society. Journal of ASEAN Studies 1 (1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Manguin, Pierre-Yves. 2000. Les cites-États de l’Asie du Sud-Est côtière [De l’ancienneté et de la permanence des forms urbaines]. Bulletin de l’Ecole francaise d’Extrême-Orient 87 (1): 151–82.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manning, Patrick. 1996. The Problem of Interactions in World History. The American Historical Review 101 (3): 771–82.Google Scholar
Markovits, Claude. 2016. Army, India (c. 596–1366/1200–1947). In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 3rd ed., edited by Fleet, Kate, Krämer, Gudrun, Matringe, Denis, Nawas, John, and Rowson, Everett. Leiden: Brill. Accessed at http://referenceworks.brillonline.com.Google Scholar
Matthee, Rudi. 2010. Was Safavid Iran an Empire? Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 53: 233–65.Google Scholar
Matthee, Rudi and Mashita, Hiroyuki. 2012. Kandahar IV: From The Mongol Invasion through the Safavid Era. Encyclopædia Iranica 15 (5): 478–84. Accessed at www.iranicaonline.org/articles.Google Scholar
Mayall, James. 1990. Nationalism and International Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McClellan, David. 1977. Karl Marx: Selected Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCloud, Donald G. 1986. System and Process in Southeast Asia: The Evolution of a Region. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
McKinnon Wood, Hugh. 1943. The Treaty of Paris and Turkey’s Status in International Law. The American Journal of International Law 37 (2): 262–74.Google Scholar
McNeill, William. 1974. Venice: The Hinge of Europe 1081–1797. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, William. 1982. The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, William. 1986. Organizing Concepts for World History. Review. Fernand Braudel Center 10 (2): 211–29.Google Scholar
McNeill, William. 1990. The Rise of the West after Twenty-Five Years. Journal of World History 1 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
McWilliams, William. 1975. East Meets East: The Soejima Mission to China, 1873. Monumenta Nipponica 30 (3): 237–75.Google Scholar
Menegon, Eugenio. 2013. European and Chinese Controversies over Rituals: A Seventeenth-Century Genealogy of Chinese Religion. In Devising Order: Socio-religious Models, Rituals, and the Performativity of Practice, edited by Boute, Bruno and Samberg, Thomas, 193–222. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 2005. Rationality and Psychology in International Politics. International Organization 59 (1): 77–106.Google Scholar
Miles, Gary. 1990. Roman and Modern Imperialism: A Reassessment. Comparative Studies in Society and History 32 (4): 629–59.Google Scholar
Minawi, Mostafa. 2016. The Ottoman Scramble for Africa: Empire and Diplomacy in the Sahara and the Hijaz. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Modelski, George. 1978. The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State. Comparative Studies in Society and History 20 (2): 214–35.Google Scholar
Moertono, Somersaid. 1968. State and Statecraft in Old Java. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. 1990. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mus, P. 1964. Thousand Armed Kannon: A Mystery or a Problem? Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 12 (1): 438–70.Google Scholar
Naff, Thomas. 1984. The Ottoman Empire and the European States System. In The Expansion of International Society, edited by Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam, 143–69. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Navari, Cornelia, ed. 2009. Theorising International Society. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Necipoğlu, Gülru. 1993. Framing the Gaze in Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal Palaces. Ars Orientalis 23: 303–42.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver. 2011. Entry into International Society Reconceptualised: The Case of Russia. Review of International Studies 37 (2): 463–84.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver and Welsh, Jennifer. 1991. The Other in European Self-Definition: An Addendum to the Literature on International Society. Review of International Studies 17 (4): 327–48.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. 1944. Foundations of the Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Newby, Laura. 2014. From Frontier Policy to Foreign Policy: The Question of India and the Transformation of Geopolitics in Qing China by Matthew W. Mosca (review). Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 74 (2): 359–62.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel. 2009. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass and Weingast, Barry. 1989. Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in 17th Century England. Journal of Economic History 49 (4): 803–32.Google Scholar
North, Douglass. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
North, Douglass. 1994. Economic Performance through Time. American Economic Review 84 (3): 359–68.Google Scholar
O’Hagan, Jacinta. 2017. The Role of Civilization in the Globalization of International Society. In The Globalization of International Society, edited by Dunne, Tim and Reus-Smit, Christian, 185–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oksenberg, Michel. 2001. The Issue of Sovereignty in the Asian Historical Context. In Problematic Sovereignty, edited by Krasner, Stephen, 83–104. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oneal, John R. and Russett, Bruce M.. 1997. The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict. International Studies Quarterly 41 (2): 267–95.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. 1991. Sovereignty: Outline of a Conceptual History. Alternatives 16 (4): 425–46.Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander. 2006. The Idea of European International Law. The European Journal of International Law 17 (2): 315–47.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 1994. The States System of Europe, 1640–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 2001. Before Sovereignty: Society and Politics in Ancien Régime Europe. Review of International Studies 27 (5): 119–45.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 2007. Before the State: Systemic Political Change in the West from the Greeks to the French Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Otto, Jan M., Dekker, Albert, and Cora, de Waaij. 1994. Indonesian Law and Administration as Reflected in 150 years of Bijdragen. BKI 150 (4): 728–54.Google Scholar
Outhwaite, William. 1985. Hans-Georg Gadamer. In The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences, edited by Skinner, Quentin, 21–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Owen, John, 2015. Confronting Political Islam. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pankenier, David. 2010. Cosmic Capitals and Numinous Precincts in Early China. Journal of Cosmology 9: 2030–40.Google Scholar
Pardesi, Manjeet S. 2017. Region, System, and Order: The Mughal Empire in Islamicate Asia. Security Studies 26 (2): 249–78.Google Scholar
Pardesi, Manjeet S. 2019. Mughal Hegemony and the Emergence of South Asia as a “Region” for Regional Order-Building. European Journal of International Relations 25(1): 276–301.Google Scholar
Park, Saeyoung. 2017. Long Live the Tributary System! The Future of Studying East Asian Foreign Relations. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 77 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Park, Seo-Hyun. 2013. Changing Definitions of Sovereignty in Nineteenth-Century East Asia: Japan and Korea between China and the West. Journal of East Asian Studies 13: 281–307.Google Scholar
Parker, Geoffrey. 1979. Warfare. In New Cambridge Modern History, vol. 13, edited by Burke, Peter, 201–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Geoffrey. 1988. The Military Revolution: Military Innovation and the Rise of the West, 1500–1800. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parry, V. J. 1976. The Successors of Sulaimān, 1566–1611. In A History of the Ottoman Empire to 1730, edited by Cook, M. A., 103–32. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parvin, Manoucher and Sommer, Maurie. 1980. Dar al-Islam: The Evolution of Muslim Territoriality and Its Implications for Conflict Resolution in the Middle East. International Journal of Middle East Studies 11 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Patomäki, Heikki. 2008. The Political Economy of Global Security. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peirce, Leslie. 1992. Beyond Harem Walls: Ottoman Royal Women and the Exercise of Power. In Gendered Domains, edited by Helly, Dorothy and Reverby, Susan, 40–55. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Perdue, Peter. 1998. Comparing Empires: Manchu Colonialism. The International History Review 20 (2): 255–62.Google Scholar
Perdue, Peter. 2009. China and Other Colonial Empires. The Journal of American East Asian Relations 16 (1–2): 85–103.Google Scholar
Perdue, Peter. 2015. The Tenacious Tributary System. Journal of Contemporary China 24: 1002–14.Google Scholar
Phillips, Andrew. 2011. War, Religion and Empire. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Andrew. 2017. International Systems. The Globalization of International Society, edited by Dunne, Tim and Reus-Smit, Christian, 43–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Andrew and Sharman, Jason. 2015. International Order in Diversity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piscatori, James P. 1986. Islam in a World of Nation-States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1972. Wittgenstein and Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, Alessandro. 1987. Politics Unbound. In Changing Boundaries of the Political, edited by Maier, Charles, 27–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poggi, Gianfranco. 1978. The Development of the Modern State. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, Kenneth. 2000. The Great Divergence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2007. “Sobjectivism”: Toward a Constructivist Methodology. International Studies Quarterly 51 (2): 359–84.Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. 1991. Arts of the Contact Zone. In Profession, 33–40. New York: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Pye, Lucian. 1998. International Relations in Asia: Culture, Nation and State. Sigur Center Asian Paper 1. Washington, DC: Sigur Center.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing. 2009. Development of International Relations Theory in China. International Studies 46 (1–2): 185–201.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing. 2011. Development of International Relations Theory in China: Progress through Debates. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 11: 231–57.Google Scholar
Rasler, Karen and Thompson, William. 1985. War Making and State Making: Governmental Expenditures, Tax Revenues and Global War. American Political Science Review 79 (2): 491–507.Google Scholar
Rawski, Evelyn. 1996. Reenvisioning the Qing: The Significance of the Qing Period in Chinese History. The Journal of Asian Studies 55 (4): 829–50.Google Scholar
Rawski, Evelyn. 2015. Early Modern China and Northeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ray, Haraprasad. 1987. An Analysis of the Chinese Maritime Voyages into the Indian Ocean during Early Ming Dynasty and Their Raison d’etre. China Report 23 (1): 65–87.Google Scholar
Reid, Anthony. 1968. Indonesia’s History between the Myths: Essays in Legal History and Historical Theory. Selected Studies on Indonesia 7 by Resink, G. J.. BKI 124 (4): 555–58.Google Scholar
Reid, Anthony. 1988. Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450–1680. Vol. 1. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Anthony. 1993a. Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450–1680. Vol. 2. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Anthony. 1993b. Introduction: A Time and a Place. In Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era, edited by Reid, Anthony, 1–19. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Reid, Anthony. 2015. A History of Southeast Asia. Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ren, Zhijun. 2012. Tributary System, Global Capitalism and the Meaning of Asia in Late Qing China. MA thesis, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Rengger, N. J. 1988. Serpents and Doves in Classical International Theory. Millennium 17 (2): 215–25.Google Scholar
Resink, G. J. 1979. Het Verbond Tussen Sultan Mangkubumi en de V.O.C. BKI 135 (2–3): 357–59.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 1997. The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions. International Organization 51 (4): 555–89.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2013. The Liberal International Order Reconsidered. In After Liberalism, edited by Friedman, R, Oskanian, K, and Pacheco-Pardo, R, 167–86. Houndsmills, England: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2017. Cultural Diversity and International Order. International Organization 71 (4): 851–85.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2018. On Cultural Diversity: International Theory in a World of Difference. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Craig. 1995. A New Look at Old Southeast Asia. The Journal of Asian Studies 54 (2): 419–46.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Frank E. 1978. Buddhism as Universal Religion and as Civic Religion. In Religion and Legitimation of Power in Thailand, Laos and Burma, edited by Smith, Bardwell, 194–203. Chambersburg, PA: ANIMA Books.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, M. C. 1983. Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali by Clifford Geertz, Review. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 14 (1): 184–85.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, M. C. 1993. A History of Modern Indonesia since c. 1300. 2nd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, M. C. 2014. Rediscovering Islam in Javanese History. Studia Islamika 21 (3): 397–418.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1976. History and Hermeneutics. The Journal of Philosophy 73 (19): 683–95.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1977. The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text. In Understanding and Social Inquiry, edited by Dallmayr, Fred and McCarthy, Thomas, 316–34. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Riedlmayer, Andräs. 1981. Ottoman–Safavid Relations and the Anatolian Trade Routes: 1603–1618. Turkish Studies Association Bulletin 5 (1): 7–10.Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik. 2012. Performing International Systems: Two East-Asian Alternatives to the Westphalian Order. International Organization 66 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Rizvi, Kishwar. 2002. The Imperial Setting: Shah “Abbās at the Safavid Shrine of Shaykh Safī in Ardabil. In Safavid Art and Architecture, edited by Canby, Sheila, 9–15. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Luke S. 2012. Performing the Great Peace: Political Space and Open Secrets in Tokugawa Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, David. 1999. Politics, Force and Ethnicity in Ming China: Mongols and the Abortive Coup of 1461. Journal of Asiatic Studies 59 (1): 79–123.Google Scholar
Rogers, Ben. 1990. Review. Philosophy for Historians: The Methodological Writings of Quentin Skinner. History 75 (244): 262–71.Google Scholar
Roosen, William. 1980. Early Modern Diplomatic Ceremonial: A Systems Approach. The Journal of Modern History 52 (3): 452–76.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard. 1963. Action and Reaction in World Politics. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard. 1986. The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard. 1987. Long Cycle Theory and International Relations. International Organization 41 (2): 283–302.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard and Miller, Steven, eds. 2015. The Next Great War? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James. 1989. Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Toward a Post-international Politics for the 1990s. In Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges, edited by Czempiel, Ernst-Otto and Rosenau, James, 135–59. Washington, DC: Heath.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, eds. 1992. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Marc Howard. 1997. Culture and Identity in Comparative Political Analysis. In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, edited by Lichbach, Mark and Zuckerman, Alan, 42–80. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rozman, Gilbert. 1981. The East Asian Region in Comparative Perspective. In The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation, edited by Rozman, Gilbert, 3–42. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Jennifer. 2005. Creating a Personnel Base: Zongli Yamen Efforts to Penetrate the Qing Hierarchy. The Chinese Historical Review 12 (2): 202–29.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Susanne. 1987. Presidential Address: State Formation in Asia – Prolegomenon to a Comparative Study. The Journal of Asian Studies 46 (4): 731–46.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Susanne. 2005. Presidential Address: The Imperialism of Categories: Situating Knowledge in a Globalizing World. Perspectives on Politics 3 (1): 5–14.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John. 1982. International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization 36 (2): 379–415.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John. 1986. Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis. In Neorealism and Its Critics, edited by Keohane, Robert, 131–57. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John. 1993. Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. International Organization 47 (1): 139–74.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John. 1998. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization 52 (4): 855–85.Google Scholar
Runciman, W. G. 1982. Origins of States: The Case of Archaic Greece. Comparative Studies in Society and History 24: 351–77.Google Scholar
Şahin, Kaya. 2017. The Ottoman Empire in the Long Sixteenth Century. Renaissance Quarterly 70 (1): 220–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 1976. Culture and Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Said, Edward W., Grabar, Oleg, and Lewis, Bernard. 1982. Orientalism: An Exchange. New York Review of Books 29 (13): 44–48.Google Scholar
Sarotte, Mary E. 2010. Perpetuating U.S. Preeminence: The 1990 Deals to “Bribe the Soviets Out” and Move NATO In. International Security 35 (1): 110–37.Google Scholar
Sastrapratedja, M. 1984. The Crisis of Religion as a System of Legitimation. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science 12 (1): 16–24.Google Scholar
Savory, Roger. 2003. Relations between the Safavid State and Its Non-Muslim Minorities. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 13 (4): 435–58.Google Scholar
Scammel, G. V. 1981. The World Encompassed: The First European Maritime Empires c. 800–1650. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schluchter, Wolfgang. 1981. The Rise of Western Rationalism: Max Weber’s Developmental History. Translated by Guenther Roth. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schouenborg, Laust. 2017. International Institutions in World History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Paul. 1994. The Transformation of European Politics, 1763–1848. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall. 1994. Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In. International Security 19 (1): 72–107.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1964. How to Derive “Ought” from “Is.” The Philosophical Review 73 (1): 43–58.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 2006. Social Ontology: Some Basic Principles. Anthropological Theory 6 (1): 12–29.Google Scholar
Severi, Bart. 2001. “Denari in Loco Delle Terre …”: Imperial Envoy Gerard Veltwijck and Habsburg Policy towards the Ottoman Empire, 1545–1547. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 54 (2/3): 211–56.Google Scholar
Sharman, Jason. 2019. Empires of the Weak: The Real Story of European Expansion and the Creation of the New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shenhav, Shaul R. 2006. Political Narratives and Political Reality. International Political Science Review/Revue internationale de science politique 27 (3): 245–62.Google Scholar
Shorto, Harry L. 2002. The 32 Myos. In Classical Civilisations of South East Asia, edited by Braginsky, Vladimir, 186–205. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1966. The Limits of Historical Explanations. Philosophy 41 (157): 199–215.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1978. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1985. Introduction: The Return of Grand Theory. In The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences, edited by Skinner, Quentin, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Bardwell and Reynolds, Holly B., eds. 1987. The City as a Sacred Center. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Smith, Richard. 2013. Mapping China and the Question of a China-Centered Tributary System. The Asia-Pacific Journal 11 (3): 1–18.Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert L. 1970. Boundary Concepts and Practices in Southeast Asia. World Politics 23 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Song, Nianshen. 2012. Tributary from a Multilateral and Multilayered Perspective. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5 (2): 155–82.Google Scholar
Sood, Gagan D. 2008. Pluralism, Hegemony and Custom in Cosmopolitan Islamic Eurasia, Ca. 1720–90. PhD diss., Yale University.Google Scholar
Sood, Gagan D. 2011. Circulation and Exchange in Islamicate Eurasia: A Regional Approach to the Early Modern World. Past and Present 212 (1): 113–62.Google Scholar
Speer, James. 1968. Hans Morgenthau and the World State. World Politics 20 (2): 207–27.Google Scholar
Spence, Jonathan D. 1999. The Search for Modern China. 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 2000. The End of Empire and the Extension of the Westphalian System: The Normative Basis of the Modern State Order. International Studies Review 2 (2): 65–92.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 2001a. Diversity or Uniformity in the Modern World? Answers from Evolutionary Theory, Learning, and Social Adaptation. In Evolutionary Interpretations of World Politics, edited by Thompson, William, 110–32. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 2001b. Empires and Imperialism. In Encyclopedia of Nationalism, edited by Motyl, Alexander, 237–49. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 2013. Empires, Past and Present: The Relevance of Empire as an Analytic Concept. In Empire and International Order, edited by Parker, Noel, 20–40. Farnham, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 2017a. Collective Imaginations and International Order: The Contemporary Context of the Chinese Tributary System. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 77 (1): 21–45.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 2017b. Economies and Economic Interaction across Eurasia in the Early Modern Period. In The Globalization of International Society, edited by Dunne, Tim and Reus-Smit, Christian, 82–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 2017c. How to Integrate Global History in International Relations Theory. Symposium on Comparing International Systems in World History. International Studies Quarterly Online, November 28, 8–10.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 2017d. War and State Formation: Amending the Bellicist Theory of State Making. In Does War Make States? Investigations of Charles Tilly’s Historical Sociology, edited by Kaspersen, Lars and Strandsberg, Jeppe, 73–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, Amy. 2013. Performing the Great Peace, Review. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 73 (1): 216–24.Google Scholar
Stapel, F. W., ed. 1938. Corpus Diplomaticum Neerlando-Indicum (1726–1752). BKI 96 (1): 4–600.Google Scholar
Steensgaard, Niels. 1974. The Asian Trade Revolution of the Seventeenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steinhardt, Nancy. 2013. Early Cities – China. In The Oxford Handbook of Cities in World History, Oxford Handbook Online, edited by Clark, Peter. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accessed at www.oxfordhandbooks.com.Google Scholar
Stewart, Devin. 2013. Shari’a. In The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought, edited by Bowering, Gerhard, 496–505. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Strong, Tracy. 1990. The Idea of Political Theory. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Stuart-Fox, Martin. 1994. Conflicting Conceptions of the State: Siam, France and Vietnam in the Late Nineteenth Century. Journal of the Siam Society 82 (2): 135–44.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. 2006. A Tale of Three Empires: Mughals, Ottomans, and Habsburgs in a Comparative Context. Common Knowledge 12 (1): 66–92.Google Scholar
Sun, Weiguo. 2001. Choson’s Revering the Zhou and Longing for the Ming: The Influence of Ming China on Choson Korea, 1637–1800. PhD diss., Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Sverdrup-Thygeson, Bjørnar. 2012. A Neighbourless Empire? The Forgotten Diplomatic Tradition of Imperial China. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 7: 245–67.Google Scholar
Swarat, Christopher M. 2011. In Other Words: A Critique of Modernism in International Relations Discourse from the Perspective of Confucian Tradition. PhD diss., Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Swearer, Donald K. 1987. The Northern Thai City as a Sacred Center. In The City as a Sacred Center, edited by Smith, Bardwell and Reynolds, Holly B., 103–13. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Swope, Kenneth M. 2002. Deceit, Disguise, and Dependence: China, Japan, and the Future of the Tributary System, 1592–1596. The International History Review 24 (4): 757–82.Google Scholar
Szuppe, Maria. 1997. L’évolution de l’image de Timour et des Timourides dans l’historiographie safavide du XVIe au XVIIIe siècle. Cahiers d’Asie centrale 3/4: 313–31.Google Scholar
Tambiah, Stanley. 1976. World Conqueror and World Renouncer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tambiah, Stanley. (1973) 2013. The Galactic Polity in Southeast Asia. Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (3): 503–34.Google Scholar
Tarling, Nicholas. 1999a. The Establishment of Colonial Regimes. In The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, vol. 3, edited by Tarling, Nicholas, 1–74. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarling, Nicholas, ed. 1999b. The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tautz, Birgit. 2009. “Das Hamburgische Parterre”: Johann Christoph Bodes “Westindier” und die Verortung des Globalen. Zeitschrift für Germanistik 19 (1): 183–90.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1971. Interpretation and the Sciences of Man. The Review of Metaphysics 25 (1): 3–51.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1982. Rationality. In Rationality and Relativism, edited by Hollis, Martin and Lukes, Steven, 87–105. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Testa, I., de. 1864. Recueil des traités de la Porte Ottomane avec les puissances étrangères depuis le premier traité conclu, en 1536, entre Suléyman I et François I, jusqu’à nos jours. Paris: Amyot. Accessed at https://archive.org/details/recueildestrait01testuoft.Google Scholar
Tezcan, Baki. 2007. The Politics of Early Modern Ottoman Historiography. In The Early Modern Ottomans, edited by Aksan, Virginia and Goffman, Daniel, 167–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, George and Meyer, John. 1984. The Expansion of the State. In Annual Review of Sociology, edited by Turner, Ralph, 461–82. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
Thomas, George, Meyer, John, Ramirez, Francisco, and Boli, John. 1987. Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Thompson, William. 1990. Long Waves, Technological Innovation, and Relative Decline. International Organization 44 (2): 201–34.Google Scholar
Tibi, Bassam. 1990. The Simultaneity of the Unsimultaneous: Old Tribes and Imposed Nation-States in the Modern Middle East. In Tribes and State Formation in the Middle East, edited by Khoury, Philip and Kostiner, Joseph, 127–52. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, ed. 1975. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1985. War Making and State Making as Organized Crime. In Bringing the State Back In, edited by Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, 169–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toby, Ronald P. 1991. State and Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Toorawa, Shawkat M. 2013. Pillars of Islam. In The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought, edited by Bowering, Gerhard, 418–19. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tracy, James D., ed. 1990. The Rise of Merchant Empires: Long-Distance Trade in the Early Modern World, 1350–1750. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tracy, James D., ed. 1991. The Political Economy of Merchant Empires. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Travers, Robert. 2007. Ideology and Empire in Eighteenth-Century India. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trocki, Carl A. 2009. Chinese Revenue Farms and Borders in Southeast Asia. Modern Asian Studies 43 (1): 335–62.Google Scholar
Tucker, Ernst. 1996. The Peace Negotiations of 1736: A Conceptual Turning Point in Ottoman–Iranian Relations. Turkish Studies Association Bulletin 20 (1): 16–37.Google Scholar
Van der Kroef, Justus. 1954. Pantjasila: The National Ideology of the New Indonesia. Philosophy East and West 4 (3): 225–51.Google Scholar
Van der Kroef, Justus. 1958. On the Writing of Indonesian History. Pacific Affairs 31 (4): 352–71.Google Scholar
Van der Kroef, Justus. 1961. On the Sovereignty of Indonesian States: A Rejoinder. BKI 117 (2): 238–66.Google Scholar
Van der Veer, Peter. 2013. The Value of Comparison. HAU-Morgan Lectures Initiative. Transcript of the Lewis Henry Morgan Lecture. University of Rochester, November 13.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1984. To Save the Phenomena. In Scientific Realism, edited by Leplin, Jarrett, 250–59. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, C. F. 1992. Maluku en de Ambonse Eilanden tot het Midden van de 17e eeuw: Socio-Kosmische Ordening en Politieke Verhoudingen. In Sedjarah Maluku, edited by Knaap, G. J., Manuhutu, W, and Smeets, H, 33–54. Amsterdam: Van Soeren.Google Scholar
Van Oosten, Jarich, van de Velde, Pieter, and Claessen, Henri J. M.. 1994. Constructing the Early State: The Rise of a Research Programme. BKI 150 (2): 291–304.Google Scholar
Vatin, Nicholas. 2015. The Ottoman View of France from the Late Fifteenth to the Mid-Sixteenth Century. French History 29 (1): 6–11.Google Scholar
Venturi, Franco. 1963. Oriental Despotism. Journal of the History of Ideas 24 (1): 133–42.Google Scholar
Virgil, . 1916. Eclogues, Georgics, Aeneid. Translated by H. R. Fairclough. Loeb Classical Library 63 and 64. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Voll, John O. 1994. Islam as a Special World-System. Journal of World History 5 (2): 213–26.Google Scholar
Voltaire, . (1763) 2015. A Treatise on Toleration. In The Works of Voltaire, vol. 4, translated by William F. Fleming. Project Guttenberg e-Book 49726.Google Scholar
Wade, Geoff. 2008. Engaging the South: Ming China and Southeast Asia in the Fifteenth Century. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 51 (4): 578–638.Google Scholar
Waever, Ole. 1998. The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations. International Organization 52 (4): 687–727.Google Scholar
Waldron, Arthur. 1996. Review of Alastair Johnston, “Cultural Realism.” The China Quarterly 147: 962–64.Google Scholar
Walker, Robert and Mendlovitz, Saul, eds. 1990. Contending Sovereignties: Rethinking Political Community. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Walker, Robert J. 1993. Inside–Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World System. 2 vols. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1984. The Politics of the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1986. Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics. In Neorealism and Its Critics, edited by Keohane, Robert, 322–45. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1967. On the Role of Symbolism in Political Thought. Political Science Quarterly 82 (2): 191–204.Google Scholar
Wang, Gungwu. 1998. Ming Foreign Relations: Southeast Asia. In Cambridge History of China, vol. 8, edited by Twitchett, Denis and Mote, Frederick, 301–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Mingming. 2012. All under Heaven. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2 (1): 337–83.Google Scholar
Wang, Yuanchong. 2018. Remaking the Chinese Empire. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Yuan-kang. 2012. Managing Regional Hegemony in Historical Asia: The Case of Early Ming China. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5 (2): 129–53.Google Scholar
Wang, Yuan-kang. 2013. Explaining the Tribute System: Power, Confucianism, and War in Medieval East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies 13 (2): 207–32.Google Scholar
Wang, Yuhua. 2019. Elite Kinship Network and State Strengthening: Theory and Evidence from Imperial China. Paper presented at the Comparative Politics Workshop, Northwestern University, Evanston, May 31.Google Scholar
Wang, Zheng. 2008. National Humiliation, History Education, and the Politics of Historical Memory: Patriotic Education Campaign in China. International Studies Quarterly 52 (4): 783–806.Google Scholar
Watson-Andaya, Barbara. 1999. Political Development between the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. In The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, vol. 2, edited by Tarling, Nicholas, 58–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Cynthia. 1998. Performative States. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 27 (1): 77–95.Google Scholar
Weber, Eugen. 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870–1914. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946. Politics as a Vocation. In From Max Weber, edited and translated by Gerth, Hans and Wright Mills, C, 77–128. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1949. Methodology of the Social Sciences. Edited and translated by Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Henry A.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1958. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 1998. Acting “as If”: Symbolic Politics and Social Control in Syria. Comparative Studies in Society and History 40(3): 503–23.Google Scholar
Welsh, Jennifer. 2017. Empire and Fragmentation. In The Globalization of International Society, edited by Dunne, Tim and Reus-Smit, Christian, 145–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1987. The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. International Organization 41 (3): 335–70.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46 (2): 391–426.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1994. Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American Political Science Review 88 (2): 384–96.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Reinhard and Nagel, Jürgen G. 2015. Southeast Asia and Oceania. In Empires and Encounters 1350–1750, edited by Reinhard, Wolfgang, 555–736. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wheatley, Paul. 1967. City as Symbol. London University College Inaugural Lecture, November 20.Google Scholar
Wheatley, Paul. 1971. The Pivot of the Four Quarters: A Preliminary Enquiry into the Origins and Character of the Ancient Chinese City. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
White, Ben. 2007. Clifford Geertz: Singular Genius of Interpretive Anthropology. Development and Change 38 (6): 1187–1208.Google Scholar
White, Joyce. 1995. Incorporating Heterarchy into Theory on Socio-political Development: The Case from Southeast Asia. In Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, edited by Ehrenreich, Robert, Crumley, Carole, and Levy, Janet, 101–23. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1977. Systems of States. Edited by Bull, Hedley. Leicester, England: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1991. International Theory: The Three Traditions. Edited by Wight, Gabriele and Porter, Brian. Leicester, England: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Wills, John E. 2009a. Introduction to “From Tribute System to Peaceful Rise: American Historians, Political Scientists, and Policy Analysts Discuss China’s Foreign Relations.” Journal of American-East Asian Relations 16 (1–2): 1–9.Google Scholar
Wills, John E. 2009b. How Many Asymmetries? Continuities, Transformations, and Puzzles in the Study of Chinese Foreign Relations. Journal of American-East Asian Relations 16 (1–2): 23–39.Google Scholar
Wills, John E. 2011. Introduction. In China and Maritime Europe, 1500–1800: Trade, Settlement, Diplomacy, and Missions, edited by Wills, John E., 1–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wills, John E. 2012. Functional, Not Fossilized: Qing Tribute Relations with Dai Viet (Vietnam) and Siam (Thailand), 1700–1820. T’oung Pao 98 (4–5): 439–78.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter. 1964. Understanding a Primitive Society. American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (4): 307–24.Google Scholar
Winichakul, Thongchai. 1994. Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-body of a Nation. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Winichakul, Thongchai. 2000. The Quest for “Siwilai”: A Geographical Discourse of Civilizational Thinking in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth-Century Siam. The Journal of Asian Studies 59 (3): 528–49.Google Scholar
Wink, André. 1984. Sovereignty and Universal Dominion in South Asia. The Indian Economic and Social History Review 21 (3): 265–91.Google Scholar
Wisseman Christie, Jan. 1995. State Formation in Early Maritime Southeast Asia. BKI 151 (2): 235–88.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. 1982. Europe and the People without History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold. 1962. Discord and Collaboration. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wolters, Oliver W. 1999. History, Culture, and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Wong, John D. 2013. Traversing the Laws of the Lands: The Strategic Use of Different Legal Systems by Houqua and His China Trade Partners in the Canton System. Conference Paper for SSRC Inter-Asian Connections IV, Koç University, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Wong, Lawrence Wang-chi. 2017. Entrance into the Family of Nations: Translation and the First Diplomatic Missions to the West, 1860–1870s. In Translation and Modernization in East Asia in the 19th and Early 20th Century, edited by Wong, Lawrence Wang-chi, 165–217. Hong Kong: Research Centre for Translation/Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2002. World Bank Group Work in Low-Income Countries under Stress: A Task Force Report. Report 26903. New York: World Bank.Google Scholar
Wright, Mary. 1958. The Adaptability of Ch`ing Diplomacy: The Case of Korea. The Journal of Asian Studies 17 (3): 363–81.Google Scholar
Wyatt, David K. 2003. Thailand: Short History. 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Yan, Xuetong. 2011. Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Zewei. 2011. Western International Law and China’s Confucianism in the 19th Century: Collision and Integration. Journal of the History of International Law 13: 285–306.Google Scholar
Yuan, Chen. 2014. Legitimation Discourse and the Theory of the Five Elements in Imperial China. Journal of Song-Yuan Studies 44: 325–64.Google Scholar
Zacher, Mark. 2001. The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force. International Organization 55 (2): 215–50.Google Scholar
Zakharov, Anton. 2009. Constructing the Polity of Sriwijaya in the 7th–8th centuries: The View According to the Inscriptions. Indonesian Studies Working Paper 9. University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayşe. 2017. States and Ontological Security: A historical Rethinking. Cooperation and Conflict 52 (1): 48–68.Google Scholar
Zéphir, Thierry. 1995. The Angkorean Temple-Mountain: Diversity, Evolution, Permanence. Expedition 37 (3): 6–17.Google Scholar
Zhang, Chunjie. 2015. August von Kotzebue’s Bruder Moritz, der Sonderling and German Transcultural Consciousness around 1800. German Studies Review 38 (1):1–16.Google Scholar
Zhang, Feng. 2009. Rethinking the “Tribute System”: Broadening the Conceptual Horizon of Historical East Asian Politics. Chinese Journal of International Politics 2 (4): 545–74.Google Scholar
Zhang, Lawrence. 2013. Legacy of Success: Office Purchase and State–Elite Relations in Qing China. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 73 (2): 259–97.Google Scholar
Zhang, Xiaoming. 2011. China in the Conception of International Society: The English School’s Engagements with China. Review of International Studies 37 (2): 763–86.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yongjin. 2001. System, Empire and State in Chinese International Relations. Review of International Studies 27 (5): 43–63.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yongjin and Buzan, Barry. 2012. The Tributary System as International Society in Theory and Practice. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5 (1): 3–36.Google Scholar
Zhao, Tingyang. 2006. Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept “All-under-Heaven” (Tian-xia). Social Identities 12 (1): 29–41.Google Scholar
Zhou, Fangyin. 2011. Equilibrium Analysis of the Tributary System. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 4 (2): 147–78.Google Scholar