Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:42:53.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - The first United Kingdom's National Ecosystem Assessment and beyond

from Part III - Assessing water ecosystem services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Marije Schaafsma
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Silvia Ferrini
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Amii R. Harwood
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Ian J. Bateman
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Julia Martin-Ortega
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Robert C. Ferrier
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Iain J. Gordon
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Shahbaz Khan
Affiliation:
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), France
Get access

Summary

9.1 INTRODUCTION

As water and land resources become scarcer, further conflicting demands of different uses and users will arise (Vörösmarty et al. 2000). Sustainable management is required to secure water resources for future generations. Ecosystem services-based approaches aim to ensure that the values of a broad range of benefits to humanity that are provided by our natural environment are accounted for in policy making, in order to foster sustainable development (Chapter 2). National-level incorporation of sustainable development goals has propelled interest in large-scale assessments of ecosystem services which can help address complex problems of ecosystem change (Bateman et al. 2013).

The central question of this chapter is whether large-scale ecosystem services-based approaches provide an opportunity for improving water management. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment (UK-NEA) was the first analysis of the societal benefits of the UK natural environment (UK-NEA 2011a). Moreover, it was one of the leading initiatives worldwide to assess ecosystem services at national level after the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005) produced a global assessment. The first phase of the UK-NEA provided a wealth of policy-relevant information, and we use it here as a case study.

UK rivers, lakes, and ponds make up around 250 000 hectares (1.1%) of the UK total surface area. These surface waters, together with unseen groundwater systems, contribute significant ecosystem services and goods to human well-being in the UK. The quality of UK freshwaters has improved over the last 50 years following direct regulatory interventions in rural and agricultural practices and EU Directives, such as the Water Framework Directive (Watson 2012). These policies have led to a reduction of point and diffuse chemical pollution and improved ecological conditions. Nonetheless, pressures from agricultural, industrial, and domestic use on water resources remains high, both in terms of quality and quantity (Watson 2012). Agricultural practices and landscape modifications, such as use of fertilisers, habitat fragmentation, and degradation, reduce the ecosystem service provision and resulting human benefits.

Type
Chapter
Information
Water Ecosystem Services
A Global Perspective
, pp. 73 - 81
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bateman, I. J., Mace, G. M., Fezzi, C., et al. (2011). Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environmental and Resource Economics 48, 177–218.Google Scholar
Bateman, I. J., Harwood, A., Mace, G. M., et al. (2013). Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision making: land use in the UK. Science 341, 45–50.Google Scholar
BES and UK BRAG (2011). Where next for the UK National Ecosystem Assessment and IPBES? Report of a joint session between the British Ecological Society (BES) and the UK Biodiversity Research Advisory Group (UK BRAG), 13 September, Council Chamber, Octagon Centre, University of Sheffield.
Brander, L. M., Ghermandi, A., Kuik, O., et al. (2008). Scaling up ecosystem services values: methodology, applicability and a case study. Final Report, EEA. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. Available at: www.feem.it/userfiles/attach/2010471736364 NDL2010-041.pdf (last accessed 21 October 2014)
Defra (2010). Payments for Ecosystem Services: A Short Introduction. Defra, London.
Defra (2011). Water for Life: Market Reform Proposals. Defra, London.
Defra (2012). National Policy Statement for Waste Water. Defra, London.
Fisher, B. & Turner, R. K. (2008). Ecosystem services: classification for valuation. Biological Conservation 141, 1167–1169.Google Scholar
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., Zylstra, M., et al. (2008). Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research. Ecological Applications 18, 2050–2067.Google Scholar
Haines-Young, R., Paterson, J., Potschin, M., et al. (2010). The UK NEA Scenarios: Development of Storylines and Analysis of Outcomes. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
Hanley, N., Wright, R. E., & Alvarez-Farizo, B. (2006). Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the Water Framework Directive. Journal of Environmental Management 78, 183–193.Google Scholar
H.M. Government (2011a). The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature (the Natural Environment White Paper). The Stationery Office, London.
H.M. Government (2011b). The Water White Paper. The Stationery Office, London.
Jackson, D. L. (2000). Guidance on the Interpretation of Biodiversity Broad Habitat Classification (Terrestrial and Freshwater Types): Definitions and the Relationship with Other Habitat Classifications. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough.
Krutilla, K. (2005). Using the Kaldor–Hicks Tableau format for cost–benefit analysis. Public Policy Analysis and Management 24, 864–875.Google Scholar
Maltby, E., Omerod, S., Acreman, M., et al. (2011). Freshwater: Open Waters, Wetlands and Floodplains. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
Martin-Ortega, J. (2012). Economic prescriptions and policy applications in the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. Environmental Science and Policy 24, 83–91.Google Scholar
Martin-Ortega, J., Allot, T. E., Glenk, K., & Schaafsma, M. (2014). Valuing water quality improvements from peatland restoration: evidence and challenges. Ecosystem Services 9, 34–43.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, P. J., Baker, W., Andrews, K., et al. (2012). An assessment of the nonmarket benefits of the Water Framework Directive for households in England and Wales. Water Resources Research 48, W03526.Google Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Morris, J. & Camino, M. (2010). Economic Assessment of Freshwater, Wetland and Floodplain Ecosystem Services. UK-NEA, Cranfield.
Mourato, S., Atkinson, G., Collins, M., et al. (2010). Economic Assessment of Ecosystem Related UK Cultural Services. The Economics Team of the UK-NEA, London.
Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., et al. (2010). Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 69, 1202–1208.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M. H., Jenkins, G. J., et al. (2009). UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change Projections. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter.
Natural England (2010). Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment: The National Survey on People and the Natural Environment. Natural England, Sheffield.
NERA (2007). The Benefits of Water Framework Directive Programmes of Measures in England and Wales. NERA, London.
Nisbet, T., Silgram, M., Shah, N., et al. (2011). Woodland for water: summary report. Environment Agency and Forestry Commission.
Sen, A., Harwood, A. R., Bateman, I. J., et al. (2014). Economic assessment of the recreational value of ecosystems: methodological development and national and local application. Environmental and Resource Economics 57, 233–249.Google Scholar
UK-NEA (2011a). The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
UK-NEA (2011b). The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
Vörösmarty, C. J., Green, P., Salisbury, J., & Lammers, R. B. (2000). Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289(5477), 284–288.Google Scholar
Vörösmarty, C. J., McIntyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., et al. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467, 555–561.Google Scholar
Watson, R. T. (2012). The science–policy interface: the role of scientific assessments – UK National Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the Royal Society A 468, 3265–3281.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×