Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:22:21.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The need for psychiatric treatment in the general population

from Part II - Unmet need: general problems and solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2009

Gavin Andrews
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Scott Henderson
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Defining the need for psychiatric care is essentially the province of experts, and the concept of need thus differs from the empirically related concepts of demand and utilization. Despite the importance of assessing population levels of need for treatment, this has almost invariably been done by indirect methods based on consideration of prevalence, disability, and utilization. Such data do have some use, and I use the results of the household component of the British National Survey of Psychiatric Morbidity to demonstrate that there must be a considerable, if imprecisely defined, shortfall in treatment for depression and anxiety in the British population. In the Camberwell Needs for Care Survey (Bebbington et al., 1997), we adapted the Needs for Care Assessment for use in the community in an attempt to provide a detailed account of the treatment needed by individuals, whether it was provided, and if not, why. This allows statements of aggregate levels of need and its fulfillment. The results of these two studies cohere in identifying considerable unmet need for treatment of depression and anxiety. Some of this arises because treatment was not and would not be sought, some because it was not offered. The problems of remedying this situation are complex.

Need, demand and utilization

The performance of organizations and agencies responsible for delivering psychiatric care can be assessed in relation to what care is delivered, to whom, and with what effect. This is set against the background of the moral imperative of health economics: that resources should not be used in one way, if using them differently would increase the overall health benefit.

Type
Chapter
Information
Unmet Need in Psychiatry
Problems, Resources, Responses
, pp. 85 - 96
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×