Book contents
- Thomas Aquinas on the Metaphysics of the Human Act
- Thomas Aquinas on the Metaphysics of the Human Act
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The General Framework
- Part II Choice Hylomorphism
- Part III Act Hylomorphism
- Appendix Judgment and Composition and Division
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 June 2021
Book contents
- Thomas Aquinas on the Metaphysics of the Human Act
- Thomas Aquinas on the Metaphysics of the Human Act
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The General Framework
- Part II Choice Hylomorphism
- Part III Act Hylomorphism
- Appendix Judgment and Composition and Division
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Thomas Aquinas on the Metaphysics of the Human Act , pp. 208 - 221Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Aertsen, Jan A., Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals: The Case of Thomas Aquinas. Leiden: Brill, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A. Emery, Kent, and Speer, Andreas, eds. After the Condemnation of 1277. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2000.Google Scholar
Aguilar, J. H. and Buckareff, A. A., eds. Causing Human Actions: New Perspectives on the Causal Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilar, J. H. and Buckareff, A. A. “The Causal Theory of Action: Origins and Issues.” In Aguilar, and Buckareff, , Causing Human Actions, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert the Great. Opera omnia, vol. 9 (Parvorum naturalium pars prima). Edited by Borgnet, Auguste. Paris: Vivès, 1890.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry and Moore, Michael. “Deontological Ethics.” In Zalta, , The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/ethics-deontological/.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Maria and Hyman, John. “Agents and Their Actions.” Philosophy 73, no. 2 (1998): 219–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th edition. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association. 2013.Google Scholar
Anonymous (Ps.-Cicero). Rhetorica ad Herennium. Edited by Caplan, Harry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33, no. 124 (1958): 1–19. Reprinted in Anscombe, Collected Philosophical Papers, vol. 3, 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. Collected Philosophical Papers, vol. 3. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1981.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Complete Works: The Revised Oxford Translation. Edited by Jonathan, Barnes. 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R. A. Primary and Secondary Precepts in Thomistic Natural Law Teaching. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, J. J. Die menschliche Willensfreiheit im Lehrsystem des Thomas von Aquin und J. Duns Scotus. Munich: Max Hueber Verlag, 1938.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De spiritu et littera. Latin text with a Foreword by William Bright. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1914.Google Scholar
Averill, Edward and Keating, B. F.. “Does Interactionism Violate a Law of Classical Physics?” Mind 90, no. 357 (1981): 102–7.Google Scholar
Avicenna Latinus, . Liber de anima sive sextus de naturalibus, I-II-III. Edited by Van Riet, S.. With an Introduction by G. Verbeke. Leuven: Peeters, 1972.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette C. “Act and Intent.” The Journal of Philosophy, 67, no. 19 (Proceedings of the Sixty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Philosophical Association Eastern Division) (1970): 648–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Băltuță, Elena, ed. Medieval Perceptual Puzzles: Theories of Sense Perception in the 13th and 14th Centuries. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Barad, Judith A. “Aquinas on Faith and the Consent/Assent Distinction.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24, no. 3 (1986): 311–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. “Belief Is up to Us.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106, no. 1 (2006): 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnwell, Michael. Negligent Omissions: Medieval Action Theories to the Rescue. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Bazán, Bernardo, Andujar, E., and Sbrocchi, L. G., eds. Les philosophies morales et politiques au Moyen Âge. 3 vols. New York: LEGAS, 1995.Google Scholar
Belmans, Theo. “La spécification de l’agir humain par son objet chez Saint Thomas d’Aquin.” Divinitas 22 (1979): 336–56.Google Scholar
Billuart, C.-R. Summa Sancti Thomae hodiernis academiarum moribus accomodata, vol. 2. Editio Nova. Rome: Libraria Sacrae Congregationis De Propaganda Fide, s.a.Google Scholar
Binkley, Robert, Bronaugh, Richard, and Marras, Ausonio, eds. Agent, Action, and Reason. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Alexander Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Deborah. “Estimation in Avicenna: The Logical and Psychological Dimensions.” Dialogue 32, no. 2 (1993): 219–58.Google Scholar
Boler, John. “Aquinas on Exceptions in Natural Law.” In MacDonald, and Stump, , Aquinas’s Moral Theory, 161–204.Google Scholar
Bono, James J. “Medical Spirits and the Medieval Language of Life.” Traditio 40 (1984): 91–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulter, Stephen. “Aquinas on Action and Action Explanation.” In Sandis, , New Essays on the Explanation of Action, 257–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowlin, John. “Psychology and Theodicy in Aquinas.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 7, no. 2 (1998): 129–56.Google Scholar
Bradley, Denis M. Aquinas on the Twofold Human Good: Reason and Human Happiness in Aquinas’s Moral Science. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Bradley, Denis M. “Thomas Aquinas on Weakness of the Will.” In Hoffmann, , Weakness of Will, 82–114.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Brock, Stephen L. “What Is the Use of Usus in Aquinas’ Psychology of Action?” In Bazán, et al., Les philosophies morales et politiques, vol. 2, 654–64.Google Scholar
Brock, Stephen L. Action and Conduct: Thomas Aquinas and the Theory of Action. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1998.Google Scholar
Brock, Stephen L. “Causality and Necessity in Thomas Aquinas.” Quaestio 2 (2002): 217–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, Stephen L. “Realistic Practical Truth.” Doctor Communis: Nova Series 12, no. 1–2 (2008): 62–75.Google Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey E. Aquinas’s Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism, and Material Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey E. “Aquinas on the Individuation of Substances.” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 5 (2017): 122–50.Google Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey E. and Brower-Toland, Susan. “Aquinas on Mental Representation: Concepts and Intentionality.” The Philosophical Review 117, no. 2 (2008): 193–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. “Kinēsis vs. Energeia: A Much-Read Passage in (but Not of) Aristotle’s Metaphysics.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34 (2008): 219–92.Google Scholar
Cajetan, Thomas de Vio. Commentaria in partem primam et secundam Summae theologiae. In Aquinas, Opera omnia iussu Leonis, vols. 4–10.Google Scholar
Capreolus, John. Defensiones theologiae Divi Thomae Aquinatis. Edited by Paban, Ceslai and Pègues, Thomas. Turin: Cattier, 1900–8.Google Scholar
Carl, Brian T. “Action, Supposit, and Subject: Interpreting Actiones sunt Suppositorum.” Nova et Vetera 17, no. 2 (2019): 545–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caroti, Stefano, Imbach, Ruedi, Zeno Kaluza, G. Stabile, and L. Sturlese, , eds. Ad Ingenii Acuitionem: Studies in Honour of Alfonso Maierù. Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération Internationale des Instituts d’Études médiévales, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catan, John R., ed. St Thomas Aquinas on the Existence of God: Collected Papers of Joseph Owens C.Ss.R. Albany: SUNY Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Chenu, M. D. “Un vestige du stoicisme.” Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques 27 (1938): 63–8.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick M. “The Structure of Intention.” The Journal of Philosophy 67, no. 19 (Proceedings of the Sixty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Philosophical Association Eastern Division) (1970): 633–47.Google Scholar
Cohoe, Caleb. “There Must Be a First: Why Thomas Aquinas Rejects Infinite, Essentially Ordered, Causal Series.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21, no. 5 (2013): 838–56.Google Scholar
Coope, Ursula. “Aristotle on Action.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81, no. 1 (Supplementary Volume) (2007): 109–38.Google Scholar
Coope, Ursula “Aquinas on Judgment and the Active Power of Reason.” Philosophers’ Imprint 13, no. 20 (2013): 1–19.Google Scholar
Corcilius, Klaus and Gregoric, Pavel. “Aristotle’s Model of Animal Motion.” Phronesis 58, no. 1 (2013): 52–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cory, Therese. “The Reflexivity of Incorporeal Acts as Source of Freedom and Subjectivity in Aquinas.” In Kaukua, and Ekenberg, , Subjectivity and Selfhood, 125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, Thomas. “The Matter of Events.” The Review of Metaphysics 65, no. 1 (2011): 3–39.Google Scholar
Cunningham, F. A. “The Second Operation and the Assent vs. the Judgment in St. Thomas.” New Scholasticism 31, no. 1 (1957): 1–33.Google Scholar
Darge, Rolf. Habitus Per Actus Cognoscuntur: Die Erkenntnis des Habitus und die Funktion des moralischen Habitus im Aufbau der Handlung nach Thomas von Aquin. Bonn: Bouvier, 1996.Google Scholar
Davids, Tobias. Anthropologische Differenz und animalische Konvenienz: Tierphilosophie bei Thomas von Aquin. Leiden: Brill, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” The Journal of Philosophy 60, no. 23 (1963): 685–700. Reprinted in Davidson, , Essays on Actions and Events, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald “Agency.” In Binkley et al., Agent, Action, and Reason, 3–25. Reprinted in Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events, 43–61.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald “Freedom to Act.” In Honderich, Essays on Freedom and Action, 137–56. Reprinted in Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald “Intending.” In Yovel, Philosophy of History and Action, 41–60. Reprinted in Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events, 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald “Mental Events.” In Foster and Swanson, Experience and Theory, 79–101. Reprinted in Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events, 207–25.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald “Problems in the Explanation of Action.” In Pettit et al., Metaphysics and Morality, 35–49. Reprinted in Davidson, Problems of Rationality, 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald Essays on Actions and Events. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Brian and Stump, Eleonore, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Libera, Alain. “Les actions appartiennent aux sujets: Petite archéologie d’un principe leibnizien.” In Caroti, et al., Ad Ingenii Acuitionem, 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Libera, Alain Archéologie du sujet, vol. 3: 1 (L’acte de penser: La double révolution). Paris: Vrin, 2014.Google Scholar
Deman, Thomas, trans. Saint Thomas d’Aquin, Somme Théologique: La Prudence, 2a-2ae Questions 47–56, 2nd edition. Paris: Desclée, 1949.Google Scholar
Dewan, Lawrence, “‘Obiectum’: Notes on the Invention of a Word.” Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Age 48 (1981): 37–96.Google Scholar
Dewan, Lawrence “The Real Distinction between Intellect and Will.” Angelicum 57 (1980): 557–93. Reprinted in Dewan, , Wisdom, Law, and Virtue, 125–50.Google Scholar
Dewan, Lawrence Wisdom, Law, and Virtue: Essays in Thomistic Ethics. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Di Martino, Carla. Ratio Particularis: Doctrines des sens internes d’Avicenne à Thomas d’ Aquin. Paris: J. Vrin, 2008.Google Scholar
Dobler, Emil. Zwei syrische Quellen der theologischen Summa des Thomas von Aquin: Nemesios von Emesa und Johannes von Damaskus, ihr Einfluss auf die anthropologischen Grundlagen der Moraltheologie. Fribourg: Universitätsverlag Freiburg, 2000.Google Scholar
Donagan, Alan. “Thomas Aquinas on Human Action.” In Kretzmann, et al., The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, 642–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doolan, G. T. Aquinas on the Divine Ideas as Exemplar Causes. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Dumont, Stephen D. “Did Duns Scotus Change His Mind on the Will?” In Aertsen, et al., After the Condemnation, 719–94.Google Scholar
Eardley, Peter. “Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Will.” The Review of Metaphysics 56, no. 4 (2003): 835–62.Google Scholar
Enriquez, Maria Teresa. De la Decisión a la Acción: Estudio sobre el Imperium en Tomas de Aquino. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2011.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. L. Acts amid Precepts: The Aristotelian Logical Structure of Thomas Aquinas’s Moral Theory. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Foster, Lawrence, and Swanson, J. W., eds. Experience and Theory. University of Massachusetts Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. “The Problem of Action.” American Philosophical Quarterly 15, no. 2 (1978): 157–62.Google Scholar
Frost, Gloria. “Aquinas’s Ontology of Transeunt Causal Activity.” Vivarium 56, no. 1–2 (2018): 47–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, David. “Aquinas on Moral Action: Interior and Exterior Acts.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 64 (1990): 118–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, David “Thomas Aquinas on the Will as Rational Appetite.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 29, no. 4 (1991): 559–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, David “Free Choice and Free Judgment in Aquinas.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 76 (1994): 247–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galluzzo, Gabriele. “Il tema della verità nell’Expositio Libri Peryermenias di Tommaso d’Aquino.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 11 (2000): 217–57.Google Scholar
Garceau, Benoit. Judicium: Vocabulaire, sources, doctrine de Saint Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1968.Google Scholar
Gauthier, R. A. “Compte rendu de ‘O. Lottin, O.S.B.: Psychologie et morale aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles. II-III. Louvain, Mont-César, Gembloux, Duculot, 1948–1949’.” Bulletin Thomiste 8 (1947–53): 60–86.Google Scholar
Gauthier, R. A. “Saint Maxime le confesseur et la psychologie de l’acte humaine.” Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale 21 (1954): 51–100.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter. Mental Acts: Their Content and Their Objects. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957.Google Scholar
George, Marie I. “On the Meaning of ‘Immanent Activity’ according to Aquinas.” The Thomist 78, no. 4 (2014): 537–55.Google Scholar
Gilby, Thomas, trans. St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologiae, Vol. 17 (I/II 6–17, Psychology of Human Acts). New York: Blackfriars, 1970.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. Being and Some Philosophers. 2nd edition, corrected and enlarged. Toronto: PIMS, 1952.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I. A Theory of Human Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1970.Google Scholar
González, A. M. “Depositum Gladius Non Debet Restitui Furioso: Precepts, Synderesis, and Virtues in Saint Thomas Aquinas.” The Thomist 63, no. 2 (1999): 217–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, Germain. “The First Principle of Practical Reason: A Commentary on the Summa Theologiae 1–2, Question 94, Article 2.” In Kenny, , Aquinas: A Collection of Critical Essays, 340–82.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. Human Nature: The Categorial Framework. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
Haldane, John. “Is Every Action Morally Significant?” Philosophy 86, no. 3 (2011): 375–404.Google Scholar
Harré, Romano and Madden, Edward. Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1975.Google Scholar
Hause, Jeffrey. “Thomas Aquinas and the Voluntarists.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6, no. 2 (1997): 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoenen, Peter. Reality and Judgment according to Saint Thomas. Chicago: Regnery, 1952.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Tobias, ed. Weakness of Will from Plato to the Present. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Tobias Müller, Jörn, and Perkams, Matthias, eds. Aquinas and the Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Tobias Müller, Jörn, and Perkams, Matthias and Michon, Cyrille. “Aquinas on Free Will and Intellectual Determinism.” Philosophers’ Imprint 17, no. 10 (2017): 1–36.Google Scholar
Honderich, Ted, ed. Essays on Freedom and Action. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer Simple Mindedness: In Defense of Naive Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer “Agency and Actions.” In Steward, and Hyman, , Agency and Action, 1–23.Google Scholar
Jaworski, William. Structure and the Metaphysics of Mind: How Hylomorphism Solves the Mind-Body Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeschke, Thomas. Deus ut tentus vel visus: Die Debatte um die Seligkeit im reflexiven Akt (Ca. 1293–1320). Leiden: Brill, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damascene, John. De fide orthodoxa: Versions of Burgundio and Cerbanus. Edited by Buytaert, E. M.. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute, 1955.Google Scholar
Scotus, John Duns. Opera omnia, vol. 19. Edited by the Scotistica, Commissio. Vatican City: Typis Vaticanis, 1993.Google Scholar
Kaukua, Jari and Ekenberg, Tomas, eds. Subjectivity and Selfhood in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. Cham: Springer, 2016.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. F. Goodness and Rightness in Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony ed. Aquinas: A Collection of Critical Essays. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “Transitory Vice: Thomas Aquinas on Incontinence.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27, no. 2 (1989): 199–223.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie “Habits and Virtues (Ia IIae, qq. 49–70).” In Pope, , The Ethics of Aquinas, 116–30.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie “Losable Virtue: Aquinas on Character and Will.” In Hoffmann, et al., Aquinas and the Nicomachean Ethics, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Yul. Selbstbewegung des Willens bei Thomas von Aquin. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar
King, Peter. “Aquinas on the Passions.” In MacDonald, and Stump, , Aquinas’s Moral Theory, 101–32.Google Scholar
Koons, Robert and O’Brien, Matthew B.. “Objects of Intention: A Hylomorphic Critique of the New Natural Law Theory.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86, no. 4 (2012): 655–703.Google Scholar
Kostman, James. “Aristotle’s Definition of Change.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4, no. 1 (1987): 3–16.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman, and Stump, Eleonore. “Absolute Simplicity.” Faith and Philosophy 2, no. 4 (1985): 353–82.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman, and Stump, Eleonore Kenny, Anthony, Pinborg, Jan, and Stump, Eleonore, eds. The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy: From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism. 1100–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Patrick. “The Relation between Intellect and Will in Free Choice according to Aquinas and Scotus.” The Thomist 49, no. 3 (1985): 321–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Patrick “Aquinas on Knowledge of Truth and Existence.” The New Scholasticism 60, no. 1 (1986): 46–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisska, Anthony. Aquinas’s Theory of Natural Law: An Analytic Reconstruction. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Lisska, Anthony Aquinas’s Theory of Perception: An Analytic Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Lonergan, Bernard. Verbum: Word and Idea in Aquinas. Edited by Burrell, David B.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Lonergan, Bernard Grace and Freedom: Operative Grace in the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas. Edited by Crowe, Frederick E. and Doran, Robert M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loose, Jonathan J., Menuge, Angus J. L., and Moreland, J. P., eds. The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2018.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. “Liberté humaine et motion divine de saint Thomas d’Aquin à la condamnation de 1277.” Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale 7 (1935): 52–69 and 156–73.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon Psychologie et morale aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles. 6 vols. Gembloux: J. Duculot, 1942–1960.Google Scholar
Löwe, C. L. “Mind over Matter: Aquinas’s Transformation of Aristotle’s Definition of ‘Change’.” Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 82 (2015): 45–68.Google Scholar
Löwe, C. L. “John Duns Scotus versus Thomas Aquinas on Action-Passion Identity.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26, no. 6 (2018): 1027–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz-Bachmann, Matthias. “Praktisches Wissen und ‘Praktische Wissenschaft’: Zur Epistemologie der Moralphilosophie bei Thomas von Aquin.” In Lutz-Bachmann, and Fidora, , Handlung und Wissenschaft, 89–96.Google Scholar
Lutz-Bachmann, Matthias and Fidora, Alexander, eds. Handlung und Wissenschaft: Die Epistemologie der praktischen Wissenschaften im 13. und 14. Jahrhundert (Action and Science: The Epistemology of the Practical Sciences in the 13th and 14th Centuries). Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2008.Google Scholar
Lycan, William G. “Desire Considered as a Propositional Attitude.” Philosophical Perspectives 26 (2012): 201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Scott. “Ultimate Ends in Practical Reasoning: Aquinas’s Aristotelian Moral Psychology and Anscombe’s Fallacy.” The Philosophical Review 100, no. 1 (1991): 31–66.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott “Aquinas’s Libertarian Account of Free Choice.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 52 (1998): 309–28.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott “Practical Reasoning and Reasons-Explanation: Aquinas’s Account of Reason’s Role in Action.” In MacDonald, and Stump, , Aquinas’s Moral Theory, 133–60.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott and Stump, Eleonore, eds. Aquinas’s Moral Theory: Essays in Honor of Norman Kretzmann. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese. Zwischen Philosophie und Mechanik: Studien zur Naturphilosophie der Spätscholastik. Rome: Storia e Letteratura, 1958.Google Scholar
Maierù, Alfonso and Valente, Luisa, eds. Medieval Theories of Assertive and Non-assertive Language. Florence: Olschki, 2004.Google Scholar
Makin, Stephen. Aristotle: Metaphysics, Book Θ. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, Anna. “The Union of Cause and Effect in Aristotle: Physics 3.3.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32 (2007): 205–32.Google Scholar
Maurer, Armand, ed. St. Thomas Aquinas 1274–1974: Commemorative Studies. Toronto: PIMS, 1974.Google Scholar
McCann, Hugh. The Works of Agency: On Human Action, Will, and Freedom. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
McCluskey, Colleen. “Intellective Appetite and the Freedom of Human Action.” The Thomist 66, no. 3 (2002): 421–56.Google Scholar
McInerny, Ralph. Aquinas on Human Action: A Theory of Practice. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred. Springs of Action: Understanding Intentional Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred “Mental Actions: A Case Study.” In O’Brien, and Soteriou, , Mental Actions, 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred “Intentional, Unintentional, or Neither? Middle Ground in Theory and Practice.” American Philosophical Quarterly 49, no. 4 (2012): 369–79.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred and Moser, Paul K.. “Intentional Action.” Noûs 28, no. 1 (1994): 39–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Stephen. “The Origins of Aristotle’s Concept of ᾽Ενέργεια: ‘Ενέργεια and Δύναμις.’” Ancient Philosophy 14, no. 1 (1994): 73–114.Google Scholar
Mertens, Karl. “Handlungslehre und Grundlagen der Ethik.” In Speer, , Thomas von Aquin: Die Summa Theologiae, 168–97.Google Scholar
Miller, Marianne Therese. “The Problem of Action in the Commentary of St. Thomas Aquinas on the Physics of Aristotle.” The Modern Schoolman 23, no. 3 (1945–6): 135–67.Google Scholar
Millgram, Elijah. “Pluralism About Action.” In O’Connor, and Sandis, , A Companion to the Philosophy of Action, 90–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. “Events, Processes, and States.” Linguistics and Philosophy 2, no. 3 (1978): 415–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, Stephen and Anjum, Rani Lill, Getting Causes from Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naus, J. E. The Nature of the Practical Intellect according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. Rome: Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 1959.Google Scholar
Noone, Timothy. “Nature, Freedom and Will: Sources of Philosophical Reflection.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81 (2008): 1–23.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Lucy, and Soteriou, Matthew, eds. Mental Actions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy. “Agent Causation.” In O’Connor, , Agent, Causes, and Events, 173–200.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy ed. Agents, Causes, Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy and Sandis, Constantine, eds. A Companion to the Philosophy of Action. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oeing-Hanhoff, Ludger. “Zur thomistischen Freiheitslehre.” Scholastik 31 (1956): 161–81.Google Scholar
Osborne, Thomas M. Human Action in Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, and William of Ockham. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Osborne, Thomas M. “Practical Reasoning.” In Davies, and Stump, , The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas, 276–86.Google Scholar
Owens, Joseph. “Judgment and Truth in Aquinas.” Medieval Studies 32 (1970): 138–58. Reprinted in Catan, St. Thomas Aquinas on the Existence of God: Collected Papers of Joseph Owens C.Ss.R, 34–51.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. “Aquinas on Thought’s Linguistic Nature.” The Monist 80, no. 4 (1997): 558–75.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature: A Philosophical Study of Summa Theologiae 1ª 75–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Penner, Terry. “Verbs and Identity of Action: A Philosophical Exercise in the Interpretation of Aristotle.” In Wood, and Pitcher, , Ryle: A Collection, 393–460.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik. Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter. Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann, 2004.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik “Rational Seeing: Thomas Aquinas on Human Perception.” In Băltuță, , Medieval Perceptual Puzzles, 213–37.Google Scholar
Pesch, Otto. “Philosophie und Theologie der Freiheit bei Thomas von Aquin in quaest. Disp. 6 de Malo.” Münchener Theologische Zeitschrift 13, no. 1 (1962): 1–25.Google Scholar
Auriol, Peter, Scriptum I, d. 27, pars 2, a. 2. Edited by Russell Friedman. www.peterauriol.net/auriol-pdf/SCR-27-1.pdf.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip, Sylvan, Richard, and Norman, Jean, eds. Metaphysics and Morality: Essays in Honour of J. J. C. Smart. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar
Pfänder, Alexander. Phänomenologie des Wollens: Eine psychologische Analyse. Leipzig: Barth, 1900.Google Scholar
Pickavé, Martin. “On the Intentionality of Emotions (and of Other Appetitive Acts).” Quaestio 10 (2010): 45–63.Google Scholar
Pilsner, Joseph. The Specification of Human Acts in St. Thomas Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Pinckaers, Servais. “Compte rendu de ‘Deman, Th., O.P: Le précepte de la prudence chez saint Thomas d’Aquin’. Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale 20 (1953): 40–59’ et ‘Gauthier, R.A., O.P.: Saint Maxime le Confesseur et la psychologie de l’acte humain’. Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale 21 (1954), 51–100’.” Bulletin Thomiste 9 (1954–6): 345–62.Google Scholar
Pinckaers, Servais “La structure de l’acte humain suivant Saint Thomas.” Revue Thomiste 55 (1955): 393–412.Google Scholar
Pini, Giorgio. “Scotus on Assertion and the Copula: A Comparison with Aquinas.” In Maierù, and Valente, , Medieval Theories of Assertive and Non-assertive Language, 307–31.Google Scholar
Pope, Stephen J., ed. The Ethics of Aquinas. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Porter, Jean. “Why Are the Habits Necessary? An Inquiry into Aquinas’s Moral Psychology.” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 1 (2013): 113–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez, Jacobus M., De actibus humanis. In I-II Summae theologiae Divi Thomae expositio, qq. 6–21, ed. Rodríguez, Victorino. Madrid: Instituto De Filosofia “Luis Vives,” 1972, 107–32.Google Scholar
Régis, Louis-Marie. “The Knowledge of Existence in St. Thomas Aquinas.” The Modern Schoolman 28 (1951): 111–25.Google Scholar
Renz, Oskar. Die Synteresis nach dem Heiligen Thomas von Aquin. Münster: Aschendorffsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1911.Google Scholar
Rhonheimer, Martin. Natur als Grundlage der Moral: Die personale Struktur des Naturgesetzes bei Thomas von Aquin: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit autonomer und teleologischer Ethik. Innsbruck: Tyrolia Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar
Rhonheimer, Martin “‘Intrinsically Evil Acts’ and the Moral Viewpoint: Clarifying a Central Teaching of Veritatis Splendor.” The Thomist 58, no. 1 (1994): 1–39.Google Scholar
Rhonheimer, Martin Praktische Vernunft und Vernünftigkeit der Praxis: Handlungstheorie bei Thomas von Aquin in ihrer Entstehung aus dem Problemkontext der aristotelischen Ethik. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. Philosophie de la volonté, vol. 1 (Le volontaire et l’involuntaire). Paris: Aubier, 1950.Google Scholar
Riesenhuber, Klaus. Die Transzendenz der Freiheit zum Guten: Der Wille in der Anthropologie und Metaphysik des Thomas von Aquin. Munich: Berchmanskolleg Verlag, 1971.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert Dilemmas: The Tarner Lectures 1953. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Sandis, Constantine, ed. New Essays on the Explanation of Action. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
Schröer, Christian. Praktische Vernunft bei Thomas von Aquin. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1995.Google Scholar
Schröer, Christian “Das normative Urteil bei Thomas von Aquin in handlungstheoretischer Perspektive.” Theologie und Philosophie 84, no. 2 (2009): 199–218.Google Scholar
Rudolf, Schüssler. “Doxastischer Voluntarismus bei Thomas von Aquin: Wille, Intellekt und ihr schwieriges Verhältnis zur Zustimmung.” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales 79, no. 1 (2012): 75–107.Google Scholar
Searle, John. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Sehon, Scott. “Deviant Causal Chains and the Irreducibility of Teleological Explanation.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78, no. 2 (1997): 195–213.Google Scholar
Sherwin, Michael. By Knowledge and by Love: Charity and Knowledge in the Moral Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael. “The Standard Story of Action: An Exchange (1).” In Aguilar, and Buckareff, , Causing Human Actions, 45–56.Google Scholar
Solère, Jean-Luc. “Scotus versus Aquinas on Instrumental Causality.” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 7 (2019): 147–85.Google Scholar
Soteriou, Matthew. The Mind’s Construction: The Ontology of Mind and Mental Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Speer, Andreas, ed., Thomas von Aquin: Die Summa theologiae: Werkinterpretationen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2005.Google Scholar
Spiering, J. A. “‘Liber est causa sui’: Thomas Aquinas and the Maxim ‘The Free Is the Cause of Itself’.” The Review of Metaphysics 65, no. 2 (2011): 351–76.Google Scholar
Steward, Helen. “Do Actions Occur Inside the Body?” Mind & Society 1, no. 2 (2000): 107–25.Google Scholar
Steward, Helen A Metaphysics for Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steward, Helen “Actions as Processes.” Philosophical Perspectives 26, no. 1 (2012): 373–88.Google Scholar
Steward, Helen and Hyman, John, eds. Agency and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen. “Mental Ballistics or the Involuntariness of Spontaneity.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103, no. 1 (2003): 227–56.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. “Sanctification, Hardening of the Heart, and Frankfurt’s Concept of Free Will.” The Journal of Philosophy 85, no. 8 (1988): 395–420.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore “Wisdom: Will, Belief, and Moral Goodness.” In MacDonald, and Stump, , Aquinas’s Moral Theory, 28–62.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. Opera omnia. Editio Nova, vol. 4. Edited by André, D. M.. Paris: Vivès, 1856.Google Scholar
Sylvester of Ferrara. Commentaria in Summam contra gentiles. In Aquinas, Opera omnia iussu Leonis, vols. 13–15.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. “States, Activities and Performances.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 39 (Supplementary Volume) (1965–6): 85–102.Google Scholar
Thalberg, Irving. Perception, Emotion, and Action: A Component Approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1977.Google Scholar
Thillet, Pierre. Alexandre d’Aphrodise: De fato ad imperatores: Version Latine de Guillaume de Moerbeke. Paris, J. Vrin, 1963.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Commentum in quatuor libros Sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi, vols. 6–7 of Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Doctoris Angelici Ordinis Praedicatorum opera omnia ad fidem optimarum editionum accurate recognita. Parma: Typis Petri Fiaccadori, 1852–1873.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII. P. M. edita, cura et studio fratrum praedicatorum, ex typographia polyglotta et al., Rome: Commissio Leonina, 1882–.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas Scriptum super libros Sententiarum. 4 vols. Edited by Mandonnet, R. P. and Moos, M. F.. Paris: Lethielleux 1929–47.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas Quaestiones disputatae, vol. 2 (De potentia, De anima, De spiritualibus creaturis, De unione verbi incarnati, De malo, De virtutibus in communi, De caritate, De correctione fraterna, De spe, De virtutibus cardinalibus). Edited by Bazzi, P., Calcaterra, M., Centi, T. S., Odetto, E., and Pession, P. M.. Turin: Marietti, 1949.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas In librum Beati Dionysii De divinis nominibus expositio. Edited by Pera, C., Caramello, P, and Mazzantini, C. Turin: Marietti, 1950.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas Super librum De causis expositio. Edited by Saffrey, H. D.. Fribourg: Société Philosophique, 1954.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas In duodecim libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis expositio. Edited by Cathala, M. R. and Spiazzi, R.. Turin: Marietti, 1964.Google Scholar
Sutton, Thomas. Quaestiones ordinariae. Edited by Schneider, Johannes. Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1977.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael. Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrell, J. P. Saint Thomas Aquinas: The Person and His Work, vol. 1. Translated by Robert Royal. Revised edition. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press 2005.Google Scholar
Trompeter, Julia. “The Actions of Spirit and Appetite: Voluntary Motion in Galen.” Phronesis 63, no. 2 (2018): 176–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuninetti, Luca F. “Per se Notum”: Die logische Beschaffenheit des Selbstverständlichen im Denken des Thomas von Aquin. Leiden: Brill, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuninetti, Luca F. Persone che giudicano: Lineamenti di epistemologia. Vatican City: Urbaniana University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Tyrell, Francis M. “Concerning the Nature and Function of the Act of Judgment.” New Scholasticism 26, no. 4 (1952): 393–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaccarezza, Maria Silvia. Le ragioni del contingente: La saggezza practica tra Aristotele e Tommaso d’Aquino. Naples: Orthotes, 2012.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. “When Is the Will Free?” In O’Connor, , Agents, Causes, Events, 219–38.Google Scholar
Veatch, Henry. “St. Thomas’s Doctrine of Subject and Predicate.” In Maurer, , St. Thomas Aquinas 1274–1974, 401–22.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. “Verbs and Times.” The Philosophical Review 66, no. 2 (1957): 143–60. Reprinted in revised form in Vendler, , Linguistics in Philosophy, 97–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory. “Reasons and Causes in the Phaedo.” The Philosophical Review 78, no. 3 (1969): 291–325.Google Scholar
Wright, Von, Henrik, Georg. Explanation and Understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971. Reprinted: London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Wright, Von, Henrik, Georg Norm and Action: A Logical Enquiry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963.Google Scholar
Weidemann, Hermann. “Freiheit als Selbstursächlichkeit: Ein fruchtbares Mißverständnis bei Thomas von Aquin?” Metaphysica 2, no. 3 (2001): 25–37.Google Scholar
Westberg, Daniel. “Did Aquinas Change His Mind about the Will?” The Thomist 58, no. 1 (1994): 41–60.Google Scholar
Westberg, Daniel Right Practical Reason: Aristotle, Action and Prudence in Aquinas. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Wheelock, Frederic M. Wheelock’s Latin. 6th edition. Revised by Richard A. Lafleur. New York: HarperCollins, 2005.Google Scholar
White, Kevin. “Wanting Something for Someone: Aquinas on Complex Motions of Appetite.” The Review of Metaphysics 61, no. 1 (2007): 3–30.Google Scholar
William of Auxerre. Summa aurea: Liber 2. Edited by Ribaillier, Jean. Grottaferrata: Collegii S. Bonaventurae ad Claras Aquas, 1982.Google Scholar
Williams, Thomas. “The Libertarian Foundations of Scotus’s Moral Philosophy.” The Thomist 62, no. 2 (1998): 193–215.Google Scholar
Wilson, George. The Intentionality of Human Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press: 1989.Google Scholar
Wippel, J. F. “Truth in Thomas Aquinas: Part 1.” The Review of Metaphysics 43, no. 2 (1989): 295–326.Google Scholar
Wippel, J. F. “Truth in Thomas Aquinas: Part 2.” The Review of Metaphysics, 43, no. 3 (1989–90): 543–67.Google Scholar
Wood, O. P. and Pitcher, George, eds. Ryle: A Collection of Critical Essays. London: Macmillan, 1971.Google Scholar
Zalta, Edward N., ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu.Google Scholar
Zita-Lauer, Rosemary. “St. Thomas’s Theory of Intellectual Causality in Election.” New Scholasticism 28, no. 3 (1954): 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar