Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T22:46:40.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The Impact of Market Orders

from PART V - PRICE IMPACT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2018

Jean-Philippe Bouchaud ,
Julius Bonart ,
Jonathan Donier  and
Martin Gould
Jean-Philippe Bouchaud
Affiliation:
Capital Fund Management, Paris
Julius Bonart
Affiliation:
University College London
Jonathan Donier
Affiliation:
Capital Fund Management
Martin Gould
Affiliation:
CFM - Imperial Institute of Quantitative Finance
Get access

Summary

To measure is to know.

(Lord Kelvin)

In this chapter, we address the seemingly obvious notion of price impact (which we first discussed in Section 1.3.2): buy trades tend to push the price up and sell trades tend to push the price down. Expressed in the notation and language that we have subsequently developed, we might also express this notion by saying that price impact refers to the positive correlation between the sign (+1 for a buy order and –1 for a sell order) of an incoming market order and the subsequent price change that occurs upon or after its arrival. As we discuss in Section 11.3, these seemingly obvious statements are indeed verified by empirical data.

Price impact is an all-too-familiar reality for traders who need to buy or sell large quantities of an asset. To these traders, price impact is tantamount to a cost, because the impact of their earlier trades makes the price of their subsequent trades worse on average. Therefore, monitoring and controlling impact costs is one of the most active and rapidly expanding domains of research in both academic circles and trading firms.

Understanding and assessing price impact entails considering two different but related topics. The first is how volume creates impact: how much more impact does a larger trade cause? The second is the temporal behaviour of impact: how much of a trade's impact is permanent, how much decays over time, and how does this transient behaviour unfold? We will consider both of these topics in detail throughout this chapter. As we will discuss, both of these aspects of price impact are far from trivial. Is a transaction not a fair deal between a buyer and a seller? If so, which of the two is really impacting the price?

What Is Price Impact?

In much of the existing literature, there are two strands of interpretation for price impact, which reflect the great divide between efficient-market enthusiasts (who believe that the price is always close to its fundamental value) and sceptics (who believe that the dynamics of financial markets is primarily governed by order flow).

Type
Chapter
Information
Trades, Quotes and Prices
Financial Markets Under the Microscope
 , pp. 208 - 228
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Weber, P., & Rosenow, B. (2005). Order book approach to price impact. Quantitative Finance, 5(4), 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerig, A. (2007). A theory for market impact: How order flow affects stock price. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, available at: arXiv:0804.3818.Google Scholar
Farmer, J. D., & Zamani, N. (2007). Mechanical vs. informational components of price impact. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 55(2), 189–200.Google Scholar
Hasbrouck, J. (2007). Empirical market microstructure: The institutions, economics, and econometrics of securities trading. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bouchaud, J. P., Farmer, J. D., & Lillo, F. (2009). How markets slowly digest changes in supply and demand. In Hens, T. & Schenk-Hoppe, K. R. (Eds.), Handbook of financial markets: Dynamics and evolution. North-Holland, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bouchaud, J. P. (2010). Price impact. In Cont, R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quantitative finance. Wiley.Google Scholar
Eisler, Z., Bouchaud, J. P., & Kockelkoren, J. (2012). The price impact of order book events: Market orders, limit orders and cancellations. Quantitative Finance, 12(9), 1395–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hautsch, N., & Huang, R. (2012). The market impact of a limit order. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36(4), 501–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cont, R., Kukanov, A., & Stoikov, S. (2014). The price impact of order book events. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 12(1), 47–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donier, J., & Bonart, J. (2015). A million metaorder analysis of market impact on the Bitcoin. Market Microstructure and Liquidity, 1(02), 1550008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, C., & Waelbroeck, H. (2015). Is market impact a measure of the information value of trades? Market response to liquidity vs. informed metaorders. Quantitative Finance, 15(5), 773–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tóth, B., Eisler, Z. & Bouchaud, J.-P. (2017). The short-term price impact of trades is universal. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2924029.
Hasbrouck, J. (1991).Measuring the information content of stock trades. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 179–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. M., Kaul, G., & Lipson, M. L. (1994). Transactions, volume, and volatility. Review of Financial Studies, 7(4), 631–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z., Stanzl, W., & Watanabe, M. (2002). Price impact costs and the limit of arbitrage. Yale ICF Working Paper No. 00–66.Google Scholar
Lillo, F., Farmer, J. D., & Mantegna, R. N. (2003). Econophysics: Master curve for price-impact function. Nature, 421(6919), 129–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potters, M., & Bouchaud, J. P. (2003). More statistical properties of order books and price impact. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 324(1), 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, W. X. (2012). Universal price impact functions of individual trades in an order-driven market. Quantitative Finance, 12(8), 1253–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taranto, D. E., Bormetti, G., & Lillo, F. (2014). The adaptive nature of liquiditytaking in limit order books. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2014(6), P06002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomber, P., Schweickert, U., & Theissen, E. (2015). Liquidity dynamics in an electronic open limit order book: An event study approach. European Financial Management, 21(1), 52–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchaud, J. P., Gefen, Y., Potters, M., & Wyart, M. (2004). Fluctuations and response in financial markets: The subtle nature of random price changes. Quantitative Finance, 4(2), 176–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchaud, J. P., Kockelkoren, J., & Potters, M. (2006). Random walks, liquidity molasses and critical response in financial markets. Quantitative Finance, 6(02), 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, J. D., Gerig, A., Lillo, F., & Mike, S. (2006). Market efficiency and the long-memory of supply and demand: Is price impact variable and permanent or fixed and temporary? Quantitative Finance, 6(02), 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taranto, D. E., Bormetti, G., Bouchaud, J. P., Lillo, F., & Tóth, B. (2016). Linear models for the impact of order flow on prices I. Propagators: Transient vs. history dependent impact. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2770352.
Kempf, A., & Korn, O. (1999). Market depth and order size. Journal of Financial Markets, 2(1), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plerou, V., Gopikrishnan, P., Gabaix, X., & Stanley, H. E. (2002). Quantifying stock-price response to demand fluctuations. Physical Review E, 66(2), 027104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chordia, T., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2004). Order imbalance and individual stock returns: Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 72(3), 485–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. D., & Lyons, R. K. (2002). Order flow and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Political Economy, 110(1), 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabaix, X., Gopikrishnan, P., Plerou, V., & Stanley, H. E. (2006). Institutional investors and stock market volatility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 461–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillo, F., Farmer, J. D., & Gerig, A. (2008). A theory for aggregate market impact. Technical report, Santa Fe Institute, unpublished research.Google Scholar
Hopman, C. (2007). Do supply and demand drive stock prices? Quantitative Finance, 7, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×