Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T19:26:44.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References and Further Reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2022

Suzanne Bell  and
John M. Butler
Suzanne Bell
Affiliation:
West Virginia University
John M. Butler
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Gaithersburg, MD
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Understanding Forensic DNA , pp. 159 - 169
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

American Red Cross (2021). Facts about blood and blood types. www.redcrossblood.org/donate-blood/blood-types.html (accessed August 12, 2021).Google Scholar
Ballantyne, J. (2000). Serology. In Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, ed. Seigel, J. A.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

American Red Cross (2021). Facts about blood and blood types. www.redcrossblood.org/donate-blood/blood-types.html (accessed August 12, 2021).Google Scholar
Ballantyne, J. (2000). Serology. In Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, ed. Seigel, J. A.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bromwich, M. R. (2007). Final Report of the Independent Investigator for the Houston Police Department Crime Laboratory and Property Room. Washington, DC: Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP.Google Scholar
Gaensslen, R. E., Bell, S. C., and Lee, H. C. (1987). Distributions of genetic markers in United States populations. 1. Blood group and secretor systems. Journal of Forensic Sciences 32(4): 1016–1058.Google Scholar
Gaensslen, R. E., Bell, S. C., and Lee, H. C. (1987). Distributions of genetic markers in United States populations. 2. Isoenzyme systems. Journal of Forensic Sciences 32(5): 1348–1381.Google Scholar
Mitra, R., Mishra, N., and Rath, G. P. (2014). Blood groups systems. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 58(5): 524–528.Google Scholar
Wang, L., Chen, M., Wang, F., et al. (2020). A 21-plex system of STRs integrated with Y-STR DYS391 and ABO typing for forensic DNA analysis. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 52(1): 16–26.Google Scholar
WorldAtlas (2021). World population by percentage of blood types. www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-are-the-different-blood-types.html (accessed August 18, 2021).Google Scholar
Wraxall, B. G. D., and Culliford, B. J. (1968). A thin-layer starch gel method for enzyme typing of bloodstains. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 8(2–3): 81–82.Google Scholar
Gill, P., and Werrett, D. J. (1987). Exclusion of a man charged with murder by DNA fingerprinting. Forensic Science International 35(2–3): 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Justice (2000). The Future of Forensic DNA Typing: Predictions of the Research and Development Working Group. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1992). DNA Technology in Forensic Science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/1866.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1996). The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/5141.Google Scholar
University of Leicester (2009). The history of genetic fingerprinting. https://le.ac.uk/dna-fingerprinting/history (accessed August 15, 2021).Google Scholar
Venter, C. H. (2020). A critical review of the current state of forensic science knowledge and its integration in legal systems. PhD thesis, University of South Africa.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. K. (2013). Out with the “junk DNA” phrase. Journal of Forensic Sciences 58(1): 292–294.Google Scholar
Zagorski, N. (2006). Profile of Alec J. Jeffreys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(24): 8918–8920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gasiorowski-Denis, E. (2016). The mystery of the Phantom of Heilbronn. ISOFOCUS July/August 2016. www.iso.org/news/2016/07/Ref2094.html (accessed August 18, 2021).Google Scholar
Ogawa, H., Hiroshige, Y., Yoshimoto, T., Ishii, A., and Yamamoto, T. (2018). STR genotyping from a dry-cleaned skirt in a sexual assault case. Journal of Forensic Sciences 63(4): 1291-1297.Google Scholar
Royal Society of Edinburgh (2017). Forensic DNA Analysis: A Primer for Courts. Edinburgh: RSE. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/about-us/programmes/science-and-law/royal-society-forensic-dna-analysis-primer-for-courts.pdf (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar
Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (2020). SWGDAM Quality Assurance Standards Documents, 2020 Quality Assurance Standards. www.swgdam.org/publications (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar
Bieber, F. R., Buckleton, J. S., Budowle, B., Butler, J. M., and Coble, M. D. (2016). Evaluation of forensic DNA mixture evidence: protocol for evaluation, interpretation, and statistical calculations using the combined probability of inclusion. BMC Genetics 17(1): 125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-016-0429-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graversen, T., Mortera, J., and Lago, G. (2019). The Yara Gambirasio case: combining evidence in a complex DNA mixture case. Forensic Science International: Genetics 40: 52–63.Google Scholar
Criminal Justice Information Services. Frequently asked questions on CODIS and NDIS. www.fbi.gov/services/laboratory/biometric-analysis/codis/codis-and-ndis-fact-sheet (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar
Royal Society of Edinburgh (2017). Forensic DNA Analysis: A Primer for Courts. Edinburgh: RSE. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/about-us/programmes/science-and-law/royal-society-forensic-dna-analysis-primer-for-courts.pdf (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar
Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (2019). Recommendations of the SWGDAM Ad Hoc Working Group on Genotyping Results Reported as Likelihood Ratios. SWGDAM. www.swgdam.org/publications (accessed August 19, 2021)Google Scholar
Torres, Y., Flores, I., Prieto, V., et al. (2003). DNA mixtures in forensic casework: a 4-year retrospective study. Forensic Science International 134(2–3): 180–186.Google Scholar
Xiao, C., Jiang, Y. W., and Liang, M. (2019). Using the information embedded in the mixed profiles to assist in determining the identity of the deceased and the suspect in a deficiency case. Forensic Science International 300: E13–E19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basset, P. and Castella, V. (2018). Lessons from a study of DNA contaminations from police services and forensic laboratories in Switzerland. Forensic Science International: Genetics 33: 147–154.Google Scholar
Gill, P. (2016). Analysis and implications of the miscarriages of justice of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito. Forensic Science International: Genetics 23: 9–18.Google Scholar
Gill, P. (2019). DNA evidence and miscarriages of justice. Forensic Science International 294: E1–E3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gosch, A., and Courts, C. (2019). On DNA transfer: the lack and difficulty of systematic research and how to do it better. Forensic Science International: Genetics 40: 24–36.Google Scholar
Gosch, A., Euteneuer, J., Preuss-Wössner, J., and Courts, C. (2020). DNA transfer to firearms in alternative realistic handling scenarios. Forensic Science International: Genetics 48: 102355.Google Scholar
Kanokwongnuwut, P., Kirkbride, K. P., and Linacre, A. (2018). Detection of latent DNA. Forensic Science International: Genetics 37: 95–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meakin, G. E., Butcher, E. V., van Oorschot, R. A. H., and Morgan, R. M. (2017). Trace DNA evidence dynamics: an investigation into the deposition and persistence of directly- and indirectly-transferred DNA on regularly-used knives. Forensic Science International: Genetics 29: 38–47.Google Scholar
Smith, P. A. (2016). When DNA implicates the innocent. Scientific American 314(6): 11–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0616-11.Google Scholar
Thornbury, D., Goray, M., and van Oorschot, R. A. H. (2021). Indirect DNA transfer without contact from dried biological materials on various surfaces. Forensic Science International: Genetics 51: 102457.Google Scholar
van Oorschot, R. A. H., Szkuta, B., Meakin, G. E., Kokshoorn, B, and Goray, M. (2019). DNA transfer in forensic science: a review. Forensic Science International: Genetics 38: 140–166.Google Scholar
Abarno, D., Sobieraj, T., Summers, C., and Taylor, D. (2019). The first Australian conviction resulting from a familial search. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 51: S56–S59.Google Scholar
Byard, R. W. (2020). The execution of the Romanov family at Yekatarinberg. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology 16(3): 552–556.Google Scholar
Coble, M. D., Loreille, O. M., Wadhams, M. J., et al. (2009). Mystery solved: the identification of the two missing Romanov children using DNA analysis. PLoS One 4(3): e4838. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, L. (1998). Mitochondrial DNA: State of Tennessee v. Paul Ware. GenePrint. www.promega.com/~/media/Files/Resources/Profiles%20In%20DNA/103/Mitochondrial%20DNA%20State%20of%20Tennessee%20v%20Paul%20Ware.ashx (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar
Gill, P., Ivanov, P. L., Kimpton, C., et al. (1994). Identification of the Romanov family by DNA analysis. Nature Genetics 6(2): 130–135.Google Scholar
Ivanov, P. L., Wadhams, M. J., Roby, R. K., et al. (1996). Mitochondrial DNA sequence heteroplasmy in the Grand Duke of Russia Georgij Romanov establishes the authenticity of the remains of Tsar Nicholas II. Nature Genetics 12(4): 417–420.Google Scholar
Marquez, M. C., Caballero, P. A. B., and Domingo, C. N. (2021). Application of mitochondrial DNA as a tool in the forensic field: update and new perspectives in mtDNA analysis. In Forensic DNA Analysis: Technological Developments and Innovative Applications, ed. Pilli, E. and Berti, A.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 113–146.Google Scholar
Melton, T. (2016). Mitochondrial DNA: profiling. In A Guide to Forensic DNA Profiling, ed. Bader, S. and Jamieson, A.. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 397–405.Google Scholar
NBC News (2003) Judge: DNA found in Peterson’s boat admissible. NBC, November 17, 2003. www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna3474357 (accessed August 28, 2021).Google Scholar
Pereira, V., and Gusmao, L. (2021). The X-chromosomal STRs in forensic genetics: X chromosome STRs. In Forensic DNA Analysis: Technological Developments and Innovative Applications, ed. Pilli, E. and Berti, A.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 91–112.Google Scholar
Royal Society of Edinburgh (2017). Forensic DNA Analysis: A Primer for Courts. Edinburgh: RSE. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/about-us/programmes/science-and-law/royal-society-forensic-dna-analysis-primer-for-courts.pdf (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar
Vergani, D. (2021). The Y-chromosomal STRs in forensic genetics: Y chromosome STRs. In Forensic DNA Analysis: Technological Developments and Innovative Applications, ed. Pilli, E. and Berti, A.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 77–90.Google Scholar
Wang, L., Chen, M., Wang, F., et al. (2020). A 21-plex system of STRs integrated with Y-STR DYS391 and ABO typing for forensic DNA analysis. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 52(1): 16–26.Google Scholar
Ballard, D., Winkler-Galicki, J., and Wesoly, J. (2020). Massive parallel sequencing in forensics: advantages, issues, technicalities, and prospects. International Journal of Legal Medicine 134(4): 1291–1303.Google Scholar
Barrientos, L. S., Crespi, J. A., Fameli, A., et al. (2016). DNA profile of dog feces as evidence to solve a homicide. Legal Medicine 22: 54-57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borsting, C., Pererira, V., Andersen, J. D., and Morling, N. (2016). Single nucleotide polymorphism. In A Guide to Forensic DNA Profiling, ed. Jamieson, A. and Bader, S.. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 205–222.Google Scholar
Bruijns, B., Tiggelaar, R., and Gardeniers, H. (2018). Massively parallel sequencing techniques for forensics: a review. Electrophoresis 39(21): 2642–2654.Google Scholar
Butler, J. M., David, V. A., O’Brien, S. J., and Menotti-Raymond, M. A. (2002). The MeowPlex: a new DNA test using tetranucleotide STR markers for the domestic Cat. Profiles in DNA 5(2), 7–10.Google Scholar
Decker, R. S., and Kerns, T. L. (2020). The FBI’s Amerithrax Task Force and the advent of microbial forensics. In Microbial Forensics (Third Edition), ed. Budowle, B., Schutzer, S. and Morse, S. A.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 11–23.Google Scholar
de Knijff, P. (2019). From next generation sequencing to now generation sequencing in forensics. Forensic Science International: Genetics 38: 175–180.Google Scholar
Forlani, G., and Petrollino, D. (2021). A comprehensive molecular approach to the detection of drug-type versus fiber-type hemp varieties. Forensic Science International: Genetics 52: 102464.Google Scholar
Genome Reference Consortium. Human Build 38 patch release 14 (GRCh38.p14). www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCA_000001405.29 (accessed April 12, 2022).Google Scholar
Gettings, K. B., Aponte, R. A., Vallone, P. M., and Butler, J. M. (2015). STR allele sequence variation: current knowledge and future issues. Forensic Science International: Genetics 18: 118–130.Google Scholar
Gettings, K. B., Borsuk, L. A., Steffen, C. R., Kiesler, K. M., and Vallone, P. M. (2018). Sequence-based US population data for 27 autosomal STR loci. Forensic Science International: Genetics 37: 106–115.Google Scholar
Gin, K., Tovar, J., Bartelink, E. J., et al. (2020). The 2018 California wildfires: integration of rapid DNA to dramatically accelerate victim identification. Journal of Forensic Sciences 65(3): 791–799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, P. J. (2020). Microbial forensic investigation of the anthrax letter attacks: how the investigation would differ using today’s technologies. In Microbial Forensics (Third Edition), ed. Budowle, B., Schutzer, S. and Morse, S. A.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 25–32.Google Scholar
King, T. E., Gonzalez Fortes, G., Balaresque, P., et al. (2014). Identification of the remains of King Richard III. Nature Communications 5: 5631.Google Scholar
Linacre, A. (2021). Animal forensic genetics. Genes 12(4): 515.Google Scholar
National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health (2020). The Human Genome Project. www.genome.gov/human-genome-project (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar
SASA [Scottish Agricultural Science Agency]. Wildlife crime. www.sasa.gov.uk/wildlife-environment/wildlife-crime (accessed April 12, 2022).Google Scholar
Schleimer, A., Frantz, A. C., Lang, J., Reinert, P. and Heddergott, M. (2016). Identifying a hunter responsible for killing a hunting dog by individual-specific genetic profiling of wild boar DNA transferred to the canine during the accidental shooting. Forensic Science Medicine and Pathology 12(4): 491–496.Google Scholar
Thermo Fisher Scientific (2021). FBI approves Thermo Fisher Scientific’s rapid DNA solution for use in law enforcement booking stations. Cision PR Newswire, July 8, 2021. www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fbi-approves-thermo-fisher-scientifics-rapid-dna-solution-for-use-in-law-enforcement-booking-stations-301327486.html (accessed August 29, 2021).Google Scholar
Tillmar, A., Fagerholm, S. A., Staaf, J., Sjolund, P., and Ansell, R. (2021). Getting the conclusive lead with investigative genetic genealogy: a successful case study of a 16 year old double murder in Sweden. Forensic Science International: Genetics 53: 102525.Google Scholar
US Fish and Wildlife Service. Clark R. Bavin National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory. www.fws.gov/law-enforcement/clark-r-bavin-national-fish-and-wildlife-forensics-laboratory (accessed April 12, 2022).Google Scholar
Vidaki, A., and Kayser, M. (2017). From forensic epigenetics to forensic epigenomics: broadening DNA investigative intelligence. Genome Biology 18(1): 238.Google Scholar
Vidaki, A., and Kayser, M. (2018). Recent progress, methods and perspectives in forensic epigenetics. Forensic Science International: Genetics 37: 180–195.Google Scholar
Yamamuro, T., Segawa, H., Kuwayama, K., et al. (2021). Rapid identification of drug-type and fiber-type cannabis by allele specific duplex PCR. Forensic Science International 318: 110634.Google Scholar
Arnold, C. (2020). The controversial company using DNA to sketch the faces of criminals. Nature 585: 178–181.Google Scholar
Barrio, P. A., Crespillo, M., Luque, J. A., et al. (2018). GHEP-ISFG collaborative exercise on mixture profiles (GHEP-MIX06). Reporting conclusions: results and evaluation. Forensic Science International: Genetics 35: 156–163.Google Scholar
Butler, J. M., Iver, H., Press, R., et al. (2021). DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review (NISTIR 8351-DRAFT). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Butler, J. M., Kline, M. C., and Coble, M. D. (2018). NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX05 and MIX13): variation observed and lessons learned. Forensic Science International: Genetics 37: 81–94.Google Scholar
Coble, M. D., and Bright, J. A. (2019). Probabilistic genotyping software: an overview. Forensic Science International: Genetics 38: 219–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dror, I. E., and Hampikian, G. (2011). Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation. Science & Justice 51(4): 204–208.Google Scholar
Egel, B. (2018). Here’s the string of crimes tied to the East Area Rapist in years of California terror. The Sacramento Bee, April 18, 2018.Google Scholar
Ge, J. Y., and Budowle, B. (2021). Forensic investigation approaches of searching relatives in DNA databases. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 66(2): 430–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14615.Google Scholar
Gill, P., Kirkham, A., and Curran, J. (2007). LoComatioN: a software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles. Forensic Science International 166(2–3): 128–138.Google Scholar
Government Accountability Office (2021). Forensic technology: algorithms strengthen forensic analysis, but several factors can affect outcomes. GAO-21-435SP. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office. www.gao.gov/products/gao-21-435sp (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar
Greytak, E. M., Moore, C., and Armentrout, S. L. (2019). Genetic genealogy for cold case and active investigations. Forensic Science International 299: 103–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jouvenal, J. (2021). A secret algorithm is transforming DNA evidence. This defendant could be the first to scrutinize it. Washington Post, July 13, 2021.Google Scholar
Kamb, L. (2021). DNA puts a name to one of the last unidentified victims of the Green River Killer. Seattle Times, January 25, 2021.Google Scholar
Katsanis, S. H. (2020). Pedigrees and perpetrators: uses of DNA and genealogy in forensic investigations. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 21: 535–564.Google Scholar
Kayser, M. (2015). Forensic DNA phenotyping: predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes. Forensic Science International: Genetics 18: 33–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennett, D. (2019). Using genetic genealogy databases in missing persons cases and to develop suspect leads in violent crimes. Forensic Science International 301: 107–117.Google Scholar
Kling, D., Phillips, C., Kennett, D., and Tillmar, A. (2021). Investigative genetic genealogy: current methods, knowledge and practice. Forensic Science International: Genetics 52: 102474.Google Scholar
Krimsky, S. (2022). Understanding DNA Ancestry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maguire, C. N., McCallum, L. A., Storey, C., and Whitaker, J. P. (2014). Familial searching: a specialist forensic DNA profiling service utilising the National DNA Database (R) to identify unknown offenders via their relatives. The UK experience. Forensic Science International: Genetics 8(1): 1–9.Google Scholar
Mateen, R. M., Sabar, M. F., Hussain, S., Parveen, R., and Hussain, M. (2021). Familial DNA analysis and criminal investigation: usage, downsides and privacy concerns. Forensic Science International 318: 110576.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (2010). Familial DNA testing scores a win in serial killer case. Science 329(5989): 262. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.329.5989.262.Google Scholar
Moran, G. (2019). Murder case that highlighted DNA analysis controversy ends with plea to reduce charge, release. San Diego Union Tribune, December 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Moran, K. S. (2018). Damned by DNA: balancing personal privacy with public safety. Forensic Science International 292: E3–E4.Google Scholar
Mortera, J. (2020). DNA mixtures in forensic investigations: the statistical state of the art. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 7: 111–142.Google Scholar
Pham-Hoai, E., Crispino, F., and Hampikian, G. (2014). The first successful use of a low stringency familial match in a French criminal investigation. Journal of Forensic Sciences 59(3): 816–819.Google Scholar
Plemel, E. (2019). Genetic genealogy and its use in criminal investigations: are we heading towards a universal genetic database? Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management 15. https://doi.org/10.5931/djim.v15i0.8983.Google Scholar
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2016). Forensic Science in the Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature Comparison Methods. Washington, DC: PCAST.Google Scholar
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2017). Addendum to Forensic Science in the Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature Comparison Methods. Washington DC, PCAST.Google Scholar
Press, R. (2019) DNA Mixtures: A Forensic Science Explainer. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce. www.nist.gov/feature-stories/dna-mixtures-forensic-science-explainer (accessed April 8, 2022).Google Scholar
Samuel, G., and Prainsack, B. (2019). Civil society stakeholder views on forensic DNA phenotyping: balancing risks and benefits. Forensic Science International: Genetics 43: 102157.Google Scholar
Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (2020). Overview of investigative genetic genealogy. SWGDAM. www.swgdam.org/publications (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar
Scudder, N., McNevin, D., Kelty, S. F., Walsh, S. J., and Robertson, J. (2018). Forensic DNA phenotyping: developing a model privacy impact assessment. Forensic Science International: Genetics 34: 222–230.Google Scholar
St. John, P. (2020). The untold story of how the Golden State Killer was found. Los Angeles Times, December 8, 2020.Google Scholar
US Department of Justice (2019). United States Department of Justice Interim Policy Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA Analysis and Searching. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×